Page 79 of 144 FirstFirst ... 296975767778798081828389129 ... LastLast
Results 1,561 to 1,580 of 2864

Thread: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

  1. #1561

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    Quote Originally Posted by Shawon View Post
    So, really, it ALWAYS halves your opp's life total, thus, if you want to actually kill your opp, you're going to have to find a way to unattach 'Deathtouch Equipment' from your guy (i.e. Equip another creature with it).

    I guess, in conclusion, seems a little win-more, or just plain situational.
    If I'm reading you right, you seem to be under the impression that is will always take away half you opponent's life rounded down and nothing more. That's not true, the creature deals it's damage then the opponent loses half his life.

    Also cool about it; Arc-Slogger can use it to kill anything it can target or quickly knock the opponent's life down. A single shock can take someone from twenty down to nine.

  2. #1562
    Loves the anus
    Jaiminho's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2007
    Location

    Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brasil
    Posts

    544

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    A 6/3 double striking Rakdos Pit Dragon kills a 20 life opponent in a single attack with that equipment. Fun shits!

    I ain't saying it's good, but it might be.
    Keep moon-walking.

  3. #1563
    Cabal Therapist
    Kuma's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Akron, OH
    Posts

    968

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    Both of the above cases are win more, especially the Dragon. If I hit with a 6/3 double striking Dragon, I should win regardless of what equipment it attached.

    It does do neat tricks with Arc-Slogger, but paying six mana before you can use it plus five for an Arc-Slogger and at least one more to shock and we're talking about a ton of mana.

    Isn't the trend in Dragon Stompy away from equipment?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuzzy View Post
    I have LOTS of questions about this deck:

    - How good 3sphere is? I only can see it's useful against Storm Combo and ThreshThreshThreshThreshThresh, both in decadence.
    It's useful against a few other decks too. Scan the past ten or so pages. Affinity comes to mind, possibly Goyf Sligh, but I've never played against the deck. The card's usefulness decreases rapidly after turn one and if you're on the draw.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuzzy View Post
    - A friend of mine played Rally the Horde in the Extended Dragon Stompy. It could be playable or SoK only have 2 good cards?
    Rally the Horde is too expensive to run.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuzzy View Post
    - What do you guys think about the "Goblin Blossom" from Alara?
    I actually kind of like this card, especially in goblin heavy metas. If dropped early, it gets out of hand quickly, and the goblin player is going to hate having to swing with everything. It's also useful vs Wrath/Damnation and high creature removal decks.

    I don't think it's going to replace Mauler in most lists, but it does have applications.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuzzy View Post
    And, finally:

    - WHAT DO AGAINST AGGRO-LOAM?
    In addition to the aforementioned Chalice at two, pray really hard.

    More seriously, side in crypts/Pyrokinesis. Use the former against Terravore/Loam, and the latter to kill Countryside Crusher before they get an upkeep. Sword of Fire and Ice is also good.

    Moons can be effective here depending on how many colors they run. At the very least they make Terravore difficult to cast. I'd probably side out Maguses, since they have a ton of ways to kill him.

    Maybe -4 Magus, +4 Crypt, -4 Trinispheres or Maulers, +4 Pyrokinesis. SoFI over Jitte if you expect a lot of Aggro Loam/Dragon Stompy/Other non-Burn Red decks.
    Quote Originally Posted by Skeggi View Post
    How would Nitewolf have said this?... P_R went over the line. But it was about naming cats. Also, Anus Mittens is a good name for a cat.
    Quote Originally Posted by MMogg View Post
    "Casual sex, NO Touching/Licking/Sucking/Groping/Fondling/Riding/Tickling/Binding/Quitters/Italians. Play Fast, Be Polite, Have Fun."

    Sure as hell sounds like fun.

  4. #1564
    Refuses to play dual lands
    Joe_C's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Terryville, CT
    Posts

    452

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuma View Post
    Both of the above cases are win more, especially the Dragon. If I hit with a 6/3 double striking Dragon, I should win regardless of what equipment it attached.

