Page 56 of 279 FirstFirst ... 64652535455565758596066106156 ... LastLast
Results 1,101 to 1,120 of 5564

Thread: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

  1. #1101

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by rockout View Post
    You list just doesn't make sense to me.
    That's really not surprising. You make a lot of assumptions without actually testing anything. The comments you've made about card interactions are laughable to anyone who has actually played with (or against) the deck you are "analyzing".

    When I posted the deck, I stated that I was interested in feedback from people who tested the deck. Not simply read the list and grasped at straws, which you do repeatedly.

    I removed the list to reduce chances of running up against it in Chicago. I'd much rather play against your version. So please, keep promoting that.

  2. #1102
    Eating glass
    gustha's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2008
    Location

    Italy, Venice, a small town somwhere in the north.east
    Posts

    236

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    HI!
    I came back after a full period of exams and a 61 people toyrney yesterday. Meta has really anything, from Thresh to stompy / stax, many goblins and elves from aggro to combo), lots of landstill of course, aggro loam, plenty of combo (high tide, belcher, AdnT), and the new yugioh deck (that with progrenitals, that top8ed), ichorid also. Finished 13th, stopped with stupid burn (keldon marauders, mogg fanatic, rift bolt and all those stupid things) on ROUND 5!!! how the hell a deck like this in a meta like that could be round 5 at table 6?!? g1 obviously lost, g2 my counterbalances were in the last 10 cards of the deck, i didn't see any with top on the board and 5 fetches to shuffle away the crap... there's no glory in losing like this, but I was obviously even angry with the ugly match with the player at table 2 the round before, who played aggroloam very sowly (i was nearly sleeping...). g1 lasted 40 minutes, he attacks for lethal with worm tokens while I was swearing cause i din't see any EE with jace on the board (so 2 cards per turn for ten turns!!! = 20 cards!!!); g2 finished at turns with me bashing with factories and he at 4 life. Had elspeth come down the turn before, could have won. No mirror match this time. This the list I played:

    // Lands
    3 [AQ] Mishra's Factory (1)
    1 [TSP] Academy Ruins
    2 [ON] Polluted Delta
    3 [B] Tundra
    3 [TE] Wasteland
    1 [R] Underground Sea
    3 [ON] Flooded Strand
    1 [TSP] Swamp (1)
    1 [R] Scrubland
    2 [APL] Plains (3)
    3 [RAV] Island (4)

    // Creatures
    1 [SC] Eternal Dragon
    2 [ALA] Elspeth, Knight-Errant
    3 [LRW] Jace Beleren

    // Spells
    4 [MM] Brainstorm
    1 [A] Nevinyrral's Disk
    2 [FD] Engineered Explosives
    1 [10E] Crucible of Worlds
    2 [R] Wrath of God
    3 [OD] Standstill
    4 [AL] Force of Will
    2 [SC] Decree of Justice
    3 [AP] Vindicate
    4 [A] Swords to Plowshares
    3 [DIS] Spell Snare
    2 [A] Counterspell
    1 [CHK] Sensei's Divining Top

    // Sideboard
    SB: 1 [CH] Tormod's Crypt
    SB: 2 [ALA] Relic of Progenitus
    SB: 3 [7E] Engineered Plague
    SB: 3 [PS] Meddling Mage
    SB: 2 [CHK] Sensei's Divining Top
    SB: 4 [CS] Counterbalance

    The deck worked very well and did everything i wanted to to. Still, in some MU's i felt like I really loved having FoF instead of jace, but the CA it makes is rediculous. Aso, I'm not yet convinced on the 3/3 split between standstill and jace, maybe a 4/2 split would be bettere (but: a) i don't want to think at jace simply replacing fof; b) 2x jace forces me to use more often its +2 ability). Vindicate proved itself the good card it is, and simply makes dstompy MU (if you manage to get your basics and some removal in the first turns) almost a auto-win. Doj almost useless...

