Page 49 of 174 FirstFirst ... 394546474849505152535999149 ... LastLast
Results 961 to 980 of 3476

Thread: [Deck] TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

  1. #961
    shallow
    .dk's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2010
    Location

    denver, co
    Posts

    1,129

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    So, with the M14 rule changes - it's possible that a change to the manabase is in order to take advantage of the insanity that is Mox Opal. Just a thought anyway... I can't see a good reason why any storm deck wouldn't want those now if they can achieve metalcraft.
    Find me on Twitter: @beanaman

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    His graveyard was a fucking encyclopedia of countermagic.

  2. #962

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    That was my initial thought as well. Mox Opal just got a whole lot better in any deck that can support it. Also, -1 Duress, +1 Probe?

  3. #963
    shallow
    .dk's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2010
    Location

    denver, co
    Posts

    1,129

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    Quote Originally Posted by DredgingLoam View Post
    That was my initial thought as well. Mox Opal just got a whole lot better in any deck that can support it. Also, -1 Duress, +1 Probe?
    maybe - that was my first thought. test it and see!
    Find me on Twitter: @beanaman

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    His graveyard was a fucking encyclopedia of countermagic.

  4. #964
    Undefeated hair
    phazonmutant's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2012
    Location

    Seattle, WA
    Posts

    1,152

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    Quote Originally Posted by .dk View Post
    So, with the M14 rule changes - it's possible that a change to the manabase is in order to take advantage of the insanity that is Mox Opal. Just a thought anyway... I can't see a good reason why any storm deck wouldn't want those now if they can achieve metalcraft.
    I don't see Mox Opal in this deck as it's currently built. It's much more conditional than Chrome Mox is, and we're not exactly excited about Chrome Mox to begin with. Of course there could be a new build that abuses it, maybe more like walker's original LED build. So working off that thought, how about this as a sketch of a build that tries to abuse infinite Lotus Petal effects?

    4 Lion's Eye Diamond
    4 Lotus Petal
    4 Mox Opal
    4 Dark Ritual
    4 Shallow Grave
    4 Infernal Tutor
    4 Entomb
    4 Griselbrand
    4 Brainstorm
    4 Ponder
    1 Children of Korlis
    1 Emrakul, the Aeons Torn
    1 Tendrils of Agony
    3 Silence
    4 Thoughtseize
    4 Polluted Delta
    1 Marsh Flats
    1 Swamp
    2 Underground Sea
    1 Tundra
    1 Scrubland

    It seems pretty sketchy, but could be powerful. The natural Tendrils plan is much more legitimate with this build too.
    Languages and dates for every set. For all you true pimps.

  5. #965
    hai 2 u
    zulander's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Location

    SoCal - Anaheim
    Posts

    1,688

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    Wait, M14 is next year right? Also I don't know what the rule change is, where can I read it at?
    #mtgfinance follow on twitter: @mtgStaples


    Quote Originally Posted by OBFREELY
    You should all immediately fire emails at the DCI requesting the banning of Tarmogoyf and Golgari Grave-Troll.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheInfamousBearAssassin View Post
    I'm pretty sure I'm not compelled to address your non-argument based simply on the fact that you're obviously borderline retarded.
    Team Brown & Team Unicorn. Does that make me a Brown Unicorn?

  6. #966
    Site Contributor
    ScatmanX's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2008
    Posts

    761

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    Quote Originally Posted by zulander View Post
    Wait, M14 is next year right? Also I don't know what the rule change is, where can I read it at?
    http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazin...feature%2F248e
    Discussion in the Forum
    Super Bizarros Team. Beating everything with small green dudes and big waves.

  7. #967
    shallow
    .dk's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2010
    Location

    denver, co
    Posts

    1,129

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    Quote Originally Posted by phazonmuant View Post
    I don't see Mox Opal in this deck as it's currently built. It's much more conditional than Chrome Mox is, and we're not exactly excited about Chrome Mox to begin with. Of course there could be a new build that abuses it, maybe more like walker's original LED build. So working off that thought, how about this as a sketch of a build that tries to abuse infinite Lotus Petal effects?

