Page 14 of 113 FirstFirst ... 41011121314151617182464 ... LastLast
Results 261 to 280 of 2251

Thread: [Deck] Pox

  1. #261

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    Just to throw this out there, I've tried 2x and even 3x Tomb of Yawgmoth and found even the 3x to be of little to no detriment.

    You can sac or discard any extras to Smallpox or Pox. But the massive gain you get from being able to tap Wastelands for black mana just can't be beat. I am actually seriously considering testing 4 copies!

    And also, for those builds that are cutting Pox running 3-4 in order to abuse Wasteland, Pox, Smallpox, Fetchlands, and Factories, I would almost certainly run 1-2 Cabal Pit. Pox is powerful, and it does cost you life. I can see why some people are cutting it. But if they are, you can afford to lose life to Cabal Pit.

    jebus, yes I do think a case can be made Idols are better than Factories even with Crucible.

    Anyways, having established that 3x Tomb of Yawgmoth works just fine, here's what I'm going to attempt to test now...

    8 Swamp
    4 Polluted Delta
    4 Wasteland
    3 Mishra's Factory
    3 Tomb of Yawgmoth
    2 Cabal Pit

    4 Dark Ritual
    4 Duress
    4 Hymn to Tourach
    4 Sinkhole
    4 Smallpox
    3 Pox

    4 Innocent Blood/Infest
    3 Nether Spirit
    3 Phyrexian Totem
    3 Crucible of Worlds

    Is there anything about this build that you would change?
    Last edited by Clark Kant; 01-27-2007 at 04:59 AM.

  2. #262
    Random Dude....

    Join Date

    Jan 2007
    Location

    In the middle of nowhere...
    Posts

    10

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    Hi everyone,

    First of all , this is my first post ever. I’ve been playing the pox deck for a few month and I was greatly inspired by this very productive thread (although it’s quite fuzzy sometime).

    Here is the list I run

    14 swamps
    4 wasteland
    3 cabal pit
    4 mox diamond ----------- or dark ritual, I can’t really tell the difference

    4 sinkhole
    4 hymn to tourach
    4 duress
    4 smallpox
    4 pox
    3 innocent blood

    2 nether spirit------------ 2 only but I hate drawing 2 of them and can be fetched with machination
    2 crucible of world----same thing as nether
    3 chimeric idol
    3 the rack -------------- your best (only?) chance against aggro, why in hell would you take him out ?

    2 dimir machination ----- probably the most controversial card but fetches everything (pox, nether, crucible, plague). Occasionally it can assure victory if you swept board and hand with a beater on your side, casting it to make sure the opponent doesn’t draw a solution.

    SB:
    4 leyline of the void
    4 pithing needle
    4 engineered plague
    3 powder keg

    Ok so I won’t pretend my built is the best, some would probably argue that I should play more of this or less of that (nether, crucible) but all the cards in here have already been discussed on this thread and everyone was able to make his own opinion depending on his meta, the cards he like or own etc.

    However, I think it can be improved and the planar chaos release can be a good occasion for it. I’d like to have your opinion on these :

    Yagmoth tomb : the first tests seem to be good. I’m also quite enthusiastic about this card. The reason why I haven’t played mishra’s factory so far is because I got too often color screwed because of colorless wasteland. I think it’s a real problem in this deck where there is very few colorless mana cost.

    Sinkhole : Ok I can already hear the roar of the crowd but I’m actually seriously thinking about taking these out. “ Are you out of your mind man ! It’s the best landbreak ever!!!!” Sure it is, and I’m the first one to feel sorry to have spent 120€ for 4 beta ones that I’m now thinking about take out. I have a few arguments to make my point :

    _First basically in terms of CA, sinkhole isn’t that good. One spell for one land. It usually make you lose one turn and makes your opponent lose one turn. You gain nothing from it while you’re are supposed to get advantage of spoiling the game.

    _Second, a few cards make it really useless : fetchland, quirion/scryb ranger, (played in zoo), misdirection (sided by faerie stompy), daze (for thresh)…….

    _Third, it’s bad against most unfavorable MU : goblin, random aggro, burn, loam decks, superfast combo...

    _Fouth : I think Pox lacks kill conditions so I think about cutting some disrupt.

    That is why most of the time, I deside sinkhole on G2 to usually put some plague or powder keg in.

    So I’m currently thinking the following changes :

    -4 sinkhole
    -2 chimeric idol
    -4 swamps
    -1 cabal pit
    -1 wasteland

    + 3 phyrexian totem
    +1 rack
    +3 tomb of yagmoth
    +3 mishra’s factory
    +3 powder keg

    I’m also thinking about including sensei divining top which seem quite good to increase mid-game card quality but that means to include fetchlands and I don’t know if it worth it.

    I hope this post wasn’t too heretic nor erratic and I sure wait for your response.

