Page 231 of 258 FirstFirst ... 131181221227228229230231232233234235241 ... LastLast
Results 4,601 to 4,620 of 5144

Thread: [Deck] Imperial Painter

  1. #4601

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    This is a huge hit to us. I'm not giving up on the archetype but do not undervalue how good this card has been for us. It is an integral part of the deck.

  2. #4602

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Quote Originally Posted by Kap'n Cook View Post
    Stream for discussing where we're gonna have to go and potential ideas tonight 11pm eastern.
    Link to stream would be great. I get off at 11 central.

    I was only able to play test for a few hours before work today with a few different cards. List I ended with: http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/artist-by-trade/

    I can see reasons for filling the 3 slots with the third Chandra, E tutor, and bridge (if like me and others you run one of each in the board) and opening up three more sideboard slots. I also do believe another land is recommended, possibly the last city of traitors or even another basic. I will be testing the two rack at least at fnm. I almost wonder if the looting should just be the third Chandra and open up a sideboard slot. Possibly a goblin rabblemaster now that terminus is less likely.

    Last minute thought: I will run two scroll rack and the 3rd Chandra Friday. Freeing the sb slot for another card. Possibly Dualcaster mage as there is a lot of B/r reanimator in my area.

  3. #4603

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Quote Originally Posted by Russki View Post
    Link to stream would be great. I get off at 11 central.

    I was only able to play test for a few hours before work today with a few different cards. List I ended with: http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/artist-by-trade/

    I can see reasons for filling the 3 slots with the third Chandra, E tutor, and bridge (if like me and others you run one of each in the board) and opening up three more sideboard slots. I also do believe another land is recommended, possibly the last city of traitors or even another basic. I will be testing the two rack at least at fnm. I almost wonder if the looting should just be the third Chandra and open up a sideboard slot. Possibly a goblin rabblemaster now that terminus is less likely.

    Last minute thought: I will run two scroll rack and the 3rd Chandra Friday. Freeing the sb slot for another card. Possibly Dualcaster mage as there is a lot of B/r reanimator in my area.
    The problem with scroll rack is that we are a deck that frequently empties our hand. We don't want to have to hold back cards to improve scroll rack. We have no true draw engine to refill our hand in the late game either. Chandra doesn't actually draw a card.

  4. #4604

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Quote Originally Posted by pinkfrosting View Post
    The problem with scroll rack is that we are a deck that frequently empties our hand. We don't want to have to hold back cards to improve scroll rack. We have no true draw engine to refill our hand in the late game either. Chandra doesn't actually draw a card.
    what cards do you recommend then?

  5. #4605
    Member
    drude1's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2010
    Location

    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts

    670

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    BLEAH!!!! STUPIDO!!!

    what's ironic is that Miracles can probably function with scroll rack as a replacement better than any other deck that runs top (Granted, it's still terrible).
    Back to the drawing board.

  6. #4606
    Member
    Morcrux's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2015
    Location

    Oslo, Norway
    Posts

    104

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Quote Originally Posted by Russki View Post
    what cards do you recommend then?
    There isn't anything that can mimick Top's effect, Scroll Rack ain't even close in usefulness for reasons stated. Our options is to either run other cards that reduce varience (Tutor, Chandra, Filters), or just jam more threats to increase the chance to draw action. Chandra does both, but playing too many copies takes away from the explosiveness of the usual shortcake.

    I don't think Faithless is discussable at all, it's card disadvantage without the power-level of E.Tutor. Something similiar to Tormenting Voice is more like it, but still too bad. I think changes will be something like:
    -3 Top
    -1 Welder

    +1 Chandra
    +1 Bridge
    +1 E.Tutor
    +1 City of Traitors

    But depending on how meta ends up the list could be different. Speculators say Deathrite Shaman will bountiful moving forward, so even 1-2 Phyrexian Revoker main again might be a thing.

  7. #4607

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Quote Originally Posted by Russki View Post
    what cards do you recommend then?
    Cards that improve consistency while still providing value. Chandra and magma jet are good examples. Perhaps it's time to look into other colors.

