Page 65 of 428 FirstFirst ... 155561626364656667686975115165 ... LastLast
Results 1,281 to 1,300 of 8554

Thread: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

  1. #1281
    itsJulian.com - Legacy Videos
    Julian23's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Location

    Munich / Germany
    Posts

    3,141

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Flusterstorm is way better against combo decks that run countermagic of their own like Hive Mind or Reanimator. Spell Pierce is more flexible, hitting a lot of random stuff like Stax, Enchantress and Planeswalkers.
    The seven cardinal sins of Legacy:
    1. Discuss the unbanning of Land Tax Earthcraft.
    2. Argue that banning Force of Will would make the format healthier.
    3. Play Brainstorm without Fetchlands.
    4. Stifle Standstill.
    5. Think that Gaea's Blessing will make you Solidarity-proof.
    6. Pass priority after playing Infernal Tutor.
    7. Fail to playtest against Nourishing Lich (coZ iT wIlL gEt U!).

  2. #1282
    Monkey Blast
    UnsungHero's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2011
    Location

    Champaign, IL
    Posts

    170

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Speaking of counters, Would Rebuff the Wicked be any use in this deck? Is running counters to protect our permanents be of good use? No splash required.

    Rebuff the Wicked
    W
    Instant
    Counter target spell that targets a permanent you control.

  3. #1283

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by UnsungHero View Post
    Speaking of counters, Would Rebuff the Wicked be any use in this deck? Is running counters to protect our permanents be of good use? No splash required.

    Rebuff the Wicked
    W
    Instant
    Counter target spell that targets a permanent you control.
    Isn't that more or less Mother of Runes?

  4. #1284
    itsJulian.com - Legacy Videos
    Julian23's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Location

    Munich / Germany
    Posts

    3,141

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by randomly.anonymous View Post
    Isn't that more or less Mother of Runes?
    Basically, it's Mother of Runes + Scryb Ranger. This deck doesn't want cards that are bad on their own; no space for such an instant.
    The seven cardinal sins of Legacy:
    1. Discuss the unbanning of Land Tax Earthcraft.
    2. Argue that banning Force of Will would make the format healthier.
    3. Play Brainstorm without Fetchlands.
    4. Stifle Standstill.
    5. Think that Gaea's Blessing will make you Solidarity-proof.
    6. Pass priority after playing Infernal Tutor.
    7. Fail to playtest against Nourishing Lich (coZ iT wIlL gEt U!).

  5. #1285
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    I like Spell Pierce better than Flusterstorm due to it being able to hit Artifacts (Ensnaring Bridge), Enchantments (aka Enchantress), and Planeswalkers. Flusterstorm helps the combo matchup, but taxing with Pierce is just as effective if used properly.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  6. #1286
    Member
    KobeBryan's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2011
    Location

    Arcadia, CA
    Posts

    2,232

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by rukcus View Post
    I like Spell Pierce better than Flusterstorm due to it being able to hit Artifacts (Ensnaring Bridge), Enchantments (aka Enchantress), and Planeswalkers. Flusterstorm helps the combo matchup, but taxing with Pierce is just as effective if used properly.
    hey rukcus.. what was your decklist for this mtgdeals tournament?

  7. #1287
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    The same one that I played from KW, which is 73/75 the same as I played at Vegas.

    That is to say, only SB changes are happening at this point.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  8. #1288
    Member
    KobeBryan's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2011
    Location

    Arcadia, CA
    Posts

    2,232

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by rukcus View Post
    The same one that I played from KW, which is 73/75 the same as I played at Vegas.

    That is to say, only SB changes are happening at this point.
    then its same to say your going to roll with this for scg LA

  9. #1289
    itsJulian.com - Legacy Videos
    Julian23's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Location

    Munich / Germany
    Posts

    3,141

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    I may have already mentioned this, but I really think 3 Path to Exile in the sideboard are a very efficient way to combat RUG Delver. Also, having the 2nd Scryb Ranger helps a lot here.
    The seven cardinal sins of Legacy:
    1. Discuss the unbanning of Land Tax Earthcraft.
    2. Argue that banning Force of Will would make the format healthier.
    3. Play Brainstorm without Fetchlands.
    4. Stifle Standstill.
    5. Think that Gaea's Blessing will make you Solidarity-proof.
    6. Pass priority after playing Infernal Tutor.
    7. Fail to playtest against Nourishing Lich (coZ iT wIlL gEt U!).

  10. #1290
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Julian23 View Post
    I may have already mentioned this, but I really think 3 Path to Exile in the sideboard are a very efficient way to combat RUG Delver. Also, having the 2nd Scryb Ranger helps a lot here.
    I'm currently up to 2 Path to Exile, and already running the 2nd Scryb Ranger. Man, that latter guy helps out on land-light draws so much. Turn 2 - Ranger + another 2 drop (like SFM). Shit is broken!
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  11. #1291
    I like Tacos.
    dahcmai's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2006
    Location

    Traverse City, MI
    Posts

    2,202

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    I totally agree on the Ranger. It helped a lot more once I realized the little guy actually has a useful protection too. lol

  12. #1292
    Member
    The Colonel's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2011
    Location

    A little place called None of Your Damn Business
    Posts

    10

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Hey guys

    I'm brand new to this deck. I actually have the cards on order as I type this. Deck looks like a blast to pilot, I get how it works and how it wins but I have a few questions about the mana base:

    What should your turns 1 and 2 look like (game 1 not knowing what your playing against, the safest bet)? They seem to be super important for this deck. How often do you burn a Zenith for Arbor? Nobel H? Bird of Paradise? The reason I ask is because the HUGE question mark seems to be the incredible volitility of the mana base. You have to go into every game assuming to see wasteland.. HAVE to. How often do you get screwed by wasteland? Also it seems like blood moon wrecks this deck, is that true? Do you want to fetch out the single plains or single forest every time as your first fetched land? How many mana producing cards should a keepable opening hand look like (not counting Zenith as a searcher for a mana criter)?

