Quote Originally Posted by Ryoku View Post
Perhaps you should take your own advice here. You're assuming that the data is so flawed that it must have no bearing on real results whatsoever? You must be right, zoo must beat us 200% of the time.

Or, perhaps you should take the initiative, and put your own time into testing, and give us your results. Either way, please do not waste the time of people who have put far more work into this deck than you.

However, the fact remains that, with the direction zoo is shifting, it is becoming more of a positive matchup. They are beginning to maindeck Price of Progress more. As stated previously by Forbiddian, we can play around this easily. Also, more and more Teegs are getting maindecked. Please, in the future, try and back up your posts with a bit more substance, rather than attempt to preach about how to tell if a deck is bad or not.
There's a ridiculous amount of irony here. I mean, the guys with the most experience ever with the deck said, "Hey, our bad, the Zoo lists we were testing against didn't look like the lists anyone else is testing with; that's why the results varied so much." And you said, "Hey, you shouldn't waste the time of people who have more experience with the deck."

Punishing Fire is actually going to be worse for you than Grim Lavamancer. After all, all but one or two of your creatures dies to the combo. And unlike Lavamancer, he can use it more than once per turn. EOT Punishing Fire your MoM (you tap it), rebuy Punishing Fire. Untap, Fire MoM, bolt your Avenger?