Page 28 of 179 FirstFirst ... 182425262728293031323878128 ... LastLast
Results 541 to 560 of 3566

Thread: [Deck] Elves Combo

  1. #541
    Keep Calm and Brainstorm
    (nameless one)'s Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2009
    Location

    GTA, Ontario
    Posts

    2,878

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    And its a casted Eldrazi, not cheated you get the perks.

    Hey ruckus, if your meta on paper is ideal for Elves Combo and Survival of the Fittest gets the axe, how would your list look like. Would it look the same as your MTGO list? How would this affect your deck's playstyle?
    I am convinced that WotC is "dumbing" the game because of all the stupid posts they come across on MTG-related forums
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyle View Post
    13NoVa plays Force of Will from his hand.
    Finglonger plays Spell Pierce from his hand.
    [10:22:43]  13NoVa: lol
    sure
    Finglonger points from his Dack Fayden to 13NoVa's Sol Ring.
    [10:23:04]  13NoVa: lol dumb ******; nice draws with retard.dec
    stupid cocksucker
    You have been kicked out of the game.

  2. #542

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by rukcus View Post
    I tried Army of Ancients (Glimpse + Food Chain Elves), but the list relies too heavily on Food Chain.

    Turn 2 Eldrazi is really funny however. :)
    True, though I get turn 2 Emrakul quite a bit as it is...

  3. #543
    Bald. Bearded. Moderator.
    Mr. Safety's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2010
    Location

    Hell in a Nutshell
    Posts

    5,245

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Just a question: if I decide to utilize Emrakul in my build, does Priest of Titania become neccessary? I would think so...

  4. #544

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Safety View Post
    Just a question: if I decide to utilize Emrakul in my build, does Priest of Titania become neccessary? I would think so...
    No it doesn't. I optimize my build for combo, so I want as few creatures that are more than one mana as possible. Visionary is necessary for consistency in the combo, so she's in, and then I figure I need a lord for an aggro backup and a mana lord. Archdruid does both in one card and leaves room for more one drops. Thus, he is the choice.

  5. #545
    Another Post!!!
    Neil's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2010
    Posts

    11

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    k2thej could you post your latest deck list? Also on what turns do you likely combo off?
    Oooooops I forgot to pay for my Summoner's Pact upkeep cost . Edit undo

  6. #546
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Most of the discussion from August to today is relevant. I highly recommend interested players in reading the thread from then.

    Quote Originally Posted by rukcus View Post
    Combo Elves can conceivably go off turn 2. Turn 3 is very common start up as well. 4 Summoner's Pact make it easy to get the right pieces; just watch out for potential mass/spot removal in case you need to pass the turn.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  7. #547

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Well....i'm starting with this deck with a "full combo" ie no natural order. I goes off pretty good but i know it dies to plague. But well, it's just the begining. Suggestions are welcomed and advises too.


    // Lands
    3 [ON] Wooded Foothills
    8 [P3] Forest (2)
    1 [ON] Windswept Heath
    2 [US] Gaea's Cradle

    // Creatures
    4 [ALA] Elvish Visionary
    1 [IA] Fyndhorn Elves
    4 [5E] Llanowar Elves
    4 [ON] Birchlore Rangers
    4 [MOR] Heritage Druid
    2 [US] Priest of Titania
    4 [EVE] Nettle Sentinel
    4 [SC] Wirewood Symbiote
    2 [EVG] Sylvan Messenger
    1 [EVE] Regal Force
    1 [FD] Eternal Witness
    1 [EVE] Wickerbough Elder
    1 [ROE] Emrakul, the Aeons Torn
    2 [FNM] Quirion Ranger

    // Spells
    3 [RAV] Chord of Calling
    4 [CHK] Glimpse of Nature
    3 [FUT] Summoner's Pact
    1 [TSP] Grapeshot

    // Sideboard
    SB: 3 [LE] Caller of the Claw
    SB: 2 [TSP] Krosan Grip
    SB: 3 [LRW] Thorn of Amethyst
    SB: 4 [SHM] Faerie Macabre
    SB: 3 [TE] Choke


    3 NO + 1 Proggy post side is good?? What about leyline of the vitality?

    Thx you all!

