Quote Originally Posted by k2thej View Post
Yes, yes, I know, I am obsessed with this thread. We can move beyond this and continue discussion now.
K, sorry, I'm done. It's just very amusing.


Quote Originally Posted by k2thej View Post
The reason I think concordant Crossroads is not a good idea:
-one less creature when you are comboing for each copy you run
-doesn't actually help the combo since mana isn't the issue, it is cards, so it is essentially just a win condition
-The deck is designed with creatures that have abilities you can use the turn they come into play (heritage, birchlore, quirion, symbiote) so that you don't need haste. This is a big advantage of this deck; it plays like the creatures have haste without actually giving it to them. A card that gives all creatures haste is pretty much a wasted spot in this deck unless you want to use it as your wincon, but as discussion has shown, there are better options for that.
I see...

Hmm, well if I drop the Concordants', I don't know how I'd feel about running Priest of Titania/Archdruid. Seems haste is necessary for those. Would either of those still be valid main board choices without Crossroads?

Also, I posted above:

I saw someone running Gaea's Herald instead of Leyline on the side. Seemed interesting, but likely it's inferior. Am I right? Thoughts?