Page 7 of 46 FirstFirst ... 3456789101117 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 908

Thread: [Deck] Monoblue Control (MUC)

  1. #121
    Faerie Godfather

    Join Date

    Jul 2005
    Location

    Finland
    Posts

    1,617

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    Here's what you need against Solidarity:
    Counterbalance

    There, I said it. A resolved Counterbalance should be good enough to basically win the game, as it can counter every spell they try (most importantly, without giving them Storm-count), not only their accelerants (of course, it requires you to add Top, but meh, better than nothing).

  2. #122
    Undefined Fantastic Object

    Join Date

    Oct 2006
    Location

    Waterloo, Canada
    Posts

    810

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    How does a spell countered by the balance does not count as spell?

    Anyway, this deck only runs 4 brainstorm. And the top/counterbalance is not sufficient to stop the deck. I guess it deserves try, but the engine tends to suck against aggro decks, especially goblins.
    She said, "You're broken."
    "So is your face." replied the Tarmogoyf.

  3. #123
    Plays whatever whenever, and fails anyway
    Kadaj's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2006
    Posts

    297

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    Here's something interesting coming out in Planar Chaos:

    Pirate Charm

    Instant C
    Choose one — Target creature gains islandwalk until end of turn; or target creature gets +2/-1 until end of turn; or target player discards a card.

    So a blue Funeral Charm. It's never going to be the best card, but it is an answer to turn 1 Lackey as well as a brand of disruption Blue doesn't get a lot. I'm going to be testing this in my next build as well as Counterbalance-Top, so I'll get back to you guys on it.

  4. #124
    Member
    Drkdstryer's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2005
    Location

    CMU
    Posts

    82

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    Quote Originally Posted by C.P. View Post
    How does a spell countered by the balance does not count as spell?
    You don't help THEM out with a counterspell of your own.
    If you rearrange the letters in Vin Diesel's name, it reveals his credo: "I End Lives."

  5. #125
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2005
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    358

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    That new charm could have some impact. It's very effective on a stick, and staying mono-blue frees you to do a lot of things that would stretch the manabase too thin otherwise (such as a draw engine based on Scrying Sheets).

  6. #126
    Undefined Fantastic Object

    Join Date

    Oct 2006
    Location

    Waterloo, Canada
    Posts

    810

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    @ Drkdstryer

    They can still go spell - spell - spell - spell - freeze. The thing is you are going to give them the time to set a perfect hand to do so.


    @Kadaj

    Wow. I'm exited. Not sure how good it would be, but very interesting thing to run against aggro. a potential sideboard?
    She said, "You're broken."
    "So is your face." replied the Tarmogoyf.

  7. #127
    YES WE CAN
    outsideangel's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2005
    Location

    GMU
    Posts

    634

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    Quote Originally Posted by C.P. View Post
    @ Drkdstryer

    They can still go spell - spell - spell - spell - freeze. The thing is you are going to give them the time to set a perfect hand to do so.
    That would all happen anyway. Counterbalance may not be the best answer, but at least it's an answer, which MUC is traditionally lacking when facing down Solidarity.

    They can still play spells, but if you can counter most of their draw and High Tides, it'll be difficult for them to get both their mana and their storm to critical levels.
    TEAM DRAGONFORCIA-
    Ghost ridin' the whip like we invented that shit.
    TEAM UNICORN
    We're going for number four!

  8. #128
    Undefined Fantastic Object

    Join Date

    Oct 2006
    Location

    Waterloo, Canada
    Posts

    810

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    Quote Originally Posted by outsideangel View Post
    That would all happen anyway. Counterbalance may not be the best answer, but at least it's an answer, which MUC is traditionally lacking when facing down Solidarity.

    They can still play spells, but if you can counter most of their draw and High Tides, it'll be difficult for them to get both their mana and their storm to critical levels.
    The point is that counterbalance needs a backup. What do you plan to run, a top? If you talk about an incomplete answer, chalice or teferi also serves an answer.

    Counterbalance is also not very impressive against the goblins. An aggro plan with dandan is something that I've been thinking of. with counter backup, winning with 5 turn clock is not hard.
    She said, "You're broken."
    "So is your face." replied the Tarmogoyf.