    Round1: goblins 2-0
    Favorable MU, but he played Rgb so threats in sideboard. G2 he opens a slow hand with cabal naming EE, but i played plague. he casts ringleader but sees lackey taiga taiga badlands, cast another and sees lackey lackey (with plague in game, lol!) and 2 lands. Then he needed g for krosan, but i go in waste/vindicate mode on his lands to secure my win.
    1-0

    Round2: elfstaff 2-1
    My team-mate. G1 I kept a godhand, but then draw lands lands lands...g3 he goes the same, and 3 plagues gave me enough time to bash him with mishra and elspeth.
    2-0

    Round 3: dragonstompy 2-1
    g1 i had nohing but kept anyway, and i lost in five turns. g2 and g3 were a cakewalk... thanx to my fow and removal, he goes topdeck mode in 2-3 turns. Disk always won the game, with the 3rd ability of elspeth. g3 he cast chalice@3 (and I drew in order: crucible, vindicate, jace, jace ) and needle naming disk. EE@ got rid of chalice, vindicate of needle and disk of the rest!
    3-0

    Round 4: aggroloam 0-1
    g1 was the crap above. g2 i resolved 2 relics and a tormod, and I can't figure out how he managed to resist however... a jund charm on my graveyard, in reponse to my crucible, kept me away from WW to cast elspeth until the last additional turn.
    3-1

    Round 5: stupid burn 0-2
    No (further) comments
    3-2

    Round 6: belcher 2-0
    Another not particulary difficult MU. g2 mishra and mage (naming ETW) bashed him to death. I cast 3 standstill and never see a fow. But he can't risk with my 10 cards hands... the only relevant draws he made was xantid swarm (that got STP), a land and LED / chrome (which got respectively wasted and EE'd).

    Next week hope i can play and do a better result, even if I'm not dissatisfied with this one. 2'00 a.m., better go to sleep.
    Last edited by gustha; 02-16-2009 at 07:55 AM. Reason: why the hell it was written "thresh" a thousand times?!?

  3. #1103
    Team Bad Guys
    mossivo1986's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Michigan, specificly Lansing
    Posts

    1,105

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by Viscosity View Post
    That's really not surprising. You make a lot of assumptions without actually testing anything. The comments you've made about card interactions are laughable to anyone who has actually played with (or against) the deck you are "analyzing".

    When I posted the deck, I stated that I was interested in feedback from people who tested the deck. Not simply read the list and grasped at straws, which you do repeatedly.

    I removed the list to reduce chances of running up against it in Chicago. I'd much rather play against your version. So please, keep promoting that.
    IIs the list your refering to the one that looks like a combination of stax manabase with landstill configuration? If so I wouldn't fear running up against it, as I don't think anyone in their right mind is going to play something they have less then a month to test.

    Rockout may not know the ins and outs to your list, but he is a very experianced landstill player and though he may nag like a whore it is imperitive that you both understand that your both completely different players.

    vis you apparently like to sacrifice efficiency for explosiveness. Rockout you like to have answers over raw power/ manipulation.

  4. #1104
    RawR Bitch
    rockout's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Norwich, CT
    Posts

    1,273

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    I personally enjoy playing a 60 card pile of good cards. I'm sorry they just mesh well together somehow. Raw power? WTF?

    Tournament report from the Grid tournament:

    // Lands
    3 [ON] Flooded Strand
    2 [ON] Polluted Delta
    2 [UNH] Plains
    2 [UNH] Island
    1 [UNH] Swamp
    3 [B] Tundra
    2 [B] Underground Sea
    1 [B] Scrubland
    3 [JGC] Mishra's Factory
    3 [REW] Wasteland - marry me please
    1 [TSP] Academy Ruins - didn't use it once

    // Creatures
    2 [PR] Eternal Dragon

    // Spells
    4 [MM] Brainstorm
    4 [AL] Force of Will
    4 [OD] Standstill
    4 [B] Swords to Plowshares
    3 [JGC] Counterspell - second worst card in the deck
    3 [FD] Engineered Explosives
    3 [AP] Vindicate - amazing the best card
    2 [SC] Decree of Justice - I cycled decree twice all day and both times were on turn 3 to find my fourth mana for wrath
    2 [ALA] Elspeth Knight-Errant
    2 [IN] Fact or Fiction - 2nd best card in the deck
    2 [DIS] Spell Snare
    2 [REW] Wrath of God - worst card in the deck

