Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 220

Thread: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

  1. #61
    Foreign Black Border
    Lord_Mcdonalds's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2012
    Location

    Houston, Texas
    Posts

    753

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by Phoenix Ignition View Post
    Okay how about the top 8 from the pro tour, which features UWr control alongside UR storm? This was 2 weeks ago. http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazin...14/top_8_decks

    Also to be found there are affinity, pod, splinter twin (2 different versions, one with beatdown goyfs and the other with only combo) and a blue/red control deck that is pretty different than the UWr deck.
    To the extent this is true, I have no idea, but I have been told the meta game at pro tours are a bit different than normal

    That being said, there is still brewing to be done, and there probably is a good Bitterblossom/Wild Nacatl deck that hasn't been made yet, if halfway through modern season we are seeing nothing but Pod/Affinity/UWR, then we can discuss stale boring meta games.
    Quote Originally Posted by iatee View Post
    I still have a strong suspicion that if 'Thalia, Heretic Cathar' had been named 'Frank, Heretic Cathar', people would be a lot more skeptical of it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Goin Aggro View Post
    Ugh, there he goes again, talking about the girlfriend. We get it dude.

  2. #62

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by Grand Superior View Post
    Not to diminish the Modern format, but I firmly believe that much of GP Richmond's success comes from the perfect storm of the event occurring just weeks after a Modern Pro Tour and a few months before Modern season, the event being at a reasonably accessible east coast location, the format having near unprecedented support from Wizards, and StarCityGames promoting, facilitating, and hosting the event. Of course the popularity of the Modern format is responsible too, but there are other factors at play here. Consider the fact that Legacy, despite having next to zero support from Wizards (and hell, infecting the format with the disease that is True-Name Nemesis), was able to have 1,700 players at GP Washington DC and 1,580 people at GP Paris. I personally think that Legacy's numbers are more impressive, all things considered.

    Having said that, I am concerned that this will only result in Wizards realizing that their, for lack of better term, "babying" of the Modern format is working and will only increase the already huge support for the format and basically reduce Eternal format support to nothing. I'm scared of the day that we no longer have Legacy Grand Prix events. That's what bugs me most about the Modern format. I'm perfectly okay with Modern existing and it thriving, but keep Legacy alive and let it coexist with Modern. Unfortunately, Modern's success will only make this less and less likely.

    A little off topic, but what surprised me about watching GP Richmond's coverage was just how combo-tastic the Modern format is. It certainly seems like far more games in Modern end via a combo kill (whether it be Grapeshot, mountains+Valakut, or infinite creatures, among other things) than in Legacy, even if that flies in the face of what one would expect. If people labouring under the misconception that Legacy is where every game is a combo-fest and believe that Modern is any different, then they're in for quite a rude awakening.
    And the most successful modern decks have a strong aggro backup plan since their combos are creature-tastic.
    “There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle".
    - Albert Einstein

  3. #63

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord_Mcdonalds View Post
    To the extent this is true, I have no idea, but I have been told the meta game at pro tours are a bit different than normal

    That being said, there is still brewing to be done, and there probably is a good Bitterblossom/Wild Nacatl deck that hasn't been made yet, if halfway through modern season we are seeing nothing but Pod/Affinity/UWR, then we can discuss stale boring meta games.
    Actually, a deck with Bitterblossom did make it into the Top 16 of the Grand Prix. You can see it here.

  4. #64
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,533

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    I think the situation we're in does actually mirror the beginning of the end for Vintage in some ways - decks are getting more and more expensive and supply of essential staples is limited. Sure, it isn't the P9, but the duals are and remain the bottleneck of the format, along with some other RL staples. E.g. Underground Sea hovers around 220$ for now (SCG is 250$ and out of stock) and Polluted Delta is 105$.

    And it certainly doesn't help that the format Wizards dumps more and more dumb blue shit into format, forcing more and more people into blue, thus further increasing demand for blue staples and prices for those, making the format more and more expensive.

    Once SCG decides to drop Legacy support, we're going to enter dark times.