  3. #263
    12/12
    Bane of the Living's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2004
    Location

    Spencer MA
    Posts

    1,828

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    Quote Originally Posted by Misobizo View Post

    2 dimir machination ----- probably the most controversial card but fetches everything (pox, nether, crucible, plague). Occasionally it can assure victory if you swept board and hand with a beater on your side, casting it to make sure the opponent doesn’t draw a solution.
    Welcome to The Source, and our little thread. Its certainly the best discussion going on for the Pox archetype and we've made alot of progress coming to an optimal build. There are some general points I'd like to make about your deck regardless of your meta. The first is that Dimir Machination is crap. We've discussed it with high hopes (being a 3cc tutor and all) but discovered its short comings in testing. Each time you draw this you'll wish it was simply one of the cards it would fetch. Or even worse, something it cant. You never want to stare down a turn one lackey with this in hand when it couldve been your fourth Innocent Blood. Turn three is a terrible turn to do nothing. Thats really all there is to it, infact doing nothing any turn is hazardous to your gameplan. The deck needs to constantly apply pressure to one of 3 things at all times.

    - The opponents mana sources.
    - The opponents card advantage.
    - The opponents creature base.

    The only exception to this rule is when your applying pressure to the opponents life total. This is done by tapping out to cast Totem or Spirit.

    The only exception to that rule is Crucible of the Worlds. Its the only non aggressive card played in the deck. Its the only card that earns a spot in the deck as a non-threat. The exception to this seems to be Top. Pox needs card draw or some way to filter through late game draws. This is the best way. You can cast top with totem on turn 3 or cast it with extra ritual mana.


    Quote Originally Posted by Misobizo View Post
    SB:
    4 leyline of the void
    4 pithing needle
    4 engineered plague
    3 powder keg
    Based off your maindeck your sb looks very strong. If your seeing a surge in Faerie Stompy in your meta consider swapping Pithing Needle or some copies of keg for Sudden Death. The same for thresh. I doubt your bringing in 4 needle, plague, and 3 kegs against goblins. If so one of those options belongs in the maindeck, and something like Duress in the board.

    Quote Originally Posted by Misobizo View Post
    Yagmoth tomb : the first tests seem to be good. I’m also quite enthusiastic about this card. The reason why I haven’t played mishra’s factory so far is because I got too often color screwed because of colorless wasteland. I think it’s a real problem in this deck where there is very few colorless mana cost.
    I havent personally tested tomb yet but it seems like it has no downfalls. Extras are simply discarded to pox effects. The question of course is how many to run? If your playing factory, and you should be, considering 3 may not be out of question. They make fetchlands better by letting you keep your life total unless you want a shuffle effect for top.

    Quote Originally Posted by Misobizo View Post
    Sinkhole : Ok I can already hear the roar of the crowd but I’m actually seriously thinking about taking these out. “ Are you out of your mind man ! It’s the best landbreak ever!!!!” Sure it is, and I’m the first one to feel sorry to have spent 120€ for 4 beta ones that I’m now thinking about take out. I have a few arguments to make my point :

    _First basically in terms of CA, sinkhole isn’t that good. One spell for one land. It usually make you lose one turn and makes your opponent lose one turn. You gain nothing from it while you’re are supposed to get advantage of spoiling the game.

    _Second, a few cards make it really useless : fetchland, quirion/scryb ranger, (played in zoo), misdirection (sided by faerie stompy), daze (for thresh)…….

    _Third, it’s bad against most unfavorable MU : goblin, random aggro, burn, loam decks, superfast combo...

    _Fouth : I think Pox lacks kill conditions so I think about cutting some disrupt.

    That is why most of the time, I deside sinkhole on G2 to usually put some plague or powder keg in.
    I, as well as others have experimented with cutting Sinkhole. Until playing without it I didnt realize it was MVP. It rounds out the ld effects of Wasteland and Poxen perfectly. Without it you'll notice your opponent getting more little windows to cast a cheap threat.

    - First, Pox is build for 1 for 1 trades off the opponent. I know you feel your doing 'nothing' for the turn, an amusing statement from someone playing Transmute cards, but what your really doing is stopping your opponent from doing anything for a turn. In that time walk you can often sneak in damage or simply mana screw the opponent. It also opens windows such as these..

    Opponent- Mountain, Lackey
    You (on draw)- Swamp, Ritual, Innocent Blood, Sinkhole.

    You start your opponent back to nothing in such plays, and if luckey, your gob opponent kept a 2 land hand because he had lackey, ect.

    - Second, no deck plays enough fetches to create no targets. Eventually your opponent will crack them and you can hit their land. If your opponent sits with 2-3 fetches on the table in fear of Sinkhole, your winning. You should welcome a Misdirected Sinkhole because Faerie Stompy will need to pitch an extremely good card against you, since they play little blue. That means you wont be mauled by a Sea Drake, or hit with Psi Blast. ect. Your taking 2 cards out of your opponent hand in exchange for 2 of your own cards. Although that seems like FS is pulling off something tricky, their really treading water over their head with plays like that.

    If your opponent Dazes your Sinkhole guess what? You still reduced their manabase. This is another example of uphill battles for the blue mage, and is one occassion where I wouldnt play around the expected Daze.

