Page 311 of 389 FirstFirst ... 211261301307308309310311312313314315321361 ... LastLast
Results 6,201 to 6,220 of 7776

Thread: [Deck] The Rock

  1. #6201
    Member
    AggroSteve's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2010
    Location

    innsbruck, austria
    Posts

    419

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    Quote Originally Posted by Valtrix View Post
    Are any manlands playable* in this deck?

    Mishra's Factory
    Stirring Wildwood
    Treetop Village

    Since Creeping Tar Pit is playable in Shardless BUG and both the rock and shardless bug are pretty mid-rangey it was just a thought I had. (But I don't play this deck much, so perhaps it'sa bad thought.)

    *use whatever definition of playable you want.
    same answer as stuuch allready had given, creeping tar pit is able to stabalize your mana-developement, our options do the opposite
    but still, it is not wrong to run a man-land, i have done so for a long time, but neither of the listed ones are the one i would suggest... the one i would run if i definitely want a manland is nantuko monastery, even if it is a bit situational and grave-dependant it gives the best options for a manland in our deck (even if not able to kill a planeswalker like creeping tar pit) because it can block and kill a batterskull and still live

    allthough i will have to mention, that a manland in our deck would be most beneficial only if knight of the reliquary would be used as well, but in this case i think that the stage+depths combo would be even better to build around. as it is able to close the game immediately.



    Quote Originally Posted by uncletiggy View Post
    I personally prefer the one top over the third library but I would play no less then two libraries. Card advantage wins games and so does having what you need when you need it. Top is better at finding your one of's, niether is strictly better they actually work very well together. Playing 0 libraries is wrong any way you slice it though.
    i really loved damions post about this one, that neither option is wrong to run
    the reason i love this deck so much is that compared to most other decks running arround, you actually have to build your own deck, and not just run the stock list and still do well

    the way i see it, is that, to fully understand this deck you will have to test all the possibilities and decide for yourself, depending on your playstyle and maybe metacomposition what you want to run

    this is mostly the reason why this deck does not really have a "57-cards-core" compared to other deck. This deck at most has a "40-card-core" of the most unconditionally good spells, and the rest is up to personal preference and expirience, and its all about your own decision where you want to take the deck, hence all the different decks

    all cards viable in this deck come with a certian package to them, where most of the provide a toolbox or are able to give us an edge in the matchups we either face the most, or have the most trouble with, and all of these packages have synergies to any other one and highly influence how the deck is running

    my personal opinion on top vs. library actually is not that much different of anyone on this thread, meaning i lean towards library, but for a a few specific reasons

    - library is able to win the games where top would just be a filter for searching answers and still struggle (vs. miracles, UWR, RUG, to name a few)
    - gives you card advantage and selection compared to multitime-selection
    - i do not run knights anymore so the multitime-selection of top is not as effective anymore

    but the most important one, at least for me is, that it changes the gameplan/way the deck works

    in any strategic game the one player that is playing proactively tends to have a slight edge over the reacting player, and that is the main difference between library and top.
    library lets you pressure your opponent just by being there, being able to get you more cards for "only life" and no mana, and advancing your gameplan at the same time WITHOUT spending extra mana which in a midrange deck is more important for the early and midgame
    top on the other hand really shines in the lategame or in a deck where you have mana to spare, which is not the case for most of the lists in this thread

    but there are still some downsides to library, where the most important ones for me are:
    - the manacost of 1G (=2) which makes it necessary to have G on turn 2 (which also makes hymn to tourach less consistent or harder to cast, therefore the 6-7 1-CMC discard spells)
    - the CMC of 2 in a deck full of 2-drops, making it sometimes hard to decide which road to choose

    allthough i have to say that in a decklist running hymn to tourach instead of the 6-7 1 CMC discard-spells i might be favoring top over library


    it has become quite a long post now, just to underline Damians statement from before, which i want to apologize for, but i just had to add my two cents

    have a nice day everyone

  2. #6202

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    Hey all, I've been a lurker for a little while, finally got around to making an account.

