Page 81 of 119 FirstFirst ... 317177787980818283848591 ... LastLast
Results 1,601 to 1,620 of 2375

Thread: [Deck] U/R Delver

  1. #1601
    Member
    festeringGAB's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2010
    Location

    Lucca, Italy
    Posts

    24

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    I think..say welcome to swiftspear
    BUGdelver
    Delver
    T.E.S.
    - I enjoy doing broken stuff. I don't care if you're having fun as long as I am -

  2. #1602
    Stackbuilder

    Join Date

    Mar 2012
    Posts

    859

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    I don't think so.

    Yes, this guy _can_ be better than GG. The problem, however, is that you need to play additional spells pre-combat-damage-step. In a 4 Probe-Build this might be "okay", but you really don't want to tap out or waste your spells just to get the damage in GG would have provided anyway.

  3. #1603

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    I was trying to think of the perks of this guy over GG.

    He, at first, appeared to be decent in a 4 Stifle 4 Wasteland build that plays more to the style of RUG, but then it's slow damage that isn't useful. UR Delver that is essentially counter burn wants faster damage and he doesn't always deliver, especially in top deck mode. He also doesn't trade with many creatures as cleanly as GG does so... I'm not entirely sure.
    “There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle".
    - Albert Einstein

  4. #1604
    Member

    Join Date

    Aug 2013
    Location

    Turin
    Posts

    14

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    What you think about a version with 4 standstill?

    Inviato dal mio KFTHWI utilizzando Tapatalk

  5. #1605
    Member

    Join Date

    Feb 2007
    Location

    San Diego
    Posts

    1,478

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    I played this deck with standstills... Sometimes with delver/GG turn one into turn 2 standstill, you just win. But sometimes it sits there in hand with an even or unfavorable board and you die a little on the inside. Too inconsistent.

  6. #1606
    Cavern on Soldier
    Jon's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2013
    Location

    Woodstock, Georgia, America
    Posts

    226

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Quote Originally Posted by thefreakaccident View Post
    I played this deck with standstills... Sometimes with delver/GG turn one into turn 2 standstill, you just win. But sometimes it sits there in hand with an even or unfavorable board and you die a little on the inside. Too inconsistent.
    I have also played both versions, I think the U/R Burn list is just that, a burn deck with play. I was never impressed with the deck when it didn't have the first 2 turns taken by playing Goblin Guides. For that reason, I much prefer the Delverstill version of the list. The 11th place at the last SCG open was piloted by my cousin and he felt it was very good in the current meta. We have some work to do with the SB, I think on the advice of Nedleeds, we will add a Crucible to the board as well as revisit our elves match. The deck gives you much more play, and is overall much more powerful in the wide spectrum of decks.
    Soldier Stompy

    Quote Originally Posted by nedleeds View Post
    Isn't the reward for an IQ the right to play standard? I'd rather get rickets.

  7. #1607
    “There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle".
    - Albert Einstein

  8. #1608
    Member

    Join Date

    Aug 2012
    Location

    Hamburg
    Posts

    22

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    The fact that Swiftspear plays a lot better with Daze than Goblin Guide would make it possible to emphasize a Mana Denial Strategy and build a deck similar to RUG. While this might be just building a worse version of a successful deck - besides the advantages of being two colors - not using the graveyard could be good. This fact as well as the need for a lot of cheap cantrips to use with Young Pyromancer and Swiftspear could make the deck the perfect spot to abuse Treasure Cruise. Was thinking about some list like the following one:

    4x Delver of Secrets
    4x Monastery Swiftspear
    4x Young Pyromancer

    4x Force of Will
    4x Daze
    4x Lightning Bolt
    4x Stifle
    4x Brainstorm
    4x Gitaxian Probe
    3x Ponder
    3x Treasure Cruise

    4x Wasteland
    4x Scalding tarn
    4x Volcanic Island
    2x Flooded Strand
    1x Wooded Foothills
    2x Island
    1x Mountain

    There are some additional cards to consider. Faithless Looting could fit right in, filling the graveyard and being two spells in one. Dack Fayden could be a nice 1-2 of, the 12 creatures being all human one could give cavern a shot, maybe even fitting Snapcaster in, despite it having a poor synergy with delve. What do you think?