  5. #65
    Cabal Therapist
    TheArchitect's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2010
    Location

    Colchester, VT
    Posts

    600

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by JPoJohnson View Post
    And the most successful modern decks have a strong aggro backup plan since their combos are creature-tastic.
    That's the thing. Modern decks are having more combos in them but really UR storm, Griselbraned/fury of the horde and ad nauseum are the only real "true combo decks" I've seen in modern. Anything with pod or twin just look like creature based mid range decks with a combo thrown in them. A lot of the time I imagine they are just beating down with cliques, exarchs or kitchen finks while they sling lightning bolts or decays at problem cards. And Scapeshift is no more a combo deck that UWr Miracles is; its a control deck that wins with one big card (entreat/scapeshift) or it just beats with snapcasters.

  6. #66

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    Oh please....

    If you look at the Top 16 of Richmond, where're the planeswalkers? 2 out of top 16 decks run that card type. If you look at the 443 decks that made day 2, only WUR Control 4% + Jund 5% + Obliterator Rock 4% + GB Rock 3% + (3+2)/2 = 2.5% of Zoo decks + 3% of Tron + 1% of WB token run planeswalkers, that's 22.5%.

    Legacy gets to use Koth of the Hammer for God's sake, how cool is that? If Modern's really gonna become the format people go for, it has a long road ahead.

  7. #67
    Greatness awaits!
    Lemnear's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2010
    Location

    Berlin, Germany
    Posts

    6,997

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by Phoenix Ignition View Post
    Okay how about the top 8 from the pro tour, which features UWr control alongside UR storm? This was 2 weeks ago. http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazin...14/top_8_decks

    Also to be found there are affinity, pod, splinter twin (2 different versions, one with beatdown goyfs and the other with only combo) and a blue/red control deck that is pretty different than the UWr deck.
    You missed my point. There was stated, that Modern offers MULTIPLES of DIFFERENT archetypes for Combo AND Control but all I see for months is Twin/Kiki, UWR burn.dec and a few Pyromancers Ascension that qualify for both mentioned strategies. That's not MULTIPLES if you ask me. That's bold advertising. Nothing more
    www.theepicstorm.com - Your Source for The Epic Storm - Articles, Reports, Decktech and more!

    Join us at Facebook!

    Quote Originally Posted by Echelon View Post
    Lemnear sounds harsh at times, but he means well. Or to destroy, but that's when he starts rapping.

    Architect by day, rapstar by night. He's pretty much the German Hannah Montana. Sometimes he even comes in like a wrecking ball.

  8. #68
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,533

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by twndomn View Post
    Oh please....

    If you look at the Top 16 of Richmond, where're the planeswalkers? 2 out of top 16 decks run that card type. If you look at the 443 decks that made day 2, only WUR Control 4% + Jund 5% + Obliterator Rock 4% + GB Rock 3% + (3+2)/2 = 2.5% of Zoo decks + 3% of Tron + 1% of WB token run planeswalkers, that's 22.5%.

    Legacy gets to use Koth of the Hammer for God's sake, how cool is that? If Modern's really gonna become the format people go for, it has a long road ahead.
    I fail to see how Planeswalker usage is an indicator for a good/healthy format. With that logic, Standard would be the best format ever since it's a massive Planeswalker circlejerk.

  9. #69

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by TheArchitect View Post
    That's the thing. Modern decks are having more combos in them but really UR storm, Griselbraned/fury of the horde and ad nauseum are the only real "true combo decks" I've seen in modern. Anything with pod or twin just look like creature based mid range decks with a combo thrown in them. A lot of the time I imagine they are just beating down with cliques, exarchs or kitchen finks while they sling lightning bolts or decays at problem cards.
    Splinter Twin used to be more of a combo deck in that it focused on just getting the combo together, but it's moved more towards a tempo strategy. The purpose of the deck is less about assembling the combo and more about threatening the combo, forcing your opponent to choose between trying to hold back their cards to stop in case you combo off or dealing with the creatures that attacking you right now.