  8. #548
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by (nameless one) View Post
    Hey ruckus, if your meta on paper is ideal for Elves Combo and Survival of the Fittest gets the axe, how would your list look like. Would it look the same as your MTGO list? How would this affect your deck's playstyle?
    I believe my metagame is about 40-50% blue decks, comprised of Merfolk, X-still, and CB/Top. The remaining is random decks from every gamut (Affinity, RDW/Burn, Goblins, Aggro Elves, Zoo, etc). Only about 15-20% of it is Survival decks right now. Until Jan 1st (once bannings are in place), I would say that the metagame is marginally positive for combo Elves.

    I would very likely play a list very similar to k2thej's. It is very streamlined. Unfortunately, I prefer the SotF back-up plan with Anger/utility, and that may sadly get banned. We'll see soon enough.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  9. #549

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Hello :)

    I got to say I really like k2thej's list. Quite stable and really quick, I've gotten Emrakuls on turn 2 with surprising regularity. It's on page 24 if I'm not mistaken.

    I'd be interested in an updated list as well if you have one.

    As for Priest of Titania, I haven't missed it in my 20ish matches with the deck.

    Also, yes, Survival might get banned, according to BDM's last article.

  10. #550
    Member
    Koplinchen's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2010
    Location

    Prague
    Posts

    125

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    I like this list as well. It is suprisingly stable and within a few turns it can fully recover from opponent's bomb. I was just thinking that the inclusion of single viridian shaman might be vital. Chalice turn1 just kills this deck, doesen't it?
    I am not sure if that is relevant argument for weakaning maine? And if the calls for it, what to replace?
    Second. Is Gaea's Cradle all that necessary? Doesen't if weaken your opening hand?

    I am just starting with this decek eventhough I play legacy for a long time.

    Thank to all for comments.

  11. #551
    Member
    Koplinchen's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2010
    Location

    Prague
    Posts

    125

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    I like this list as well. It is suprisingly stable and within a few turns it can fully recover from opponent's bomb. I was just thinking that the inclusion of single viridian shaman might be vital. Chalice turn1 just kills this deck, doesen't it?
    I am not sure if that is relevant argument for weakaning maine? And if the calls for it, what to replace?
    Second. Is Gaea's Cradle all that necessary? Doesen't if weaken your opening hand?

    I am just starting with this decek eventhough I play legacy for a long time.

    Thank to all for comments.

  12. #552

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by Koplinchen View Post
    I like this list as well. It is suprisingly stable and within a few turns it can fully recover from opponent's bomb. I was just thinking that the inclusion of single viridian shaman might be vital. Chalice turn1 just kills this deck, doesen't it?

    Thank to all for comments.
    I'm running 1 x of Wickerbough Elder and it works awesome!

  13. #553

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenCid View Post
    I'm running 1 x of Wickerbough Elder and it works awesome!
    Your list isnt bad, but Emrakul+Grapeshot=overkill. The reasons this deck works is because you maximize the number of favorable opening hands, and to do this you want to minimize the number of times your wincon is in your opening hand, thus, only play one. Especially if your one goes back into your library if discarded.

    I will post a new list once I finalize the few slots I am toying with right now.

  14. #554

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Just thought of new terminology we should start thinking about using.

    Tapper- heritage, birchlore
    Untapper- Nettle (yes I want to consider Nettle an untapper), wirewood, quirion
    Starter- glimpse, Regal (ideally through a summoners pact)

    You generally want one of each of these categories in your opening hand (or a pact so sub for one or even two), usually, in the order they are written down. This deck is all about getting one of each of these puppies in your opening hand, design accordingly!