    If Zoo is enough of your meta to be a concern, dont play pox. You have a terrible matchup against blistering fast aggro, ones E plague dont help against in particular.

    - Third, If you havent noticed those are the decks weakness's regardless of Sinkholes presence. Infact you'll find it more usefull against gobs to Sinkhole a Rishadin Port than to play Pox.

    - Fourth, every bit of disruption you remove makes your win conditions weaker. Every Sinkhole you dont play gives your opponent more mana to comply with, lets face it, weak win conditions.

    Quote Originally Posted by Misobizo View Post
    So I’m currently thinking the following changes :

    -4 sinkhole
    -2 chimeric idol
    -4 swamps
    -1 cabal pit
    -1 wasteland

    + 3 phyrexian totem
    +1 rack
    +3 tomb of yagmoth
    +3 mishra’s factory
    +3 powder keg
    Your deck has the notable difference of The Rack. While I dont think this is the wrong choice just remember you need to play a larger combination of hand removal to make this suite work out. Even though Rack seems to be winning against goblins all they need to do is play Ringleader to fill the hand back up to 0 damage from rack. I took this card out for Powder Keg.

    Aside from that your build looks good. Id go with this change instead tho..

    -2 dimir machination
    -2 chimeric idol
    -7 swamps
    -3 cabal pit
    -3 the rack
    -1 pox

    + 1 innocent blood
    + 3 bloodstained mire
    + 3 phyrexian totem
    +3 tomb of yagmoth
    +3 mishra’s factory
    +2 powder keg
    +2 top

    Quote Originally Posted by Misobizo View Post
    I’m also thinking about including sensei divining top which seem quite good to increase mid-game card quality but that means to include fetchlands and I don’t know if it worth it.
    Top is probably worth inclusion and also fights for the rack's role. playing top requires a few fetchlands, playing some fetch lets you pull tons of swamps out of your deck with crucible. Also, when playing with Top, Totem, The Rack, and Crucible, means no Cabal Pit. You'll never hit thresh enough to make it worth it.

    Hope this helps.
    Now playing real formats.

  4. #264

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    Yeah, Tomb of Yawgmoth is insane!! I still miss running Chimeric Idol over Mishra's Factory though.

    Cabal Pit does have a lot of minuses. The lifeloss sucks, and the threshold requirement really sucks too, esp since being able to kill creatures early on is more important.

    One card I'm actually looking at is Quicksand, possibly in place of Mishra's Factory, or possibly in addition to it. Yes it's colorless, but it's a great answer to turn one lackey, and a whole lot of other problem creatures early on, something that Cabal Pit wasn't able to do. Plus it recurs with Crucible.

    Assuming you go up to as many as 4 Tomb of Yawgmoth, I've tried it briefly and I think we might be able to get away with it, I think we might be able to run 2-3 Quicksand, in place of Cabal Pit.

    What do you guys think?

  5. #265
    Random Dude....

    Join Date

    Jan 2007
    Location

    In the middle of nowhere...
    Posts

    10

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    Clark Kant : With tomb of Yagmoth in, it is true that quicksand appears to be better that cabal pit. However, it doesn't deal with flying and the creature must be attacking. That's why cabal pit is better in my opinion if you can thresh quick enough (which is not the case). I would try 1 or 2.

    Bane of the living : Thanks for your help. I found it very usefull. I think I'll try it that way.

  6. #266

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    The opening post has been completely overhauled. Check it out.

  7. #267

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    I'm wondering what you guys think of Expirate. As I mentioned. If Expirate is a good card, this is just about the best deck to abuse it.

    It gets your opponent to sac away or discard most of their bombs by it's very nature. It's not a very fast deck by any means, which means that the benefits of Expirate are morely likely to come to fruition by the end of the game. And there are a couple of cards that Pox really fears from each deck if it can't get rid of them quickly, cards like Exalted Angel. Expirate sees that you never have to worry about that particular card again.

    Expirate's inclusion might warrant Cabal Therapy as well. The trifecta of Duress, Cabal Therapy, and Expirate work incredibly well together ensuring that you always know what your opponent is up to, and how best to stop them.

    The main problem I'm having with Expirate is that it's damn near impossible to test properly because you pretty much have to guess how good the card was, you never know it first hand, since the card many times doesn't have it's effect until several turns down the line.

  8. #268
    The secret member of team Info-Ninja
    BeeblesofLife's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2007
    Location

    Washington DC
    Posts

    70

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    I've played against extirpate....and i have to say im not really impressed with it.
    Someone extirpated my sinkholes. That was like, ok woopdy fuckin do. I havent tested it out or anything, its has only been used against me. But based on the results that i have seen, it doesnt really do that much. It generates no card advantage, no virtual card advatage and really isnt a tempo loss for the other side. It really is like cabal therapy, name a card in the yard or guess what they have in their hand. Only extirpate has a slight advantage, you have to see what you are nameing. Again I'm not that impressed.