    I've been winning a lot of locals lately with this list:



    4 Dark Confidant
    4 Deathrite Shaman
    3 Stoneforge Mystic
    3 Knight of the Reliquary

    1 Batterskull
    1 Umezawa's Jitte
    1 Sword of Fire and Ice

    2 Liliana of the Veil
    2 Lingering Souls

    2 Sylvan Library
    1 Sensei's Divining Top

    3 Thoughtseize
    2 Cabal Therapy
    1 Inquisition of Kozilek

    3 Abrupt Decay
    3 Swords to Plowshares
    1 Golgari Charm

    4 Verdant Catacombs
    3 Marsh Flats
    1 Windswept Heath
    2 Scrubland
    2 Bayou
    1 Savannah
    1 Plains
    1 Forest
    1 Swamp
    3 Wasteland
    1 Karakas
    1 Horizon Canopy
    1 Bojuka Bog
    1 Gavony Township

    1 Lingering Souls
    1 Green Sun's Zenith
    1 Scavenging Ooze
    1 Gaddock Teeg
    1 Qasali Pridemage
    2 Zealous Persecution
    1 Golgari Charm
    1 Thoughtseize
    2 Phyrexian Revoker
    1 Surgical Extraction
    1 Swords to Plowshares
    2 Maelstrom Pulse



    Most of the (good) players in my local meta are on miracles, so the Lingering Souls+Gavony Township plan has been pretty solid. Township has won me games, it's really solid at killing Jaces/people out of nowhere. Like any good junk deck the sideboard is subject to change a lot, so this is just what I have from this week.

    The sideboard is a bunch of one-ofs, but it's a lot of extra copies of cards I already have in the main. Lots of very generic answers.

    Long live Junk!

  3. #6203
    Is Cancer

    Join Date

    Jul 2014
    Posts

    1,146

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    If they had made enemy color dual-manlands I'd probably use it as a 2-of at first (then a 1-of when remembering how obnoxious CipT lands are.

    -Mishra's I'd use if I were on some kind of Urborg-Obliterator build (which isn't a thing in Legacy)
    -Wildwood I've used in Nic Fit lists and if I had to choose; I'd run it. Still, it doesn't tap for B and in my deck that means it's garbage before you even get to CipT.
    -Village is cute, but Wildwood's better mana and better butt means it's really only vulnerable to swords or double PFire. Blocking delvers is neat (though in my short test period with it it's worth mentioning that that never happened.)

    I'll say that in place of a Manland I did testing with Kjeldoran Outpost and it was neat. It's better against fair decks than it looks and it's worse against miracles than it looks. That said, I run KotR with 1-2 Loams so it's issues as a 1-of sac-land of sorts were mitigated.

  4. #6204

    New to the Rock

    I've been playing UWr Delver for a number of months now, but have gotten tired of losing to Miracles and UB Tezz in my local meta. It's small, which means I frequently play against these decks so I can't just hope to dodge them. Near as I can tell, Junk Rock should have a pretty good matchup against them. Is this deck a good choice for a meta which features: Burn, Elves, UB Tezz, UWb Miracles, Deathblade, Dredge, ANT, D&T?

    This is a rough list I drafted. I don't have Goyfs and am unwilling to pony up the $$$ for them at this time, so I'm on the SFM plan. Souls seem like better beaters in the face of Jace's anyway. Thoughts? The SB is incomplete. Any recommendations for the last three slots?


    4 Bayou
    1 Dryad Arbor
    1 Forest
    4 Marsh Flats
    1 Plains
    1 Savannah
    2 Scrubland
    1 Swamp
    4 Verdant Catacombs
    4 Windswept Heath

    4 Deathrite Shaman
    4 Dark Confidant
    1 Qasali Pridemage
    1 Scavenging Ooze
    4 Stoneforge Mystic

    2 Sylvan Library

    2 Liliana of the Veil

    3 Swords to Plowshares
    4 Abrupt Decay

    3 Thoughtseize
    3 Cabal Therapy
    3 Lingering Souls

    1 Umezawa's Jitte
    1 Sword of Fire and Ice
    1 Batterskull

    Sideboard
    2 Grafdigger's Cage
    1 Surgical Extraction
    1 Swords to Plowshares
    3 Gaddock Teeg
    1 Golgari Charm
    2 Zealous Persecution
    1 Aura Shards
    1 Maelstrom Pulse