  15. #555
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2010
    Location

    Segovia, Spain
    Posts

    2

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by k2thej View Post
    Just thought of new terminology we should start thinking about using.

    Tapper- heritage, birchlore
    Untapper- Nettle (yes I want to consider Nettle an untapper), wirewood, quirion
    Starter- glimpse, Regal (ideally through a summoners pact)

    You generally want one of each of these categories in your opening hand (or a pact so sub for one or even two), usually, in the order they are written down. This deck is all about getting one of each of these puppies in your opening hand, design accordingly!
    I'm agree with that clasification if we speak about opening hands and odds. Which is in your opinion the best possible hand/s?

  16. #556

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by abel_lg View Post
    I'm agree with that clasification if we speak about opening hands and odds. Which is in your opinion the best possible hand/s?
    Anything that gets you a turn 2 combo. Almost always involves glimpse being in your hand. Something like this:

    Glimpse
    Land
    Heritage
    Nettle
    Qurion
    Land
    Llanowar/fyndhorn

    Note that you can have a pact to replace anything you would play on the turn you combo. They are literally interchangeable at that point with no drawbacks; one of the main contributions to the consistency of this build.



    The main change I am toying with in my build right now is 3 wishes for the emrakul and two other spots. I really like the idea of never having emrakul when you don't need him (again, ups the consistency of opening hands) since you would always be able to get him when you need him as well. It seems to remove the downside of having emrakul in your opening hand without contributing and new drawbacks. It also allows you access to a cradle mid combo if you are running out of mana, and access to a regal force if you are running out of dudes. It seems like a good idea, my only hesitation is what other two cards to remove to free up the three slots for the wishes.


    I do, however, think the maindeck is pretty set. Let's face it, it works. The thing keeping this from being a top-tier deck is that there arn't many complementary sideboard cards, especially since anything we add to the deck to, in a sense, up the defense against something will weaken our combo consistency. If we can figure out sideboard choices and what to board out for them to maintain consistency (mainly against sweepers) this will become a top tier deck. But it is the sideboard that is holding it back not the main deck.

  17. #557

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    My suggestion to strengthen the deck against sweepers would be to include some combination of Elevish Messenger (the Apoc. elf ringleader) and Elvish Champion.

    These adjustments to the board allow you to become a more aggro oriented build that is not dependent on comboing off and reduces the opponents ability to gain card advantage and thus in turn reducing there ability to win through brute card advantage.

  18. #558

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by nodahero View Post
    My suggestion to strengthen the deck against sweepers would be to include some combination of Elevish Messenger (the Apoc. elf ringleader) and Elvish Champion.

    These adjustments to the board allow you to become a more aggro oriented build that is not dependent on comboing off and reduces the opponents ability to gain card advantage and thus in turn reducing there ability to win through brute card advantage.
    I don't think diminishing the combo is the way to beat sweepers. In fact, it hurts us against sweepers. The combo allows you to wait to drop your elves until you will win that turn, removing the threat of any sorcery sweepers. Aggro leaves your guys out vulnerable to all sweepers on the field. It is better to keep everyone you can in hand until you go off. The deck should be played by only dropping the elves you NEED out in order to combo off the following turn.

  19. #559
    Member-ish
    kicks_422's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Location

    Manila
    Posts

    1,209

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by rukcus View Post
    I tried Army of Ancients (Glimpse + Food Chain Elves), but the list relies too heavily on Food Chain.
    Well, the Food Chain Elves list relies on Food Chain just as much as the Glimpse Elves list relies on Glimpse of Nature.
    The Source: Your Source for "The Source: Your Source for..." cliche.

  20. #560

    Re: [Deck] Elves Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by kicks_422 View Post
    Well, the Food Chain Elves list relies on Food Chain just as much as the Glimpse Elves list relies on Glimpse of Nature.
    Food chain is 3 mana and it is on the field and can be killed. It is much better to rely on glimpse. Also, we have regal force and pacts to get him if need be.

    We should be focusing on sb though.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)