    // Sideboard
    SB: 3 [JGC] Meddling Mage
    SB: 3 [FNM] Engineered Plague - good
    SB: 3 [ALA] Relic of Progenitus
    SB: 2 [LRW] Ajani Goldmane - amazing
    SB: 2 [TE] Perish - eh
    SB: 2 [SHM] Runed Halo

    Round 1: Pat Kellaher - My teammate - TES 1-2
    Game 1: He chants me I CS and don't force wish cuz he has 5 cards in hand He goes dark rit cabal lotus petal x 3 tendrils. play mistake hoorah
    Game 2: He AD at 3 life.
    Game 3: I keep the nuts hand of force, bs, ee, fetch, cs, and other. I bs into the rest of my mages and don't see a 2nd land until he goes off with a chant protected igg loop.

    Round 2: Brent Gilmore - MUC 1-1-1 Nice Guy
    Game 1: It ends with all my ee's and vindicates in the gy with 10+ lands unable to untap due to a b2b. Skybreaker gets there.
    Game 2: I am able to 3 for 1 jace and 2 b2b with ee.
    Game 3: We go to time. I probably could have won if I didn't play the last 5 extra turns poorly.

    Round 3: Michael Maclean - Goyf Sligh 2-1
    Game 1: Multiple PoPs and stping a double pumped factory.
    Game 2: Ajani wins this match up.
    Game 3: I have double mage double halo naming PoP, Bolt, Fireblast, PoP. I played this game like a frantic mother looking for her lost son.

    Round 4: Brian Popp (BPopp) 0-2 Rgb Gobos Nice Guy
    Game 1: I get swarmed. I answer a lot of dudes but lose to multiple ringleaders.
    Game 2: He has triple port active. I have triple plague out. No joke. 20 turns later I don't see a win condition and lose to krosan grip and earwig squad.

    Round 5: Chris Rock 2-1 Nice Guy
    Game 1: I string a lot of CA
    Game 2: I lose to turn 1 teeg off chrome mox and to a jitte equiped goyf. He vindicates my land like a champ when next turn I had wrath o well.
    Game 3: He deeds away his chrome mox, needle naming ee, and jitte to kill my ajani. Whoops.

    Round 6: DJ My other teammate 0-2 Dragonstompy.
    Round 1: I lose to red akroma.
    Round 2: His opening hand was triple SSG, double magus, city of traitors, Mountain. I force the first magus, cs the second magus and lose to the third magus. Must be nice.

    Wrath is by far the worst card in this deck. Having to try to assemble 4 mana through wastelands, ports and vindicates is just awful.

    All in all, a shitty meta for landstill. There was a lot of survival, goyf sligh, goblins and DS. I should have played mono red burn.

    No props or slops cuz I scrubzored. Why can't I play aggro control? Where are you aggro control? The next person I see casting a PoP at me I might leap the table.
    Co-Founder of Team Awesome - I heard Randy Buehler say a while back that good players give themselves the most number of turns to find the answer.
    The Source on MTGO - Predator8785 and RockOut
    Quote Originally Posted by Secretly.A.Bee View Post
    Women come and go, turn one protection is forever.

  5. #1105
    Artist formerly known as Anti-American
    Citrus-God's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2005
    Location

    Thursday...
    Posts

    1,692

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    Why do you need Relic? You're better off having a 4th copy of MM, 3rd copy of Runed Halo and a 3rd copy of Perish. Reason why I say this is better because those cards tend to be better in terms of raw power in many match ups. Against Thresh, having Perish is much more insane than Relic; even kills Teeg, which I also think is awesome. Extra Runed Halos and MM would also make combo and Burn match ups easier to handle.
    ICBE - We're totally the coolest Anti-Thesis ever.