    4 Lion's Eye Diamond
    4 Lotus Petal
    4 Mox Opal
    4 Dark Ritual
    4 Shallow Grave
    4 Infernal Tutor
    4 Entomb
    4 Griselbrand
    4 Brainstorm
    4 Ponder
    1 Children of Korlis
    1 Emrakul, the Aeons Torn
    1 Tendrils of Agony
    3 Silence
    4 Thoughtseize
    4 Polluted Delta
    1 Marsh Flats
    1 Swamp
    2 Underground Sea
    1 Tundra
    1 Scrubland

    It seems pretty sketchy, but could be powerful. The natural Tendrils plan is much more legitimate with this build too.
    Looks... weird. Maybe you want some number of Tops to help achieve Metalcraft? Although Top is really too slow for what this deck wants to do.
    Find me on Twitter: @beanaman

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    His graveyard was a fucking encyclopedia of countermagic.

  8. #968
    Undefeated hair
    phazonmutant's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2012
    Location

    Seattle, WA
    Posts

    1,152

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    Quote Originally Posted by .dk View Post
    Looks... weird. Maybe you want some number of Tops to help achieve Metalcraft? Although Top is really too slow for what this deck wants to do.
    Ok. I actually goldfished that list for some games. It's real bad. Like. Real bad. Mox Opal doesn't belong in this deck, the LED build is still inconsistent.
    Languages and dates for every set. For all you true pimps.

  9. #969
    Foreign Black Border
    Lord_Mcdonalds's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2012
    Location

    Houston, Texas
    Posts

    753

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    So I was playtesting against RUG and was wondering

    a) If a RUG player stifles the Chrome Mox trigger, is it safe to assume they do not have daze?

    b) I probed the RUG player, he reveals FoW, Stifle and Spell Snare, is it correct to cabal therapy the Snare

    c) is it correct to board out thoughtseize/discard in favor of Silence?
    Quote Originally Posted by iatee View Post
    I still have a strong suspicion that if 'Thalia, Heretic Cathar' had been named 'Frank, Heretic Cathar', people would be a lot more skeptical of it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Goin Aggro View Post
    Ugh, there he goes again, talking about the girlfriend. We get it dude.

  10. #970
    shallow
    .dk's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2010
    Location

    denver, co
    Posts

    1,129

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord_Mcdonalds View Post
    So I was playtesting against RUG and was wondering

    a) If a RUG player stifles the Chrome Mox trigger, is it safe to assume they do not have daze?

    b) I probed the RUG player, he reveals FoW, Stifle and Spell Snare, is it correct to cabal therapy the Snare

    c) is it correct to board out thoughtseize/discard in favor of Silence?
    i'll bite.

    a - wouldn't necessarily say it's "safe" to assume that. depends on the board state. Stifle is there as a mana denial source - that works on either fetchlands or chrome mox triggers. Either seems appropriate, although a fetchland is obviously better. Again though, it depends on the board state. They could be wanting to cut you off of mana from Chrome Mox so that you CAN'T play around Daze...

    b - yes, I would usually take the Spell Snare. If you are making them Force your plays, then they are losing more cards. Spell Snare is pretty insane against this deck in general. Exceptions could be if you know that you need to fetch to win now, and they have a Blue open for Stifle or something like that.

    c - I wouldn't board out Thoughtsieze for Silence. It's a combo piece. Some of this depends on how many Griselbrands you are running, but I would usually cut something like Gitaxian Probe or an extra Chrome Mox or something before discard.
    Find me on Twitter: @beanaman

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    His graveyard was a fucking encyclopedia of countermagic.

  11. #971
    Foreign Black Border
    Lord_Mcdonalds's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2012
    Location

    Houston, Texas
    Posts

    753

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    Quote Originally Posted by .dk View Post
    a - wouldn't necessarily say it's "safe" to assume that. depends on the board state. Stifle is there as a mana denial source - that works on either fetchlands or chrome mox triggers. Either seems appropriate, although a fetchland is obviously better. Again though, it depends on the board state. They could be wanting to cut you off of mana from Chrome Mox so that you CAN'T play around Daze...
    If I remember right, the board state was simply that I had a fetch active and he had one land in play.

    As for the board plan, would you do:
    -1 Chrome Mox
    -1 Reanimate
    -1 Child
    +3 Silence (I don't run any mainboard, my list is similar to koby's, so I ran 1 mainboard, never really used it and sent it to the board for a third thoughtseize, my last post didn't reflect that as I forgot I cut it, so it should say -1 Reanimate +3 Silence, in addition to the -2 Thoughtsieze)

    I don't feel confidant cutting probe as it gives information and interacts favorably with Cabal Therapy, and helps during the combo turn a little bit, although the two life tends to add up against RUG fairly quick.
    Quote Originally Posted by iatee View Post
    I still have a strong suspicion that if 'Thalia, Heretic Cathar' had been named 'Frank, Heretic Cathar', people would be a lot more skeptical of it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Goin Aggro View Post
    Ugh, there he goes again, talking about the girlfriend. We get it dude.