  9. #269
    12/12
    Bane of the Living's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2004
    Location

    Spencer MA
    Posts

    1,828

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    Quote Originally Posted by BeeblesofLife View Post
    I've played against extirpate....and i have to say im not really impressed with it.
    Someone extirpated my sinkholes. That was like, ok woopdy fuckin do. I havent tested it out or anything, its has only been used against me. But based on the results that i have seen, it doesnt really do that much. It generates no card advantage, no virtual card advatage and really isnt a tempo loss for the other side. It really is like cabal therapy, name a card in the yard or guess what they have in their hand. Only extirpate has a slight advantage, you have to see what you are nameing. Again I'm not that impressed.
    We're mainly discussing the inclusion of the card, not strategy against it. It does seem as though Exirpate has a home here in pox. How is beyond me. It should probably be regulated to the board however, a Rack based version might find success playing 4 Duress, 4 Cabal Therapy, and 4 Exirpate. You'll definitly hit more targets with therapy and exi, probably making the effect rather cummulative and effective.
    Now playing real formats.

  10. #270
    The secret member of team Info-Ninja
    BeeblesofLife's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2007
    Location

    Washington DC
    Posts

    70

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    Wow, i didnt think of it like that at all....useing Extirpate as a catalist for therapy. Seriously, turn two extirpate and follow it up by a same turn therapy?
    I like the general concept...I am going to try out a version that useing duress therapy instead of duress hymn. It just seems like you'd hit more cards that way. I dont know, maybe im just being dumb.

  11. #271

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    Quote Originally Posted by Clark Kant View Post
    I'm wondering what you guys think of Expirate. As I mentioned. If Expirate is a good card, this is just about the best deck to abuse it.

    It gets your opponent to sac away or discard most of their bombs by it's very nature. It's not a very fast deck by any means, which means that the benefits of Expirate are morely likely to come to fruition by the end of the game. And there are a couple of cards that Pox really fears from each deck if it can't get rid of them quickly, cards like Exalted Angel. Expirate sees that you never have to worry about that particular card again.

    Expirate's inclusion might warrant Cabal Therapy as well. The trifecta of Duress, Cabal Therapy, and Expirate work incredibly well together ensuring that you always know what your opponent is up to, and how best to stop them.

    The main problem I'm having with Expirate is that it's damn near impossible to test properly because you pretty much have to guess how good the card was, you never know it first hand, since the card many times doesn't have it's effect until several turns down the line.
    ...which is precisely why you shouldn't run it. Several turns down the line, you may very well have won the game, in which case you just wasted a turn doing something that didn't contribute to your eventual victory anyway. Furthermore, there is nothing that Extirpate could do in this deck that cannot be done better by Leyline of the Void or Planar Void. The only benefit you'd get from this is an improvement in the matchup against LftL decks, and even then those decks are going to start packing Burning Wish in expectation of Extirpate, which means that you have to force them to discard Wish so you can Extirpate it first, then hit LftL. Otherwise, you have a temporary solution at best and you might as well just run Leyline as it will get rid of their entire yard and not just LftL.

    In other words, every deck and its dog are going to be expecting Extirpate, and every deck and its dog are going to be making changes to either minimize Extirpate's impact or nullify it entirely by packing one or more different kinds of Wishes.

  12. #272
    It's an ugly pile of bones... like me.
    clavio's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2004
    Location

    Albany
    Posts

    745

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    I went to a tournament yesterday. I ran this:

    // Lands
    4 [TE] Wasteland
    18 [OD] Swamp (3)

    // Creatures
    3 [MM] Nether Spirit

    // Spells
    4 [7E] Duress
    3 [IA] Pox
    4 [ON] Infest
    4 [PY] Chimeric Idol
    4 [FE] Hymn to Tourach (1)
    3 [TS] Smallpox
    3 [R] The Rack
    2 [OD] Innocent Blood
    3 [U] Sinkhole
    3 [IA] Dark Ritual
    3 [TE] Cursed Scroll

    // Sideboard
    SB: 2 [OD] Innocent Blood
    SB: 4 [US] Oppression
    SB: 3 [6E] Perish
    SB: 4 [UL] Engineered Plague
    SB: 1 [5E] Pox
    SB: 1 [TSP] Smallpox


    Pox is bad against big creatures. A pneumbra wurm and an eternal witness will just laugh at you, and then kill you. Pox is good against tier one, but gets destroyed by random natural order decks.

  13. #273

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    Please stop running dark ritual everyone.

    Consider the following two scenarios.

    An aggro control black deck runs ritual to power out negator on turn one and follows it up with some combination of sink, waste, and duress to win the game. The game is over by the time the black player has spent their hand and the card disadvantage of dark ritual has not actually had a negative impact. The negator came out so fast and was so large that it had the power to win the game all by itself, even with minimal support. Alternatively, the ritual can power out hypnotic specter, which can more than make up for the card disadvantage by effectively locking the opponent out of the game. Again the threat is potent enough all by itself to end the game. Finally, the deck can ritual out a turn 1 duress + sink/hymn, turn 2 sink/hymn/etc., and turn 3 drop negator or hippie. The former can still end the game so fast the opponent cannot effectively capitalize on your card disadvantage. Also, as I said, the latter can neutralize the card disadvantage and lock your opponent out of the game. The major point is that both of these ritual workhorses either directly negate the card disadvantage (specter) or win the game before the card disadvantage is ever actually felt.