  5. #6205
    Salt of the earth

    Join Date

    May 2009
    Location

    Canada
    Posts

    4,685

    Re: New to the Rock

    Quote Originally Posted by slikwilly View Post
    I've been playing UWr Delver for a number of months now, but have gotten tired of losing to Miracles and UB Tezz in my local meta. It's small, which means I frequently play against these decks so I can't just hope to dodge them. Near as I can tell, Junk Rock should have a pretty good matchup against them. Is this deck a good choice for a meta which features: Burn, Elves, UB Tezz, UWb Miracles, Deathblade, Dredge, ANT, D&T?

    This is a rough list I drafted. I don't have Goyfs and am unwilling to pony up the $$$ for them at this time, so I'm on the SFM plan. Souls seem like better beaters in the face of Jace's anyway. Thoughts? The SB is incomplete. Any recommendations for the last three slots?


    4 Bayou
    1 Dryad Arbor
    1 Forest
    4 Marsh Flats
    1 Plains
    1 Savannah
    2 Scrubland
    1 Swamp
    4 Verdant Catacombs
    4 Windswept Heath

    4 Deathrite Shaman
    4 Dark Confidant
    1 Qasali Pridemage
    1 Scavenging Ooze
    4 Stoneforge Mystic

    2 Sylvan Library

    2 Liliana of the Veil

    3 Swords to Plowshares
    4 Abrupt Decay

    3 Thoughtseize
    3 Cabal Therapy
    3 Lingering Souls

    1 Umezawa's Jitte
    1 Sword of Fire and Ice
    1 Batterskull

    Sideboard
    2 Grafdigger's Cage
    1 Surgical Extraction
    1 Swords to Plowshares
    3 Gaddock Teeg
    1 Golgari Charm
    2 Zealous Persecution
    1 Aura Shards
    1 Maelstrom Pulse

    With two bullet creatures, you could run 1-GSZ maindeck, especially since you already have the Dryad Arbor and it gives you 1 more way to get Teeg out of the board.

    I think for your sideboard, I'd cut the Golgari Charm and Aura Shards for Krosan Grips (and possible the Pulse, but that's up to you if there are enough Walkers in your format). Aura Shards is far too slow, and you already have Decay and such. You're looking for unconditional removal, especially against Blade and Miracles. Plus, you're already running 2 ZP, so Charm is a non-bo with your Souls and unnecessary.

    For the last sideboard slots, you could play extra combo hate (extra Miracle hate isn't necessary), extra Delver hate, etc. I'd suggest either Engineered Explosives against Delver decks, and stuff like Dredge, angel tokens, etc. or Pithing Needle against Jace, Top, Sneak Attack, Griselbrand, etc.

    Overall, list looks good.

    -Matt

  6. #6206

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    Matt, would you play the blue splash for Meddling Mages even if would be forced to play Watery Grave instead of U.Sea? I like the idea (and it works good!) but don't owe any Underground Sea.

    I am toying with this sideboard. I am testing your list -1 Stoneforge, -1 Sylvan Library, +1 Goyf, +1 SDT recently and I am very satistied with the deck so far.


    3x Gaddock Teeg
    2x Krosan Grip
    1x Zealous Persecution
    1x Scavenging Ooze
    1x Enlightened Tutor
    1x Pithing Needle
    1x Engineered Explosives
    1x Engineered Plague
    1x Grafdigger's Cage
    1x Ethersworn Canonist
    2x Flex slots


    Two empty slots could be: Batterskull, Thrun, Sylvan Safekeeper, Choke, Swords to Plowshares, Maelstrom Pulse, Thoughtseize or another target for E.Tutor. My meta consists mostly of Miracles, DnT, BUG variance, some RUG, ANT and then pretty much everything in small numbers.

