Page 260 of 428 FirstFirst ... 160210250256257258259260261262263264270310360 ... LastLast
Results 5,181 to 5,200 of 8554

Thread: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

  1. #5181

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    my main concern is Miracles (destroying counterbalance). Also, I noticed a lot of people are running Path to Exile in the SB - this is for delver matchups? I don't see how Abrupt Decay wouldn't be better in this slot - kills every creature in delver decks + noncreature stuff like Liliana. Please enlighten me!

  2. #5182
    Member

    Join Date

    Jan 2012
    Location

    Oslo, Norway
    Posts

    40

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Path has a pretty big advantage against Delver decks - it can be cast off a single plains, allowing you to fetch a single basic land and have all your removal online for the rest of the game. Abrupt Decay makes you immune to counterspells but vulnerable to Wasteland. So what you're doing is really just trading one risk for another, and I personally run Decay (maindeck even) due to the large number of Miracle decks in my meta.

  3. #5183

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I think I'm going to run 2x Abrupt Decay in the SB for Miracles mainly in lieu of Path to Exile because while we are vulnerable to being wasted off a black source, with DRS and KotR I think uncounterability is worth the risk. Also, with an active counterbalance what is the safest X to GSZ for so that it will resolve? My guess is 4? Since they are probably running 3 Jace and maybe a miser Venser (so, maximum of four 4 CMC in their deck) as opposed to definitely running 4 FoW and 4 Terminus (and the probability they are sandbagging a terminus on top is the highest of all cards) - granted a glance at their GY is relevant. I'm guessing post board miracles takes out ALL their FoWs too?

  4. #5184
    Just call me Dick.
    Richard Cheese's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2011
    Location

    Your mom's house.
    Posts

    2,105

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by rlesko View Post
    I think I'm going to run 2x Abrupt Decay in the SB for Miracles mainly in lieu of Path to Exile because while we are vulnerable to being wasted off a black source, with DRS and KotR I think uncounterability is worth the risk. Also, with an active counterbalance what is the safest X to GSZ for so that it will resolve? My guess is 4? Since they are probably running 3 Jace and maybe a miser Venser (so, maximum of four 4 CMC in their deck) as opposed to definitely running 4 FoW and 4 Terminus (and the probability they are sandbagging a terminus on top is the highest of all cards) - granted a glance at their GY is relevant. I'm guessing post board miracles takes out ALL their FoWs too?
    Yes, postboard they will cut Forces, and remember they will most likely bring in some number of Supreme Verdict, so you'll have a couple more 4s to deal with.
    I think the biggest thing is the deep seeded emotional understanding that the right play is the right play regardless of outcomes. The ability to make a decision 5 straight times, lose 5 times because of it, and still make it the 6th time if it's the right play. - Jon Finkel

    "Notions of chance and fate are the preoccupation of men engaged in rash undertakings."

  5. #5185

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Be aware of SFM after sideboard and Batterskull trying to sneak into the battlefield! :)

  6. #5186
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by kubalonek View Post
    Be aware of SFM after sideboard and Batterskull trying to sneak into the battlefield! :)
    All the more reason to play more QPM in the 75, that card does a lot of duty in this matchup.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  7. #5187
    MTGO Name: Adelorenzi
    ironclad8690's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Posts

    984

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Updating GW to include Council's Judgement

    4 Noble
    1 Dryad Arbor
    4 Mother of Runes
    3 Thalia
    2 Stoneforge
    2 Qasali Pridemage
    2 Scavenging Ooze
    1 Scryb Ranger
    4 Knight of the Reliquary
    1 Sigarda, Host of Herons
    1 Gaddock Teeg

    4 Green Sun's Zenith
    3 Swords to Plowshares
    2 Council's Judgement
    2 Sylvan Library
    1 Umezawa's Jitte
    1 Batterskull

    4 Savannah
    2 Forest
    1 Plains
    4 Wasteland
    1 Cavern of Souls
    1 Karakas
    1 Gaea's Cradle
    4 Windswept Heath
    2 Verdant Catacombs
    1 Maze of Ith
    1 Horizon Canopy

    What do you guys think?
    Last edited by ironclad8690; 05-26-2014 at 12:21 AM.

  8. #5188

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    what does Will of the Council say? cant find any info

  9. #5189

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    It is an ability, not a card...?

  10. #5190
    Member

    Join Date

    Jan 2012
    Location

    Oslo, Norway
    Posts

    40

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I thought it was a legendary creature.

    Either that, or he means Council's Judgment. Nonland Vindicate for 1WW.

  11. #5191
    Stomping blue decks with "dead" decks, as usual.
    Vandalize's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2010
    Posts

    314

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Moroklumpen View Post
    I thought it was a legendary creature.