    "The Citrus-God just had a Citrus-Supernova... in your mouth."

  6. #1106
    RawR Bitch
    rockout's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Norwich, CT
    Posts

    1,273

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by Citrus-God View Post
    Why do you need Relic? You're better off having a 4th copy of MM, 3rd copy of Runed Halo and a 3rd copy of Perish. Reason why I say this is better because those cards tend to be better in terms of raw power in many match ups. Against Thresh, having Perish is much more insane than Relic; even kills Teeg, which I also think is awesome. Extra Runed Halos and MM would also make combo and Burn match ups easier to handle.
    This is true. You just blew my mind. Thanks dude. No sarcasm intended.
    Co-Founder of Team Awesome - I heard Randy Buehler say a while back that good players give themselves the most number of turns to find the answer.
    The Source on MTGO - Predator8785 and RockOut
    Quote Originally Posted by Secretly.A.Bee View Post
    Women come and go, turn one protection is forever.

  7. #1107
    Eating glass
    gustha's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2008
    Location

    Italy, Venice, a small town somwhere in the north.east
    Posts

    236

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    Someone forgot aggroloam and ichorid... perish does nothing against ichorid and does little vs aggro loam...i do agree that perish is a good card, with all those green/elves/zoo/progenitals/aggroloam/thres I saw the other day I really woul've had perish instead of wrath in my deck. Also, against all these decks i've mentioned perish works like a less-expensive-less-specific-mana-investment-single-sided-wrath-of-god, which makes it absolutely insane (though does nothing against the 7-8 gobbos in the room, and merfolk too). But against aggroloam I'm not so sure I'd prefer perish above relic, in the ichorid MU there's really no point to prefer perish instead of relic.

  8. #1108
    RawR Bitch
    rockout's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Norwich, CT
    Posts

    1,273

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by gustha View Post
    Someone forgot aggroloam and ichorid... perish does nothing against ichorid and does little vs aggro loam...i do agree that perish is a good card, with all those green/elves/zoo/progenitals/aggroloam/thres I saw the other day I really woul've had perish instead of wrath in my deck. Also, against all these decks i've mentioned perish works like a less-expensive-less-specific-mana-investment-single-sided-wrath-of-god, which makes it absolutely insane (though does nothing against the 7-8 gobbos in the room, and merfolk too). But against aggroloam I'm not so sure I'd prefer perish above relic, in the ichorid MU there's really no point to prefer perish instead of relic.
    You bring in E plague against goblins and merfolk not perish. Also, Perish isn't replacing relic. Relic is being replaced for the 3rd perish, the 4th mage, and the 3rd halo. The aggro loam/ichorid MU gets a little tougher without the GY hate, but you can bring in 7 cards against both of those decks: Runed Halo x 3 and Mage x 4.
    Co-Founder of Team Awesome - I heard Randy Buehler say a while back that good players give themselves the most number of turns to find the answer.
    The Source on MTGO - Predator8785 and RockOut
    Quote Originally Posted by Secretly.A.Bee View Post
    Women come and go, turn one protection is forever.

  9. #1109
    Merkwürdigeliebe
    jazzykat's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Vienna, AT
    Posts

    913

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    Realizing that the builds are remarkably different with regards to UWb Landstill (I am playing Konsultant's list) what would be the good SB cards to play against WRg Loam Slide.

    It's relevant cards are:

    Decree of Justice
    Life from the Loam
    Wasteland
    Resounding Thunder (6 damage cycled under standstill)
    Slide
    Rift
    Knight of the Reliquary/Eternal Witness/Kitchen Finks
    STP
    Lightning Helix

    I feel that while I do have manlands and I do have my own Decree of Justice that his loam will bury me. He brings in ancient grudge and krosan grip to deal with artifacts, so I'm thinking I should run extirpate in the board hit his loam and dominate the standstill match up with man lands and my own DoJ.

    I would take out my 3 wraths. I was also thinking of boarding in Elspeth/Anjani Goldmane.

