Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 40

Thread: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

  1. #1
    Member
    Nate's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2009
    Location

    Portland, Oregon
    Posts

    25

    Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    Pro Tour Austin just ended, and this 2-card combo made an appearance in several successful Extended decks, particularly Kibler's (err, Rubin's) 1st-place Zoo deck. In Extended, this package seems awesome. What about Legacy?

  2. #2
    Site Contributor
    Esper3k's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2008
    Location

    Houston, TX
    Posts

    2,057

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    I think it's interesting, but not sure how exactly viable it is.

    At first glance, I'd put it in a Loam deck since it can get both Grove and Punishing Fires for you.

  3. #3
    Etherium is limited. Innovation is not.
    Hanni's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Columbus, OH
    Posts

    2,838

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    At first glance, I'd say not very viable.

    On its own, Grove is completely contradictory for an aggressive archetype. Of course, it can be tapped for colorless, but most spells that Zoo (or Sligh) use are full of colored costs.

    On its own, Punishing Fire seems narrow. 1R for 2 damage is mediocre at best. I can see it being strong against lifegain, whether that be vs Kitchen Finks, Jitte, etc... but still narrow. Sulfuric Vortex is much better in that context.

    Together, they seem slow. Each tap + recast is netting you 1 damage. Agressive decks like Zoo (or Sligh) don't really need an engine that slow.

    Finally, Groves seems like it's just going to add even more strain to an already vulnerable manabase (Zoo), or weaken a fairly solid manabase (Sligh).

    Just my thoughts though, I've never tried it.

  4. #4

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    Quote Originally Posted by Hanni View Post
    At first glance, I'd say not very viable.

    On its own, Grove is completely contradictory for an aggressive archetype. Of course, it can be tapped for colorless, but most spells that Zoo (or Sligh) use are full of colored costs.

    On its own, Punishing Fire seems narrow. 1R for 2 damage is mediocre at best. I can see it being strong against lifegain, whether that be vs Kitchen Finks, Jitte, etc... but still narrow. Sulfuric Vortex is much better in that context.

    Together, they seem slow. Each tap + recast is netting you 1 damage. Agressive decks like Zoo (or Sligh) don't really need an engine that slow.

    Finally, Groves seems like it's just going to add even more strain to an already vulnerable manabase (Zoo), or weaken a fairly solid manabase (Sligh).

    Just my thoughts though, I've never tried it.
    Actually, those are pretty much all of the legitimate complaints about it. I doubt it will see much play because it's basically a card advantage engine for a deck that's strong enough to not really need it (Zoo has Library, which is much better). There's no other deck I can think of that would want this over Loam + Barbarian Ring.

  5. #5

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    I'm seeing quite a few problems --

    (1) Wasteland is everywhere, if you lose Burnwillows, the Punishing Fires themselves are pretty awful.

    (2) It's doing non-broken things with the graveyard. If I'm going to have a strategy vulnerable to Crypt/Relic/Extirpate/whatever, I'd like it to be stupid on the level of Ichorid or Loam, not recurring Shock. I know that you can dodge even Extirpate since you can tap the Grove in response, but still. . .

    (3) Goyf grows a bit more quickly in legacy than extended, there's less of a window to kill him with 1-2 casts before he gets huge and mauls you.

    (4) Wouldn't control rather use EE/Academy Ruins recursion and wouldn't aggro rather Cursed Scroll? And really, as much as I love the card, when was the last time anyone saw Cursed Scroll? Three mana for a recurring two damage hasn't been turning heads on either side of control or aggro here in a while.

    (5) It easily gets locked out by CB/Chalice -- yay!
    Quote Originally Posted by TheInfamousBearAssassin View Post
    Being a 1C 2/1 with an ability isn't enough to make a card good by default. Elvish Archer is to First Striking as Dark Confidant is to card draw, and Nezumi Graverobber is to robbing graves as Tarmogoyf is to being much much better than a 2/1, but what the fuck does that even mean?

  6. #6

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    Otter pretty much nailed it. If I'm playing a combo that's vulnerable to wasteland, it would have to win games for me. 2RRR to kill a
    Kird Ape doesn't seem so hot.

    Also, Grove of the Burnwillows seems pretty terrible in any deck that runs those colors (Zoo and Goyfsligh immediately come to mind).

  7. #7
    mull to the skull
    badjuju's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2007
    Location

    SoCal
    Posts

    357

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    The combo isn't bad, it's actually what allowed Kibler to totally mess up Ikeda in the finals of PT Austin. Is it right for Legacy though? Probably not. Zoo has access to much better stuff in this format and is already pretty tight for slots to fit in this "cool" combo. In a somewhat slower format (*cough* extended) with less lethal spells, Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burningwillows will shine more.