    It does do neat tricks with Arc-Slogger, but paying six mana before you can use it plus five for an Arc-Slogger and at least one more to shock and we're talking about a ton of mana.

    Isn't the trend in Dragon Stompy away from equipment?



    It's useful against a few other decks too. Scan the past ten or so pages. Affinity comes to mind, possibly Goyf Sligh, but I've never played against the deck. The cards usefulness decreases rapidly after turn one and if you're on the draw.



    Rally the Horde is too expensive to run.



    I actually kind of like this card, especially in goblin heavy metas. If dropped early, it gets out of hand quickly, and the goblin player is going to hate having to swing with everything. It's also useful vs Wrath/Damnation and high creature removal decks.

    I don't think it's going to replace Mauler in most lists, but it does have applications.



    In addition to the aforementioned Chalice at two, pray really hard.

    More seriously, side in crypts/Pyrokinesis. Use the former against Terravore/Loam, and the latter to kill Countryside Crusher before they get an upkeep. Sword of Fire and Ice is also good.

    Moons can be effective here depending on how many colors they run. At the very least they make Terravore difficult to cast. I'd probably side out Maguses, since they have a ton of ways to kill him.

    Maybe -4 Magus, +4 Crypt, -4 Trinispheres or Maulers, +4 Pyrokinesis. SoFI over Jitte if you expect a lot of Aggro Loam/Dragon Stompy/Other non-Burn Red decks.

    Pithing needle naming their cycling lands limits them to topdecking everything. So a moon effect plus needle on tranquil thicket, forgotten cave slows them to a crawl. Although in practice I played a game that turn 1 I played song song, dragon, mauler and I lost this due to devastating dreams. Yet again, a reason to run null brooch, I am seriously going to test this card in the 3 trinisphere spot. Please others do so as well to entertain my madness, I think it can be a huge asset.
    TEAM AWESOME

    Well, at least we smell better

  5. #1565
    Cabal Therapist
    Kuma's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Akron, OH
    Posts

    968

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    I can see some good and bad things about Null Brooch:

    Good

    -Allows us to always have Hellbent
    -Stops a litany of spells we have to see, Dev Dreams, Wrath, Deed
    -Forces opponent to play around it

    Bad

    -Pithing Needle stops many non creature spells we hate for 1/6th the cost
    -Trinisphere hurts most of the other half
    -CMC of four hurts consistencey
    -Doesn't imprint or pitch
    -Can be Needled/Gripped before it's ever used (unless you want to try for six mana before you cast it)
    -Sometimes you don't want Hellbent

    I guess if you went song, song, Null Brooch, Mauler, you could have stopped D.D., but I don't need to tell you that requiring two Seething Songs to be useful is a bad thing.
    Quote Originally Posted by Skeggi View Post
    How would Nitewolf have said this?... P_R went over the line. But it was about naming cats. Also, Anus Mittens is a good name for a cat.
    Quote Originally Posted by MMogg View Post
    "Casual sex, NO Touching/Licking/Sucking/Groping/Fondling/Riding/Tickling/Binding/Quitters/Italians. Play Fast, Be Polite, Have Fun."

    Sure as hell sounds like fun.

  6. #1566
    Refuses to play dual lands
    Joe_C's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Terryville, CT
    Posts

    452

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    well the thing is with brooch it could be just a 2 of in the deck. It's a mid/late game sealer against control. Even early it can score us hellbent which is cool. The imprint part isnt an issue due to it taking the place of 3sphere in my list, also not too many people board in needle against dragon stompy unless they saw jitte, chalice at 1 also stops that problem. Im saying I think "for sure it belongs yet" but I'd love to play 10 or so straight games against lanstill to prove it to myself whether or not it makes a difference. Anyone up to testing on MWS????
    TEAM AWESOME

    Well, at least we smell better

  7. #1567

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    Quote Originally Posted by Sanguine Voyeur View Post
    Also cool about it; Arc-Slogger can use it to kill anything it can target or quickly knock the opponent's life down. A single shock can take someone from twenty down to nine.
    Why settle for a single shock when you can just do three shocks in a row and straight up win the game.