    Pox rituals out a chimeric idol or nether spirit and follows it up with some disrupt. They spend their hand and still have 10 damage or so to go. Now the opponent recovers, deals with their one threat, and is in a winning position because pox's disrupt becomes progressively weaker as the game advances to a more mature state. Pox's win condition(s) was/were simply not fast or potent enough on their own to win the game. The other scenario where pox rituals out duress/hymn on turn one and follows it up with a turn 3 threat has the same problem. The main point here is this: When casting ritual pox will exhaust its hand well before the game is over because it cannot cast a 5/5 trample on turn 1, at which point the disadvantage of ritual will begin to have significant effect. The disadvantage will become a serious liability as the game continues more and more turns after the pox player has exhausted their hand. Today's resilient decks recover and the game progresses past a "turn 3 state"; pox is toast.

    Most commonly pox wants to ritual out duress/hymn on turn one. This is card neutral and does not actually bring you closer to winning. This kind of play was great back in the ole (misspelled for emphasis) days when decks were simply unresilient and tended to bow over in the face of real disruption. There was also a far smaller variety of good black control cards at <3cc back then.

    That is not true today, there are plenty of things to replace dark ritual with. Namely smallpox. You can also go with a crucible build with lots of fancy lands. Or you can go with a more traditional 18-20 swamps/4 wastes build with 16-20 discard and 16-20 LD. Today the name of the game is consistency and steady pressure. You make every card in your deck go one for one or better with every card in theirs. You use utility like duress, in addition to other options like pithing needle and powder keg, to knock out specific problems (aether vial, fow, daze etc.). You use pox to shorten your clock and you pound for the last few while you keep denying resources. You never run out of gas unless you get mana flooded quite badly, in which case dark ritual would have only excacerbated the problem. Finally, you sideboard for whatever your versatile maindeck cannot handle. I've found that my only autoloss in game one is land.dec. I sideboard 4x ankh of mishra and 4x leyline of the void. Ankh is a bomb against a few decks. Leyline's great against a lot. The only other matchup I find a little below satisfactory is gobs, so I sb E. Plague. Then there are 3 more meta slots.

    I must urge the pox-playing world to cut ritual. I have presented arguments far more convincing than "but it's ritual!". I have presented viable replacements for ritual which shore up weak spots in the deck. I have given every reason in the world to stop running ritual. I hope I have been heard by at least some of you.



    - Andro

  14. #274
    12/12
    Bane of the Living's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2004
    Location

    Spencer MA
    Posts

    1,828

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    Playtesting endlessly and very positive results based on games Ritual shows up deter me from your anti ritual crusading. Your making a terrible mistake if your ritualing into Nether Spirit turn one. There are far better things to do with the mana. Your also making the mistake of pushing ritual as a turn one play when infact it can be a phenominal turn 2 or 3 play because it accelerates you into Pox when your opponent usually has handsizes of 4-5. It gives you early game Pox played through Dazes. Against Goblins the deck really needs to 2 mana boost to keep ahead of the game. Turn one Chimeric Idol is amazing against gobs isnt even comparable to casting Negator or Spector, which would otherwise be sucking. Dark Ritual doesnt need an aggro//control suite to be effective.
    Now playing real formats.

  15. #275

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    Quote Originally Posted by bane_of_the_living View Post
    Playtesting endlessly and very positive results based on games Ritual shows up deter me from your anti ritual crusading. Your making a terrible mistake if your ritualing into Nether Spirit turn one. There are far better things to do with the mana. Your also making the mistake of pushing ritual as a turn one play when infact it can be a phenominal turn 2 or 3 play because it accelerates you into Pox when your opponent usually has handsizes of 4-5. It gives you early game Pox played through Dazes. Against Goblins the deck really needs to 2 mana boost to keep ahead of the game. Turn one Chimeric Idol is amazing against gobs isnt even comparable to casting Negator or Spector, which would otherwise be sucking. Dark Ritual doesnt need an aggro//control suite to be effective.
    I do not intend to offend or to insult, but please listen to me when I say that you missed the actual point of my argument when you address the following:

    I do not personally make a habit of ritualing nether spirit on turn one. When reading my argument I follow this scenario up by directly comparing it with ritualing out negator on turn one to illustrate a point: fast/potent win conditions capitalize on dark ritual best.

    I use turn one simply because it is simplest to compare scenarios/examples on turn one. The points and arguments I made are valid on all turns.