  12. #972
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    It's fairly safe to cut 2 Probes in matchups against Tempo, as the life loss is more relevant than the information you gain.
    Thoughtseize provides the same information and eats the same life, but also removes one of their spells which is important.

    Now against Delver for instance, as long as they don't have a threat out; you can take as much time as you need to setup. The hardest games against Delver are in which they resolve Delver and/or Goyf and start countering the setup spells like Entomb. You don't have the luxury of waiting for a good time to cast them; you just have to go for it. Sometimes, it means walking into an unfortunate Daze.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  13. #973

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    I haven't played Magic for years since they split the format away from Vintage's restricted list but I just wanted to say this is the most magnificent deck I've ever seen. I used to play Angry Ghoul Reanimator when I last played MTG competitively in 2004 and this deck is the first deck in that amount of time that looks just as fun IMO.

    I'm proxying this deck and testing it out and I was wondering why the OP says that Lim-Dul's Vault has been found to be redundant. It seems that sometimes the deck has trouble pitching a Griselbrand in the graveyard if you're only running 2 Grizzles since you need either an Entomb or a discard spell + Griselbrand in your hand. Brainstorm/Ponder only digs so far but Lim-Dul's is basically a 2 mana Vampiric Tutor (is that considered too slow?)

    Also, is there a strong case for Pact of Negation in this deck? I haven't really had the combo fizz on me much so it seems like it would be okay to run one of these just as insurance.

  14. #974
    shallow
    .dk's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2010
    Location

    denver, co
    Posts

    1,129

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    Quote Originally Posted by roflwaffles View Post
    I haven't played Magic for years since they split the format away from Vintage's restricted list but I just wanted to say this is the most magnificent deck I've ever seen. I used to play Angry Ghoul Reanimator when I last played MTG competitively in 2004 and this deck is the first deck in that amount of time that looks just as fun IMO.

    I'm proxying this deck and testing it out and I was wondering why the OP says that Lim-Dul's Vault has been found to be redundant. It seems that sometimes the deck has trouble pitching a Griselbrand in the graveyard if you're only running 2 Grizzles since you need either an Entomb or a discard spell + Griselbrand in your hand. Brainstorm/Ponder only digs so far but Lim-Dul's is basically a 2 mana Vampiric Tutor (is that considered too slow?)

    Also, is there a strong case for Pact of Negation in this deck? I haven't really had the combo fizz on me much so it seems like it would be okay to run one of these just as insurance.
    Yeah, I think that line on the OP is a bit outdated. We had tried LDV a long long time ago with a suboptimal build (pre-children) and it didn't seem to work that great. If you're running a 2 Griselbrand build and are a bit more all-in on Entomb, then LDV makes a lot of sense.

    I think you can make a good case for a 1 of Pact main, depending on your meta. I personally prefer Silence as it is a lot better in the combo mirror (and it seems every event I play this deck in is riddled with combo), but if you're in a very permission heavy meta, then Pact could be just fine. I kind of view that slot (as well as some of the sideboard slots) as very meta dependent.
    Find me on Twitter: @beanaman

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    His graveyard was a fucking encyclopedia of countermagic.

  15. #975

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    I am going to second LDV being awesome in this deck. I run two of them in the main, and they also help for finding necessary SB cards.

  16. #976
    shallow
    .dk's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2010
    Location

    denver, co
    Posts

    1,129

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    Quote Originally Posted by cogitoergosum View Post
    I am going to second LDV being awesome in this deck. I run two of them in the main, and they also help for finding necessary SB cards.
    If you're at 2 Griselbrand, I agree. I've been back playing around with 3-4 Griselbrand + Careful Study, and it's definitely not needed (nor is there room) in those builds
    Find me on Twitter: @beanaman

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    His graveyard was a fucking encyclopedia of countermagic.