    And Scapeshift is no more a combo deck that UWr Miracles is; its a control deck that wins with one big card (entreat/scapeshift) or it just beats with snapcasters.
    Scapeshift is not a control deck. A control deck takes control of the game, and once it's done that, hits the opponent with something like Entreat the Angels or a Jace the Mind Sculptor to seal the deal. Scapeshift just wants to hold off the opponent for long enough to get its 8 lands together (or if it's on the Prismatic Omen plan, 6 lands) and cast Scapeshift . It doesn't care about taking control of the game; it just wants to survive long enough to cast its combo card and win.

  10. #70

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by Barook View Post

    Once SCG decides to drop Legacy support, we're going to enter dark times.
    I really think that the only thing that will both save the relative format we know as Legacy from purgatory and also rescue Modern from its blandness will be a gradual (or rapid, who knows) reprinting of non reserve list stuff. Eventually resulting in a format called "modern" or if WOTC gets some balls, they scrap "modern" and call it Legacy minus the reserve list. Then they support the hell out of it as it eventually solves two huge problems. Couple this with the unbanning of all the goodies on the "modern" ban list as well and you have a format that we can play into our 70's

    Now everyone loses out on their duals, but we get all of the things that make Legacy what it really is; Karakas, Wasteland, Force of Will, Brainstorm, Hymn to Tourach, Show and Tell, Stifle, ONS fetches, all of the goblins that make goblins a deck and a bunch of other stuff. Basically close to overextended.

    Sure we might lose Storm decks, Dredge, decks like MUD and Elves would take a hit, Moat, Tabernacle, High Tide etc.

    I'm pretty sure 90% of legacy players would play this format initially, and eventually 95% would come around. probably 80% of modern players would play it, with another 10% coming around (if they get the reprint machines humming), and wizards could turn "Legacy Masters" into a once a year set, reprinting stuff, and using 20% ish of the set to introduce "new Legacy/modern" cards to help nudge the metagame (rather than ban hammering), thus printing themselves money, legally.

    This is not a solution, it is a compromise , but it is what is best for the game, long-term.

  11. #71

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    Modern will kill Legacy. It's just a matter of time. This GP will be one of the steps to the end.

  12. #72
    Member

    Join Date

    Jan 2005
    Location

    I actually live in actual Chicago
    Posts

    680

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by sloppyjoe View Post
    This is not a solution, it is a compromise , but it is what is best for the game, long-term.
    The best thing for the game, long-term, is for Hasbro to hire a sufficiently creative team of lawyers and cast Mulligan targeting the reserve list.

  13. #73
    Site Contributor
    Scott's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2013
    Location

    Virginia
    Posts

    659

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by testing32 View Post
    Modern will kill Legacy. It's just a matter of time. This GP will be one of the steps to the end.
    There will always, always be lots of people who want to play a competitive format that uses cards from Magic's entire history.

  14. #74
    Foreign Black Border
    Lord_Mcdonalds's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2012
    Location

    Houston, Texas
    Posts

    753

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Seth View Post
    Actually, a deck with Bitterblossom did make it into the Top 16 of the Grand Prix. You can see it here.
    I stand by my statement
    Quote Originally Posted by iatee View Post
    I still have a strong suspicion that if 'Thalia, Heretic Cathar' had been named 'Frank, Heretic Cathar', people would be a lot more skeptical of it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Goin Aggro View Post
    Ugh, there he goes again, talking about the girlfriend. We get it dude.

  15. #75
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Jun 2013
    Location

    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts

    1,658

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by Scott View Post
    There will always, always be lots of people who want to play a competitive format that uses cards from Magic's entire history.
    I don't play or follow Modern, so I can't comment on its growth or lack thereof. I can say with certainty that if it ever becomes anywhere near as difficult to play Legacy competitivly as it is to play Vintage competitivly, I will switch back to Vintage as my primary format. I don't think Modern alone can kill Legacy for the reason you've stated. But Modern and Vintage together can.