    You have missed my fundamental argument and have not addressed the issues I have raised. On a basic, fundamental level, dark ritual exploits fast wins. When have you seen one shot mana acceleration in anything but a deck that wins turn 5 or earlier? Usually ritual decks win turn 4 or even 3. Besides pox, that is. Pox was an exception at a time when a little potent and fast disruption could push a deck back too far. Now decks are exponentially more resilient. In older days a sprinkling of LD and point discard in the first few turns would knock someone on their back. There was also a shortage of good poxish cards. Neither of these things are true anymore and the rule of not playing one shot mana acceleration in a slow deck has not changed. There is now an abundance of pox options, so many that people can't decide on the right 60 card lists. It would be a lot easier to build your 60 card pox deck to encompass everything you want/need in it if you didn't have ritual. It will have a better percentage against a varied field because your deck runs additional versatile answers or threats rather than a card that your deck cannot fully use and that causes you to run out of disruption faster.

    The argument is simple and fundamental. You cannot win before the disadvantage of ritual is fully felt by your deck. Your deck does not possess essential answers to very problematic cards (vial and other random troublesome artifacts). Speaking of artifacts, artifact mana can really hurt you a lot. You can turn some off with needle or blow it up with powder keg or even run null rod (if you're not running idol, which would be ill-advised). The point is, the deck has fundamental weaknesses in the current legacy metagame. Dark ritual is conditionally good and can be a blank. A well-known adage and wise advice is that a deck with fundamental weaknesses and flaws should trade random speed/goodness for consistency, versatility, and better controlling elements. That advice applies here, and the options are here. Make use of as many as you can.

    I have communicated my perspective based on basic principles of magic deck construction. It is well known that the deck is lacking in some specific aspects. It is also well known that the deck lacks answers to some very important cards. It is also well known that there is a relatively versatile answer to every single one of these problem cards. I believe you when you claim positive results when casting ritual. Dark ritual can enable some fast openings and I do not dislike the card at all. It does not surprise me that you win games with a deck full of brutal disruption when you cast dark ritual. But, your deck will be better in the long run without it.

  16. #276

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    Let us say for the sake of arguement that you're correct, that while Dark Ritual is powerful and can win games, we would be better off running something else in it's place.

    In my list below, what do you recommend testing in place of the Dark Rituals...

    8 Swamp
    4 Bloodstained Mire
    4 Wasteland
    3 Mishra’s Factory
    3 Tomb of Yawgmoth
    2 Cabal Pit

    3 Dark Ritual
    4 Duress
    4 Hymn to Tourach

    4 Innocent Blood
    4 Sinkhole
    4 Smallpox
    4 Pox

    3 Crucible of Worlds
    3 Nether Spirit
    3 Phyrexian Totem

    Sideboard:
    X Expirate
    X Pithing Needle
    X Powder Keg
    X Engineered Plague
    X Infest


    The options that come to mind for me are...

    Sensei's Divining Top
    Powder Keg
    Pithing Needle
    Phyrexian Arena
    Infest
    Funeral Charm
    Mox Diamond
    Engineered Plague
    Cabal Therapy
    Extripate

    The card IMO should probably be on the low end of the mana curve.

  17. #277

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    Quote Originally Posted by Clark Kant View Post
    Let us say for the sake of arguement that you're correct, that while Dark Ritual is powerful and can win games, we would be better off running something else in it's place.

    In my list below, what do you recommend testing in place of the Dark Rituals...

    8 Swamp
    4 Bloodstained Mire
    4 Wasteland
    3 Mishra’s Factory
    3 Tomb of Yawgmoth
    2 Cabal Pit

    3 Dark Ritual
    4 Duress
    4 Hymn to Tourach

    4 Innocent Blood
    4 Sinkhole
    4 Smallpox
    4 Pox

    3 Crucible of Worlds
    3 Nether Spirit
    3 Phyrexian Totem

    Sideboard:
    X Expirate
    X Pithing Needle
    X Powder Keg
    X Engineered Plague
    X Infest




    The options that come to mind for me are...

    Sensei's Divining Top
    Powder Keg
    Pithing Needle
    Phyrexian Arena
    Infest
    Funeral Charm
    Mox Diamond
    Engineered Plague
    Cabal Therapy
    Extripate

    The card IMO should probably be on the low end of the mana curve.
    I'd say you're correct in thinking it should be on the low end. Ideally one mana, two is acceptable, three is too much. Plague's an exception because goblins forces other decks to do whatever they can to not lose, so our hands are tied if the meta's full of gobs and we want something to own them with.

    First I'll make it known that I'm not a fan of the crucible/fancyland version, but I recognize it as a powerful strategy and a legitimate direction to take your deck. So, because I don't have any experience with this version, I'll assume that you have optimized your mana base when I make my suggestions. My pox runs 20 swamps, so I blanch a bit at your number (12), and I can't accurately quantify how much the 3 totems, 3 rituals, 3 tomb, and 3 crucibles make up for it. It's 12 fixers and that seems like a lot I suppose. So, I assume you've fixed it so it's consistent.

    Pithing needle, powder keg, and funeral charm are the most versatile cards you listed, and are my personal favorites. They fit all the criteria:

    - Low end of the mana curve
    - Deal with the deck's specific problems (artifact mana, Aether vial, artifacts in general, charm hits lackey, needle hits occasional Survival of the Fittest)
    - Versatile, needle turns off a variety of things and powder keg destroys a large variety of things. Needle can be worse because they may sac the land/creature you name. Keg may be worse if they cast something with >2cc. But if the game hasn't slowed to a point where you have the two turns, or has advanced to a point where they have >3mana, your basic game plan has probably failed. Not a specific card. Charm always goes one for one and hits lackey. Along with innocent blood you have 7x lackey answers.

