Page 340 of 428 FirstFirst ... 240290330336337338339340341342343344350390 ... LastLast
Results 6,781 to 6,800 of 8554

Thread: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

  1. #6781
    Land Destruction Enthusiast
    Megadeus's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2012
    Location

    Kennesaw, GA
    Posts

    5,572

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    GSZ is definitely the best card. I probably win 75% of games I draw 3 of them. I can see certain metas where shaving KOTR is fine. I've debated it for the fourth new Thalia. I don't know if that's right though. I just really want to jam Thalia on turn 2 every game
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    I've been taking shitty brews and tier 2 decks to tournaments and losing with them for years now. Welcome to the club. We meet for cocktails after round 6.
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevestamopz View Post
    Top quality german restraint there.

    If I'm at the point where I'm rage quitting, you can bet your kransky that I'm calling everyone involved a cunt.

  2. #6782

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Are you guys not considering the new chalice on legs card? Seems like you would be the best deck for it since you can cast on T2 when you have it. I thought I'd check out the forum to see if the ideas you had would sway me back to Maverick, but no one has mentioned in the last few pages?
    Junk and Stoned Rhinos.

  3. #6783

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I just had to cut my flex slot PW and my 2nd library to fit in Thalia HC.

    Im not cutting SFM, I'm not shaving a pridemage. My main is pretty much stock now aside from playing a swamp. How am I supposed to fit in Sanctum Prelate :(

  4. #6784
    Member

    Join Date

    Aug 2014
    Location

    Central New York
    Posts

    175

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Jain_Mor View Post
    Are you guys not considering the new chalice on legs card? Seems like you would be the best deck for it since you can cast on T2 when you have it. I thought I'd check out the forum to see if the ideas you had would sway me back to Maverick, but no one has mentioned in the last few pages?
    When I acquire them, I'm pretty sure I want 4 in the 75. How that 4 is split is beyond me.
    I am willing to shave down on some flex slots in favor of prelate. I also thought about the new white Recruiter...but it has been "meh" at best. I think a green and taxes list could better incorporate Recruiter. The upside of recruiter is a strong flow of creatures throughout the game. Almost never missing a beat. The upside of prelate is locking out your opponent. Prelate "puts the boot to their throat" because you reduce the odds of a comeback. Eliminate sweepers and cantrips. Finish with the lead you have.
    If there was a downside to both new cards (focusing more on prelate coming into the deck), it's the slots you're not using to make room for them. I just top 8'ed without decay and felt fine. I could also drop scryb, a QPM, a Thalia 2.0 and be fine. So the room is there.

    The small amount of goldfishing I've done with the new cards has been interesting. Prelate definitely plays the game better. It's something I'd like to see nearly every match. Usually my 3 turn sequencing is dork into Thalia and SFM or dork into three drops. I'm not ruling out the idea of new cards being better suited for DNT or Deadguy.

  5. #6785
    Land Destruction Enthusiast
    Megadeus's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2012
    Location

    Kennesaw, GA
    Posts

    5,572

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I think Prelate and new Thalia compete for the same slots. Thalia is a better body and easier to cast plus first strike and exalted or equipment is insane. I think Prelate is more something for the board and it maybe simply replaces some number of KOTR in the matches where it's not as good like miracles, storm (KOTR of course is good against SNT), and other stuff.
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    I've been taking shitty brews and tier 2 decks to tournaments and losing with them for years now. Welcome to the club. We meet for cocktails after round 6.
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevestamopz View Post
    Top quality german restraint there.

    If I'm at the point where I'm rage quitting, you can bet your kransky that I'm calling everyone involved a cunt.

  6. #6786
    Member
    ET1's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2016
    Location

    Eugene, OR
    Posts

    8

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Anybody have thoughts on Kaya in the sideboard? I played a copy today in my LGS's weekly legacy tournament and it was an absolute house against Miracles. Ticking her down making them discard cards and you drawings is huge, after doing that twice you can just reset her. She seems like she may also be decent against decks like Jund and Shardless.

  7. #6787

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Rascalyote View Post
    I just had to cut my flex slot PW and my 2nd library to fit in Thalia HC.

    Im not cutting SFM, I'm not shaving a pridemage. My main is pretty much stock now aside from playing a swamp. How am I supposed to fit in Sanctum Prelate :(
    whats your list?

