Page 97 of 113 FirstFirst ... 478793949596979899100101107 ... LastLast
Results 1,921 to 1,940 of 2251

Thread: [Deck] Pox

  1. #1921

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    Your thinking about Blinkmoth Nexus. Mishra's Factories are also base 2/2 similar to Mutavault. Factories being artifact creatures really isn't that big a deal; not a whole lot of people will board in artifact destruction against Pox. And if they do just to get rid of Factory, then that's one less answer to Crucible. The reason why I would consider Mutavault over Factory would be if I'm in a Merfolk heavy meta where my manlands can piggyback ride on their lords. Other than that, the pump ability makes Factories the better choice.

  2. #1922
    Member

    Join Date

    Apr 2008
    Location

    Trapped.
    Posts

    1

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    Eternaldarkness summed up my reasoning behind Mishra's Factor > Mutavault.

    Even in a Merfolk meta you'll only be piggybacking on Lord of Atlantis with Mutavault. With two Lord of Atlantis on the table Mutavault is better than Mishra's Factory. However, you're also probably screwed because you opponent has two Lord of Atlantis on the board, presumably with all his other fishies.
    1/3 Life, 1/3 Land
    1/3 Creatures, 1/3 Hand
    Round it up, don't round it down
    So turn that smile into a frown!

  3. #1923

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    I'm planning to take Pox to GP Amsterdam and haven't settled on my sideboard cards yet.
    So far it looks like this:
    3 Null Rod
    4 Leyline of the Void
    2 Extirpate
    3 Pithing Needle
    3 open slots

    I'm still desperately searching for an answer for aggro, but haven't found an adequate one yet.
    Perish is good against certain decks, but it doesn't help so much against Zoo, which is a bad matchup(at least fast Zoo).
    Lately, I've been testing Spinning Darkness, but I had mixed feelings regarding the disharmony with Tombstalker.

    Any proposals?

  4. #1924

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    You could try Deathmark if you're contend with spot removal, but feel like Spinning Darkness' alternative cost hampers your Tombstalkers too much.

  5. #1925
    Member

    Join Date

    Apr 2008
    Location

    Trapped.
    Posts

    1

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    Withering Wisps is great against aggro. Unfortunately, it take a turn to be effective.

    Infest (or even Massacre depending on the meta) won't kill a fully grown Kird Ape/Goyf/Nacatl, but it can clear a board of all the other annoying creatures eating your edict spells.
    1/3 Life, 1/3 Land
    1/3 Creatures, 1/3 Hand
    Round it up, don't round it down
    So turn that smile into a frown!

  6. #1926

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    Powder Keg or Ratchet Bomb? I guess Damnation could work but it is probably to expensive for pox.

  7. #1927

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    Consuming vapor is quite a lot cheaper and very good against zoo... Life gain is really helpful... Also 2 for one is good

  8. #1928

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    I generally prefer Powder Keg to deal with Zoo. Consuming Vapors is okay, but will definitely be too slow if Zoo gets the momentum early. If Zoo is a really big problem in your meta, then Phyrexian Cusader might be really helpful. First Strike with infect will automatically render their Kird Apes useless, and protection from boros colors makes it immune to removal. Can't stop a Tarmogoyf, but it stops everything else.

  9. #1929

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    Quote Originally Posted by TokenMaster View Post
    I generally prefer Powder Keg to deal with Zoo. Consuming Vapors is okay, but will definitely be too slow if Zoo gets the momentum early. If Zoo is a really big problem in your meta, then Phyrexian Cusader might be really helpful. First Strike with infect will automatically render their Kird Apes useless, and protection from boros colors makes it immune to removal. Can't stop a Tarmogoyf, but it stops everything else.
    Keg sucks vs Zoo. The crusader is interesting..

  10. #1930
    Mega Shark VS. Giant Octopus!
    bowvamp's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2009
    Posts

    344

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    The crusader can only be viewed as creature hate against zoo though, because no other sources of damage in the deck help him to kill your opponent. I'd rather play Wall of Tanglecord, Wall of Junk or Shield Sphere. If your list supports it Meekstone could be useful, although it does nothing to goblins, and allows other creature strategies to amass a swarm and swing for lethal. If you're running white, there's Island Sanctuary, and Ghostly Prison.
    feefox: each card in hand!!!!
    ridicolous
    only fortune

  11. #1931

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    Quote Originally Posted by bowvamp View Post
    The crusader can only be viewed as creature hate against zoo though, because no other sources of damage in the deck help him to kill your opponent. I'd rather play Wall of Tanglecord, Wall of Junk or Shield Sphere. If your list supports it Meekstone could be useful, although it does nothing to goblins, and allows other creature strategies to amass a swarm and swing for lethal. If you're running white, there's Island Sanctuary, and Ghostly Prison.
    Walls can get killed by removal, and the ones you listed can also be destroyed by Qasali Pridemage. Also, the Crusader is more than just an empty blocker, because infect will instantly render Kird Apes and anything with power 2 or less unable to deal damage in the following turns, which can give you plenty of time to start fighting back. Walls will just keep blocking one creature at a time without being able to shut them down.

  12. #1932

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    Hmm, Infest doesn't do anything against Zoo as well as against Merfolk most of the time.

    Damnation and Consuming Vapors are too slow.