  9. #129
    That other Stax guy
    Silverdragon's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2004
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    327

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    It's 3 a.m. here in Germany and I'm really tired so forgive me if this sounds just stupid but what about Boomerang and Capsize?
    These bouce spells can slow down Solidarity until you can find some other hate and creatures by simply bouncing their lands and Capsize can even create a softlock once you've got enough mana. As a bonus they are not dead against aggro too.
    "Anybody want some . . . toast?" —Jaya Ballard, Task Mage

  10. #130
    Plays whatever whenever, and fails anyway
    Kadaj's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2006
    Posts

    297

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    Here's the problem I've had in testing. The Counterbalance-Top engine reminds me a lot of Intuition-AK. It's good, but not as good as you'd like considering how much space it takes up and how little it does in certain matchups. Yes it helps against Solidarity, but still you're not going to get that matchup any better than 50-50, and it's horrible against Goblins. I've tried several lists, all of which have had the same issue: Counterbalance-Top takes up 8 potential slots (aproximately, anyway) that would otherwise go to draw, creature control, or counterspells, and it's not good enough at any of the above to replace them. Hence, my reccomendation is those of you who want to play Balance-Top is to find an aggro-control shell to fit it into, where you can actually establish board position before dropping the pseudo-lock.

    Pirate Charm really sucks in this kind of deck. It was never what I wanted it to be, and at most it's a very bad Lackey answer in a deck that really can't use any of its other functions. I will, however, readily admit that the lists I used were badly unrefined and thus their lack of success isn't really surprising. I'd be glad to continue testing, or let others take it up, but it seems like this is not the deck for Balance-Top.

  11. #131
    Sweat pours when muscles cry!

    Join Date

    Oct 2006
    Location

    Germany, NRW
    Posts

    56

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    I have never been a friend of that Counterbalance/Top-Engine for all those reasons and the ones listed before in this thread.

    The only thing in the SB against Solidarity for me would be the Arcane Laboratory as a 3 of. It is even good against other Combo.
    If you manage to resolve one try to counter the wishes as they will turn into Wipe Away.
    Otherwise, I go so far to say that this IS a bad MU and concentrate on others.
    Other Combo-MU except solidarity are pretty much in MUC's favour, so why to desperate about that only one while there are really not so much Solidarity-Players (in my meta).

    @ Silverdragon:

    I think the only real possible bounce for MUC is Repeal, as it is cheap (means fast) enough to handle early threats (especially vial) without creating any disadvantage.
    Until Capsize comes online with Buyback it is pretty much too late.


    So far,

    Doks

  12. #132
    MUC FTW!?!
    Maximus04's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2006
    Location

    WVU
    Posts

    4

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    Pirate charm is TOO conditional for it have any true use in the deck. I realistically played this deck at D4D, knowing that I had a terrible matchup against Solidarity. There is really no way to get around the fact. Run Arcane Labs and try to get a chalice for 1. That is really your only way of slowing them down, also make sure to counter the Wish.

    If you are THAT paranoid about this matchup then this deck is obviously not for you. You dedicate 3 to 5 slots in the side and you do your best to win. You can usually top 8 with a loss.

    After much testing, Repeal is still the best bounce around. Dok's is right, again, haha.

  13. #133
    Utterly ViLe
    Cait_Sith's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2006
    Posts

    1,601

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    Pirate Charm is good early game vs Gobs, Thresh, and meh vs Solidarity. I would think that MUC would like using it.
    Quote Originally Posted by frolll View Post
    It is not like any other penises, though...
    It's a penis drawn by Leonard friggin' Da Vinci; which pretty much owns our penises.
    Team Multi-Grain - We're wholesome.

  14. #134
    His name is not unknown in these woods.
    nitewolf9's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Area 88
    Posts

    1,499

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    Quote Originally Posted by Kadaj View Post
    Pirate Charm really sucks in this kind of deck. It was never what I wanted it to be, and at most it's a very bad Lackey answer in a deck that really can't use any of its other functions.
    How is Pirate Charm a bad answer for lackey? It kills lackey. That's the best answer to lackey. Force is card disad., and putting a blocker out there isn't guaranteed. It's never a dead card and this deck runs draw. Lackey destroys you if he hits. I think Pirate Charm is a boon for this deck.

    Oh yeah, boomerang might be alright MD. Then you could run 4 Dandans in the board. At least you'd have some kind of a clock, which is what you need to beat solidarity.
    they haunt minds...

  15. #135
    Undefined Fantastic Object

    Join Date

    Oct 2006
    Location

    Waterloo, Canada
    Posts

    810

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    Quote Originally Posted by nitewolf9 View Post
    How is Pirate Charm a bad answer for lackey? It kills lackey. That's the best answer to lackey. Force is card disad., and putting a blocker out there isn't guaranteed. It's never a dead card and this deck runs draw. Lackey destroys you if he hits. I think Pirate Charm is a boon for this deck.

    Oh yeah, boomerang might be alright MD. Then you could run 4 Dandans in the board. At least you'd have some kind of a clock, which is what you need to beat solidarity.
    It is bad because it only deals with lackey. FoW, on the other hand, deals with everything. Against gobbos, the charm only deals with lackey, fanatic(how horrible), and matron. Its discard function is marginal at best.