    When I read this thread some time ago, few people were using E.Tutor package but then left the idea behind. Why so? The variance of hate cards is so wide and we can play bunch of 1-ofs thanks to E.TUTor.

  7. #6207
    Victory Dance ftw?
    Mirrislegend's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Posts

    959

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    I shifted from Rock to Deadguy splash green (yes I know the differentiation can be very subtle) a while ago, so I haven't been posting in this thread. But I'm hitting a stumbling block and I'm wondering how you guys surmount it.

    How do you beat BUG? I find the matchup very close and often coming down to how much resources each player has available.
    Quote Originally Posted by Tacosnape
    <Dallieza> your mom uses the stack
    <System> Player Lost
    Quote Originally Posted by Tacosnape
    Every time someone drops a Chalice against me I think of the Family Guy episode where the guy in jail stabs himself with the knife to see how it feels and then he says, "My God! Is this what I've been doing to people? I belong in here!"
    Referring to the art on Stasis:
    Quote Originally Posted by Pinder View Post
    Well, uh...the mime, you see, is....um...

    God, is that furry bondage?

  8. #6208
    Salt of the earth

    Join Date

    May 2009
    Location

    Canada
    Posts

    4,685

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    Beating BUG is about sticking a creature and going all the way, and just out-removalling the BUG player. In Game 1, if you can play around Daze, do so, but if you can't, make them have it.

    Use Decay on Goyfs, and save STP if you can for Tombstalker, Dark Confidants, or Deathrite Shamans. Ooze out of the board really helps, as does Sword of Feast and Famine.

    So, if you can pack more removal out of the board, that's a plus. If you're mostly BW, bring in maximal STP/Decay counts and board out some discard because the game is going to go long.

    -Matt

  9. #6209

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    I sleeved up this seventy-five tonight to play at my weekly legacy. Went 3-0-1 with the draw being a round four ID to take first. I didn't drop a game all night.

    3 Bayou
    1 Dryad Arbor
    1 Forest
    3 Marsh Flats
    1 Plains
    1 Savannah
    2 Scrubland
    2 Swamp
    4 Verdant Catacombs
    4 Wasteland
    1 Windswept Heath

    2 Liliana of the Veil

    2 Lingering Souls
    2 Cabal Therapy
    2 Green Sun's Zenith
    3 Thoughtseize

    3 Swords to Plowshares
    4 Abrupt Decay

    4 Deathrite Shaman
    4 Dark Confidant
    1 Qasali Pridemage
    1 Scavenging Ooze
    4 Stoneforge Mystic

    2 Sylvan Library

    1 Umezawa's Jitte
    1 Sword of Fire and Ice
    1 Sword of Light and Shadow

    Sideboard:
    2 Engineered Explosives
    2 Grafdigger's Cage
    1 Swords to Plowshares
    2 Gaddock Teeg
    2 Hymn to Tourach
    2 Zealous Persecution
    1 Council's Judgment
    1 Doran, the Siege Tower
    2 Krosan Grip


    R1 - UB Tezz (2-0)
    This deck is part of why I have switched to junk. I'm on the draw, he goes Ancient Tomb into Chalice on 1, stranding a DRS in my hand. I waste the tomb, then play double Bobs into more wastes and beat him down with Bob. Bring in Explosives, Teeg, and Doran. G2 he drops a T2 Cursed Totem negating my DRS. There was a Tezz involved somewhere, and some grinding until I drop Doran. I swing with him, the DRS, and Arbor. Dorans ability means DRS + Arbor kill Tezz who's at 3 and put him to 8. Swing lethal the next turn because Doran means DRS swings for two :)

    R2 - Elves (2-0)
    G1 I mull to 4 because the first few hands had either no land or only wastelands. But the 4 had a fetch, a Thoughtseize, and a Therapy. I took apart his hand while he was going on the beatdown plan. I land an Ooze to get me some life and blocks, then a Lingering Souls and a Therapy naming Craterhoof which I thought might be stranded in his hand (it was), and finally a SFM for Jitte. Jitte + Spirit = Elves has a bad day. Bring in STP, Zealous, Cage, Teeg. G2 a turn 2 Teeg shuts off his Green Sun. I kill a bunch of creatures until I get a Jitte online.

    R3 - Belcher (2-0)
    I had no idea what this guy was on. I kept a (probably not so good) hand of 3x SFM, Pridemage, STP, fetch x2. He's on the play, goes for it with triple Manamorphose and fails to draw whatever it was he was looking for. I drop the T2 Pridemage and proceed to hold up mana for it while deploying additional threats and finally hitting some discard. Bring in Teeg, Explosives, Hymn. G2 I have T1 DRS + Explosives. I don't recall the particulars but at one point he gets a Belcher out but is short the mana to activate it. But Library finds me a timely GSZ so I promptly find my Pridemage and nuke his Belcher. Eventually I just beat him down. Should I bring Doran in in this match? Seems like improving my clock would be a good idea... A spectator commented that he thought I should have been aggressively using DRS to drain, but I was spending all my mana every turn and had to keep 1 mana up for activating Pridemage. Pretty sure I'm right (he can kill me out of nowhere if I don't have that mana up) but I am not exactly a Junk (or Belcher) expert.

    R4 - ID

    Deck was fun, though going back to a deck w/o Force of Will was hair raising at times, especially since I had shaved a Therapy to make room for Green Sun. But the flip side is it was awesome to not give a damn about Chalice of the Void.

  10. #6210
    Salt of the earth

    Join Date

    May 2009
    Location

    Canada
    Posts

    4,685

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    Played Team Italia tonight just because I wanted to try something different and went 3-1, losing to burn.

    4 Stoneforge Mystic
    4 Dark Confidant
    2 Grim Lavamancer
    4 Deathrite Shaman
    3 Lingering Souls
    3 Liliana of the Veil
    4 Swords to Plowshares
    3 Lightning Bolt
    1 Sword of Fire and Ice
    1 Umezawa's Jitte
    1 Batterskull
    4 Wasteland
    4 Thoughtseize
    3 Hymn to Tourach
    3 Badlands
    1 Plateau
    3 Scrubland
    1 Swamp
    1 Plains
    4 Marsh Flats
    4 Bloodstained Mire
    1 Arid Mesa
    2 Sensei's Divining Top

    SB: 2 Chains of Mephistopheles
    SB: 3 Red Elemental Blast
    SB: 2 Wear/Tear
    SB: 2 Tormod's Crypt
    SB: 3 Zealous Persecution
    SB: 3 Duress

    Lacking Abrupt Decay is really bad, but otherwise the list ran alright.

    Also, someone asked if they should splash Mage using Watery Grave - I say no. You need to fetch and hit Thoughtseize as well, so taking an additional two is really bad.

    -Matt

  11. #6211
    Member
    SevenInTheQueue's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2013
    Location

    Vancouver, BC
    Posts

    40

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    Figured I'd try working on a list that doesn't start with 4x Brainstorm, and give this ol' chestnut a whirl. I've played a couple of locals with similar lists (to decent success), but two or three tournaments don't exactly count for much.

    He's my starting point.


    Creatures (16)

    1x Dryad Arbor
    4x Deathrite Shaman
    4x Dark Confidant
    3x Stoneforge Mystic
    3x Tarmogoyf
    1x Edric, Spymaster of Trest

    Artifacts/Enchantments/Planeswalkers (4 / 1 / 4)

    1x Sensei's Divining Top
    1x Umezawa's Jitte
    1x Sword of Feast and Famine
    1x Sword of Fire and Ice

    1x Sylvan Library

    3x Liliana of the Veil
    1x Garruk Relentless

    Instants and Sorceries (6 & 7)

    2x Swords to Plowshares
    4x Abrupt Decay

    3x Thoughtseize
    2x Green Sun's Zenith
    2x Lingering Souls

    Lands (22)

    3x Bayou
    2x Savannah
    2x Scrubland
    1x Underground Sea
    4x Verdant Catacombs
    2x Marsh Flats
    1x Windswept Heath
    3x Wasteland
    2x Swamp
    1x Forest
    1x Plains


