Page 15 of 79 FirstFirst ... 51112131415161718192565 ... LastLast
Results 281 to 300 of 1571

Thread: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

  1. #281
    Land Destruction Enthusiast
    Megadeus's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2012
    Location

    Kennesaw, GA
    Posts

    5,572

    Re: SCG and lousy Legacy coverage

    I really want to make Green Painter so my GSZ can be awesome. Or NO for Emrakul
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    I've been taking shitty brews and tier 2 decks to tournaments and losing with them for years now. Welcome to the club. We meet for cocktails after round 6.
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevestamopz View Post
    Top quality german restraint there.

    If I'm at the point where I'm rage quitting, you can bet your kransky that I'm calling everyone involved a cunt.

  2. #282
    Site Contributor
    thecrav's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2010
    Location

    Houston, Texas, USA
    Posts

    1,097

    Re: SCG and lousy Legacy coverage

    Quote Originally Posted by Megadeus View Post
    I really want to make Green Painter so my GSZ can be awesome. Or NO for Emrakul
    Go all the way and GSZ for Emrakul.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dice_Box View Post
    You don't get to play the most powerful cards in the format and then bitch when someone finally says no. You also don't get to bitch that it's not fun when someone finally tells you no instead of voyeuristicly watching you masturbate with Cantrips.

  3. #283
    Land Destruction Enthusiast
    Megadeus's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2012
    Location

    Kennesaw, GA
    Posts

    5,572

    Re: SCG and lousy Legacy coverage

    Yeah... Or like Green sun for Trinket mage, fetching grindstone plus activation. You could run Mainboard Deathmark. Too strong.
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    I've been taking shitty brews and tier 2 decks to tournaments and losing with them for years now. Welcome to the club. We meet for cocktails after round 6.
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevestamopz View Post
    Top quality german restraint there.

    If I'm at the point where I'm rage quitting, you can bet your kransky that I'm calling everyone involved a cunt.

  4. #284
    Land Destruction Enthusiast
    Megadeus's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2012
    Location

    Kennesaw, GA
    Posts

    5,572

    Re: SCG and lousy Legacy coverage

    At least we got to see Todd Anderson just have all the combo pieces for Sneak and Show in his hand and win an easy match.
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    I've been taking shitty brews and tier 2 decks to tournaments and losing with them for years now. Welcome to the club. We meet for cocktails after round 6.
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevestamopz View Post
    Top quality german restraint there.

    If I'm at the point where I'm rage quitting, you can bet your kransky that I'm calling everyone involved a cunt.

  5. #285
    Rob Rogers
    HammafistRoob's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2007
    Location

    Wareham, MA
    Posts

    1,024

    Re: SCG and lousy Legacy coverage

    You know, I actually feel that Cedric's format knowledge has been improving. Just a few months ago I was constantly disagreeing with him, but now it's only a few times per match.
    Team Hammafist-We don't take kindly to those who don't take kindly.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jander78 View Post
    You still have to appreciate a well timed "fuck yall niggas" though.
    Quote Originally Posted by FTW View Post
    WotC should either stop printing such good blue creatures or start printing more Hammerfist Giants
    "Got any trade boogas?"

  6. #286
    Member
    bakofried's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2009
    Location

    Bakersfield, Ca
    Posts

    744

    Re: SCG and lousy Legacy coverage

    I'm confused, it looked like the Anderson's Merfolk opponent had both Phantasmal Image and Cavern of Souls in hand prior to the weird Hurkyl's Recall thing?
    Quote Originally Posted by ktkenshinx View Post
    The Reserved List is a) not legally binding, b) antiquated, c) broken, and d) preventative of maximum game enjoyment. Wizards will remove as many cards from that list as possible to increase the fun of their game. Using market research, they can find a balance between printing enough cards to lower a price from $40 to $15-$20, and not utterly ruining their value. This will be both an economically feasible AND sensible move.
    -ktkenshinx-

  7. #287

    Re: SCG and lousy Legacy coverage

    He looked uncomfortable. Quite possibly because of being on camera. I think he meant to play the Image, but f'ed up and then scooped. Alternatively, he may have thought that Emrakul was an artifact. If he didn't, I have no understanding of why he would board in HRecall in the first place.

    Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

  8. #288
    Land Destruction Enthusiast
    Megadeus's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2012
    Location

    Kennesaw, GA
    Posts

    5,572

    Re: SCG and lousy Legacy coverage

    Yeah I think when he realized recall didn't do anything he got flustered and scooped
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    I've been taking shitty brews and tier 2 decks to tournaments and losing with them for years now. Welcome to the club. We meet for cocktails after round 6.
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevestamopz View Post
    Top quality german restraint there.

    If I'm at the point where I'm rage quitting, you can bet your kransky that I'm calling everyone involved a cunt.

  9. #289

    Re: SCG and lousy Legacy coverage

    One of the thiungs that bothered me, was in round 5, I think, when neither commentator wanted to move to the other feature match, which was High Tide (not sure if Spring Tide or Solidarity) vs ...something.

    Thatw as annoying, although the feature match they had was an interesting clusterfuck of TNN vs Maverick.

