Page 387 of 428 FirstFirst ... 287337377383384385386387388389390391397 ... LastLast
Results 7,721 to 7,740 of 8554

Thread: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

  1. #7721
    Member

    Join Date

    Jul 2013
    Location

    Texas
    Posts

    1,184

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Welcome back to the format

  2. #7722

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by maharis View Post
    Welcome back to the format
    I welcome to our stoneblade, deathblade, combo deck returning overlords.

  3. #7723
    Member
    lavafrogg's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2005
    Location

    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts

    1,330

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Amazing!

    This most likely means that Stoneblade is back, UR Delver is better and Zoo gets to play again. I think Prelate on 1 gets a big boost and Maverick should very much be a real deck again!
    "eggs... why'd it have to be eggs"

  4. #7724
    Member

    Join Date

    Jul 2013
    Location

    Texas
    Posts

    1,184

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Thunderknight View Post
    I welcome to our stoneblade, deathblade, combo deck returning overlords.
    Maverick is by far the most consistent non-blue deck now and it doesn't have to twist itself into a pretzel to beat Miracles. This is good for this deck even if I think banning top was largely shit.

  5. #7725
    Clergyman of Cool
    lordofthepit's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Location

    Daisy Hill Puppy Farm
    Posts

    1,954

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I'm happy to roll with Knights again.

    I'd previously been a big advocate for Aether Vial over GSZ, primarily because of its better Miracles matchup, but I think GSZ may be the way going forward.

  6. #7726

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by maharis View Post
    Maverick is by far the most consistent non-blue deck now and it doesn't have to twist itself into a pretzel to beat Miracles. This is good for this deck even if I think banning top was largely shit.
    100% agree. I didn't want anything banned. But I'm glad I'm a Maverick player and not a miracles player right now.

  7. #7727
    Member
    lavafrogg's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2005
    Location

    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts

    1,330

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Screw top. It was 100% the correct call. Banning balance would have just left them with a deck full of predicts, snapcasters, counterspells and terminus, still tier 1. Wizards stance has always been to ban the enabler, glad they stood by their own standards.

    Teeg takes a hit and can most likely go to SB, Pridemage needs to be a 2-3 if to make sure equipment die.
    "eggs... why'd it have to be eggs"

  8. #7728

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by lavafrogg View Post
    Screw top. It was 100% the correct call. Banning balance would have just left them with a deck full of predicts, snapcasters, counterspells and terminus, still tier 1. Wizards stance has always been to ban the enabler, glad they stood by their own standards.

    Teeg takes a hit and can most likely go to SB, Pridemage needs to be a 2-3 if to make sure equipment die.
    I feel like we still want teeg. It's good against storm and elves (even though winning g1 against elves feels like a crapshoot) and if stoneblade comes back with engineered explosives, supreme verdict and Jace I feel like teeg could be a reasonable 1 of in that matchup.

    I do agree extra Pridemage is a thing.

  9. #7729

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Luthiereisfun View Post
    Well the miracles matchup just got better...top is banned
    Mother of Runes: In response, *sips tea*
    Mom-mom had to die because of the ground chemicals. http://achewood.com/index.php?date=10272003

  10. #7730

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by maharis View Post
    Welcome back to the format
    Oh my God oh my God oh my God (gets zeniths outta dusty box, dancing and whistling).
    To make a prairie, it takes a clover and one bee. One clover, a bee, and revery...

  11. #7731

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    ^^

    I'm so hyped! What changes should we make to our sideboard now that Maverick Christmas is finally happening?

    Time to brew boiz!

  12. #7732

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Cpt-Qc View Post
    ^^

    I'm so hyped! What changes should we make to our sideboard now that Maverick Christmas is finally happening?

    Time to brew boiz!
    In my sb I had garruk relentless for miracles mainly but it's still a fine grindy card. But I think I'm going to switch it to a toxic deluge (already being supported by 2x zp). I feel like deluge is really good against elves and infect, two bad matchups, and fine against DnT.

  13. #7733

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I was trying Garruk as well and was also thinking of dropping him. It did make our Shardless BUG matchup better but it's not like that changed much, it was mainly there for the deceased.

  14. #7734
    Member
    lavafrogg's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2005
    Location

    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts

    1,330

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Gideon now counters all of the -1/-1 effects that will be everywhere, and he stomps BUG.
    "eggs... why'd it have to be eggs"

  15. #7735

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Well my friends we got some decisions. My guess is we have the return of stoneblade. Show and tell, elves and storm are going to be our major threats. Let's see some list!

