Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: MONO GREEN CONTROL (deathtouch)

  1. #1

    MONO GREEN CONTROL (deathtouch)

    Yeah, another one of these stax shell variants. The gimmick of this one is the Deathtouch mechanic. Obviously this deck is developmental, so Im posting it here for ideas.

    x4 thornweald archer
    x4 daggerback basilisk
    x4 ohran viper
    X4 wood elves

    x4 mox diamond
    x4 chalice of the void
    x4 trinisphere
    x4 natural order
    x3 harmonize

    x2 garruk wildspeaker
    x1 progenitus
    x1 terastodon

    x4 ancient tomb
    x4 city of traitors
    x13 forest

    SB:

    x4 thorn amethyst
    x3 choke
    x3 krosan grip
    x3 tormod's crypt
    x2 tranquility

    Matchups against other similar decks, geddon stax and dragon stompy have been favorable so far. Being able to board out 3spheres and chalices for hate like grips and tranquility have helped. The ANT matchup is close, but it can really go either way depending on how bad their draw is and how good your draw is. Obviously being on the play helps a lot. Im not entirely happy with the sideboard so if anyone has any ideas to suggest, please do. Im contemplating switching ohran viper for lowland basilisk, because sometimes that double green hurts.

    DO NOT suggest llanowar elves. thanks.
    Last edited by denial; 06-15-2010 at 07:22 PM.

  2. #2
    Member
    Felidae's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2010
    Location

    Germany, NRW
    Posts

    168

    Re: MONO GREEN CONTROL (deathtouch)

    Maybe -4 Wood Elves and +4 Elvish Spirit Guide, in order to play around Daze or just cast Trinisphere on turn 1 with more consistency.

    Edit.:Running Mox Diamond with 21 lands seems to be a bad idea, Chrome Mox should be better in many situations.
    Our music means nothing, except for what it means to
    you.

  3. #3
    Noachide'
    MMogg's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2009
    Location

    Dongying, China
    Posts

    1,048

    Re: MONO GREEN CONTROL (deathtouch)

    This deck would be greatly improved with the inclusion of Fyndhorn Elves.

    Instead of Choke, for the sideboard, I was wondering if City of Solitude would be better. I have no experience playing with this deck, so I'm not sure what its weaknesses are, but if you are trying to get a Natural Order easily resolved, maybe City of Solitude would help.
    Who says the Internet isn't full of <3?
    Quote Originally Posted by Aleksandr View Post
    MMogg, I love you more and more.
    Quote Originally Posted by menace13
    MMogg is already loved any place he goes.

  4. #4
    Member
    Gocho's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2006
    Location

    Spain
    Posts

    393

    Re: MONO GREEN CONTROL (deathtouch)

    Please, tag you lists:

    Quote Originally Posted by denial View Post
    Yeah, another one of these stax shell variants. The gimmick of this one is the Deathtouch mechanic. Obviously this deck is developmental, so Im posting it here for ideas.


    4 thornweald archer
    4 daggerback basilisk
    4 ohran viper
    4 wood elves

    4 mox diamond
    4 chalice of the void
    4 trinisphere
    4 natural order
    3 harmonize

    2 garruk wildspeaker
    1 progenitus
    1 terastodon

    4 ancient tomb
    4 city of traitors
    13 forest

    SB:

    4 thorn amethyst
    3 choke
    3 krosan grip
    3 tormod's crypt
    2 tranquility


    Much better

    Matchups against other similar decks, geddon stax and dragon stompy have been favorable so far. Being able to board out 3spheres and chalices for hate like grips and tranquility have helped. The ANT matchup is close, but it can really go either way depending on how bad their draw is and how good your draw is. Obviously being on the play helps a lot. Im not entirely happy with the sideboard so if anyone has any ideas to suggest, please do. Im contemplating switching ohran viper for lowland basilisk, because sometimes that double green hurts.

    DO NOT suggest llanowar elves. thanks.
    I lost vs Enchatress with ANT because he play a 2nd turn Choke that crush my Undergrounds. I like it more that City of Solitude.

