Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 40 of 40

Thread: GPT Results

  1. #21
    Member

    Join Date

    Jan 2007
    Location

    Milwaukee, WI, USA
    Posts

    287

    Re: GPT Results

    The Chicago GPT was won by Goblins, after a Goblins mirror in the finals. ICBM made top 8, top 4, and finals, but lost.

  2. #22
    Member
    Gekoratel's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Location

    NJ
    Posts

    78

    Re: GPT Results

    How big was the flash deck at this tourny, with two Goblins decks in the finals I'm assuming it wasn't popular or was hated out by Thresh/Fish variants.

  3. #23

    Re: GPT Results

    GPT Atlanta was:

    1st - B/W Confindant
    2nd - U/W Landstill
    3rd - Iggypop
    4th - U/W/R fish?
    5th - Mono white stax
    6th - Mono white stax
    7th - Pox
    8th - I forget~

    We only had 15 people and for some reason played 5 rounds instead of 4 to a top 8. By the time round 5 had rolled around we only had 10 people left.

  4. #24
    Member

    Join Date

    Oct 2006
    Location

    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts

    32

    Re: GPT Results

    5C Survival with C-Victory and Sliver queen is awesome...
    DDestroyer: Can't wait to see ya in PGH tomorrow.
    --
    Namaste
    -Dave

  5. #25
    Member

    Join Date

    Jan 2007
    Location

    Milwaukee, WI, USA
    Posts

    287

    Re: GPT Results

    Quote Originally Posted by Gekoratel View Post
    How big was the flash deck at this tourny, with two Goblins decks in the finals I'm assuming it wasn't popular or was hated out by Thresh/Fish variants.
    0 people played it. Goblins was everywhere.

  6. #26
    rating is higher than yours
    Ta Jugs's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2006
    Location

    Rachacha, NY
    Posts

    155

    Re: GPT Results

    Well the GPT in Rachacha is tomorrow last time we had 47 players it should be an interesting GPT.

  7. #27
    Banned
    Caboose's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2006
    Location

    Columbus, OH
    Posts

    335

    Re: GPT Results

    Pittsburgh had like 36 people and had about 3 or 4 Flash decks. Top 8 was:

    Goblins/UGW Thresh (split)
    Meathooks
    4c Landstill
    U/G Madness/Landstill hybrid
    Hulk Flash
    Hulk Flash
    (Don't know the 8th deck right now)

  8. #28
    Member
    Gekoratel's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Location

    NJ
    Posts

    78

    Re: GPT Results

    UPDATED
    The Top 8 for the Rochester GPT was:
    Rg Goblins
    Hulk Flash
    Aluren
    Land.dec
    Belcher
    Belcher
    4 Color Thresh
    Fairy Stompy variant w/ Standstill

    Matchups were:
    Quarter Finals
    Rg Goblins vs. Aluren
    Fairy Stompy vs. Belcher
    4 Color Thresh vs. Hulk Flash
    Belcher vs. Land.dec

    Semis
    Aluren vs. Belcher
    4 Color Thresh vs. Fairy Stompy

    Finals
    Aluren vs. Fairy Stompy
    Last edited by Gekoratel; 05-06-2007 at 10:27 PM.

  9. #29
    The King of Lockjobs
    Peter_Rotten's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2003
    Location

    Middle of Nowhere, NY
    Posts

    1,214

    Re: GPT Results

    Quote Originally Posted by Gekoratel View Post
    The Top 8 for the Rochester GPT was:
    How many players attended this event?
    Quote Originally Posted by Cavius The Great View Post
    Germany seems to find me influential. Have you ever Googled "Nourishing Lich"?
    Quote Originally Posted by Nihil Credo View Post
    No, Peter_Rotten, you are the problems.

  10. #30
    Sweet Sixteenth
    Happy Gilmore's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2004
    Location

    Fairfax City, VA
    Posts

    1,497

    Re: GPT Results

    T8 for GPT Richmond 05-05-07: 24 players I believe

    Hulk Flash (Mr. Nipples)
    Hulk Flash (Obfuscate Freely)
    Solidarity (unregged)
    CRIT Belcher (unreggerd)
    Truffle Shuffle (Unregged)
    Didly Dizzle or whatever it is called (Deep6er)
    Red Death (Nightwolf9)
    UGw(r?) ********, played by Paul Lynch.
    Last edited by Happy Gilmore; 05-06-2007 at 10:50 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Krieger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Getsickanddie View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Parcher View Post
    Looks like Team Unicorn has about sixteen coming to this.