  9. #1609

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Hey Everyone!

    I decided to put a UR delver list together last night. I had always thought that all UR Delver lists played Goblin Guide. As I was looking through, it seems that lists either play Young Pyromancer or Guide and that the guide lists are more focused on Burn.

    Is this always the case? I am sure there are pros an cons to each.

  10. #1610

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Playing both the swiftspear and pyromancer I think you should focus on playing proactive spells on your turn. Chain lightning seems a must and lava dart is something I think should be tested for the enormous synergy with the cards mentioned.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  11. #1611

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Quote Originally Posted by Sentient6 View Post
    4x Delver of Secrets
    4x Monastery Swiftspear
    4x Young Pyromancer

    4x Force of Will
    4x Daze
    4x Lightning Bolt
    4x Stifle
    4x Brainstorm
    4x Gitaxian Probe
    3x Ponder
    3x Treasure Cruise

    4x Wasteland
    4x Scalding tarn
    4x Volcanic Island
    2x Flooded Strand
    1x Wooded Foothills
    2x Island
    1x Mountain
    Think of the number of turns you're going to spend durdling around with that list and the likely payoffs for all the durdling. Fill your GY for two effective plays and a lot of card selection in the process and then draw 3. Does that sound like a winning strategy?

    The RUG lists have Goyf as a finisher once they've done their two turn durdle and disrupt routine. They have a 3/3 with shroud. This list has a bunch of guys that can be removed and no big hitter to finish with.

    UR needs more burn than this. It needs Price of Progress to finish with. It has to have a way to end the game on turn 4 or 5 at the outside. Not that it has to do that every time but it needs to be able to do it.

  12. #1612

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Quote Originally Posted by Sentient6 View Post
    The fact that Swiftspear plays a lot better with Daze than Goblin Guide would make it possible to emphasize a Mana Denial Strategy and build a deck similar to RUG. While this might be just building a worse version of a successful deck - besides the advantages of being two colors - not using the graveyard could be good. This fact as well as the need for a lot of cheap cantrips to use with Young Pyromancer and Swiftspear could make the deck the perfect spot to abuse Treasure Cruise. Was thinking about some list like the following one:

    4x Delver of Secrets
    4x Monastery Swiftspear
    4x Young Pyromancer

    4x Force of Will
    4x Daze
    4x Lightning Bolt
    4x Stifle
    4x Brainstorm
    4x Gitaxian Probe
    3x Ponder
    3x Treasure Cruise

    4x Wasteland
    4x Scalding tarn
    4x Volcanic Island
    2x Flooded Strand
    1x Wooded Foothills
    2x Island
    1x Mountain

    There are some additional cards to consider. Faithless Looting could fit right in, filling the graveyard and being two spells in one. Dack Fayden could be a nice 1-2 of, the 12 creatures being all human one could give cavern a shot, maybe even fitting Snapcaster in, despite it having a poor synergy with delve. What do you think?
    I think the idea of the deck seams right, however, I am not positive that stifle would fit in a pyromancer-cantrip shell. Here we are looking to cantrip and deploy treats and make dudes. We cannot only hold mana for stifle, otherwise our creatures wont grow.
    With that said, I am more inclined to -4stifle for 2 chain/2pierce
    Also, i think 2 cruise should be enough.

  13. #1613
    Member

    Join Date

    Aug 2012
    Location

    Hamburg
    Posts

    22

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    I think you guys are right with stifle, it seems awkward. More gas in the form of Chain Lightning really seems like the way to go. Lava Dart I am not so sure about... Might be too cute. But then again you go through a lot of cards and therefore enough lands to sac. There's also synergy with looting, if you wanna go down that route.

  14. #1614
    Cavern on Soldier
    Jon's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2013
    Location

    Woodstock, Georgia, America
    Posts

    226

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Is Wasteland / Stifle / Pyro better then Price of Progress / Goblin Guide / Snapcaster ? Why try to play the mana denial game with Pyro and jam black for Cabal Therapy and DRS?
    Soldier Stompy

    Quote Originally Posted by nedleeds View Post
    Isn't the reward for an IQ the right to play standard? I'd rather get rickets.