  16. #7736

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by NEELEY View Post
    Well my friends we got some decisions. My guess is we have the return of stoneblade. Show and tell, elves and storm are going to be our major threats. Let's see some list!
    My current list runs 3sfm and 3 equipment (SoLaS/SoFaI and jitte)....I am debating do I go back down to 2 sfm and just SOFI/JiTTE and add 2x Prelate to help with combo?

    List would be as such

    Creatures (25)
    4x DRS
    4x Mom
    4x Thalia GoT
    4x Knight of the Reliquary
    1x Gaddock Teeg
    1x Scavenging Ooze
    1x Scryb Ranger
    1x Dryad Arbor
    1x Qasali Pridemage
    2x Stoneforge Mystic
    2x Sanctum Prelate

    Spells (13)
    4x GSZ
    4x Swords to Plowshares
    2x Abrupt Decay
    1x Sylvan Library
    1x Umezawa's Jitte
    1x Sword of Fire and Ice

    Land (22)
    1x forest
    1x plains
    4x windswept heath
    3x verdant catacombs
    4x wasteland
    1x karakas
    1x gaea's cradle
    1x horizon canopy
    1x cavern of souls
    2x savanah
    2x bayou
    1x scrubland

    Sb
    2x ethersworn canonist
    1x gaddock teeg
    2x zealous persecution
    1x toxic deluge
    1x qasali pridemage
    2x choke
    2x surgical extraction
    3x thoughtseize
    1x pithing needle

    Other options are to up the maindeck Qasali Pridemage to 2x and add something else relevant...Keep 3x sfm and replace Sword of Light and Shadow with Batterskull..Honestly not sure

    edit: Another option is to take out Abrupt Decay for Prelate. Prelate's cost of 2 white is tough but it would mean there is no MD black and I could just focus on G/W. In matchups where I'd want prelate on 2 against BUG it would also feel bad to turn off my own decays. Choices choices.

  17. #7737
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2016
    Location

    New Hampshire
    Posts

    16

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by NEELEY View Post
    Well my friends we got some decisions. My guess is we have the return of stoneblade. Show and tell, elves and storm are going to be our major threats. Let's see some list!
    I think this is pretty accurate. Most combo gets a boost from the banning. Elves definitely benefits. Wondering if other creature-based combo (Aluren, Food Chain) will also benefit. I also think D&T will gain somewhat as well, as their Miracles matchup was mediocre at best. Grindy BUG/Leovold/4c Pile decks will probably collectively be the default "best deck."

    I think this change lets us perhaps move away from Abrupt Decay and more towards a straight G/W only shell aside from cards from the sideboard. Running a 4th Thalia might become the norm again if combo becomes more prevalent. Additional Stoneforge Mystics seem good and maybe even good old Batterskull might make a comeback.

    As for other cards, I think perhaps Containment Priest might be worth playing once again to help combat D&T, Elves, Sneak and Show, Reanimator, and Dredge. Cutting the sideboard Gaddock Teeg is worth considering. Engineered Plague is a card I've wanted to fit in for some time - great against D&T, Elves, and even decks that run TNN.
    Last edited by timmyod17; 04-24-2017 at 04:23 PM.

  18. #7738
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    See my signature, unchanged.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  19. #7739
    Member
    lavafrogg's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2005
    Location

    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts

    1,330

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Koby View Post
    See my signature, unchanged.
    Still calling the deck dead? Sad, I was super excited to see that you posted in Mav after all this time.

    We need to see where all the blue players flock, delver and stone blade will be popular but so will the DRS fueled 3-4 color decks. Sanctum Prelate on 1 shuts all of that crap down. I feel like my list from yesterday is even more viable now, maybe a sword change depending on what is played.
    "eggs... why'd it have to be eggs"

  20. #7740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by lavafrogg View Post
    Still calling the deck dead? Sad, I was super excited to see that you posted in Mav after all this time.

    We need to see where all the blue players flock, delver and stone blade will be popular but so will the DRS fueled 3-4 color decks. Sanctum Prelate on 1 shuts all of that crap down. I feel like my list from yesterday is even more viable now, maybe a sword change depending on what is played.
    Is 1 what you name against bug usually (talking about tnn/Leo builds)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)