  10. #290
    Stackbuilder

    Join Date

    Mar 2012
    Posts

    859

    Re: SCG and lousy Legacy coverage

    At least SCG has a decent overlay. Compare it to the madness Wizards just used for GP Manchester: http://i.imgur.com/91UpHcn.png

  11. #291
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,533

    Re: SCG and lousy Legacy coverage

    Quote Originally Posted by JDK View Post
    At least SCG has a decent overlay.
    This

    I don't get how other big streamers *cough* Wizards *cough* can't get their shit together and provide an overlay on par of SCG. This isn't rocket science, especially when already shown how it's done right.

  12. #292

    WotC coverage STINKS

    Quote Originally Posted by Barook View Post
    This

    I don't get how other big streamers *cough* Wizards *cough* can't get their shit together and provide an overlay on par of SCG. This isn't rocket science, especially when already shown how it's done right.
    SCG Coverage blows AWAY Wizards' coverage by a country mile. All of the US commentators are forgettable. Specifically Marshall Sutcliffe, for a guy who quit his day job to do coverage, you'd think one would learn something about constructed formats. I kid you not, just a couple months ago at a Standard GP he once asked, "Is Hero's Downfall still being played?" No Marshall, it only is the premier removal spell in format ....

    But as for the new overlay crap? Blame Rich Hagon. He is the person responsible for all European coverage. I have hated him in the past for his commentary, but after that decision with that horrendous overlay, I have to wonder what WotC is doing letting this guy be in charge.

    Oh, would it kill WotC to provide larger, visible dice for players under the camera? Yeesh. Are they completely oblivious or just lazy?

  13. #293
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,533

    Re: WotC coverage STINKS

    Quote Originally Posted by Arcbound Twerker View Post
    But as for the new overlay crap? Blame Rich Hagon. He is the person responsible for all European coverage. I have hated him in the past for his commentary, but after that decision with that horrendous overlay, I have to wonder what WotC is doing letting this guy be in charge.
    Rich Hagon? So that's the name of the annoying guy with glasses. I hate him, too.

    Wizards' handling of staff is extremely poor. See: All people responsible for the horrible mess called MTGO who get away with delivering a subpar experience. When you're personally at the point where you wish that a big corporation like Hasbro steps in to get shit back on track, you know they fucked up big time.

  14. #294
    Clergyman of Cool
    lordofthepit's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Location

    Daisy Hill Puppy Farm
    Posts

    1,954

    Re: WotC coverage STINKS

    Quote Originally Posted by Barook View Post
    you know they fucked up big time.

  15. #295

    Re: SCG and lousy Legacy coverage

    The entire company could use an overhaul. From R&D to marketing and productivity all the way to advertising.

    Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

  16. #296
    Stackbuilder

    Join Date

    Mar 2012
    Posts

    859

    Re: SCG and lousy Legacy coverage

    You know who Wizards is desperately needing, right?


  17. #297
    Greatness awaits!
    Lemnear's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2010
    Location

    Berlin, Germany
    Posts

    6,997

    Re: WotC coverage STINKS

    Quote Originally Posted by Barook View Post
    Rich Hagon? So that's the name of the annoying guy with glasses. I hate him, too.

    Wizards' handling of staff is extremely poor. See: All people responsible for the horrible mess called MTGO who get away with delivering a subpar experience. When you're personally at the point where you wish that a big corporation like Hasbro steps in to get shit back on track, you know they fucked up big time.
    You expect, that a company, that is unwilling to let Tom LaPille go, after him insulting the whole eternal community, will ever draw a line for their employees? Hell, look how they handle positions within the design team.
    www.theepicstorm.com - Your Source for The Epic Storm - Articles, Reports, Decktech and more!

    Join us at Facebook!

    Quote Originally Posted by Echelon View Post
    Lemnear sounds harsh at times, but he means well. Or to destroy, but that's when he starts rapping.

    Architect by day, rapstar by night. He's pretty much the German Hannah Montana. Sometimes he even comes in like a wrecking ball.

  18. #298

    Re: WotC coverage STINKS

    Hagon just wants to do coverage worse than anyone, so he gets gigs by sheer doggedness. Supposedly he appeals to casuals, but I dunno. He has no range, all he can do is repeat the same half-dozen phrases over and over in the same artifical tone.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lemnear View Post
    You expect, that a company, that is unwilling to let Tom LaPille go, after him insulting the whole eternal community, will ever draw a line for their employees? Hell, look how they handle positions within the design team.
    Don't forget Lapille leaking B/R list changes early to his pals.
    “It's possible. But it involves... {checks archives} Nature's Revolt, Opalescence, two Unstable Shapeshifters (one of which started as a Doppelganger), a Tide, an animated land, a creature with Fading, a Silver Wyvern, some way to get a creature into play in response to stuff, some way to get a land into play in response to stuff (a different land from the animated land), and one heck of a Rube Goldberg timing diagram.
    -David DeLaney

  19. #299

    Re: SCG and lousy Legacy coverage

    That's essentially insider trading in the magic community. Do they do blow together as well?

    Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

  20. #300
    We are lost. We can never go home.
    Einherjer's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2011
    Location

    Noricum
    Posts

    1,475

    Re: SCG and lousy Legacy coverage

    Any chance we could change the title? SCG has improved their coverage in pretty much all aspects. It's far from perfect - but lousy? I don't think so.

    Greetings
    My articles here, here, here and here | My current list | Follow me on Twitter | Questions I answered.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)