@TvGuy12: (Sweet number on your handle) Well done! I was at the tournament playing Caleb/Nescient's take on prophetic flamespeaker stompy. I was very disappointed I didn't play Big Red after having to attack with 1/x and 2/x creatures all day. However I was elated when you stomped one of my friends with an all too familiar pile, and then double elated when you landed just out of top 8. I really like most of your card choices, but I want to hear you defend a couple.

4th city of traitors. Can you elaborate on that? My position is that you draw too many hands with multiples, or hands where you have to gamble on city/guide/moon. Thoughts?

Griselbrands. I've heard plenty of arguments for/against him. You played 4 so you're clearly for him, and as a 4 of at that. Any math behind that or just a gut instinct?

Fetchlands. 3 seems like an odd number. (haha, it's 100% an odd number) Whats your logic on why not 7 or 0? I've always felt with no deck manipulation, the 1 point of life was more important than the 1 less land in the deck, whats your take?

Sulfur Elemental. Sure he's the nuts against d&t. Do you use him for anything else? I've always thought that matchup was in our favor and didn't deserve board cards. With it's popularity continually growing, maybe it just shores things up, anyways I'm curious to hear what you did with him.

Again, Congrats! Hope you continue to enjoy Big Red as much as the rest of us here. And if anyone wants to comment on my questions for TvGuy, please do! I haven't put too much time into magic theory lately, but there's a legacy GP coming up so lets get back into it.
-H