    Blood moon: I play it in my other two decks and I've seen it win the game by itself time and time again. What do you do with this deck about blood moon? Especially with only running an average of two basics.


    Thanks for the advice, I appreciate it.

  13. #1293
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by The Colonel View Post
    What should your turns 1 and 2 look like (game 1 not knowing what your playing against, the safest bet)?

    How often do you burn a Zenith for Arbor? Nobel H? Bird of Paradise?

    How often do you get screwed by wasteland? Also it seems like blood moon wrecks this deck, is that true? Do you want to fetch out the single plains or single forest every time as your first fetched land? How many mana producing cards should a keepable opening hand look like (not counting Zenith as a searcher for a mana criter)?

    What do you do with this deck about blood moon? Especially with only running an average of two basics.

    Thanks for the advice, I appreciate it.
    Against an unknown opponent, a hand with acceleration (GSZ, mana dorks), business (SFM, KotR, Wasteland), and removal (STP) or a playable combination of those is good. The deck operates best when it can generate 3-4 mana every turn and still continue to apply pressure. Hands without acceleration should be on a lower curve (lots of 2 drops) with aggressive creatures (Pridemage, Ooze) and possibly KotR to round out. Hands without much business but lots of mana can be made playable with GSZ for 2, 3 or 4 (depending on the matchup). I've often GSZ for a Noble Hierarch on turn 2 after playing one on turn 1 - but usually when I have the luxury of multiple GSZ in hand and a land-light hand.

    Key point: try to get to 3-4 mana ASAP.

    In an unknown matchup, I always fetch basics right away. They are the bread and butter of this deck. Against decks that don't disrupt manabases (Wasteland, Moons) find your duals whilynily, they won't impact your development.

    Key point: have paranoia of Wasteland.

    3 lands is the sweet spot for an opening hand. On principle, I don't play non-mana producing lands. I've been hosed a few times with Gaea's Cradle, but I've won more games using it to equip or power out GSZ more. I'd prefer to see more fetchlands in my hand than not, but it depends on how fast you need to develop the board.

    Key point: Maze of Ith is cute, but rarely needed.

    Blood Moon turn 1 is almost always scoopable. Equipment + Dryad Arbor makes it able to play through, but unlikely.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  14. #1294

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    What did you cut for your 2nd Path?

  15. #1295
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Philipp2293 View Post
    What did you cut for your 2nd Path?
    Elspeth. There's no dedicated control in my local metagame right now. There is, however, entirely too much Reanimator. I might try out Weathered Wayfarer to bring in. It would be quite funny to make that play happen :D
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  16. #1296
    Member
    bakofried's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2009
    Location

    Bakersfield, Ca
    Posts

    744

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    I'm wondering if anyone has done any dedicated testing of Garruk Relentless in Elspeth's slots; he seems to have more of an impact on the mirror while offering strong game against (non-red) control decks.

    Julian, if you have any advice to offer from overseas to the general forum, I'd thank you for it. And thank you for the informative PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by ktkenshinx View Post
    The Reserved List is a) not legally binding, b) antiquated, c) broken, and d) preventative of maximum game enjoyment. Wizards will remove as many cards from that list as possible to increase the fun of their game. Using market research, they can find a balance between printing enough cards to lower a price from $40 to $15-$20, and not utterly ruining their value. This will be both an economically feasible AND sensible move.
    -ktkenshinx-

  17. #1297
    Site Contributor
    Raystar's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2009
    Location

    London, UK
    Posts

    392

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by rukcus View Post
    Blood Moon turn 1 is almost always scoopable. Equipment + Dryad Arbor makes it able to play through, but unlikely.
    Hey ruckus, I kind of disagree here. I have never lost a game to blood moon, I generally fetch for basic green and that is more enough to get the deck going: you just need a mana dork and you are set (GSZ helps immensely here). Sure, if you are on the draw and they play is a mess but that's not exactly common...

    I'm so sure about that that I was thinking of putting Blood Moon in SB against RUG...

    I'm really not worried about BM, maybe it's because I play GWr but it really doesn't have an effect on the deck.
    Last edited by Raystar; 12-20-2011 at 05:15 AM. Reason: missing part....

  18. #1298

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by rukcus View Post
    The same one that I played from KW, which is 73/75 the same as I played at Vegas.

    That is to say, only SB changes are happening at this point.
    Hi, is there any link where I could find that list? Or can you post it here?

  19. #1299
    Site Contributor
    Esper3k's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2008
    Location

    Houston, TX
    Posts

    2,057

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Yeah I haven't had much difficulties with Blood Moon or Wasteland myself either (I play the GW version).

    Once you get out a basic Forest, you have plenty of ways (Hierarch, GSZ for Hierarch) to generate white mana.

  20. #1300

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Regarding first turn plays:
    Especially since Mental Misstep was banned, it has become easier to cast Noble Hierarch turn 1. I most often fetch for forest, as the deck is not nearly as dependent on a dual as other decks. I actually only tend to fetch for duals when I am 100% sure my opponent is not running Wastelands.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)