Page 54 of 79 FirstFirst ... 44450515253545556575864 ... LastLast
Results 1,061 to 1,080 of 1571

Thread: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

  1. #1061

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    Yeah what he said. Well he won some money, maybe he can afford lands now so he doesn't auto lose to any duress effect.

  2. #1062
    Land Destruction Enthusiast
    Megadeus's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2012
    Location

    Kennesaw, GA
    Posts

    5,572

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    4 elves in Indy and the winning deck has 4 ancestral for Jersey. So sad. Maybe modern time it is
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    I've been taking shitty brews and tier 2 decks to tournaments and losing with them for years now. Welcome to the club. We meet for cocktails after round 6.
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevestamopz View Post
    Top quality german restraint there.

    If I'm at the point where I'm rage quitting, you can bet your kransky that I'm calling everyone involved a cunt.

  3. #1063
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Jun 2010
    Posts

    249

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    Quote Originally Posted by Megadeus View Post
    4 elves in Indy and the winning deck has 4 ancestral for Jersey. So sad. Maybe modern time it is
    Ban Gaea's Cradle and Brainstorm?

  4. #1064

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    Quote Originally Posted by Megadeus View Post
    4 elves in Indy and the winning deck has 4 ancestral for Jersey. So sad. Maybe modern time it is
    Sounds great, then you can play against 4 different Pod decks in the top 4.

  5. #1065
    get outta here, humanity.
    iamajellydonut's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2009
    Location

    Butugychag
    Posts

    2,031

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage



    Can we please, for the love of God, agree that this has gone too far?
    Quote Originally Posted by sdematt View Post
    tits.

  6. #1066
    get outta here, humanity.
    iamajellydonut's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2009
    Location

    Butugychag
    Posts

    2,031

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    And they're not even consistent about this bullshittery. There's BUG Delver and Sultai Delver in the top eight.
    Quote Originally Posted by sdematt View Post
    tits.

  7. #1067

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    Quote Originally Posted by iamajellydonut View Post
    And they're not even consistent about this bullshittery. There's BUG Delver and Sultai Delver in the top eight.
    Just wait until the next Wizards Focus Group Session (tm) about color naming for the rest of the shit

  8. #1068

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    I just don't get why they feel the need to force the wedge names. We didn't get this 2 years ago with RTR and forcing the acceptance of the Ravnica guild names. Their argument that RUG and BUG are hard for new players to interpret is nullified by the fact that they are still calling it UR Delver and not Izzet Delver.

  9. #1069

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    Quote Originally Posted by pochy View Post
    what?
    wasn't he playing miracles? o.0
    do i remember badly? (miracle vs reanimator in the match with Duke)
    yeah, i re-0watched it just now. I had a major derpfest.

    As for the result, - that's pretty comical.

    16/16 Visionaries. BAN VISIONARY! /s

  10. #1070
    Say no to creatures.

    Join Date

    May 2013
    Posts

    387

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    Uh, it's more like old players are not invited to read about Legacy rather than new players. What the fuck is Jeskai, which fucking color combination is it? Do I have to follow Standard now?
    Legacy: Rituals
    Vintage: Drains

  11. #1071

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    Quote Originally Posted by Higgs View Post
    Uh, it's more like old players are not invited to read about Legacy rather than new players. What the fuck is Jeskai, which fucking color combination is it? Do I have to follow Standard now?
    Those are just simple names. You don't need to follow standard to learn 5 new words for combinations of colors. Come on, magic players can remember thousands of cards and now some of you complain about learning just 5 words more? Also, after a few years nobody complains about the older names now (esperblade and bant are both decknames based on the first shards).
    I agree that the naming must be consistent, and I hope they will correct it in the near future.

  12. #1072
    Say no to creatures.

    Join Date

    May 2013
    Posts

    387

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    I won't hear any arguments defending SCG's position on this whether it's semi-plausible or not.
    Legacy: Rituals
    Vintage: Drains

  13. #1073
    Greatness awaits!
    Lemnear's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2010
    Location

    Berlin, Germany
    Posts

    6,997

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    Quote Originally Posted by guillemnicolau View Post
    Those are just simple names. You don't need to follow standard to learn 5 new words for combinations of colors. Come on, magic players can remember thousands of cards and now some of you complain about learning just 5 words more? Also, after a few years nobody complains about the older names now (esperblade and bant are both decknames based on the first shards).
    I agree that the naming must be consistent, and I hope they will correct it in the near future.
    We had the topic already. Examples like Bant and Naya are completely different as the decks which established the names actually ran Bant/Naya/Alara cards in Legacy and/or used the Guild/Wedge/shard-mechanic

    Sultai, Jeskai, Mardu, Temur and whatever the fucking 5th was, are treated like they are established keywords for color combinations, but in fact have had no impact, measured on cards/theme/mechanic so far ... maybe because Khans was not even fucking Standard-legal while WotC/SCG tried to establish the Wedge-names! This is bullshittery like handing Obama the Nobel Peace Price IN PURE HOPE that his FUTURE actions would justify the award
    www.theepicstorm.com - Your Source for The Epic Storm - Articles, Reports, Decktech and more!

    Join us at Facebook!

    Quote Originally Posted by Echelon View Post
    Lemnear sounds harsh at times, but he means well. Or to destroy, but that's when he starts rapping.

    Architect by day, rapstar by night. He's pretty much the German Hannah Montana. Sometimes he even comes in like a wrecking ball.

  14. #1074

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    Quote Originally Posted by guillemnicolau View Post
    (esperblade and bant are both decknames based on the first shards)
    Those deck names (and Jund) were community driven at least in part (unless I am mistaken). I don't understand why SCG is actively trying to rename established deck names on the grounds that the clan names are more newbie friendly. Do they know that there are 20 two- and three color combinations? How is that easier than just remembering 5 colors: U, G, R, W, B?

