I'm going to have to disagree pretty strongly with the general concensus.
I thought that as an article aimed at people outside the format, starting to consider their options at Chicago, it was a very good, if simple, article.
It gave decklists and a brief gameplan description of two up and coming decks that people who haven't checked on the format in a while would probably find to be useful jump off points.
It ended somewhat abruptly, but otherwise, I thought it was a fine article.
Really?
Who the fuck cares that the article isn't an in-depth analysis of a card that has been around over half a decade?
Early one morning while making the round,
I took a shot of cocaine and I shot my woman down;
I went right home and I went to bed,
I stuck that lovin' .44 beneath my head.
People that don't know anything about Legacy make a poor target audience for Legacy articles.
I think people are more upset about the lack of content at all.
I was willing to defend Chris on his last article because it was at least an indepth look at the format for outsiders. This time... not so much.
For my confessions, they burned me with fire/
And found I was for endurance made
I disagree.
For people who pop into the format whenever a GP or major event is coming up, this was exactly the information they'd be looking for.
Early one morning while making the round,
I took a shot of cocaine and I shot my woman down;
I went right home and I went to bed,
I stuck that lovin' .44 beneath my head.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote