Quote Originally Posted by rektareloaded View Post
i have to disagree with this mate. i wonder why we need to adapt to the rise of jund? why fear deathrite shaman when using manaless dredge? we have atleast a minimum of 8 cards ( 4 phantasmagorian, 4 streetwraith) as an answer to turn 1 deathrite (for hollywoods build they got 12 cards in MD) and we only need 1!, just 1 to show up.

due to the fact that they have 4 MD GY hate in the form of shaman, some builds dont bring in GY hate in their SB anymore. if you ask me im more afraid of decks who cant use shaman coz for sure they have 5-6 GY hate in their SB specially decks who got access for white mana.



I'll only agree to this only if i will see atleast 8 people who "consistently" plays storm in our country and always make it to the top 8, otherwise ill not change our usual SB cards like reverent silence and natures claim, on the other hand i always have a place for chancellor of the annex in my SB but not in MD.


for Unmask.... i think i will only use it if bazaar of baghdad is legal in legacy.. just my 2 cents
This is true. I play in the same area as this master dredger. We only get an avg of 2 people playing storm per 50-80 player tourney. I have simply decided to give up boarding in against Storm and rather focus on playing against the more dominant archetypes/decks (i.e. DRS.dec, GSZ.dec). Sure, we have a healthy matchup against those decks pre-board, and some people even like to argue that we have more than 60% positive matchup against those decks seeing as they would need to mull into turn 1 DRS to have an edge.

Timewalking myself twice for the sake of killing of a turn one DRS is no problem. Like Hollywood said, they won't be able to win against me during those 2 turns, even if their DRS survives somehow. I'm still playing the 4 Claim 4 Rev Silence 7 land 4 Removal SB and I'm liking it against the current meta. Chancellor MD though is something that might be worth a try.