The offending paragraph and attitude isn't offending just because it's inaccurate. It's offensive because it continues this narrative that the Legacy format doesn't exist as such beyond assholes playing around a kitchen table, and that any schmuck can casually come in and break it. Throwing out an article claiming to have created one of the top decks in the format despite the lack of play or tournament results, with little testing and a lackluster intro to the deck behind it enforces the idea that the Legacy metagame isn't anything to take seriously. And from someone that is, for whatever reason, considered to be an expert on the format makes it especially damaging.

If Anusien had written this crap attached to, "Here's a pet deck I've been working on, I think it could be really good", that would be one thing. But Christ, even Jack Mother Fucking Elgin has the goddamned common sense not to label his own pet decks as being "premier" when no one else is playing them.

I've spoken out against previous frivolous complaints because they were frivolous and they would have exactly this effect; deadening the criticism when it's actually relevant. It's relevant in this case though. Kevin should go back and edit his ego out of this article. It presents a negative stereotype of Legacy.