    Anyway, I don't think that weak critters that can kill other critters and die would be a great improvement to the deck. Perhaps with white, adding Basilisk collar and Stoneforge Mystic

  5. #5
    Psilovibin
    Vacrix's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2008
    Posts

    2,204

    Re: MONO GREEN CONTROL (deathtouch)

    I've played stuff like this before. Wall of Roots is always good. Its better than some of your other guys. He blocks well, provides acceleration, and can be used as both the acceleration piece and the creature to facilitate a fast NO--> Prog.
    Luck is a residue of design.



    I'm an aspiring Psychedelic Trance musician. Please feel free to enjoy my sense of life:
    http://soundcloud.com/vacrix


    Expect me or die. I play SI.

  6. #6
    Lion
    hungryLIKEALION's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2009
    Location

    Bethlehem, PA
    Posts

    492

    Re: MONO GREEN CONTROL (deathtouch)

    Also, you need 4 tarmogoyf. There's no reason not to be running it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bardo View Post
    Strangest convenience store I've yet seen: Kum & Go (somewhere in Nebraska). I remember thinking: "Huh, a drive-through bordello. Clever."

  7. #7

    Re: MONO GREEN CONTROL (deathtouch)

    Quote Originally Posted by hungryLIKEALION View Post
    Also, you need 4 tarmogoyf. There's no reason not to be running it.
    Yes, it is the best green wall ever printed!

  8. #8

    Re: MONO GREEN CONTROL (deathtouch)

    Quote Originally Posted by Felidae View Post
    Maybe -4 Wood Elves and +4 Elvish Spirit Guide, in order to play around Daze or just cast Trinisphere on turn 1 with more consistency.

    Edit.:Running Mox Diamond with 21 lands seems to be a bad idea, Chrome Mox should be better in many situations.
    Wood elves enable a possible turn two progenitus. I ordered a few ESGs and I'll try them in the viper slot.

    I originally had chrome mox in the deck, but the card disadvatage hurt. Also, I tend to either get mana flooded or mana screwed a lot. I'll either draw like 5 lands in a row or draw none for 5 turns.

    Quote Originally Posted by MMogg View Post
    This deck would be greatly improved with the inclusion of Fyndhorn Elves.

    Instead of Choke, for the sideboard, I was wondering if City of Solitude would be better. I have no experience playing with this deck, so I'm not sure what its weaknesses are, but if you are trying to get a Natural Order easily resolved, maybe City of Solitude would help.
    You like to wink at me dont you.

    Yeah, like the other guy said, choke hurts vs ANT. the ANT player cast wipe away on one of my lock pieces hoping to go off the next turn. Then I cast choke on my turn and locked him off most of his mana,

    Quote Originally Posted by Vacrix View Post
    I've played stuff like this before. Wall of Roots is always good. Its better than some of your other guys. He blocks well, provides acceleration, and can be used as both the acceleration piece and the creature to facilitate a fast NO--> Prog.
    Yeah, I'll take them into consideration. Im going to try with the ESGs and then the wall of roots if those dont work.

    Quote Originally Posted by hungryLIKEALION View Post
    Also, you need 4 tarmogoyf. There's no reason not to be running it.
    Well, chalice @ 2 is one good reason. I originally had goyf in the list too, but took him out for the vipers. It hurts enough when the chalice cuts me off from thornweald archer, so losing 8 cards in the deck is even worse.

  9. #9
    Member

    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    GA
    Posts

    87

    Re: MONO GREEN CONTROL (deathtouch)

    Turntimber Basilisk is probably better than Daggerback Basilisk. It's landfall ability can produce potential 2 for 1s.

  10. #10
    Lion
    hungryLIKEALION's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2009
    Location

    Bethlehem, PA
    Posts

    492

    Re: MONO GREEN CONTROL (deathtouch)

    Goyf>Thornweald Archer.

    Not running Goyf because you MIGHT Chalice it is retarded. You're not trying to lock your opponent out of the game, you're trying to steal tempo with it. Chalice is going to be answered by the opponent, the reason you're using it is to force them to answer it before they can resume playing their spells. So if you chalice at 2, that's fine. Deploy your two drops after your opponent inevitably blows them up.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bardo View Post
    Strangest convenience store I've yet seen: Kum & Go (somewhere in Nebraska). I remember thinking: "Huh, a drive-through bordello. Clever."