    I tried Dandan, and I felt it is only good with something like chalice or arcane lab. I still feel that chalice + teferi is the best answer so far, since they are good against many other decks.
    She said, "You're broken."
    "So is your face." replied the Tarmogoyf.

  16. #136
    Sweat pours when muscles cry!

    Join Date

    Oct 2006
    Location

    Germany, NRW
    Posts

    56

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    // Lands
    3 [AQ] Mishra's Factory
    2 [ON] Flooded Strand
    2 [ON] Polluted Delta
    12 [A] Island

    // Creatures
    3 [US] Morphling

    // Spells
    4 [MR] Thirst for Knowledge
    3 [FD] Vedalken Shackles
    3 [GP] Repeal
    2 [UD] Powder Keg
    3 [IN] Fact or Fiction
    4 [MR] Chrome Mox
    3 [VI] Impulse
    4 [MR] Chalice of the Void
    4 [SH] Mana Leak
    4 [B] Counterspell
    4 [AL] Force of Will

    This is what my current modern build looks like.

    The Matchups I want that chalice I want it early, so it is a 4-of.
    Otherwise, it is TfK-fodder with the third shackles and later Moxen.
    I really like Tfk, especially in a deck with that artifact count it is very supportable.

    As Maximus04 said: try out Mishra's Factory, it's worth its slots ;)
    With 20 sources of blue you can easily support 3 colorless Lands.

    They work as a Clock that doesn't need to be forced through (-> Solidarity any1?), they are another way of finishing move and last but not least - simply blockers that trade even with a threshed Mongoose or a thrown in the way of an X/2 Piledriver ;)


    Doks

  17. #137
    ?
    ForceofWill's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2003
    Location

    High stakes cash games
    Posts

    1,007

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    Quote Originally Posted by C.P. View Post
    It is bad because it only deals with lackey. FoW, on the other hand, deals with everything. Against gobbos, the charm only deals with lackey, fanatic(how horrible), and matron. Its discard function is marginal at best.

    I tried Dandan, and I felt it is only good with something like chalice or arcane lab. I still feel that chalice + teferi is the best answer so far, since they are good against many other decks.
    Are you kidding It's perfect it's removal for 1 mana which this deck REALLY Needs as well as can be pitched to force of will and if they have no cards in hand during their draw phase after they draw you can make them dicard without a chance to play anything.
    Team NeverWin: We just top 8 a lot.

    Too lazy to post.

  18. #138
    Lan2_13 for all other purposes

    Join Date

    Aug 2005
    Location

    San Diego CA
    Posts

    56

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    Quote Originally Posted by ForceofWill View Post
    can be pitched to force of will
    Never use this argument it is a terrible argument. "Hey moonlace might come in handy when somebody pyroblasts your ophidian, plus it can be pitched to force zomg!" If you haven't noticed yet, every blue card can be pitched to force, the only upside is that running cards like daze and mana leak (which both are relatively playable cards) or certain cards that are the weakest cards in your deck is that you won't have a tough choice choosing the right card to pitch to force. This deck can't afford to play a weak card (no deck can), I haven't decided what to think about pirate charm yet, but my instincts say that it is much too situational. As for choosing the right card to pitch to force when there is no obvious choice I normally choose the brainstorm or AK or the FOF or the Ophidian before I even consider a counterspell or other force. You'd rather have a counter then try to dig for a counter.

    Hate to go off topic, but am I the only one seeing just like 5 threads in the Open Legacy Discussion section?
    Quote Originally Posted by Starcity games ask the judge


    Q: I have Isochron Scepter with Glimpse the Unthinkable on it and Djinn Illuminatus in play. If activate Isochron Scepter to play Glimpse, will this copy of Glimpse have Replicate?

    A: Yes, all instants and sorceries that you play will have Replicate, even those that are not represented by actual cards and are copies of cards created by some effect..

  19. #139
    Sweat pours when muscles cry!

    Join Date

    Oct 2006
    Location

    Germany, NRW
    Posts

    56

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    Hi again.

    Got just some thought now as I looked throug my cards:

    Do you think that there is a way to usefully include Gifts Ungiven in this deck?
    Or do you even know a way?

    I mean, this card has a lot potential:
    Cardadvantage and precise search, but there is actually no way that comes into my mind to use it.


    Doks
    Last edited by Doks; 01-10-2007 at 12:45 PM.

  20. #140
    MUC FTW!?!
    Maximus04's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2006
    Location

    WVU
    Posts

    4

    Re: [Deck] MUC

    I have also considered the card too...but it would compete with FoF slot. I have never playtested it, because I was far too fond of FoF to even consider dropping it for Gifts. The amount of card advantage your recieve with FoF should overule the precision of Gifts. Not enough silver bullets in the deck.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)