Where 'proper deckbuilding' is choosing which artificially inhibited removal spell happens to answer a given room on a given day. Control strategies for most of the last 6 months have revolved around having the right answer to very specific, very disparate cards almost immediately or just praying that the opponent runs out of gas before you can cast an arbitrarily large Rev.
The fact that they justify not having a 4-mana general purpose wrath using the time period when one of the most universal answer cards ever (cryptic) defined the format is absurd.
Check out my Legacy UBTezz Primer. Chalice of the Void: Keeping Magic Fair.
-----
Playing since '96. Brief forced break '02-04. Former/Idle Judge since '05. Told Smmenen to play faster at Vintage Worlds.
-----
Most of the 'Ban brainstorm!' arguments are based on the logic that 'more different cards should get played in Legacy', as though the success or health of the format can be measured by the portion of cards that are available and see play. This is an idiotic metric.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)