    The card is pretty ridiculous with arc slogger if you think about it. 3 mana and 30 cards off the top of your library takes your opponent from 20 to 0 at instant speed!

    Lets just hope that the wording on the card is as it says. Right now, it's highly suspicious if the card even exists.

    There is only one instance of "Equip" in the orb, and that instance is already used up for another already confirmed equipment.

  8. #1568

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    yes, 3 mana and 30 cards from your library kills your opponent at instant speed... when you have payed 11 mana and have two cards in play...

    this card is a win more. No doubt about this. If you have a beater that attacks unblocked and 6 mana open, i think you don't need this card...

  9. #1569

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    Yeah, this card seems pretty terrible.
    KIDS WITH GUNS!

  10. #1570

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    It's not terrible. It does have a huge target painted on it, and paints a huge target on anything it equips, even a Simian Spirit Guide.

    But thats just because it's so threatening.

    It's synergy with cards like Grim Lavamacner, Prodigal Pyromacer, Cinder Pyromancer, Viashino Fangtail, Keldon Marauders, Siege Gang Commander, Arc Slogger, Ancient Hydra is solid. But of that list, the only half way decent cards that work decently well in this deck are Siege Gang Commander and Arc Slogger.

  11. #1571
    The EPIC Syndicate's scapegoat of humanity

    Join Date

    Feb 2008
    Location

    In ridicule.
    Posts

    477

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    You, Turn 1: Tomb, Mox, Deathtouch equipment, go (3 cards in hand).
    Them turn 1: Stuff.
    You, Turn 2: Draw, Mountain, play Dragon (2 cards in hand).
    Them turn 2: Stuff.
    You, Turn 3: Draw, Land, Equip to dragon, Drop Chalice @ 1, remove SSG from hand to pump Dragon to 4/3 and swing hellbent (0 cards in hand) for a total of 14 life lost. This gets better by replacing the SSG with a Seething Song.
    Them turn 3: Uhh...

    That's obviously a great hand, and I didn't even play it out right as Chalice @ 1 needs to happen before you drop a threat because of Needle/StP, but you get the point. It was just a scenario to prove a point.

    Top-decking this could suck, but you wouldn't need (not that you would NEED to run it at all, but w/e...) to run it anymore than as a 2-of.

    Pce,

    --DC

  12. #1572
    snooPING AS usual, I see.
    Mordel's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2008
    Location

    CANADUH
    Posts

    476

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    The above scenario would work just as well with a sword of fire and ice and almost as well with a sword of light and shadow...jitte is obviously monsterous with a doublestriking creature as well. The beauty with the jitte in the above scenario is that you could toss the chalice down a turn earlier.

    The new equipment costs one extra to equip and gives the creature no protection from removal whatsoever...it sucks in this deck. Maybe if it was cheaper to cast and/or equip you could argue that you can toss down a 3sphere or a chalice to protect its target a bit, but it costs six total: Sucks.

  13. #1573

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    In fact, the above scenario won't work with a sword of fire and ice, because you will draw a card from the first striking ability and then the dragon will lose the double stricking...

    I'm not defending the deathtouch equip, (in fact I believe SoFaI is so much better), only pointing

  14. #1574
    snooPING AS usual, I see.
    Mordel's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2008
    Location

    CANADUH
    Posts

    476

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    No, no, no good call. Jitte would be the best equipment for the above scenario for sure anyway.

    It allows you drop the chalice earlier which right there gets my vote.

    With how rampant swords are seeming to be right now in just about everything that I play, I might be tinkering around with some decks and replacing SoFaI's with SoLaS's, despite the fact that I like the sword's ability a lot more. With Dragonstompy the replacement for the tephraderm that I blow my stack getting out on the first/second turn doesn't always show up in time...the same goes for chalice. Then again Dragonstompy is all about luck anyway, so whatever.