    Other notables in your list include cabal therapy, infest, e. plague, and extripate.

    Therapy can be ridiculous *if* you have a spirit in play. You can also just get lucky and call the right card. It can also whiff horribly or sit in your hand without a spirit.

    Infest would be more of a meta slot. A somewhat odd meta, too. A high-aggro metagame typically means high-gobs, in which case just run E. plague in this spot. If, for some reason, your meta's full of sligh, elves, and thallids infest is solid.

    E. Plague, good against gobs, next.

    Extripate is new, I never tested it. It seems too conditional to be maindecked. Perhaps potent enough for the sideboard but I'm not sure about that either. You'll have to test this if you wanna know, I can't say anything with any degree of certainty.

    Sensei's top... another I haven't tested. Good in theory because the game can often drag out and top can provide a lot of selection. My estimation is that it wouldn't carry its weight in practice, however. During the crucial first 4 turns it may just waste your time or sit in your hand wishing it was a disrupt or removal like needle/keg/charm. If you topdeck it you may. again, wish it was removal for that mongrel that snuck by. Or a hymn to capitalize on their mana screw, or a sinkhole to finish screwing them. Or a powder keg to hit that chrome/diamond mox to finish screwing them. Or at worst a funeral charm to use at their upkeep to keep them screwed another turn. Or a needle to turn off their aether vial which is at 3 counters and is dangerously close to pooping out a brutal ringleader. Or at 4 counters and one more is the gangbanggame over. Or or or.... Pox wins on constant pressure, cohesion, consistency, and screwing the opponent. I'm not a fan of top.

    Phyrexian arena fixes the problem of card advantage but, as hundreds before me have noticed, the life loss is typically unacceptable. The deck walks a tight rope against slighish and burnish decks already.

    Mox Diamond, looks great in crucible builds. Can't say much more, test this one on your own and decide for yourself.

  18. #278

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    A couple of points, I'm running 20 sources of black mana 8 Swamp + 4 Fetch + 3 Tomb + 2 Pit + 3 Totem, (23 if you count Dark Rituals), not 12.

    I don't like maindeck Pithing Needle because there are several matchups against which they are largely useless.

    Sensei's Top is a lot more abusable than you make it sound like. You seemed to overlook the shuffle effect that the 4 fetchlands provide, and the possible recursion of this shuffle effect with Crucibles. Many games with this deck go long, and those games, you are likely to get both Crucible and Top in play at the same time with a fetchland in the yard. And those games, the ability to shuffle away lands and ensure that you draw only disruption and threats wins you a lot of games. Like you said, Pox wins on constant pressure/disruption, Top ensures that Pox gets that pressure/disruption rather than drawing into a bunch of extra lands.

    And I don't think the deck runs enough lands to support Mox Diamond, though admittedly, I haven't tested the card. But it does seem like you want three mana sources early on, since you'll end up saccing one or two, and for that, 24 lands isn't enough to ensure you'll have an extra one to pitch to Diamond.

    Infest is quite good against a lot of decks other than the ones you listed including many you wouldn't expect. It's pretty strong against affinity. And for example, I love that you can wipe Angel Stompy's board except for their Exalted Angel, and then force them to sac their Angel with Pox/Smallpox/Innocent Blood.

    And don't forget Therapy combos with not just Spirit but with Duress... and Expirate if you choose to run that sideboard as well.

    Other than that, I agree with you on your assessment of the other cards.

    That said, I'm still not sure which card to test in place of Dark Ritual and I'm no where close to being convinced that Dark Ritual should get the boot in the first place.

    But the top three candidates IMO are in this order...

    1. Powder Keg
    2. Top
    ...
    3. Funeral Charm

  19. #279
    i exist to cheese.

    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Posts

    64

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    @ Kant:
    What are the fetches for? With no Top, the reshuffle is basically useless. And if it's for getting threshold faster for Pit, isn't it just counterproductive with the lifeloss [from fetch AND Pit] and all?

    And why 3 Ritual? If it's in the deck, you want to see it as early and often as possible. It's almost like you should run 4, or not bother running it at all.

    Top + Fetch has been working for me, as well as 2 Tomb. And, just so Androstanolone doesn't feel alone on this one, I've once again dropped Rituals [they were back in for a while] from the maindeck. They're still calling to get back in, though.

  20. #280

    Re: [Deck Discussion] Pox & [New Card Discussion] Small Pox

    A couple of points, I'm running 20 sources of black mana 8 Swamp + 4 Fetch + 3 Tomb + 2 Pit + 3 Totem, (23 if you count Dark Rituals), not 12.
    This is a matter of definition/terminology. You're running twenty black sources. You're running 12 swamps (counting swamp fetch as a swamp). I tend to count basic lands in pox because that's how I've built it in general. Also, I would not count totem as a black source because it's at the top of your curve. I must admit, cabal pit is new and pretty cool... and another reason to make crucipox. Crucipox also benefits more from ritual, it should be noted.