    Either that, or he means Council's Judgment. Nonland Vindicate for 1WW.
    Non-land Vindicate that doesn't target (and can 2-for-1 if your foe's dumb enough). See you later Mr.True-Name Nemesis.
    Let your Dredge 6 be: Narco, Narco, Narco, Bridge, Bridge, Dread Return

  12. #5192
    MTGO Name: Adelorenzi
    ironclad8690's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Posts

    984

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by ironclad8690 View Post
    Updating GW to include Council's Judgement

    4 Noble
    1 Dryad Arbor
    4 Mother of Runes
    3 Thalia
    2 Stoneforge
    2 Qasali Pridemage
    2 Scavenging Ooze
    1 Scryb Ranger
    4 Knight of the Reliquary
    1 Sigarda, Host of Herons
    1 Gaddock Teeg

    4 Green Sun's Zenith
    3 Swords to Plowshares
    2 Council's Judgement
    2 Sylvan Library
    1 Umezawa's Jitte
    1 Batterskull

    4 Savannah
    2 Forest
    1 Plains
    4 Wasteland
    1 Cavern of Souls
    1 Karakas
    1 Gaea's Cradle
    4 Windswept Heath
    2 Verdant Catacombs
    1 Maze of Ith
    1 Horizon Canopy

    What do you guys think?
    Meant council's judgement

  13. #5193
    Member
    bakofried's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2009
    Location

    Bakersfield, Ca
    Posts

    744

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Congrats to Koby on making top 16 at the Open! Hopefully we'll see some kind of a tournament write up, maybe something on their podcast.
    Quote Originally Posted by ktkenshinx View Post
    The Reserved List is a) not legally binding, b) antiquated, c) broken, and d) preventative of maximum game enjoyment. Wizards will remove as many cards from that list as possible to increase the fun of their game. Using market research, they can find a balance between printing enough cards to lower a price from $40 to $15-$20, and not utterly ruining their value. This will be both an economically feasible AND sensible move.
    -ktkenshinx-

  14. #5194

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by bakofried View Post
    Congrats to Koby on making top 16 at the Open! Hopefully we'll see some kind of a tournament write up, maybe something on their podcast.
    congrats to him, I also hope he does a report. unfortunately for him, im pretty sure the only camera time he got all day was a rather one sided MU against elves

  15. #5195
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  16. #5196

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Are natural order packages still viable in a maverick shell?

  17. #5197
    It's not easy being green

    Join Date

    Jul 2010
    Posts

    1,635

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Shump21 View Post
    Are natural order packages still viable in a maverick shell?
    I think Teeg is probably better for you, screws over so many annoying things and your cards are individually better than Elves'.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lemnear
    (On Innistrad)
    Yeah, an insanely powerful block which put the "derp!" factor in Legacy completely over the top.

  18. #5198

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Congrats to Thomas Herzog for top8'ing again! Seems like a reliable deck list.

  19. #5199
    MTGO Name: Adelorenzi
    ironclad8690's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Posts

    984

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Just 4-0'd a small tournament.

    Beat Shardless, then High Tide, then Tin Fins, then Elves.

    Straight up GW, here is my list:

    4 Noble Hierarch
    2 Qasali Pridemage
    2 Scavenging Ooze
    3 Stoneforge Mystic
    1 Scryb Ranger
    1 Gaddock Teeg
    1 Dryad Arbor
    4 Mother of Runes
    4 Knight of the Reliquary
    3 Thalia, Guardian of Thraben
    1 Sigarda, Host of Herons

    1 Batterskull
    1 Sword of Fire and Ice
    1 Umezawa's Jitte
    4 Green Sun's Zenith
    4 Swords to Plowshares
    1 Sylvan Library

    4 Savannah
    4 Windswept Heath
    2 Verdant Catacombs
    4 Wasteland
    2 Forest
    1 Plains
    1 Gaea's Cradle
    1 Horizon Canopy
    1 Karakas
    1 Dark Depths
    1 Thespian's Stage

    //Sideboard
    SB: 3 Oblivion Ring
    SB: 2 Path to Exile
    SB: 2 Gaddock Teeg
    SB: 3 Ethersworn Canonist
    SB: 3 Surgical Extraction
    SB: 2 Choke

    I didn't run into any TNN. I do not face many decks that have it, but when I do the Marit Lage plan usually works. Not many decks that play TNN have enough ways to deal with Marit unless you are already pretty behind anyways. Golgari Charm is still tough as well, but jund is on the decline and BUG can pretty easily get mana/thaliascrewed.

  20. #5200
    Member
    from Cairo's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    RI
    Posts

    1,093

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick



    Any thoughts on this guy?

    Clearly he dies to Bolt/Decay, but he seems like he demands an answer against opposing fair strategies. Upon overcoming summoning sickness he can 'Rebel search' Mother of Runes or Deathrite Shaman. If he makes it to a 2nd activation most of the silver bullets are valid targets - Thalia, Gaddock, SFM, ScOoze, QPM, Scryb Ranger. At 3 he loses his versatility only fetching Knight, but it would seem in most cases if he put the most relevant 1 and 2 casting cost guys left in your deck directly into play at instant speed, that the game would probably be at a point where one is just looking for a Knight to wrap things up. He's GSZable and can be saved via Karakas versus removal and sweepers.

    I don't know that he's good enough, but he's interesting.
    TPDMC

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)