  15. #1075
    Member

    Join Date

    Jul 2013
    Location

    Texas
    Posts

    1,184

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    Quote Originally Posted by nedleeds View Post
    So diversity.
    haha I knew this was coming but was expecting "Such hoof derp. Many shaved ape. Wow."

  16. #1076
    banned

    Join Date

    Jul 2013
    Location

    black metal bed room
    Posts

    2,188

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    I hope that the dickheads of WotC and SCG read this:

    "Hey, fuckfaces of SCG and WotC! Could you please stop with your Tumor, Merde, Azban, Jezkain and the 5th shit shittery? We're not interested in this, and please, be so kind as to find a different guinea pigs for you target-audience-shaping tests and such.

    Kind regards, Bed Decks Palyer."

  17. #1077
    A short, sturdy creature fond of drink and industry.
    PirateKing's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2011
    Location

    BEST JERSEY
    Posts

    1,806

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    I was at the event doing poorly, so I struck up conversation with the commentators, who did not seem prepared for the level of shit being thrown at them. My impression is that a portion of the coverage team disagreed with the new names, but all made mention of an email handed down from on high, and they were all good little soldiers following orders. Seems it got errata'd partway through the day that the on screen names would not change, but commentators could call it BUG and RUG without reprimand from the boss.

    Seems like the group there liked BUG and RUG, did not like Junk and Patriot, did not agree with the "history of the format" argument, but did seem to acknowledge the arguments that Jund and Bant legacy decks did contain relevant printed cards in it. They countered that every WUB deck is Esper, even if it has nothing to do with the wedge. I never heard a good argument for not using Azorius, other than it was a longer word than UW, but that logic falls flat against the one syllable BUG.

    Also apparently the feature match with Jund was an attempt to troll the community with some ironic joke. So it was pretty interesting to see the whole thing unfold in their presence. It was definitely the side conversation topic of the day. If they continue to get shit for it at every event, their resolve doesn't seem firm enough to weather that storm.
    Quote Originally Posted by GreatWhale View Post
    Gross, other formats. I puked in my mouth a little.

  18. #1078

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    Quote Originally Posted by PirateKing View Post
    I was at the event doing poorly, so I struck up conversation with the commentators, who did not seem prepared for the level of shit being thrown at them. My impression is that a portion of the coverage team disagreed with the new names, but all made mention of an email handed down from on high, and they were all good little soldiers following orders. Seems it got errata'd partway through the day that the on screen names would not change, but commentators could call it BUG and RUG without reprimand from the boss.

    Seems like the group there liked BUG and RUG, did not like Junk and Patriot, did not agree with the "history of the format" argument, but did seem to acknowledge the arguments that Jund and Bant legacy decks did contain relevant printed cards in it. They countered that every WUB deck is Esper, even if it has nothing to do with the wedge. I never heard a good argument for not using Azorius, other than it was a longer word than UW, but that logic falls flat against the one syllable BUG.

    Also apparently the feature match with Jund was an attempt to troll the community with some ironic joke. So it was pretty interesting to see the whole thing unfold in their presence. It was definitely the side conversation topic of the day. If they continue to get shit for it at every event, their resolve doesn't seem firm enough to weather that storm.
    Oh, come on! Wouldn't you play 'John WU Miracles'? :p

    But yes, the only deck that could legitimately claim to be Jeskai is the Delver deck that played the Swiftblade, Cruise as fours, and Dig tHrough Time as a two.

  19. #1079
    A short, sturdy creature fond of drink and industry.
    PirateKing's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2011
    Location

    BEST JERSEY
    Posts

    1,806

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    Quote Originally Posted by Darkenslight View Post
    Oh, come on! Wouldn't you play 'John WU Miracles'? :p

    But yes, the only deck that could legitimately claim to be Jeskai is the Delver deck that played the Swiftblade, Cruise as fours, and Dig tHrough Time as a two.
    Hey man, you're not convincing me of anything, I'm already in the Canadian Thresh/Team America naming camp.
    Quote Originally Posted by GreatWhale View Post
    Gross, other formats. I puked in my mouth a little.

  20. #1080
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,533

    Re: SCG and its not-as-lousy-as-WotC coverage

    Quote Originally Posted by PirateKing View Post
    Seems like the group there liked BUG and RUG, did not like Junk and Patriot, did not agree with the "history of the format" argument, but did seem to acknowledge the arguments that Jund and Bant legacy decks did contain relevant printed cards in it. They countered that every WUB deck is Esper, even if it has nothing to do with the wedge. I never heard a good argument for not using Azorius, other than it was a longer word than UW, but that logic falls flat against the one syllable BUG.
    Bant - didn't have an identity before, heavily uses Bant cards
    Esper - didn't have a real identity, either; besides, why not call it Dubstep Blade instead of WUB Control?
    Grixis - no identity before - did it even exist before the shard?
    Jund - came into being with RtR, thus after the shard name was established
    Naya - Zoo was an established deck before, that's why it never caught on.

    BUG and RUG are popular and established names, so I doubt they're going to catch on either. Patriot isn't an ideal name, but Jeskai sounds terrible. Junk has the problem that it sounds to similiar to Jund, but it's an established name - besides, Abzan is terrible. Mardu might catch on because Team Italia is a terrible name, but then again, nobody plays the worst 3-color combination.

    And calling UWr Miracles "Jeskai Miracles" is just plain retarded. It's a UW deck with a few splashed red sideboard cards. What's so Jeskai about it?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)