    Your thoughts are appreciated.

  10. #1110
    Eating glass
    gustha's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2008
    Location

    Italy, Venice, a small town somwhere in the north.east
    Posts

    236

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by rockout
    You bring in E plague against goblins and merfolk not perish.
    I said I was thinking of replacing MD wrath with perish, at least 1/1 split, due to the massive presence of green permanents to destroy (tarmo mongoose terravore progenitals elves) but perish does nothing against gobbos and merfolks (yeah, my sentence may have been not so clear, was just a train of thoughts...).

    Also, Perish isn't replacing relic. Relic is being replaced for the 3rd perish, the 4th mage, and the 3rd halo. The aggro loam/ichorid MU gets a little tougher without the GY hate, but you can bring in 7 cards against both of those decks: Runed Halo x 3 and Mage x 4.
    I understand this, but still i'm not so convinced... I've tested 3 mage 4 cb 2 sdt (+1 MD) and felt much better than 4 mage 3 halo 2 ajani (actually you can bring in 9 cards against aggroloam, and perish too replacing wrath). I was thinking (and again, I apologize if I couldn't explain myself well) that those 3 slots could easily be, in my sb, 2 perish (can come in replacing wrath or paired with wrath, my disk or an explo out) +1 open slot (tormod?4th mage?). So my problem is that perish, that's a really good card i've always wanted to play, can fit in my sb only replacing GY hate (and maybe adding the 4th mage).

    My sb atm (posted above):
    3 Mage
    4 cb
    2 sdt
    3 relic
    3 plague

  11. #1111
    Team Bad Guys
    mossivo1986's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Michigan, specificly Lansing
    Posts

    1,105

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by jazzykat View Post
    Realizing that the builds are remarkably different with regards to UWb Landstill (I am playing Konsultant's list) what would be the good SB cards to play against WRg Loam Slide.

    It's relevant cards are:

    Decree of Justice
    Life from the Loam
    Wasteland
    Resounding Thunder (6 damage cycled under standstill)
    Slide
    Rift
    Knight of the Reliquary/Eternal Witness/Kitchen Finks
    STP
    Lightning Helix

    I feel that while I do have manlands and I do have my own Decree of Justice that his loam will bury me. He brings in ancient grudge and krosan grip to deal with artifacts, so I'm thinking I should run extirpate in the board hit his loam and dominate the standstill match up with man lands and my own DoJ.

    I would take out my 3 wraths. I was also thinking of boarding in Elspeth/Anjani Goldmane.

    Your thoughts are appreciated.
    From what I understand from rockout consultants list has a terrifying matchup against anything named loam, and for that matter astral slide doesn't help things either. Personally I md relics and vendillion clique against loam/ teps/ survival/ thresh the list goes on and on. But my weakness becomes the long game against other landstill models because of this.

  12. #1112
    Pandora
    konsultant's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2007
    Location

    North Syracuse
    Posts

    481

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by jazzykat View Post
    Realizing that the builds are remarkably different with regards to UWb Landstill (I am playing Konsultant's list) what would be the good SB cards to play against WRg Loam Slide.

    It's relevant cards are:

    Decree of Justice
    Life from the Loam
    Wasteland
    Resounding Thunder (6 damage cycled under standstill)
    Slide
    Rift
    Knight of the Reliquary/Eternal Witness/Kitchen Finks
    STP
    Lightning Helix

    I feel that while I do have manlands and I do have my own Decree of Justice that his loam will bury me. He brings in ancient grudge and krosan grip to deal with artifacts, so I'm thinking I should run extirpate in the board hit his loam and dominate the standstill match up with man lands and my own DoJ.

    I would take out my 3 wraths. I was also thinking of boarding in Elspeth/Anjani Goldmane.