    Sideboard (15)

    3x Meddling Mage
    3x Gaddock Teeg
    1x Qasali Pridemage
    1x Scavenging Ooze
    2x Zealous Persecution
    1x Swords to Plowshares
    2x Duress
    1x Thoughtseize
    1x Karakas


    Card Choices


    Top:

    I've spun a few tops in my time, so this might a comfort thing more than anything. If I listened to every word Matt says, this slot would be another Library (or two). I can see merits in having repeatable activations alongside fetchlands and GSZ, where Library only resets once per turn. Having a divide of 1/1 also helps getting around the issue of running into multiple libraries.

    Edric:

    It started out as a bit of a joke, but he ended up pulling his weight and much more! Works quite well with Lingering Souls, and lazy Mystics and Arbors. There's a possibility that I was already in a winning position, and Edric just helped me "win-more", but I'd like to gain some clarification on the matter.

    Garruk:

    This is a new one. Been meaning to give this gentlemen a whirl, after seeing him successfully utilized in a locals Jund/4C Junk list in recent times. Could be garbage, but I feel like this Planeswalker is being slept on.



    Questions/comments/concerns? It has been a while since I've tapped Basic Forest, so I'm all ears!
    Cowboy Magic

  12. #6212

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    Quote Originally Posted by AggroSteve View Post
    in any strategic game the one player that is playing proactively tends to have a slight edge over the reacting player, and that is the main difference between library and top.
    library lets you pressure your opponent just by being there, being able to get you more cards for "only life" and no mana, and advancing your gameplan at the same time WITHOUT spending extra mana which in a midrange deck is more important for the early and midgame
    top on the other hand really shines in the lategame or in a deck where you have mana to spare, which is not the case for most of the lists in this thread
    Dark Confidant and Top is a killer combo though. The ability to draw low cc spells or lands if you need them while keeping business on top of the deck between fetches is really powerful. I often have Abrupt Decay on top of the library for half the game when I have a top in play. That stops me from suffering a Thoughtseize or Hymn to Tourach with Decay in hand and then seeing the thing that is going to kill me land after that. Same thing with Liliana and Innocent Blood or Diabolic Edict when I am using those as solutions for True-Name Nemesis.

  13. #6213
    Is Cancer

    Join Date

    Jul 2014
    Posts

    1,146

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    I've tried Garruk a bit before. He's alright; I don't see a Legacy deck with him and cringe. His best features are the Deathtouch wolves against fair decks (good luck with their BSK or Goyfs!) and the fact he's 3G instead of 2GG. His casting cost is very forgivable outside of 4CMC and the fact he counts as sort-of sometimes removal is alright.

    I had just 1-too-many games where I couldn't cast him because of his 4 mana that I dropped him. If he landed he often GG'd the opponent simply because he demands an answer within a turn or two so the wolves are under control. More power to ya if you bolt a guy.

    That said, 4 mana is a lot and I can't imagine finding a slot for him in my current deck other than a Lingering Souls slot, but Souls just feel better. Toss to Lily, find it if I dredge a loam, easier to cast, good against Delver or Clique instead of terrible. I usually have Ensnaring Bridge in the side as S&T/random-aggro hate, which makes souls pretty good since they can chip someone to death through it.

  14. #6214
    Member
    AggroSteve's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2010
    Location

    innsbruck, austria
    Posts

    419

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    Quote Originally Posted by AggroControl View Post
    Dark Confidant and Top is a killer combo though. The ability to draw low cc spells or lands if you need them while keeping business on top of the deck between fetches is really powerful. I often have Abrupt Decay on top of the library for half the game when I have a top in play. That stops me from suffering a Thoughtseize or Hymn to Tourach with Decay in hand and then seeing the thing that is going to kill me land after that. Same thing with Liliana and Innocent Blood or Diabolic Edict when I am using those as solutions for True-Name Nemesis.
    i am well aware that dark confidant and top are a wonderfull combo, but my point was exactly what you said in your example. you do use top in a reactional way where you protect yourself from a theat that might land on the battlefield or from opposing discard.
    sylvan library lets you do the same thing but in a different way, plus it lets you keep answers on top of your library as well.
    it is true that this might cost you some life but overall library makes your life a bit easier because it makes it possible to threaten your opponent instead of reacting to your opponents threats