    I don't like maindeck Pithing Needle because there are several matchups against which they are largely useless.
    This is a good point, I don't run the needle either. But, I consider it mentionable because if its 1cc (big spot for pox) and ability to shut down a few important cards while mildly annoying other decks.

    Sensei's Top is a lot more abusable than you make it sound like.
    I'll have to take your word for it because I haven't used it. I don't run fetch lands because of the life loss. If I had top in my deck then fetches would be a natural inclusion also. This is a very positive interaction and can make the difference in terms of percentage over a long game. But then again, so can a couple points of fetch damage. It's a very good point that it helps keep constant pressure, but what about when you draw top on turn 4 or so when you need something else to keep the pressure on before the game gets away from you? That's my concern. Usually the game is clenched around turn 4 or so and its just a matter of drawing a reasonable mix of lands and spells to win. Fortunately you can shuffle it or other things away with fetches... Like I said, I only proposed my best guess, those of you who play with it carry more weight here.

    And I don't think the deck runs enough lands to support Mox Diamond
    Agreed, nor a game-winning two drop. Although a turn 2 crucible off diamond is seeeeexy.

    Infest is quite good against a lot of decks other than the ones you listed including many you wouldn't expect. It's pretty strong against affinity.
    I didn't make an exhaustive list, although affinity is a good point. My point was that, if lots of aggro is around, gobs will be most abundant because it's King Aggro. Whatever the meta's full of, it's gonna be full of the deck that beats it. Gobs generally beats aggro. So in an aggro meta E. Plague seems a better fit.

    Also, yes I remember that therapy combos with duress also. Therapy's good, I just hate having to either cast one blind (which happens half the time I draw it) or wait for the duress/spirit.

    But the top three candidates IMO are in this order...

    1. Powder Keg
    2. Top
    ...
    3. Funeral Charm
    I like your assessment, although my jury is out on top. I've been running 4x keg and 4x charm in my pox for a while now. Keg is such an all-star. I've pulled from some quite unfavorable board states by drawing it. I've hoarded removal while taking a hit only to cast keg after they make their second drop, snagging 2 for 1 with aces in the hole. People have been forced to target keg with their first pithing needle instead of idol (unless idol is already out). It's been great. Funeral charm has been great also. Everyone says it's never great, always okay. I disagree. It is sometimes very great. I've used it to pump my idol to 5/3 and win. I use it at my opponent's draw step to keep them screwed. I off lackeys and confidants all the time. One thing about pox is that, against a creature-heavy deck, they always sac their worst creature. So when there's an X/1 you really wanna deal with you don't have point removal for it. Charm provides that point removal. Did I mention it's instant? Useful against all of the big 3? Yeah, I like it :). Those are my two favs, with my third pick varying a lot. Innocent blood is great but I don't like having more dead cards against combo (already got keg), but it's just fantastic against thresh, madness, and gobs. I might try top with some fetches, I just don't know if it's worth it sans crucible, and I don't know if I'm ready to go crucipox yet or not. It looks good, I should at least try it some games.

    Top + Fetch has been working for me, as well as 2 Tomb. And, just so Androstanolone doesn't feel alone on this one, I've once again dropped Rituals [they were back in for a while] from the maindeck. They're still calling to get back in, though.
    Thanks for that, jebus :). Top+fetch can be powerful, especially with crucible. I don't think my deck can really use it, though, without turning into something different:

    4x duress
    4x fun charm
    4x sinkhole
    4x hymn
    4x keg
    4x smallpox
    4x pox
    4x chimeric idol
    4x nether spirit
    4x wasteland
    20x swamp

    I could only cut keg, I think. Then I get owned by vial every time. I'll just have to build a crucipox version.

    So, my original point, taking out dark ritual. You have all these great options you want to fit in your deck, more than you can possibly keep to 60 cards. They're all good. Except dark ritual can be great or it can set you back on the topdeck or if you run out of disrupt while your opponent recovers. It makes sense to me to add in more action-spells, so you never run out and so you have the answer to the deck's problems (lackey, vial, artifact mana to name the biggies). That's my take. However, as I said, ritual is better than crucipox because CPox seeks to win on broken interactions with crucible. Taking some disadvantage is fine if crucible recoups it quickly and then puts you ahead. Crucible takes the deck into a more combo-control direction and so ritual warrants consideration. One other thing to keep in mind, the crucible strategy is very powerful when it goes, but it's vulnerable to commonly played "hate". Graveyard hate now not only hits your spirit but also renders your crucible dead (not forever, but for a long time). Artifact destruction is still played, moreso in sideboards but some in maindecks.

    Basically I think it comes down to percentages. If people start placing with ritual pox then I'll admit I'm wrong. However, it is my belief that a more controlling, ritualless pox has the versatility, stability, and resilience that is needed in a powerful but varied legacy metagame.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)