    Your thoughts are appreciated.
    Well I can honestly say that in all of my events that I have ever played I have yet to face this deck. I would treat it like aggro loam, board out the sweepers for Mage's and Ajani. Unlike Aggro Loam they have a considerable number of ways to deal with a mage. Ajani and bulk card advantage are your only real ways to win this match. If I get bored some day i'll proxy it up and play out some games to see how the deck plays out. I think Counter magic with the Mage's and Ajani should be enough to beat this deck but that is with zero actual testing. You would definetly need a strong hand and need to get an early Standstill with enough of a threat that they would have to break it. I've played against Rifter plenty of times and counter magic should be your ace in this match.
    Team Pandora

    Team Disqualified Poster

  13. #1113

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    Hi,

    I'm just getting this deck together and started testing...

    I only had one question: I was under the assumption that Cunning Wish was normally played, but in alot of decks I see Vindicate instead.

    What are the advantages of Vindicate over Cunning Wish and in wich matchups do they care.

    My meta is with quite some DreadStill, Rg Goyfsligh/Goblins and Aggro-Loam and Stax(60%). The rest of the decks are some Rocklike decks and scrub(30%). Threshold, LandStill are hardly played(5%). There are some combo players, but only 1 or 2 who can actually play the deck...

    In this meta wich card would be better...

    BB

  14. #1114
    Broke down and started playing Standard. x_X
    Smog's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2008
    Posts

    36

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    I think the matter of wishstill vs non-wish builds is just a matter of playstyle. Wishstill and Landstill just play different. Test them both and see which you like better.
    I wonder how it feels to be bored.
    -Jhoira, artificer

  15. #1115
    Goblin Piledriver
    Ectoplasm's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2008
    Location

    Netherlands
    Posts

    462

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by Benie Bederios View Post
    Hi,

    I'm just getting this deck together and started testing...

    I only had one question: I was under the assumption that Cunning Wish was normally played, but in alot of decks I see Vindicate instead.

    What are the advantages of Vindicate over Cunning Wish and in wich matchups do they care.

    My meta is with quite some DreadStill, Rg Goyfsligh/Goblins and Aggro-Loam and Stax(60%). The rest of the decks are some Rocklike decks and scrub(30%). Threshold, LandStill are hardly played(5%). There are some combo players, but only 1 or 2 who can actually play the deck...

    In this meta wich card would be better...

    BB
    I'm 99% sure you're talking about the Dutch meta
    My (limited, online) experience with cunning wish is that you're wishing for some form of enchantment/artifacthate anyway, so you might as well invest the 3 mana in a vindicate and do it a turn earlier :)
    Hello friend.

  16. #1116
    Member
    from Cairo's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    RI
    Posts

    1,093

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by Benie Bederios View Post
    Hi,
    What are the advantages of Vindicate over Cunning Wish and in wich matchups do they care.
    Vindicate answers the problem a turn earlier, and can hit land. It's also an out to opposing Planeswalkers which I guess don't see a ton of play outside Landstill but in the mirror seems relevant.

    You lose a little bit of flexibility since I used to have Extirpate, Dismantilling Blow, Enlightened Tutor and Slaughter Pact as my 4 targets. So with Vindicate you don't have MD access to grave hate, and you don't have the Tutor to fetch Crucible or Humility. Of coarse you gain 4 SB slots though so games 2 and 3 you gain a bit of flexibility.

    I think the gain in speed from Vindicate is better though for dealing with Artifacts, Enchantments and Creatures and it's ability to capitalize on opponent's mana base if they're struggling already.

  17. #1117

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    Hi,

    Thanks for the replies, but my real questions was, in wich matchups is wich card better? In my assumption:

    • Vindicate better: Stax, DreadStill, Mirror.
    • Cunning Wish better: Goyfslight/Burn/Goblins, Aggro Loam.
    • Matchups that I don't know and like to know: The Rock, Threshold, Merfolk.