  8. #6788

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    so I just made this list from scratch:
    http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/colle...iter-maverick/

    Creature (26)

    1x Eternal Witness
    1x Thalia, Heretic Cathar
    1x Gaddock Teeg
    1x Phyrexian Revoker
    1x Qasali Pridemage
    1x Sanctum Prelate
    2x Stoneforge Mystic
    3x Recruiter of the
    3x Flickerwisp Guard
    3x Knight of the Reliquary
    3x Mother of Runes
    3x Noble Hierarch
    3x Thalia, Guardian of Thraben

    Land (22)

    1x Cavern of Souls
    1x Dark Depths
    1x Thespian's Stage
    1x Karakas
    2x Forest
    2x Plains
    2x Savannah
    4x Verdant Catacombs
    4x Wasteland
    4x Windswept Heath

    Artifact (6)

    4x AEther Vial

    Instant (7)

    3x Collected Company
    4x Swords to Plowshares

    Sideboard (15)

    1x Gideon, Ally of Zendikar
    1x Leonin Relic-Warder
    1x Life from the Loam
    1x Mangara of Corondor
    1x Phyrexian Revoker
    1x Scavenging Ooze
    1x Containment Priest
    2x Choke
    2x Council's Judgment
    2x Ethersworn Canonist
    2x Faerie Macabre


    I guess it's a way to start

  9. #6789
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by ET1 View Post
    Anybody have thoughts on Kaya in the sideboard? I played a copy today in my LGS's weekly legacy tournament and it was an absolute house against Miracles. Ticking her down making them discard cards and you drawings is huge, after doing that twice you can just reset her. She seems like she may also be decent against decks like Jund and Shardless.
    Would any of the walkers have been good in the same spot? Like Elspeth Knight-errant; Garruk; or Sorin Lord of Innistrad? Not making tokens limits Kaya's ability to be useful in other matchups. Resolving the walkers is usually the challenge. Once they're live Miracles has trouble dealing regardless of which walker you use. Also, can she beat Jace?
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  10. #6790

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    13th in the premier mtgo legacy event yesterday. Went 5-2 losses were round 1 to elves and I think round 4 to rug delver. 5th through 8th were all 5-2, shouldn't of loss so early but when you play a terrible match up round 1, it's hard to have good breakers. FYI same list I've been running. The three stoneforge with batterskull feels right. Has anyone been playing this configuration or no?

  11. #6791

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I gotta Quest for 4 Power (Black Lotus) event on Sunday that I'm looking for some feedback/discussion .

    My meta is primary Lands, Miracles, Delver, and Storm

    I have a game plan between Delver and Storm, and okish Miracles plan (I'm running DD and Bobs because the card advantage is important in this match-up and their source of removal is swords and terminus so I can afford the life loss of cards). the only deck that I don't really have a solid game plan is Lands (RUG, RG, Turbo, etc.)

    I feel that Loam + Bog just seals them out the game, safekeeper blanks on their removal, and Knights just applies more pressure. But I could be wrong.

    My list is similar to DNEELY list except I do not run the SF package and instead I run Bobs, THC, loam, and DD combo, and an extra pair of Library.

  12. #6792
    Land Destruction Enthusiast
    Megadeus's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2012
    Location

    Kennesaw, GA
    Posts

    5,572

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Having access to 2-3 Scavenging Ooze is pretty nice in the match up. Can get out of PFire range and you get to waste tabernacle and eat it so you don't have to worry about not being able to go wide
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    I've been taking shitty brews and tier 2 decks to tournaments and losing with them for years now. Welcome to the club. We meet for cocktails after round 6.
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevestamopz View Post
    Top quality german restraint there.

    If I'm at the point where I'm rage quitting, you can bet your kransky that I'm calling everyone involved a cunt.

  13. #6793

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Megadeus View Post
    Having access to 2-3 Scavenging Ooze is pretty nice in the match up. Can get out of PFire range and you get to waste tabernacle and eat it so you don't have to worry about not being able to go wide
    That sounds right. though I'm more tempted to bring out Armageddon but I know it won't do as much as I want

  14. #6794
    Member

    Join Date

    Aug 2014
    Location

    Central New York
    Posts

    175

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by NEELEY View Post
    13th in the premier mtgo legacy event yesterday. Went 5-2 losses were round 1 to elves and I think round 4 to rug delver. 5th through 8th were all 5-2, shouldn't of loss so early but when you play a terrible match up round 1, it's hard to have good breakers. FYI same list I've been running. The three stoneforge with batterskull feels right. Has anyone been playing this configuration or no?
    You can check my recent list. I am a fan of 3x SFM recently. She just powers through board states and is a wonderful top-deck. I am still opposed to Batterskull. When it works, it works well. But far too often it is a waste of space Sword of X/Y isn't. Especially in the early game I find myself capable of making several 3 drop plays. I'll even bait countermagic with a key 3 drop in exchange for later playing a sandbagged equipment. Batterskull is literally impossible to run during the game period of the game without the prerequisite SFM to fetch it. IMO if you untap with 5 mana, you're already doing well in Maverick and any equip is good by that point.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thunderknight View Post
    I gotta Quest for 4 Power (Black Lotus) event on Sunday that I'm looking for some feedback/discussion .

    My meta is primary Lands, Miracles, Delver, and Storm

    I have a game plan between Delver and Storm, and okish Miracles plan (I'm running DD and Bobs because the card advantage is important in this match-up and their source of removal is swords and terminus so I can afford the life loss of cards). the only deck that I don't really have a solid game plan is Lands (RUG, RG, Turbo, etc.)

    I feel that Loam + Bog just seals them out the game, safekeeper blanks on their removal, and Knights just applies more pressure. But I could be wrong.