  17. #977

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    Yeah the list I'm currently testing is

    Instant (22)
    4x Brainstorm
    4x Dark Ritual
    4x Entomb
    3x Goryo's Vengeance
    2x Lim-Dul's Vault
    4x Shallow Grave
    1x Silence

    Sorcery (14)
    4x Cabal Therapy
    2x Gitaxian Probe
    4x Ponder
    1x Reanimate
    1x Tendrils of Agony
    2x Thoughtseize

    Creature (5)
    2x Children of Korlis
    1x Emrakul, the Aeons Torn
    2x Griselbrand

    Land (13)
    4x Marsh Flats
    4x Polluted Delta
    1x Scrubland
    1x Swamp
    1x Tundra
    2x Underground Sea

    Artifact (6)
    2x Chrome Mox
    4x Lotus Petal

    It's quite explosive but I do feel the hurdles it has to climb when there isn't an Entomb in hand nor a Therapy/Thoughtseize + Grisel in hand. I'm also about to test a build with Careful Studies and a full set of Griselbrands

    (+2 Griselbrand, +4 Careful Study, -2 Gitaxian Probe, -1 Cabal Therapy, -1 Chrome Mox, -2 Lim-Dul's Vault)

    What is Gitaxian Probe's role in this deck? Is it just to look at the opponent's hand before you combo out or to augment Cabal Therapy? It can't be for Storm count since whenever I Tendrils of Agony, it's doing far more than 20 life loss to the opponent. I just felt its the weakest card in the OP build right now but I could be wrong.

    Also if you have a hand that's like: land, Shallow Grave, Entomb, Reanimate, land, Petal. Shallow Grave, what would you do? Go straight for a turn 1 Griselbrand that will stay past turn 1 and ride out a standard reanimator strategy or wait to go off on turn 2?
    Last edited by roflwaffles; 06-01-2013 at 05:29 AM.

  18. #978
    Undefeated hair
    phazonmutant's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2012
    Location

    Seattle, WA
    Posts

    1,152

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    Quote Originally Posted by roflwaffles View Post
    What is Gitaxian Probe's role in this deck? Is it just to look at the opponent's hand before you combo out or to augment Cabal Therapy? It can't be for Storm count since whenever I Tendrils of Agony, it's doing far more than 20 life loss to the opponent. I just felt its the weakest card in the OP build right now but I could be wrong.
    I was going to make a snarky reply to just look back a couple of pages, but then I actually tried to find the original discussion on Probe (in the modern build) and discovered it was 28 pages ago.

    Here's the post where I introduce the idea (again): http://www.mtgthesource.com/forums/s...l=1#post706939
    It was talked about by me and people before me all through the history of the deck, but this was the first build with it since a lot of the refining work.

    Basically, it's great at just digging deeper for lands, spells, etc, and the information is very important.
    Languages and dates for every set. For all you true pimps.

  19. #979
    shallow
    .dk's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2010
    Location

    denver, co
    Posts

    1,129

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    Quote Originally Posted by roflwaffles View Post
    What is Gitaxian Probe's role in this deck? Is it just to look at the opponent's hand before you combo out or to augment Cabal Therapy? It can't be for Storm count since whenever I Tendrils of Agony, it's doing far more than 20 life loss to the opponent. I just felt its the weakest card in the OP build right now but I could be wrong.

    Also if you have a hand that's like: land, Shallow Grave, Entomb, Reanimate, land, Petal. Shallow Grave, what would you do? Go straight for a turn 1 Griselbrand that will stay past turn 1 and ride out a standard reanimator strategy or wait to go off on turn 2?
    The biggest benefit to Probe is information for 0 mana. Card draw is gravy, and storm count is... well usually worthless. If you're going to cut probes though, I would highly recommend adding back at least 1 land to run 14.

    Given that hand, I would go for T1 reanimate. If it sticks, you can still attack, draw, and combo out T2. If the reanimate gets countered (likely by a Force), then you can just Shallow Grave T2. If Entomb gets countered... you're in a world of hurt. :)
    Find me on Twitter: @beanaman

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    His graveyard was a fucking encyclopedia of countermagic.

  20. #980

    Re: TinFins 3: Return of the Onion Burst

    I really don't like careful study in the deck, it is just too hard to hit grisel with only 3-4 of him. I have been running 3 grisel, to increase self-discard, and 2 LDV main, to act as entomb 5-6. This build has had the best feel to me of anything I have played so far. For build reference, I run 13 lands, no silence main, and 3 gitaxian probe (sometimes 4 with a 61 card deck).

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)