  8. #8
    Wonderlust Viscount

    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Location

    Hartford, CT
    Posts

    361

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    To me the bigger question is if sword of the meek and thopter foundry are legacy playable. that deck was fucking nutty, if I sleeved up an extended deck, that's what I would play.
    LED, LED, Announce my intention to play Yawgmoth's Bargain...

  9. #9
    Member
    Soldar's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2008
    Location

    Brighton, MI
    Posts

    84

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    I don't think this combo really fits into our current established decks, but I think it does have a place in Legacy. I'm going to work on something this week to see how viable it actually is. If it ends up being pretty decent, I'll probably try to test its mettle at the Meandeck Open.

  10. #10

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    extended is a completely different format in every way.. obv. anyway in extended there is no wasteland, decks are much slower and creatures are generally smaller... using it as endless removal for creatures that for the most part have 2 or less toughness, in a format that has no 'good' permission cards, and no wasteland, really isn't applicable in legacy.

  11. #11
    Lion
    hungryLIKEALION's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2009
    Location

    Bethlehem, PA
    Posts

    492

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    One thing that i think everyone is missing is that with 2 or more fires in the gy, you can buy them all back with them only gaining one, so you can net 3-5-7 damage a turn. even still though, it may not be enough to make the combo viable, despite my personal liking for it. I expect I'll still test it in a few different shells before giving up on it though.

  12. #12
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,533

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    Just asking: The opponent needs to actually gain life to trigger Punishing Fire, doesn't he? So no fancy tricks with Sulfuric Vortex?

    I don't think that the combo is very viable in Legacy. Goyfs, Tombstalkers, KotR, Dreadnoughts and other cheap fatties run rampant in the format thanks to the format-warping effect of Goyf which wiped out the vast majority of weenie creatures. The presence of Wasteland and other non-basic hate certainly doesn't help.

  13. #13
    The Sources Headache, your gunna need more than a tylenol.
    Shanghi Knights's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2009
    Posts

    179

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    Kinda mana expensive in my opinion. 1 to get it back and 2 to cast. worse case its 3 mana for 1 damage. But if you have multiples to bring back from the yard then Its not so bad. Something to the effect of intuition and seething song would help get it on its way.
    "I realize none of you like me. I accept it. But like all dark people, I'm rejoicing on your pain! Muwhahaha! "

  14. #14
    Attractive and Successful
    hi-val's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Location

    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts

    997

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    I've got my playsets of both. I fully expect it to see some love somewhere. Here are some considerations:

    *Moat lets you sit back and ping an opponent pretty easily
    *Humility plus this combo is pretty sick
    *card discarders, like Compulsion, really like this combo
    *aggro hates this combo

    Tribal decks, and aggro in general, is faced with hard choices, especially because this color combo enables Firespout too. I'm already testing with it and finding several favorable interactions using the combination in several decks. I think serious Legacy players are going to give it a try and not fall to the internet keyboard jockey speak of "this loses to Wasteland and Crypt."

    I don't think it's a breakin' combo, but it's a source of continual burn or board control that's hard to answer. We're smart to pay attention.

  15. #15

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    Quote Originally Posted by hi-val View Post
    I've got my playsets of both. I fully expect it to see some love somewhere. Here are some considerations:

    *Moat lets you sit back and ping an opponent pretty easily
    Or, y'know, do something to win that doesn't take a fucking eternity.

    *Humility plus this combo is pretty sick
    Again, there are better things to do with Humility down. Especially now that Painter's Servant works under Humility. I mean, shit, Rod of fucking Ruin has the same effect in one card.

    *card discarders, like Compulsion, really like this combo
    Except Compulsion sucks, and Life from the Loam is just a better card for discard strategies.

    *aggro hates this combo
    Grim Lavamancer does a better job of hosing aggro, and does it in one card, and doesn't die to Wasteland.

    Honestly, Grim Lavamancer just seems better in almost every aspect to this combo.

  16. #16

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    Quote Originally Posted by hi-val View Post
    *Moat lets you sit back and ping an opponent pretty easily
    Once you have a Moat down, does it matter how you win? Besides, Elspeth is not only on-color, but does something on her own, protects herself, and wins far more quickly.

    Quote Originally Posted by hi-val View Post
    *aggro hates this combo
    I'm not so sure about this. It doesn't kill Nacatal, Ape, KotR, or Thoctar from Zoo. It also wants you to get a bunch of land out in order to really abuse it, which walks you right into Price. Really doesn't sound that threatening.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheInfamousBearAssassin View Post
    Being a 1C 2/1 with an ability isn't enough to make a card good by default. Elvish Archer is to First Striking as Dark Confidant is to card draw, and Nezumi Graverobber is to robbing graves as Tarmogoyf is to being much much better than a 2/1, but what the fuck does that even mean?