  11. #11
    Pray for Rain
    Tammit67's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2010
    Location

    Philadelphia, PA, USA
    Posts

    1,534

    Re: MONO GREEN CONTROL (deathtouch)

    Quote Originally Posted by denial View Post

    Yeah, like the other guy said, choke hurts vs ANT. the ANT player cast wipe away on one of my lock pieces hoping to go off the next turn. Then I cast choke on my turn and locked him off most of his mana,
    Why couldn't he have just cast the wipe away at the end of your turn? It seems silly, unless you had a dosan the falling leaf you aren't telling us about

  12. #12
    Here I Rule!!!!!!!!!!
    Phoenix Ignition's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2008
    Location

    Minneapolis MN
    Posts

    2,287

    Re: MONO GREEN CONTROL (deathtouch)

    Why are you screaming so loud?

  13. #13
    !
    jrsthethird's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2010
    Location

    Lehigh Valley, PA
    Posts

    1,654

    Re: MONO GREEN CONTROL (deathtouch)

    Quote Originally Posted by MGC_player View Post
    Turntimber Basilisk is probably better than Daggerback Basilisk. It's landfall ability can produce potential 2 for 1s.
    I think it's because Turntimber costs 1GG while Daggerback is 2G. Makes it a turn faster with City/Tomb out.

  14. #14
    I like Tacos.
    dahcmai's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2006
    Location

    Traverse City, MI
    Posts

    2,202

    Re: MONO GREEN CONTROL (deathtouch)

    This deck kind of yells for Plow Under to be given a shot. It seems like one of those shut out cards, but it's only a thought. Not sure what I would even want to try to pull for it given I haven't tried it yet.

    Indrik Stomphowler demands to be put in the board at least though. I like it more than Tranquility if anything.


    Depending on how Crypt works out for you considering you are playing with Chalices, Loaming Shaman might be a thought.

  15. #15
    !
    jrsthethird's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2010
    Location

    Lehigh Valley, PA
    Posts

    1,654

    Re: MONO GREEN CONTROL (deathtouch)

    I love Plow Under, it would be awesome for it to find a competitive home.

    Quote Originally Posted by hungryLIKEALION View Post
    Goyf>Thornweald Archer.

    Not running Goyf because you MIGHT Chalice it is retarded. You're not trying to lock your opponent out of the game, you're trying to steal tempo with it. Chalice is going to be answered by the opponent, the reason you're using it is to force them to answer it before they can resume playing their spells. So if you chalice at 2, that's fine. Deploy your two drops after your opponent inevitably blows them up.
    Psssh....you just don't want him to be able to block your equipped flyers!

  16. #16

    Re: MONO GREEN CONTROL (deathtouch)

    Quote Originally Posted by hungryLIKEALION View Post
    Goyf>Thornweald Archer.

    Not running Goyf because you MIGHT Chalice it is retarded. You're not trying to lock your opponent out of the game, you're trying to steal tempo with it. Chalice is going to be answered by the opponent, the reason you're using it is to force them to answer it before they can resume playing their spells. So if you chalice at 2, that's fine. Deploy your two drops after your opponent inevitably blows them up.
    goyf>archer, sometimes
    archer>goyf, sometimes

    there is a lot and I mean a lot of combo in my meta. so getting chalices and 3sphere out fast is my main priority. also, I heard chalice @ 1 and @ 2 is pretty good against zoo too. I dont exactly want to shut off 8 cards in my deck when I could only shut off 4.


    Quote Originally Posted by Tammit67 View Post
    Why couldn't he have just cast the wipe away at the end of your turn? It seems silly, unless you had a dosan the falling leaf you aren't telling us about
    I had a 3sphere and a double thorn of amethyst out. he had to mystical for the wipe away to begin with.


    Quote Originally Posted by jrsthethird View Post
    Psssh....you just don't want him to be able to block your equipped flyers!
    or Iona or clique.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)