    ATM I'm testing the Vindicate build. This is the build:

    1 Crucible of Worlds
    3 Engineered Explosives

    1 Eternal Dragon

    4 Standstill

    3 Brainstorm
    3 Counterspell
    2 Fact or Fiction
    4 Force of Will
    3 Spell Snare
    4 Swords to Plowshare

    3 Flooded Strand
    2 Island
    4 Mishra's Factory
    2 Plains
    1 Scrubland
    1 Swamp
    4 Tundra
    1 Underground Sea
    2 Wasteland

    1 Elspeth, Knight-Errant

    2 Decree of Justice
    3 Wrath of God
    3 Vindicate

    Sideboard

    4 Meddling Mage
    4 Engineered Plague
    3 Runed Halo
    2 Ajani Goldmane
    2 Chainer's Edict
    Choices:

    As I said Vindicate is being tested. I like Elspeth, but think one is enough because Landstill isn't played that much here. 4 Mishra's and 2 Wastelands because I only play 2 Decree of Justice.

    No Academy Ruins or Tolaria West. Tolaria West was to slow every time. Academy Ruins was to slow and the colorless mana was a pity. I might drop Wastelands for a Ruins and a Dust Bowl.

    The Sideboard is completly netdecked but works wonderfully.

    Any comments?

    BB

  18. #1118
    Broke down and started playing Standard. x_X
    Smog's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2008
    Posts

    36

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by Benie Bederios View Post
    As I said Vindicate is being tested. I like Elspeth, but think one is enough because Landstill isn't played that much here. 4 Mishra's and 2 Wastelands because I only play 2 Decree of Justice.

    No Academy Ruins or Tolaria West. Tolaria West was to slow every time. Academy Ruins was to slow and the colorless mana was a pity. I might drop Wastelands for a Ruins and a Dust Bowl.

    The Sideboard is completly netdecked but works wonderfully.

    Any comments?

    BB
    Don't run more than 3 mishra's. Run 3 wastelands or none. Don't know what tolaria west being 'slow' means, it's a transmute that you can get either piece to the recurring EE combo with. Don't run Ruins without tolaria west. Don't run Dust Bowl unless you're playing wishstill.

    And I'd play 2 elspeths. She's amazing. But that's a personal call I guess.
    I wonder how it feels to be bored.
    -Jhoira, artificer

  19. #1119

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by Smog View Post
    Don't run more than 3 mishra's. Run 3 wastelands or none. Don't know what tolaria west being 'slow' means, it's a transmute that you can get either piece to the recurring EE combo with. Don't run Ruins without tolaria west. Don't run Dust Bowl unless you're playing wishstill.

    And I'd play 2 elspeths. She's amazing. But that's a personal call I guess.
    I like your replies, but can't you be more clear... Why wouldn't I play 4 Mishra's Factories?

    Why can Dustbowl only be played in the Wishstill build?

    With my experience with Tolaria West I found it slow. It cost three mana, for a not immidiate effect. So I never casted it before turn 6, wich is slow.

    BB

    About Elspeth, I know she is amazing, but I won't likely play the mirror so one is enough.

  20. #1120

    Re: [DTB] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by Smog View Post
    Don't run more than 3 mishra's. Run 3 wastelands or none. Don't know what tolaria west being 'slow' means, it's a transmute that you can get either piece to the recurring EE combo with. Don't run Ruins without tolaria west. Don't run Dust Bowl unless you're playing wishstill.

    And I'd play 2 elspeths. She's amazing. But that's a personal call I guess.
    Why on earth would you only run 3 Mishra's? You always want to see one, and they get better the more you have. It's one of the key cards in the deck, an auto 4-of.

    In regards to Dust Bowl: I'm currently playing it in my list that doesn't have Cunning Wish. The use of Dust Bowl is just a different strategy. I, also, don't run Vindicate, so LD is not a large part of my gameplan. Dust Bowl destroys the random annoying lands (manlands, volrath's stronghold, academy ruins) and, in some situations, can be useful in cutting off a color. I see no connection between Cunning Wish and Dustbowl.

    Oh yeah, run 2 Elspeths. You want to see one every game. If you have one in play and you draw another, no big deal, because you already won by having one in play. Elspeth is the best card that happened to Landstill since Spell Snare.
    Team GIANCOLI!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)