    The walls obviously suck in conjunction with Smallpox and Innocent Blood as well as Phyrexian Crusader (with lifelink maybe, but without it's far too slow).

    I think I'll stick with Ratchet Bombs as they are astonishingly decent against 1-drop-Zoo which is the scariest version and also handles other problem cards like Bitterblossom.

  13. #1933
    Mega Shark VS. Giant Octopus!
    bowvamp's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2009
    Posts

    344

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    I wasn't suggesting that you actually use any of the cards I said were equivalent to Crusader. Also, my main point was that Crusader is only going to be a reliably good blocker and is really bad dis-synergy with life loss effects. Death's Shadow costs less mana, kills more stuff, and is synergistic with life loss. Basically, crusader doesn't work very well.
    Also, Sun Droplet works VERY well against burn-heavy zoo.

    Right now I'm using a Semi-Nassif Board with 4 Leylines. What are you all using for gy hate, combo hate, and swarm-creature hate?
    feefox: each card in hand!!!!
    ridicolous
    only fortune

  14. #1934
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    Quote Originally Posted by bowvamp View Post
    What are you all using for gy hate, combo hate, and swarm-creature hate?
    This is my SB as of now:

    2 Spinning Darkness
    3 Perish
    2 Smother
    3 Extirpate
    4 Nihil Spellbomb
    1 Duress (3 maindeck, along with 3 IoK)
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  15. #1935

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    Have you tested Spinning Darkness a lot? Is it worth running it despite its dissynergy with Tombstalker?
    I've thought about it, too, but have recently abandoned this idea.

    My current sideboard looks like:

    4 Leyline
    2 Extirpate
    3 Null Rod
    3 Darkblast
    3 Pithing Needle

    In my testings I've often lost to control decks featuring Snapmages and Cliques.
    It's really hard to stick a Liliana in this matchup and I've lost a bit of faith in my pox deck cause it's such a mess to play against these kinda decks.

  16. #1936

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    Quote Originally Posted by Smea.gol.lum View Post
    Have you tested Spinning Darkness a lot? Is it worth running it despite its dissynergy with Tombstalker?
    I've thought about it, too, but have recently abandoned this idea.

    My current sideboard looks like:

    4 Leyline
    2 Extirpate
    3 Null Rod
    3 Darkblast
    3 Pithing Needle

    In my testings I've often lost to control decks featuring Snapmages and Cliques.
    It's really hard to stick a Liliana in this matchup and I've lost a bit of faith in my pox deck cause it's such a mess to play against these kinda decks.
    How did you lose with Extirpate and Leyline? Which varient of Snapcaster is it?

    I think you are running too many darkblasts in the sb...

    I've tried spinning Darkness for several months, and it's not very impressive. I usually lose it to Pox or I don't have enough black cards to feed it. Pox isn't a really fast deck, so cards don't move around that often...

    When you need Spinning Darkness (in the early game when creatures are still small), you really can't power it out through the alternative cost. I would rather play Contagion as the counters are permanent and makes multiple zoo creatures not viable.. of course this ultimately weakens your pox on them. In the end I cut both for cheap removal like Innocent Blood or Ghastly Demise/Dismember...

  17. #1937

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    I'm losing primarily to the UW versions featuring Plow, Clique, Snapmages and many counterspells.

    I don't think that boarding Leylines in only because of Snapcaster Mage is the right thing to do.

    Another card I'm tinkering with in my sideboard is Engineered Plague:
    It's very good against Elves, decent against Goblins and Merfolk and also helps against many control decks which are often running at least 6 wizards (Snapcaster Mage, Clique).

    Riptide Laboratory on their side is an indicator for us to play Plagues on our side imo.

  18. #1938

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    Quote Originally Posted by Smea.gol.lum View Post
    I'm losing primarily to the UW versions featuring Plow, Clique, Snapmages and many counterspells.

    I don't think that boarding Leylines in only because of Snapcaster Mage is the right thing to do.

    Another card I'm tinkering with in my sideboard is Engineered Plague:
    It's very good against Elves, decent against Goblins and Merfolk and also helps against many control decks which are often running at least 6 wizards (Snapcaster Mage, Clique).

    Riptide Laboratory on their side is an indicator for us to play Plagues on our side imo.
    hehe, sounds like you are just hating on Snapcaster decks. Well, I wouldn't worry about it too much. UW Snapcaster decks have a lot more power than monoB Pox decks. Plus Snapcaster inherently negates some of Pox's abilities. It doesn't seem like a fair match up.

    Maybe we should start playing chalice = ) <Edit: n/m spell snare will hit that...>

  19. #1939
    Mega Shark VS. Giant Octopus!
    bowvamp's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2009
    Posts

    344

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    jin, what makes you say "UW Snapcaster decks have a lot more power than monoB Pox decks."? Actually, don't answer that question.

    What do the BG Pox folks think about Khalni Garden.
    feefox: each card in hand!!!!
    ridicolous
    only fortune

  20. #1940

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    Quote Originally Posted by bowvamp View Post
    jin, what makes you say "UW Snapcaster decks have a lot more power than monoB Pox decks."? Actually, don't answer that question.

    What do the BG Pox folks think about Khalni Garden.
    LOL.. I guess I won't. But regarding the land, what do you mean? What purpose does it serve besides help your creatures live...?

    CIPT is terrible, so there better be a good reason for the need of a 0/1 token..

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)