    What's the term for a plural group of Unicorns? Y'know, like a murder of crows. Well that's what's on it's way.
    ******s?
    While this is close it's still wrong. Every one knows it's an orgy of unicorns.
    Team Unicorn is too hetero for me.
    TeaM NOVA for life.

  11. #31
    Member
    Shriekmaw's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2006
    Location

    Nashville, TN
    Posts

    623

    Re: GPT Results

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter_Rotten View Post
    How many players attended this event?

    I believe the number of players that attended the Rochester GPT was around 30. Could someone please confirm this? Thanks.
    ~Shriek~

  12. #32
    Sweet Sixteenth
    Happy Gilmore's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2004
    Location

    Fairfax City, VA
    Posts

    1,497

    Re: GPT Results

    Does anyone have results for the Delaware GPT on the 5th? Some of us were going to go but it started at 9 or something and we said, fuck it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Krieger View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Getsickanddie View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Parcher View Post
    Looks like Team Unicorn has about sixteen coming to this.

    What's the term for a plural group of Unicorns? Y'know, like a murder of crows. Well that's what's on it's way.
    ******s?
    While this is close it's still wrong. Every one knows it's an orgy of unicorns.
    Team Unicorn is too hetero for me.
    TeaM NOVA for life.

  13. #33
    Winter is coming...
    Phantom's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2005
    Posts

    1,089

    Re: GPT Results

    Quote Originally Posted by Gekoratel View Post
    Finals
    Aluren vs. Fairy Stompy
    Do you know who won? Also, was it Blue Skies by any chance (In New and Developmental) or was it just FS with Standstill?

  14. #34
    Insane Anarchists Get Mean
    freakish777's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2005
    Location

    NY State
    Posts

    1,644

    Re: GPT Results

    Quote Originally Posted by nickrit2000 View Post
    I believe the number of players that attended the Rochester GPT was around 30. Could someone please confirm this? Thanks.
    I think the actual number was 25.


    Do you know who won? Also, was it Blue Skies by any chance (In New and Developmental) or was it just FS with Standstill?
    It was Janos_Wuryon (username here on the Source) if I'm not mistaken. In my second game against him I called the judge over after counting his SB to be 16 cards. I felt kind of bad about it, because it was probably the only way I could win that match, since that match up has got to be like 85% in his favor.

    Anyways, from what I recall the list was something like:

    Sea Drakes
    Serendib Efreets
    Dazes
    Force of Wills
    AEther Vials
    Mishra's Factories
    Standstills
    Trickbinds (from the board maybe?)
    Jittes
    Mask of Memories
    Flying Men
    Cloud of Faeries
    Sea Sprites (? Not sure on this)
    Snow-covereds
    Phyrexian Ironfoots

    I felt like I lost to Mask of Memory (ie it did the most).

  15. #35
    Winter is coming...
    Phantom's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2005
    Posts

    1,089

    Re: GPT Results

    Yeah, that's definitely an updated version of Blue skies

    Here's the old list

    I always thought it was an underrated deck, but I can't really see running it now over FS, since speed and Chalice @2 seem very relevant these days.

  16. #36
    Clay Aiken
    URABAHN's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2005
    Location

    Mooshie's Grove
    Posts

    1,850

    Re: GPT Results

    Yesterday in Rockville, MD

    16 players, 4 Rounds of Swiss, cut to Top 8

    Krieger with Flash
    Obfuscate Freely with Flash (Top 4, Top 2)
    Simon (unregged) with Flash (Top 4, Top 2, WINNER)
    (unregged) with Flash
    overlord95 with Landstill (Top 4)
    (unregged) with Gro
    nitewolf9 with Flash
    Parcher with Gro
    Quote Originally Posted by Lifeless View Post
    Your Source for Hurt Feelings and Naming Cats.