  8. #4608

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    I'd give ur build a chance. Transmute artifact and brainstorm/ponder along with a couple of trinket mages should do the work and my guess is that the meta will be infested with unfair decks like ant or high tide in the next months and the ability to play free counterspells like fow or mindbreak trap should be considered

  9. #4609
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Apr 2014
    Posts

    950

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Quote Originally Posted by Ciubulu View Post
    I'd give ur build a chance. Transmute artifact and brainstorm/ponder along with a couple of trinket mages should do the work and my guess is that the meta will be infested with unfair decks like ant or high tide in the next months and the ability to play free counterspells like fow or mindbreak trap should be considered
    I think that the UR version is hit even harder by this ban, they've historically been the more welder/top deck than us.

    @Rest of the discussion
    It sounds a lot like we're getting to the same conclusions where we're increasing consistency through Chandra, Tutors and more bridges to protect ourselves since we're slower. I think that the only other color that I can see moving to is black, the tutor effects are just too important now. I could also see a case for green since that gives us the combo of Painter/NO -> Some big idiot but that just sounds worse than reanimating or show and telling a griselbrand into play.

  10. #4610

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Quote Originally Posted by CptHaddock View Post
    I think that the UR version is hit even harder by this ban, they've historically been the more welder/top deck than us.

    @Rest of the discussion
    It sounds a lot like we're getting to the same conclusions where we're increasing consistency through Chandra, Tutors and more bridges to protect ourselves since we're slower. I think that the only other color that I can see moving to is black, the tutor effects are just too important now. I could also see a case for green since that gives us the combo of Painter/NO -> Some big idiot but that just sounds worse than reanimating or show and telling a griselbrand into play.
    I think the Painter/NO -> Iona on green deck is probably a whole separate archetype. Green does give access to mirri's guile/sylvan library though, both worth considering. No shenanigans with welder but it does give us some level of consistency with fetches and recruiters.

  11. #4611
    Member
    drude1's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2010
    Location

    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts

    670

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    I am going to definitely focus on the R/B version more with welder and gamble/entomb. It does mean the bad daretti might see more play. U/R is also definitely an option as you can still play brainstorms and have welder/intuition shenanigans. I'm not sure I like enlightened tutor without top but at least it gets you the card you need. Also realize that elves, Storm, burn and other combo decks are going to get really popular again so build accordingly.

  12. #4612

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Quote Originally Posted by L10 View Post
    Probably something like this:

    21 Lands
    4 Ancient Tomb
    4 City of Traitors
    4 Fetch Lands
    1 Great Furnace
    8 Mountain

    17 Creatures
    2 Goblin Welder
    4 Imperial Recruiter
    1 Magus of the Moon
    4 Painter's Servant
    1 Phyrexian Revoker
    4 Simian Spirit Guide
    1 Spellskite / Walking Ballista / Hope of Ghirapur

    22 Spells
    4 Pyroblast
    2 Red Elemental Blast
    4 Blood Moon
    3 Ensnaring Bridge
    4 Grindstone
    1 Smuggler's Copter
    4 Chandra, Torch of Defiance

    The deck will be nowhere near as fun or interactive, and much more linear, unfortunately. :/
    This is extremely close to the deck that I was running for a while now. I had 3 Tops, which have now been replaced by Gamble and an extra Welder.

    21 Lands
    4 Ancient Tomb
    3 City of Traitors
    4 Fetch Lands
    1 Great Furnace
    9 Mountain

    17 Creatures
    3 Goblin Welder
    4 Imperial Recruiter
    4 Painter's Servant
    1 Phyrexian Revoker
    4 Simian Spirit Guide
    1 Spellskite

    22 Spells
    4 Pyroblast
    1 Red Elemental Blast
    4 Blood Moon
    4 Ensnaring Bridge
    4 Grindstone
    4 Chandra, Torch of Defiance
    2 Gamble

    I have tested it a little bit, but as of right now its not far from what I had.