    this probably comes down a lot to your preferred playstyle and will highly depend on what opponents you are facing

    library allthough has the downside compared to top if you absolutely need to react immideately, which top is better in doing so, but in my opinion it is better not to get into the situation of having to react to opponents threats

    let me try a different explanation

    we are in fact a "tempo-control-deck".
    depending on which stance you need more often to take in games you should prefer library or top, but also build your deck accordingly
    IMO top is better in the controlish builds because it gives you more options to react, and how to react, and gives you a longterm-advantage because its virtually not possible to destroy top
    library is better in the tempoish to midrange builds, because for those builds library will give you a tremendous advantage, but most of the time library gets worse the longer the game goes compared to top

    EDIT: i hope i did not blabber some idiotic stuff.... because i am tired as hell :P

  15. #6215
    Site Contributor
    apple713's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2012
    Location

    Manhattan, NY
    Posts

    2,086

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    Im new to his thread and was wondering what the hard matchups/obstacles this deck traditionally has to overcome? A short answer is fine nothing too detailed but I've been brewing And I'm noticing this deck has really great answers to everything... At least in theory. Having to rely on black vs combo is probably the weakest aspect ive come across and that not really a weak point at all.

    Id build it with 8-12 cards against combo (mainly 1 cmc discard), 10-14 against control (including removal, abrupt decay, stp, lotv, dark confidant, bitterblossom, revoker, deed, vindicate) and ~16 against aggro (kotr, sfm, goyg, drs, )

    From there you can use the sb to weight you deck favorably against your matchups since its pretty even against the field.
    Play 4 Card Blind!

    Currently Playing
    Legacy: Dark Depths
    EDH: 5-Color Hermit Druid

    Currently Brewing: [Deck] Sadistic Sacrament / Chalice NO Eldrazi

    why cards are so expensive...hoarders

  16. #6216
    Salt of the earth

    Join Date

    May 2009
    Location

    Canada
    Posts

    4,685

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    Your main issue against Combo is the fact that you only play discard and some hatebears. You can't counterspell off the top, unfortunately. That's your big problem. Sometimes, combo will just topdeck and you lose. Ideally, you try to strip as many ways out as possible and land some hatebears and race them.

    Another bad matchup is Burn, as well as Sneak and Show. With all the new Searing Blood effects, effectively getting Jitte online is tough. The matchup isn't impossible, but I have found it disfavourable without boarding heavily for it. Sneak and Show isn't great since we don't really play Karakas and/or Knight anymore. The best plan against us is to actually just Show and Tell a fatty. We have Needles for Sneak Attack, Teeg for hardcasting Sneak Attack, and I'm playing Mage to hit Show and Tell. However, at least I have no outs to Show --> fatty. Them's the breaks, but running SFM gives you better game against TNN, other midrange decks, and Miracles. In my experience with the deck

    Favourable:
    Patriot Delver
    Miracles
    Deathblade
    Shardless BUG
    Merfolk/Goblins
    Painter

    Even:
    Team America
    RUG Delver
    Jund
    Elves
    Death and Taxes
    OmniTell

    Slightly Disfavourable:
    ANT
    Punishing Jund

    Disfavourable:
    Sneak and Show
    TES
    Belcher
    Burn
    High Tide
    Last edited by sdematt; 08-13-2014 at 08:21 PM.

  17. #6217
    Site Contributor
    apple713's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2012
    Location

    Manhattan, NY
    Posts

    2,086

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    Quote Originally Posted by sdematt View Post
    Your main issue against Combo is the fact that you only play discard and some hatebears. You can't counterspell off the top, unfortunately. That's your big problem. Sometimes, combo will just topdeck and you lose. Ideally, you try to strip as many ways out as possible and land some hatebears and race them.