  15. #1575
    Cabal Therapist
    Kuma's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Akron, OH
    Posts

    968

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    Quote Originally Posted by Zinch View Post
    In fact, the above scenario won't work with a sword of fire and ice, because you will draw a card from the first striking ability and then the dragon will lose the double stricking...
    This isn't true. Double strike reads, "This creature does first strike damage and normal damage." First strike damage and normal damage are dealt in separate steps. The dragon would deal first strike damage causing SoFI to trigger, draw you a card, and cause dragon to lose double strike. Then, combat would move to the normal damage step, and since your dragon doesn't have double strike or first strike, it would deal normal combat damage, and you would do SoFI's triggers again.

    RPD is beast with equipment.
    Quote Originally Posted by Skeggi View Post
    How would Nitewolf have said this?... P_R went over the line. But it was about naming cats. Also, Anus Mittens is a good name for a cat.
    Quote Originally Posted by MMogg View Post
    "Casual sex, NO Touching/Licking/Sucking/Groping/Fondling/Riding/Tickling/Binding/Quitters/Italians. Play Fast, Be Polite, Have Fun."

    Sure as hell sounds like fun.

  16. #1576

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    Pit Dragon will lose double strike and not deal regular combat damage if you have a card in hand when the second helping of damage would go on the stack. That's the biggest complaint with Sword of Fire and Ice.

  17. #1577
    snooPING AS usual, I see.
    Mordel's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2008
    Location

    CANADUH
    Posts

    476

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    Someone have a oracle link handy? Now I am curious...I always just used jitte in dragon stompy. I suck at finding ruling on the mtg site now since it has changed apparently.

    Aside from like one person, the general consensus for the new death touch equipment is a resounding cry of "shit", right?

    It costs more, will tend to do pretty much the same thing any other equipment would do in regards to winning the game, excluding of course that the creature is not more difficult to kill and yeah...did I mention it costs a whopping six to lay and equip in the same turn? dayumn.

  18. #1578
    Do I look like a guy with a plan?
    Wallace's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Location

    East Syracuse, NY
    Posts

    1,234

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    Quote Originally Posted by Mordel View Post
    Someone have a oracle link handy? Now I am curious...I always just used jitte in dragon stompy. I suck at finding ruling on the mtg site now since it has changed apparently.

    Aside from like one person, the general consensus for the new death touch equipment is a resounding cry of "shit", right?

    It costs more, will tend to do pretty much the same thing any other equipment would do in regards to winning the game, excluding of course that the creature is not more difficult to kill and yeah...did I mention it costs a whopping six to lay and equip in the same turn? dayumn.
    I asked this question over in the Rules thread and got an answer. The Pit Dragon won't deal regular combat damage if it loses Double Strike.
    Team Fat Man & Little Boy

    Quote Originally Posted by pingveno View Post
    On to stone rain, Clark Kant; is a 'timewalk' as good as a threat?

  19. #1579
    Journeyman
    Taurelin's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2007
    Location

    In the forest
    Posts

    202

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    Just read the CompRules:

    502.28c Removing double strike from a creature during the first combat damage step will stop it from assigning combat damage in the second combat damage step.
    "My sky is darker than thine!"
    SENTENCED - 1993

  20. #1580
    Member

    Join Date

    Mar 2008
    Location

    Spain
    Posts

    8

    Re: [Deck] Dragon Stompy

    Looking at the cards the new expansion, Shards of Alara, is going to bring, it has come to my attention this one:

    Crucible of Fire 3R
    Enchantment Rare
    Dragon creatures you control get +3/+3.

    If its casting cost had been 2R the card would have been perfect. But I think it is worth considering it.
    Let's analyze it. It would come to be in the place of the equipments (Jitte or SoFI). Its advantage is it can be imprinted into the Chrome mox for mana. Its casting mana cost is the same than if yoy cast and equip a Jitte in the same turn.

    But the good thing it has is it not only pumps your RPD, but also the Taurean Mauler!!

    And, even I may (and will) be accused of sacrilegy, it could be worth thinking about replacing Slogger for another dragon, such as Covetous Dragon, or even the Hunted Dragon (with the same converted mana cost).

    What do you think about it?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)