Quote Originally Posted by The Rack View Post
I don't have to. Let's say you are looking in the Ichorid thread. You have JoeSchmoe with ten posts on the source, joined a week ago, and you have IBA both posting in that thread. Joe has some oddball suggestion never been tested suggestion and it doesn't see the ligh of day. But if IBA(or any other Adept, IBA is just cooler) post that same thing 10 pages later they are suddenly revered as the Ichorid redesigner.
This is a lazy and lame argument. You don't have to prove your points? To illustrate, let's use your logic for two other situations.

1. "Hi, honey. I'm breaking up with you because you're cheating on me. I can't and won't prove it, but I know."
2. There is a teacup floating in Earth's orbit. Can I prove it? Nope. But I know it's there.

And you've done it again. You made a claim that you can't support with proof.
Can you honestly say that you look at JoeSchmoe's post with the same credibility as IBA's? WHy? because of his join date? Post count? Name Color?
I guarantee JoeShmoe's post is judged by its content - just like I judge any IBA post I read.

The only way to test it is to have an Adept that knows his shit but has ben sorta forgotten, change his name, strip his color, and make him join today, with 5 posts. That would be how I test it.
Any Adept volunteers or any that you can recommend? PM me for the supersecret experiment. And who the Hell fixed you post count? I'll go change some random member's now to continue the experiment.