Quote Originally Posted by Reeplcheep View Post
Which ones and where?
Argument A, line 1: This is a false premise. The whole context of the discussion is "what makes a format healthy" and you want to just assume that answer as a premise.
Argument A, line 2: This is a false premise. The statement of fact about the state and viability about the two control decks is false.
Argument A, line 3: This is a false premise. First you have combined multiple claims into the line. The first that the action is different. The second that it is more interesting. Interesting being a subjective term can't be asserted without logic defining why and how.
Argument A, line 5: This is a false premise. First you are making two claims here: The first about where mind twist will go. There is no evidence that only non-blue decks would play mind twist. In fact having a color weight of just one B means that nearly every deck can play it. You even, in line 4, explained how. The all power of cantrips. The second claim, that it makes them better, is up for debate, you provide no evidence for this.
Argument A, line 6: Each one of the three individual claims of this line are false: There is no evidence mind twist improves these decks. There is no evidence Mind Twist is interesting. You also have shown no conntection between mind twist and Fair blue decks, so you also can't make any claim about mindtwist's affect on these decks.
Argument A, line 7: Even if the lines were true you never demonstrated that these items improved your own criteria of format health. Even if we were to assume 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 (and we shouldn't, they are all fallacious) an improvement of decks doesn't translate to diversity. You have already explained that these decks exist and the format doesn't become more diverse when extant decks continue to be extant but with an additional card. That's the meaning of the word diversity.

SO the answer is: Everywhere.