[Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

[Lemnear]

4x Delta
3x Tarn
2x Mire
2x USea
1x Volc
1x Badlands
1x Trop
1x Bayou

I'm fearless.

I dislike Gemstone: you can't fetch it so the fact that it gives any color is often irrelevant as the land sits somewhere in your library. But I haven't tested it.

Damn. So what was that about TES having a worse manabase?

TES is a worse deck in the first place.

Hilarious. You present a manabase with Badlands and Bayou which won't even help you to work towards a win with cantrips, have not tested it properly before, but comment it being superior to Rainbow lands?

How is TES a bad deck in the face of disability to cantrip/t.hold into a win with Bayou/Badlands?

I'm curious how you can sling so many bold phrases without any reasoning or arguments to support a wacky manabase (like suddenly jump off the "ANT has a more resistant manabase than TES" boat and "announce that Basics and such are overrated")?