  15. #1615

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Quote Originally Posted by Sentient6 View Post
    I think you guys are right with stifle, it seems awkward. More gas in the form of Chain Lightning really seems like the way to go. Lava Dart I am not so sure about... Might be too cute. But then again you go through a lot of cards and therefore enough lands to sac. There's also synergy with looting, if you wanna go down that route.
    I really like the UR lists that build like they are RUG except no Green. Stifle can be fantastic with the right build around it.
    “There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle".
    - Albert Einstein

  16. #1616

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Anyone have any thoughts about adding Monastery Swiftspear into a traditional burn list to put the deck at 9 one drops? Maybe cut a main deck ponder? I always feel like my best starts involve a one drop hitting the table.

  17. #1617

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Quote Originally Posted by Angelteg View Post
    Anyone have any thoughts about adding Monastery Swiftspear into a traditional burn list to put the deck at 9 one drops? Maybe cut a main deck ponder? I always feel like my best starts involve a one drop hitting the table.
    4 Monastery Swiftspear
    4 Delver of Secrets
    4 Goblin Guide

    2 Treasure Cruise
    2 Rift Bolt
    3 Daze
    2 Fireblast
    1 Forked Bolt
    4 Ponder
    4 Brainstorm
    4 Gitaxian Probe
    4 Lightning Bolt
    4 Chain Lightning
    1 Price of Progress

    4 Volcanic Island
    1 Mountain
    1 Island
    4 Scalding Tarn
    3 Wooded Foothills
    4 Flooded Strand

    SB: 4 Force of Will
    SB: 1 Pithing Needle
    SB: 2 Smash to Smithereens
    SB: 2 Grim Lavamancer
    SB: 2 Relic of Progenitus
    SB: 3 Meddling Mage
    SB: 1 Plateau

    I goldfished this list a lot, and it actually looks promising. There is a lot of synergy (and some awakwardness with the basics and Daze/Fireblast) and the speed is ridiculous, especially decks without one mana removal (aka BUG) should have big problems with this.

  18. #1618
    Member

    Join Date

    Aug 2012
    Location

    Hamburg
    Posts

    22

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Not sure if Daze belongs in the same list as Goblin Guide. Why not go all the way and cut it for even more burn?

  19. #1619

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    In my experience, UR has two routes it can take. You can go the burn/aggro route or the tempo route.

    In a tempo shell you want wasteland, pyromancer, daze, and probably stifle. You can also run snapcaster.

    In a burn shell you want goblin guide, price of progress, snapcaster, and you specifically DON'T want stifle and wasteland because your main wincon is price of progress. This list also doesn't want daze because daze's main strength is its synergy with mana denial. Between 4 force, 2 spell pierce, and sometimes 2 spell snare I never really miss daze in these kind of lists. Daze is also bad here because you want to have lots of mana open for snapcaster mage.

    The tempo shell is the "better" deck because it has good matchups against most of the meta. The issue here is that the only advantage that UR tempo has over RUG or BUG or 4 color delver is that it's cheaper to build. However, if your meta has a lot of BUG (especially shardless BUG), the burn list will absolutely stomp at local tourneys. I think in that regard, UR delver with price of progress is the only list worth running since there's no deck that does quite the same thing, so it actually fits a niche in the meta. Although you're trying to build RUG and you can't afford it yet, UR tempo is worth building since it plays the same.

  20. #1620

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Quote Originally Posted by FoolofaTook View Post
    Think of the number of turns you're going to spend durdling around with that list and the likely payoffs for all the durdling. Fill your GY for two effective plays and a lot of card selection in the process and then draw 3. Does that sound like a winning strategy?

    The RUG lists have Goyf as a finisher once they've done their two turn durdle and disrupt routine. They have a 3/3 with shroud. This list has a bunch of guys that can be removed and no big hitter to finish with.

    UR needs more burn than this. It needs Price of Progress to finish with. It has to have a way to end the game on turn 4 or 5 at the outside. Not that it has to do that every time but it needs to be able to do it.
    Uh no it does not, I don't think you have seen what Young Pyromancer can do. In the right deck it is a better and faster finisher than Goyf anyway.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)