Personally in my local environment, there are a large number of unfair decks. Once a Jace is resolved and then keeping +2, the game is nearly over. Therefore it can be a way to improve BUG Delver's solution towards unfair decks. But yes, "A 4 mana threats is countered by a 1 mana trick" is ridiculous and make me upset. (There are really not too much Czech Pile in my environment. They are all destroyed by unfair players. LOL)

Unless the environment become fair decks' leading, I would still prefer to sideboard Jace at least one(I'm considering 2 in SB now actually)

Quote Originally Posted by Absolutflipz View Post
What are everyone's thoughts on Jace in the board?

While being a ridiculous card and extremely powerful, I find that the spots I want him (notably 4c Leo and UWr miracles) the decks already pack several Pyroblast/REBs and it just feels like a terrible spot to have what's supposed to be your big-time card get answered cleanly by a 1-mana instant. Maybe there are other grindy matchups (the Mirror, Lands?) which they dont have access to Pyroblast/REB, but I feel like cards like Loam, Sylvan Library, Veils/Last Hopes, and recently Ive played some with a Tireless Tracker in the board can just as well grind out the game and provide tons of CA while dodging more clean answers.

This is also a SB space issue, and while I don't easily cut Jace, I'm not sure I can really justify him right now. Am I wrong?