    My list is similar to DNEELY list except I do not run the SF package and instead I run Bobs, THC, loam, and DD combo, and an extra pair of Library.
    I'm going to assume those 4 decks are a significant portion of the anticipated meta and that you feel you have roughly equal odds (25%) of facing any of them. They could also be the main competition you wanna skew the deck design around.

    Lands
    + Needle (port, waste, maze, stage to prevent DD combo)
    + RIP > Bog. Every. Time
    + Sanctum Prelate (crop rotation, gamble, exploration, etc. on 1 // decay, Pfires on 2)

    Miracles
    Run 2x Teeg in the 75
    Run Planeswalkers like Gideon, Ally of Zendikar and Elspeth, Knight-Errant (yes, it's a No-Bo with Teeg on table but that's a risk you need to take). If you fear the delver matchup, then Garruk Relentless is an option. He shoots down delvers as faux removal. Also relevant against Miracles but is not as strong as the 2 aforementioned.
    + Armageddon (see: also STRONG against Lands.dec)
    + Needle (see: also strong against Land.dec, stop SDT shenanigans)
    I usually cut Thalia GoT in games 2 and 3. She's a detriment beyond turn 3. They keep dropping lands and you have better things to run.
    + Krosan Grip/Abrupt Decay/QPM to knock out tops (in response to them drawing) or CB itself
    + Sylvan Library from the SB

    Do not bother with Choke.

    Delver
    + Thalia, HC obliterates them
    + Sanctum Prelate on 1 obliterates them
    + Thalia 1.0 is strong
    + Canonist (seriously, she's a pain for them to remove and it also eliminates cantrip chains. also takes the bullet in place of your other friends)

    Loam is okay, but it isnt a priority. I would aim for mana denial and the good 'ol Thalia 1.0 + Wasteland.
    Stop their fliers early and often.

    Storm
    + Thalia 1.0
    + Canonist
    + Discard in the SB
    Prelate on 2 is the priority according to Bryant and others. Don't be afraid to read the situation and call X = 0/1/4

    @Thunderknight: I think for his situation you run 'Geddon.

    ==================
    The SB I'd run
    5x Canonist + Discard (3:2 or 2:3, your pick)
    1x Sanctum Prelates not already in the main
    2x Armageddon
    2x Pithing Needle
    1x Teeg #2
    2x Rest in Peace
    2x Flex...Sword of X/Y, Walkers, additional Scooze/QPM, Kgrip, Zealous Persecution (my fav flex)

    My personal opinion is that you're wasting space running Confidants and Libraries main. They are "win more" against these decks. Storm and Lands will simply kill you without some form of disruption. I'd probably run 3x Sanctum Prelates in the main. They take care of business rather swiftly. I love Thalia, HC in general. IMO she's also a STRONG play here. Curving mom, Thalia 1, Thalia 2 sets you up rather well. The same could be said for dork into thalia-wasteland or dork into 3drop.

  15. #6795

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Warden View Post

    Do not bother with Choke.
    Been playing Maverick for a few years now and i have always had 2 Chokes in my board, most lists i look up to compare generally have at least one. Would like to know more about your Reasoning

  16. #6796

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I'm intrigued as well...

    When choke resolves it's a game changer against miracles since they cannot waste mana toping all the time.

    And since we can reliably get it out turn 2 it feels very good (knowing they probably boarded out forces if they know what they are doing means it will almost always resolve).

  17. #6797
    Pancake
    Bobmans's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2012
    Location

    Netherlands
    Posts

    845

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    How is the Elves MU on overall with this deck?
    Besides Toxic Deluge, Zealous Persecution and/or Golgari Charm what are solid cards to play/board?
    Kagu-Tsuchi カグツチ (Jund NicFit)
    Rhino's Abbondanza (Junk NicFit)
    4c Aggro Loam

    Quote Originally Posted by Chatto View Post
    How about: ramp into Deed, clear the board, and bash your opponent's head in.

  18. #6798
    Hymn-Slinging Mod
    H's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2008
    Location

    The U-easy-anna
    Posts

    3,446

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobmans View Post
    How is the Elves MU on overall with this deck?
    Besides Toxic Deluge, Zealous Persecution and/or Golgari Charm what are solid cards to play/board?
    New Thalia seems like your best hope though, right?
    "The Ancients teach us that if we can but last, we shall prevail."
    Kaysa, Elder Druid of the Juniper Order

  19. #6799

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by H View Post
    New Thalia seems like your best hope though, right?
    This.

    As long as she's there you know elves cannot combo off with craterhoof.

    This slows them down, hopefully long enough to find sideboard cards and/or force your way with mom.

  20. #6800

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Cpt-Qc View Post
    This.

    As long as she's there you know elves cannot combo off with craterhoof.

    This slows them down, hopefully long enough to find sideboard cards and/or force your way with mom.
    You have lots of ways of dealing with Elves

    between Canonist, Zealous, both Thalia's, gaddock teeg, Games two and three can be very favorable.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)