Page 16 of 179 FirstFirst ... 61213141516171819202666116 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 320 of 3566

Thread: [Deck] Elves Combo

  1. #301

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Caller of the Claw requires you to keep mana up, which is all kinds of awkward.
    Magic Level 3 Judge
    Southern USA Regional Coordinator

    Quote Originally Posted by frogboy View Post
    Battle with a ragtag crew of adorable misfits. Narcomoeba and Golgari Thug hook up before the end of the movie.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nihil Credo View Post
    Please be less rambling in your next post. I only bothered with figuring out what the fuck you were trying to ask because I took it as a challenge.

  2. #302

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Stupid question: Can i declare an elf as blocker vs Naught, then put him to hand with symbiote and don`t get any damage?

  3. #303
    Survivalist
    Waikiki's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Netherlands
    Posts

    398

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    you still get trample damage :o

  4. #304
    Zombie Elf Warrior
    danyul's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2004
    Location

    seattle
    Posts

    966

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Really? I thought trample damage, like any other damage, only comes when the damage step comes. If blockers are declared and you bounce your elf before damage then no damage is dealt, right? A blocked creature is a blocked creature. I use the same tricks to block creatures equipped with Jitte and not give my opponent Jitte counters.

  5. #305
    Survivalist
    Waikiki's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Netherlands
    Posts

    398

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    I'd like to learn from this aswell then.

  6. #306
    Zombie Elf Warrior
    danyul's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2004
    Location

    seattle
    Posts

    966

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    702.17c If an attacking creature with trample is blocked, but there are no creatures blocking it when
    damage is assigned, all its damage is assigned to the player or planeswalker it’s attacking.

    You were right. I wasn't aware of this ruling. However, you can still bounce your blocker before damage to keep a Jitte from acquiring counters.

  7. #307

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Would going pure combo be better, or would adding cards like jitte or elvish champion maindeck to give an aggro plan to fall back on.

    Also, whats better as a finisher? Grapeshot, Tendrils, or the dragon.

    And hows Hunting pack? 5 tokens are you pretty much win next turn.
    Last edited by AznSeal; 07-10-2010 at 12:18 PM.

  8. #308
    Faerie Godfather

    Join Date

    Jul 2005
    Location

    Finland
    Posts

    1,617

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by danyul View Post
    You were right. I wasn't aware of this ruling. However, you can still bounce your blocker before damage to keep a Jitte from acquiring counters.
    Unless the Jitte-wielder has Trample. Luckily that's rarely the case.

  9. #309
    Member
    1maarten1's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2008
    Location

    Netherlands
    Posts

    209

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by AznSeal View Post
    Would going pure aggro be better, or would adding cards like jitte or elvish champion maindeck to give an aggro plan to fall back on.

    Also, whats better as a finisher? Grapeshot, Tendrils, or the dragon.

    And hows Hunting pack? 5 tokens are you pretty much win next turn.
    None of the 3 is a good finisher :D! Play Jorega Warcaller as win-con. Its a strong lord when you for exemple, drop it on turn 3 with 7 mana or smthn. And just run stuff to support your aggro matches in your sb, 2 lords and maybe some jittes if you want.

    But Jorega is the best win-con you can run IMO, you just have to make the choice if you want to run geae' cradles or not. I dont own them so I dont play them atm, but I might if they are good in testing.

  10. #310

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by 1maarten1 View Post
    None of the 3 is a good finisher :D! Play Jorega Warcaller as win-con. Its a strong lord when you for exemple, drop it on turn 3 with 7 mana or smthn. And just run stuff to support your aggro matches in your sb, 2 lords and maybe some jittes if you want.

    But Jorega is the best win-con you can run IMO, you just have to make the choice if you want to run geae' cradles or not. I dont own them so I dont play them atm, but I might if they are good in testing.
    .. I just don't know what to say about the stupidity of this post...

    To answer the question which win con is the best - it depends on the build. I still think that Grapeshot along with Eternal Witness is the way to go in a real pure combo elves deck.

  11. #311
    Member
    1maarten1's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2008
    Location

    Netherlands
    Posts

    209

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by Augustas View Post
    .. I just don't know what to say about the stupidity of this post...

