Painter's Servant changes the color of every card in every gaming zone.
Now, my friend argues that you can use a card, for example Pyroblast (The destroy blue permanent ability) to destroy a creature on the battlefield.
The card specifically mentions that cards on the battlefield is not affected, so I don't believe him.
Please help
13 “Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. 14 But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it. Matthew 7:13-14 NIV
-Member of Clan Magic Eternal-
-Find me on MTGO (NarrowGate) -
"All cards that aren't on the battlefield, spells, and permanents are the chosen color in addition to their other colors."
It says "all cards that aren't on the battlefield" because it later includes "permanents", which is all cards on the battlefield.
“It's possible. But it involves... {checks archives} Nature's Revolt, Opalescence, two Unstable Shapeshifters (one of which started as a Doppelganger), a Tide, an animated land, a creature with Fading, a Silver Wyvern, some way to get a creature into play in response to stuff, some way to get a land into play in response to stuff (a different land from the animated land), and one heck of a Rube Goldberg timing diagram.”
-David DeLaney
For reference: painter's servant
It affects everything on the battlefield (permanents), all spells (stack), and everything that's not on the battlefield (everything else). I can't think of any cases where a card wouldn't be affected. Also, you might want to check out any of the decklists that use painter's servant since they rely heavily on the interaction in question.
Edit: Ok, it doesn't work on sideboards, cards from games that you aren't playing in, or - in general - cards that are outside the game.
Last edited by Malchar; 06-11-2010 at 11:22 AM.
Grabbing a mono-red card from your sideboard with Glittering Wish when Painter's Servant is set on blue?
Last edited by jrsthethird; 06-12-2010 at 12:45 AM. Reason: Apparently my quoting him wasn't clear enough...
That won't work:
Originally Posted by comprehensive rules
Exactly my point. A case where a card would not be affected.
“It's possible. But it involves... {checks archives} Nature's Revolt, Opalescence, two Unstable Shapeshifters (one of which started as a Doppelganger), a Tide, an animated land, a creature with Fading, a Silver Wyvern, some way to get a creature into play in response to stuff, some way to get a land into play in response to stuff (a different land from the animated land), and one heck of a Rube Goldberg timing diagram.”
-David DeLaney
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)