  16. #76

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    I don't want to take away from the success of the tourney, but my own 2 cents:
    1) recent Pro Tour
    2) spring break
    3) SCG heavily promoting and supporting the event
    4) good weather after weeks of shitty ass weather - people could travel
    5) east coast

    SCG themselves had set the cap at 5k people and they didn't really come close, so I think in some ways they were disappointed as to the turnout. But I think if they had it in a major city, like DC where people can fly to easily, I think they could have gotten another 500-1000, especially for people west of the Mississippi.

    As to the effect on Legacy - prices of overlapping staples has been hurting. One of the few gaps in my collection are full playsets of Zendikar fetches (I have 2-3 of each, since I try to spread out my fetch bases to make it less obvious) and the prices are getting painful to fill them out. I think that the lesson I've learned from picking up and subsequently unloading extra Onslaught fetch sets is that there's a pretty predictable pattern of value, and it can be invested against for gain. I even think shocklands are a worthwhile investment, because while they likely won't be $50, there will still be some amount of appreciation for them because they are fetchable. I wouldn't have thought Wastelands would go from $3 uncommon when Standard-legal to $100 card now. Rishadan Ports were always expensive because they existed in a block and Standards where they ran in every single deck, but they have held up surprisinginly well for only really being wanted in 2-3 decks. Tarmogoyf has continually doubled in price over the few years. Cards like Restoration Angel and Snapcaster Mage have a possibility of appreciating a lot because they are powerful and likely won't see reprints for a while.

  17. #77
    Site Contributor
    warfordium's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2011
    Location

    Vancouver
    Posts

    211

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    four whole pages and none of you slammed the OP on affect/effect? for shame. /quitstheseforums
    Quote Originally Posted by TsumiBand View Post
    I'm not saying sugarcoat the tournament scene, that's impossible, but for God's sake just act like a damned grown-up. Be polite, play fast-ish but allow for a little thought now and then, represent the rules to the best of your ability and be a good sport.
    Quote Originally Posted by thecrav View Post
    WotC fucks up something computer related. Film @ 11.
    @warfordium on twitter.

  18. #78
    Clergyman of Cool
    lordofthepit's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Location

    Daisy Hill Puppy Farm
    Posts

    1,954

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by warfordium View Post
    four whole pages and none of you slammed the OP on affect/effect? for shame. /quitstheseforums
    Probably a good time to go over this:

    1. "Affect" is usually a verb.
    2. "Effect" is usually a noun.
    3. If you're not sure whether you should invoke one of the exceptions to rules (1) and (2), you probably aren't aware of the other meanings.

  19. #79
    Greatness awaits!
    Lemnear's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2010
    Location

    Berlin, Germany
    Posts

    6,997

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by warfordium View Post
    four whole pages and none of you slammed the OP on affect/effect? for shame. /quitstheseforums
    If we start to discuss typos and stuff rather than substance, this forum would have never evolved past the first 10 threads
    www.theepicstorm.com - Your Source for The Epic Storm - Articles, Reports, Decktech and more!

    Join us at Facebook!

    Quote Originally Posted by Echelon View Post
    Lemnear sounds harsh at times, but he means well. Or to destroy, but that's when he starts rapping.

    Architect by day, rapstar by night. He's pretty much the German Hannah Montana. Sometimes he even comes in like a wrecking ball.

  20. #80

    Re: GP Richmond and its affect on legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by warfordium View Post
    four whole pages and none of you slammed the OP on affect/effect? for shame. /quitstheseforums
    Eh, I noticed it but realized that the subject matter was more important than a word misuse. It IS quite jarring, though, and is second only to "could of," "should of, "and "would of" as one of my English pet peeves.

    Quote Originally Posted by Scott View Post
    There will always, always be lots of people who want to play a competitive format that uses cards from Magic's entire history.
    Agreed. There's a level of majesty to the pre-8th edition cards that you can only experience (non casually) in Eternal formats. I tried to get into Modern in the past and I'm currently trying to get into it now but the format just doesn't have the same feel. Legacy and Vintage just lets you do so many cool and powerful things and Modern either just lacks that or has them sitting on the banned list. Again, I'm glad that Modern exists, but Legacy and Vintage should exist too.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)