    To answer the question which win con is the best - it depends on the build. I still think that Grapeshot along with Eternal Witness is the way to go in a real pure combo elves deck.
    ? Im saying that, I tested all 3 of those, and IMO they are not as good as Warcaller. Whats stupid about that?

    And dont you agree that if you fail to combo, you like to go agro? And how good would it be if your wincon, in other cases now a dead card, is very strong when you go agro also?

  12. #312

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by 1maarten1 View Post
    ? Im saying that, I tested all 3 of those, and IMO they are not as good as Warcaller. Whats stupid about that?

    And dont you agree that if you fail to combo, you like to go agro? And how good would it be if your wincon, in other cases now a dead card, is very strong when you go agro also?
    Moat makes you lose. Any removal spell in the format...makes you lost Warcaller. While it is strong, it doesn't fix what needs to be fixed. Pumping a bunch of mana into an elf that will just be counterspelled is bad.

    I run Emrakul because it is just funny. But I prefer Grapeshot. Emrakul does have the merit of being a late top deck ftw, wheras Grapeshot doen't.

  13. #313
    Yo sé, mi español es terrible :S
    ummon's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2010
    Location

    East SF Bay, CA (Summer and Winter breaks) or Austin, TX (college)
    Posts

    201

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    How are Combo Elves' matchups? It looks to me like it would fold to control, so is that the case? Obviously, while not as fast as the top tier combo decks, it looks fast enough to have favorable matchups against aggro decks, but does it have any advantages over the more common combo decks?

  14. #314

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by ummon View Post
    How are Combo Elves' matchups? It looks to me like it would fold to control, so is that the case? Obviously, while not as fast as the top tier combo decks, it looks fast enough to have favorable matchups against aggro decks, but does it have any advantages over the more common combo decks?
    No. My version runs 4 maindeck Leyline of Lifeforce. You beat control because all of your dudes, especially the important ones can't be countered. But even with out leyline, you can usually drop enough dudes to put them on a clock. Especially if you resolve glimpse.

    Aggro is a great match up, unless they go turn 1 Lava Mancer, turn 2 Jitte (ZAIEM BEG!)....and then drop Ethersworn Cannonist. But usually, you can find answers to them all. Gobbos is basically a bye unless they run the Sharpshooter, then its hard.

    And combo....well...

    So we do have decent match up against control and aggro. Against control, try not to over extend into WoG effects. I board in Fecundity and it fixes that problem as I can overextend all I want if I resolve Fecundity. Aggro...you run the combo or just overwhelm them g1, and I Bring it Jitte, Mirror Entity, and Chord of Calling Game 2. Sometimes we can rock Fecundity. Either way, it only gets better.

  15. #315
    Member
    Rune's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2009
    Location

    Denmark
    Posts

    324

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by ummon View Post
    How are Combo Elves' matchups? It looks to me like it would fold to control, so is that the case? Obviously, while not as fast as the top tier combo decks, it looks fast enough to have favorable matchups against aggro decks, but does it have any advantages over the more common combo decks?
    I have only fooled around with Elves a little, but in my oppinion the deck is inferior to other storm/combo decks.

    I think the main problems are:

    - Engine is based on creatures -> Plague, Explosives, Firespout etc. = bad times (I know it's completely possible to play around those, but still a big problem)

    - Relatively slow and no mainboard disruption = death to other combo decks

    - If the deck doesn't want to roll over to stuff like Glacial Chasm, it'll have to use an off-color storm card as wincon. A draw that is 100% dead for most of the game.

    - Has to hope for topdecked Krosan Grips against Counterbalance/Top, otherwise it's stone cold dead to it. (now that Mystical is gone, other Storm decks also have bigger difficulties dealing with CB, but atleast these decks can dig for answers with Brainstorm/Ponder and have alternate routes to victory, like Shelldock/Emrakul)

  16. #316

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    cant you put in the living wish package and use the SB to answer the threats?

  17. #317
    Zombie Elf Warrior
    danyul's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2004
    Location

    seattle
    Posts

    966

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by kikoo View Post
    I have only fooled around with Elves a little, but in my oppinion the deck is inferior to other storm/combo decks.