    Another bad matchup is Burn, as well as Sneak and Show. With all the new Searing Blood effects, effectively getting Jitte online is tough. The matchup isn't impossible, but I have found it disfavourable without boarding heavily for it. Sneak and Show isn't great since we don't really play Karakas and/or Knight anymore. The best plan against us is to actually just Show and Tell a fatty. We have Needles for Sneak Attack, Teeg for hardcasting Sneak Attack, and I'm playing Mage to hit Show and Tell. However, at least I have no outs to Show --> fatty. Them's the breaks, but running SFM gives you better game against TNN, other midrange decks, and Miracles. In my experience with the deck

    Favourable:
    Patriot Delver
    Miracles
    Deathblade
    Shardless BUG
    Merfolk/Goblins
    Painter

    Even:
    Team America
    RUG Delver
    Jund with Fires
    Elves
    Death and Taxes
    OmniTell

    Slightly Disfavourable:
    ANT
    Punishing Jund

    Disfavourable:
    Sneak and Show
    TES
    Belcher
    Burn
    High Tide

    Thanks for the info matt

    Without playing the matches its very much just speculation but it would appear that many of the lists posted could benefit from more discard main (great against combo and burn) and surgical in the board. Furthermore, maindeck canonist seems superior to teeg / thalia as 2-3x as it is strong against many of your weaker matches, tide, belcher, tes ant omni and elves. G1 is very important in those matches.
    Play 4 Card Blind!

    Currently Playing
    Legacy: Dark Depths
    EDH: 5-Color Hermit Druid

    Currently Brewing: [Deck] Sadistic Sacrament / Chalice NO Eldrazi

    why cards are so expensive...hoarders

  18. #6218
    MTGO Name: Adelorenzi
    ironclad8690's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Posts

    984

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    Quote Originally Posted by sdematt View Post
    Your main issue against Combo is the fact that you only play discard and some hatebears. You can't counterspell off the top, unfortunately. That's your big problem. Sometimes, combo will just topdeck and you lose. Ideally, you try to strip as many ways out as possible and land some hatebears and race them.

    Another bad matchup is Burn, as well as Sneak and Show. With all the new Searing Blood effects, effectively getting Jitte online is tough. The matchup isn't impossible, but I have found it disfavourable without boarding heavily for it. Sneak and Show isn't great since we don't really play Karakas and/or Knight anymore. The best plan against us is to actually just Show and Tell a fatty. We have Needles for Sneak Attack, Teeg for hardcasting Sneak Attack, and I'm playing Mage to hit Show and Tell. However, at least I have no outs to Show --> fatty. Them's the breaks, but running SFM gives you better game against TNN, other midrange decks, and Miracles. In my experience with the deck

    Favourable:
    Patriot Delver
    Miracles
    Deathblade
    Shardless BUG
    Merfolk/Goblins
    Painter

    Even:
    Team America
    RUG Delver
    Jund with Fires
    Elves
    Death and Taxes
    OmniTell

    Slightly Disfavourable:
    ANT
    Punishing Jund

    Disfavourable:
    Sneak and Show
    TES
    Belcher
    Burn
    High Tide
    How is jund w/fires different than punishing jund? You may have convinced me to put Fires of Yavimaya into my Jund deck.

  19. #6219
    Salt of the earth

    Join Date

    May 2009
    Location

    Canada
    Posts

    4,685

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    Quote Originally Posted by ironclad8690 View Post
    How is jund w/fires different than punishing jund? You may have convinced me to put Fires of Yavimaya into my Jund deck.
    Fixed! :P

    -Matt

  20. #6220
    Is Cancer

    Join Date

    Jul 2014
    Posts

    1,146

    Re: [Deck] The Rock

    @apple713
    Teeg is tutorable and good against Miracles; that sums that up. Teeg is still good against elves (possibly better than Canonist due to reclamation sage) and roughly as good against Storm while having application elsewhere. I'm finding it hard to like Canonist outside of W/x decks without green or some kind of Tutor-board.

    I am attempting a discard heavy controlly variant and so far with some mixed success. I'll let people know if it's working for me when I figure out the rest of it. I've had a sinusoidal success rate with it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)