I'm going to have to disagree pretty strongly with the general concensus.

I thought that as an article aimed at people outside the format, starting to consider their options at Chicago, it was a very good, if simple, article.

It gave decklists and a brief gameplan description of two up and coming decks that people who haven't checked on the format in a while would probably find to be useful jump off points.

It ended somewhat abruptly, but otherwise, I thought it was a fine article.




Really?

Who the fuck cares that the article isn't an in-depth analysis of a card that has been around over half a decade?