    I think the main problems are:

    - Engine is based on creatures -> Plague, Explosives, Firespout etc. = bad times (I know it's completely possible to play around those, but still a big problem)
    You have it mostly right. The deck is not a pure combo deck in the traditional sense. I would call it aggro-combo if anything. True, you are weak to Firespout/E.Plague and whatever other creature hate, but that's just the cost of the hybrid style of the deck. Those cards beat you like they beat any other aggro deck. But you also get the strengths of a combo deck. This versatility is what makes the deck unique.

    - Relatively slow and no mainboard disruption = death to other combo decks
    True, but if your meta is that full of combo then you probably shouldn't play this deck anyway.

    - If the deck doesn't want to roll over to stuff like Glacial Chasm, it'll have to use an off-color storm card as wincon. A draw that is 100% dead for most of the game.
    Most builds use an off-color wincon anyway. Banefire beats Chasm and I've personally used Primal Command a few times to get the Chasm out of my face. Janky, yeah, but whatever works.

    - Has to hope for topdecked Krosan Grips against Counterbalance/Top, otherwise it's stone cold dead to it. (now that Mystical is gone, other Storm decks also have bigger difficulties dealing with CB, but atleast these decks can dig for answers with Brainstorm/Ponder and have alternate routes to victory, like Shelldock/Emrakul)
    I actually haven't ever had trouble against Counterbalance. I bring in Leyline of Lifeforce out of the sideboard and ignore CB/top. Works great against Chalice of the Void as well. The bigger problem against those decks are the recurring EE's and Firespouts they run against you. Firespout sucks and you just gotta race it. But I bring in Pithing Needles against EE.

    All that said, I don't think anybody is playing this deck with hopes of it becoming the next big combo deck. We play these green dudes knowing full well that the whole thing is kinda janky and funny, but that makes it all the more entertaining to play.

  18. #318

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by ummon View Post
    How are Combo Elves' matchups? It looks to me like it would fold to control, so is that the case? Obviously, while not as fast as the top tier combo decks, it looks fast enough to have favorable matchups against aggro decks, but does it have any advantages over the more common combo decks?
    This deck has the advantage in that it can beat out super slow control decks like lands and landstill thanks to death by 1/1s. However, Counter/Top is one of the hardest match-ups, simply because this deck cannot deal well with any deck that packs goyf + removal. The best part about the deck is while some of the combo decks are faster, they fold harder to control decks because those decks can't do anything if they get disrupted. While you can bring in something janky like leyline of the lifeforce, I would much rather use NO.

    The deck is fast if the other person doesn't have removal or doesn't know how to play against the deck. Pretty much aggro decks that pack red are really hard to win against because they can remove all the essential elf combo pieces. Goblins vary from bye (traditional red builds) to almsot as bad as zoo (R/b with lightning bolts and weirdings and perish).

    Aggro/Control MUs vary. UGr Thresh builds destroy us (fire is too broken), while something like new horizons is much more manageable.

    Combo is hard cus other combo decks are usually faster.

  19. #319

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    This deck has potential. I think we should look into another approach to get our combo pieces since this deck basically folds if it doesnt draw a glimpse.

    The first plan is the NO+Progenitus.

    I have been thinking and has anyone thought of

    1. Splashing blue for Personal Tutor, Brainstorm, Ponder, maybe force?
    2. Splashing red for burning wish which is ok for some SB answers as well as 3 more chances at drawing glimpse
    3. Using living wish to protect yourself until you can stall out time to draw glimpse
    4. Or just add jittes/lords main deck to have an aggro fallback plan.

  20. #320

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by AznSeal View Post
    This deck has potential. I think we should look into another approach to get our combo pieces since this deck basically folds if it doesnt draw a glimpse.

    The first plan is the NO+Progenitus.

    I have been thinking and has anyone thought of

    1. Splashing blue for Personal Tutor, Brainstorm, Ponder, maybe force?
    2. Splashing red for burning wish which is ok for some SB answers as well as 3 more chances at drawing glimpse
    3. Using living wish to protect yourself until you can stall out time to draw glimpse
    4. Or just add jittes/lords main deck to have an aggro fallback plan.
    Did you play any games with this deck, yet? Did you read any posts in this thread yet?

    Ok, some input:
    50% of us play NO/Prog
    30% play Warcallers
    and the rest play Aggro elves

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)