  13. #4613

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    I am testing trinisphere in one of the spaces and LED in the other slot (obviously not at the same time). I only ran 2 SDTs and am running a sandbox version.

    Could it be worth running a Kozilek's return in the main? I can foresee a lot of creature decks running around (especially elves)

  14. #4614

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    One positive to all this for any blood moon archetype is that the resurgence of creature decks will likely make lands a very good deck in the new meta.

    Also tempo/delver is definitely still going to keep combo in check. There are so many tools in their colors to beat storm. I doubt we'll see much of a resurgence of old combo archetypes. We will see a lot more creature decks, maybe ones that haven't existed for a while or have never been brewed because terminus was too strong. We will also see decks built to beat those decks.
    Last edited by pinkfrosting; 04-24-2017 at 07:44 PM.

  15. #4615
    Member

    Join Date

    Mar 2016
    Location

    Des Moines
    Posts

    58

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Here is the list I have been playing for some time now:

    1 Great Furnace
    1 Wooded Foothills
    2 Plateau
    3 City of Traitors
    4 Mountain
    4 Ancient Tomb
    4 Bloodstained Mire

    3 Lotus Petal
    2 Simian Spirit Guide

    4 Grindstone
    4 Painter's Servant
    4 Imperial Recruiter
    4 Blood Moon
    4 Pyroblast
    2 Red Elemental Blast

    3 Goblin Welder
    2 Enlightened Tutor
    2 Sensei's Divining Top
    2 Ensnaring Bridge
    2 Chandra, Torch of Defiance

    1 Magus of the Moon
    1 Jaya Ballard, Task Mage
    1 Phyrexian Revoker


    Now that Top is gone I'm thinking I'll go up to the third Enlightened Tutor and possibly the third Red Elemental Blast. I have a Win a Lotus tournament to go to this Saturday so I'm gonna be doing a lot of testing to see if the deck can live on and be competitive without Top otherwise I may have to audible to something inferior with Brainstorm. Ew. Any ideas would be much appreciated!


    @Kap'n Cook I look forward to the stream tonight I just hope the audio is a little better

  16. #4616

    [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Hmm... I kinda like scroll rack. I think for a combo deck like ours it's not horrible. Meh... Gets around chalice.

    Think I'll be testing this out... But still researching options


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  17. #4617

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Quote Originally Posted by Ish View Post
    Hmm... I kinda like scroll rack. I think for a combo deck like ours it's not horrible. Meh... Gets around chalice.

    Think I'll be testing this out


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    The main issue with scroll rack is that it doesn't work well with bridge.

    I'm tempted to try a painter stompy list haha

  18. #4618

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Quote Originally Posted by Valleysdai View Post
    The main issue with scroll rack is that it doesn't work well with bridge.

    I'm tempted to try a painter stompy list haha
    Oh... That's very true


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  19. #4619

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Without a way to refill your hand scroll rack is extremely bad. Playtest it if you must, but unless you jam 4 land tax into the deck it steeply loses value after the first couple turns in our deck.

    If you go the mono red stompy route I highly encourage playtesting magma jet. It's always been a good card in our deck just outclassed by top

  20. #4620

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Quote Originally Posted by pinkfrosting View Post
    Without a way to refill your hand scroll rack is extremely bad. Playtest it if you must, but unless you jam 4 land tax into the deck it steeply loses value after the first couple turns in our deck.

    If you go the mono red stompy route I highly encourage playtesting magma jet. It's always been a good card in our deck just outclassed by top
    I was debating testing magma jet as well, true it doesn't draw but it can remove a threat and let us dig quite deep for 2 mana in red.

    Would sin prodder be worth testing or pia and Kiran nalaar.

    Sin prodder enables us to damage our opponent, is a beater and allows us to draw through land flood quicker.

    Pia and Kiran would allow us to be less linear, and if the opponent targets a key artifact with exile/bounce effects we can sac it in response and weld it back.

    I know that they are high CMC but we can take the control/prison position and slow the games down while we either get our combo or burn face.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)