  17. #17
    Member
    Soldar's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2008
    Location

    Brighton, MI
    Posts

    84

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    Quote Originally Posted by hi-val View Post
    I've got my playsets of both. I fully expect it to see some love somewhere. Here are some considerations:

    *Moat lets you sit back and ping an opponent pretty easily
    *Humility plus this combo is pretty sick
    *card discarders, like Compulsion, really like this combo
    *aggro hates this combo

    Tribal decks, and aggro in general, is faced with hard choices, especially because this color combo enables Firespout too. I'm already testing with it and finding several favorable interactions using the combination in several decks. I think serious Legacy players are going to give it a try and not fall to the internet keyboard jockey speak of "this loses to Wasteland and Crypt."

    I don't think it's a breakin' combo, but it's a source of continual burn or board control that's hard to answer. We're smart to pay attention.
    I 4-0'ed the swiss of a local tournament rocking this combo last night. I'll be rocking it at the Meandeck Open before I post up a list.

    I don't think people are looking at this with the right eyes. Of course there are foils to every combo and strategy in every format. That doesn't stop us from trying, does it? I mostly showed up with the deck so that if someone actually asked me, "So, does it suck?" I could confirm that it did, but it performed way better than I expected.

    Edit: That said, it's not like it's most game ending combo. I did lose in the top 8 to an active Counterbalance.
    Last edited by Soldar; 10-22-2009 at 12:32 PM. Reason: Additional note.

  18. #18
    Etherium is limited. Innovation is not.
    Hanni's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Columbus, OH
    Posts

    2,838

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    I've got my playsets of both. I fully expect it to see some love somewhere. Here are some considerations:

    *Moat lets you sit back and ping an opponent pretty easily
    *Humility plus this combo is pretty sick
    *card discarders, like Compulsion, really like this combo
    *aggro hates this combo

    Tribal decks, and aggro in general, is faced with hard choices, especially because this color combo enables Firespout too. I'm already testing with it and finding several favorable interactions using the combination in several decks. I think serious Legacy players are going to give it a try and not fall to the internet keyboard jockey speak of "this loses to Wasteland and Crypt."

    I don't think it's a breakin' combo, but it's a source of continual burn or board control that's hard to answer. We're smart to pay attention.
    I suppose I could see some potential for this in a control deck, but what control decks play green and red (at least red), and why is this win condition better than other control win conditions (like Elspeth for example)?

  19. #19
    Attractive and Successful
    hi-val's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Location

    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts

    997

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    Quote Originally Posted by Roman Candle View Post
    Or, y'know, do something to win that doesn't take a fucking eternity.



    Again, there are better things to do with Humility down. Especially now that Painter's Servant works under Humility. I mean, shit, Rod of fucking Ruin has the same effect in one card.



    Except Compulsion sucks, and Life from the Loam is just a better card for discard strategies.



    Grim Lavamancer does a better job of hosing aggro, and does it in one card, and doesn't die to Wasteland.

    Honestly, Grim Lavamancer just seems better in almost every aspect to this combo.
    It's cool, I'm not trying to be aggressive to you so maybe a nicer tone plx?

    The benefit that this has is that it doesn't die to the most common card ever, Krosan Grip. Painter's Servant and Grindstone get tanked by grip and creature removal a lot. Elspeth, while a bit harder to actually fight, can get burnt out or attacked through. For sure, this combo loses to Wasteland, but you've got several Groves and possibly more profitable Wasteland targets in your deck anyway.

    The real benefit comes from having two, since both trigger on one Grove. hungryLIKEALION pointed this out; you can get 3 damage per turn out of two copies, which is a fine win condition. Two can also feed cards that require a discard; though Masticore basically does what this card does anyway, it's an example. I was also thinking about Solitary Confinement as another card that goes well with two copies.

    It has potential and I think it's pretty cool that this thread has generated both very negative and very positive reactions toward testing the cards!

  20. #20

    Re: Viable in Legacy? Punishing Fire + Grove of the Burnwillows

    So I have been contemplating various shells in which this could really shine and while the shell I have is HIGHLY meta specific it seems like it might actually be fairly viable.

    I have played AggroLoam for... well... suffice it to say a long time... and it seems like this may actually fit fairly well into it once I figure out what card counts to adjust. My biggest beef with AggroLoam has always been the problem of solving Goyf standoffs and this card clearly is a viable solution to it without running 4 colors (I use RGB) or using cards that are poor in AggroLoam such as Noble Heiarch.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)