  17. #37
    Member
    Shriekmaw's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2006
    Location

    Nashville, TN
    Posts

    623

    Re: GPT Results

    Quote Originally Posted by freakish777 View Post

    It was Janos_Wuryon (username here on the Source) if I'm not mistaken. In my second game against him I called the judge over after counting his SB to be 16 cards. I felt kind of bad about it, because it was probably the only way I could win that match, since that match up has got to be like 85% in his favor.

    I just want to make a general comment which I have found during my major tournament play. It seems like when players know that it is going to be a tough match or they are going to lose, they resort to any kind of rules violations in order to try to steal the match from their opponent.

    The most recent example of this happened to me in GP: New Jersey playing sealed deck. I was 2-1 going against Morgan Douglass (a pro) and I smashed him in game 1. Then before we start game 2, he called a judge over to challenge my sleeves since they had a few marks on them. They were brand new at the start of the GP, but there were cheap which a lot of players had similar problems with the same sleeves. The judge that came over was Rich Bourque, which gave me a warning and just told me to change sleeves after the match. I proceed to beat him really bad in game 2, which felt really good since he tried to get a cheap win over my sleeves.

    The main point is, if he really felt this was a major issue he could of challenged my sleeves before game 1, but he didn't. He waited until he lost a game and then challenged my sleeves. He clearly noticed that they had marks prior to game 1, but didn't say anything. This is where I have a problem with anyone, but more importantly pros since they try everything in the book to win if they know they are going to lose the match.

    This is really sad, because I play the game because I really love it. Its a shame when people have to go to these measures to achieve victory.
    ~Shriek~

  18. #38
    Attractive and Successful
    hi-val's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Location

    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts

    997

    Re: GPT Results

    nickrit2000, that is very common behavior on the professional level. Randy Buehler won a PT because he knew the rules better than other people and could rack up warnings on people and win that way. If you don't know the rules and operate within them, you'll be taken out by someone who does. If you run all foil lands in your deck with no other foils, expect to be called on it. If you have more warnings, expect gamelosses for it. Them's just the breaks.

  19. #39
    Member
    Shriekmaw's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2006
    Location

    Nashville, TN
    Posts

    623

    Re: GPT Results

    Quote Originally Posted by hi-val View Post
    nickrit2000, that is very common behavior on the professional level. Randy Buehler won a PT because he knew the rules better than other people and could rack up warnings on people and win that way. If you don't know the rules and operate within them, you'll be taken out by someone who does. If you run all foil lands in your deck with no other foils, expect to be called on it. If you have more warnings, expect gamelosses for it. Them's just the breaks.

    I'm very aware of the rules, thats why I'm more careful these days because I don't want to go out early in a tournament because of it. I just wanted to point out the general philosophy of most pros. I know its a part of the game, and thats why you have to be prepared when people try these things.
    ~Shriek~

  20. #40
    Member

    Join Date

    Feb 2004
    Location

    Clifton Park, NY
    Posts

    2,690

    Re: GPT Results

    But no offense, Nick. I understand the point you are trying to make, that rules lawyering to get wins is pretty low but common place in higher level events, particularly with Pro Points and lots of money on the line..... But in Freakish777's situation, if it were the case that the other players sideboard was in view and I could count more than 15 (or less than 15. barring a wish) cards, I would call a judge immediately... Regardless of if I was winning, losing, or if it was after the match. If my round was done and I was observing a match where the individuals sideboard was not 15 cards I would quietly talk to a judge, because the sideboard is a bit more integral to the mechanics of the game and how it could play out than how played your sleeves are. Yeah, someone could theoretically be cheating by playing with marked cards, but realistically sleeves break down over time through use and play wear...... Having a 16 card sideboard gives you an slightly unfair advantage.. Meaning you either left an extra card in your board as hate vs. whatever deck or you boarded 1 too many out and are running a 59 card deck, and I would call you on it as soon as I noticed it.

    Sleeves, if they were beat enough, I wouldn't call a judge for to try and get a loss or warning on you... I'd just tell you that after the match you should either resleeve or consult one of the judges to see if they would think the condition of the sleeves would call for it. I'm not out to lawyer wins and warnings on people, but having a non-15 card sideboard in a Constructed event isn't cool.
    Team Albany: What's Legacy?

    You cannot know the sweetness of Victory, without first dwelling in the agony of Defeat.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)