Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678
Results 141 to 158 of 158

Thread: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

  1. #141

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    This thread really needs a better name. CounterTop, Next Level Blue, Legacy Blue, somethin like that.

  2. #142

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    I've been running this list lately and it's been pretty successful so far. Here it is:

    // Lands
    4 [A] Island (1)
    4 [A] Underground Sea
    4 [ON] Flooded Strand
    4 [ON] Polluted Delta
    4 [A] Tropical Island

    // Creatures
    4 [RAV] Dark Confidant
    4 [FUT] Tarmogoyf
    3 [ARB] Lorescale Coatl

    // Spells
    4 [AL] Force of Will
    4 [MM] Brainstorm
    4 [LRW] Ponder
    4 [CS] Counterbalance
    4 [CHK] Sensei's Divining Top
    3 [NE] Daze
    3 [DIS] Spell Snare
    3 [ARB] Maelstrom Pulse

    // Sideboard
    SB: 4 [UL] Engineered Plague
    SB: 2 [TSP] Krosan Grip
    SB: 2 [FD] Trinket Mage
    SB: 2 [FD] Engineered Explosives
    SB: 1 [ALA] Executioner's Capsule
    SB: 1 [ALA] Relic of Progenitus
    SB: 1 [DK] Tormod's Crypt
    SB: 1 [A] Blue Elemental Blast
    SB: 1 [IA] Hydroblast

    I'm trying not to splash white only for swords since black has removal as well. I'm not so sure about Maelstrom Pulse but it's been good up to now. It dodges counterbalance most of the time and kills annoying stuff like Moat, Tombstalker, Shackles, etc. The downside is that you don't want to use it if you have a permanent with the same name.

    About Ponder, I see no reason to play 4. It helps find answers when you need them including an early Top or Counterbalance.

    Lorescale Coatl has also been great so far since I can protect it with 10 counterspells and Counterbalance. It finishes games fast as it is usually bigger than Tarmogoyf. It gets huge with the 12 draw spells I'm running.

    The curve for Counterbalance is 15 1cc, 15 2cc, 6 3cc and has been good.

    Do you think the loss of Sower and Shackles is important? Sower is easily taken care of with all the spot removal every deck runs and Shackles can be really slow especially if you can't get your land drops in time.

  3. #143
    doesn't afraid of anything
    majikal's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2009
    Location

    in ur tournament, judgin ur gamez
    Posts

    1,253

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    You must not have any aggro in your meta to not run Swords. I find the 1cc to be invaluable. Sower I find to be subpar -- it's really strange actually. It seems it would be very good with all the Goyfs and Tombstalkers and Coatls running around, but at the same time everyone is kind of going crazy with the removal at the moment, so you more than likely won't get one to stick.

    I'm sticking to 2x Shackles currently and it's been great so far. I'm running 20 lands in my build, and between Top, BS, Ponder, and Bob I hardly ever miss a land drop until I've hit 4-5 lands.

    Here's my list:

    4x Tarmogoyf
    4x Dark Confidant
    3x Lorescale Coatl
    2x Vendilion Clique (although Kira, Great Glass-spinner seems really good here)
    2x Vedalken Shackles

    4x Brainstorm
    2x Ponder
    4x Sensei's Divining Top
    4x Counterbalance
    4x Force of Will
    3x Daze
    4x Swords to Plowshares

    4x Polluted Delta
    4x Flooded Strand
    4x Underground Sea
    3x Tropical Island
    3x Tundra
    2x Island

  4. #144
    Human Hunter
    Team-Hero's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2006
    Location

    California
    Posts

    222

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    My SB is:
    2 Counterbalance
    3 Relic of Progenitus
    1 Kira, Great Glass-Spinner
    1 Enlightened Tutor
    1 Dueling Grounds
    1 Propaganda
    1 Llawan, Cephalid Empress (for Merfolk and Faries)
    1 Spell Snare
    2 Annul
    2 OPEN

    I like how the Looters work for me. They ping the opponent early while making my Lorescales bigger. They also ditch cards I do not need. I want to squeeze in an extra Jitte just for them. The Lorescales, for me, are just that good. Most of the time I wish my Tarmogoyf was a Lorescale. I've attacked several times with an 8/8 through 12/12 Lorescale on it's first combat swing.

    Lorescale 2/2: Attack with Looter.
    Lorescale 3/3: Draw. Use Top to draw. Use Brainstorm. Cast Jace, draw.
    Attack with a 9/9 Lorescale, end turn with a 10/10.

    If you get the Top engine going, it helps too. The Lorescale IS good. People I've played against can vouch that they rather deal with a Tarmogoyf than with Lorecale.

    But I am going to try to squeeze in at least another Counterbalance and 2 Shackles, once I get them, in the deck.
    You know that nightmare where your running but you just can't get away...

  5. #145
    Member
    from Cairo's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    RI
    Posts

    1,093

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    Quote Originally Posted by gamegeek2 View Post
    This thread really needs a better name. CounterTop, Next Level Blue, Legacy Blue, somethin like that.
    Next Level Blue (NLU) and Baseruption are the names I hear it referred to most as. I wouldn't pick anything new that just seems like it would be even more confusing.

    Also I agree with Gekoratel, most of these new "innovations" seem worse than the Chicago lists.
    TPDMC

  6. #146
    Montreal's legacy scene
    Enigma's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2008
    Location

    Montreal
    Posts

    204

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    GP versions are really CB-hated oriented. In a more aggro meta, I would change those lists for sure.

    P-M

  7. #147
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Penn State
    Posts

    46

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    Quote Originally Posted by Enigma View Post
    GP versions are really CB-hated oriented. In a more aggro meta, I would change those lists for sure.

    P-M
    Would you mind elaborating on the changes you would make to Probasco's/Nassif's lists for an aggro meta?

  8. #148
    Member
    Gekoratel's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Location

    NJ
    Posts

    78

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    I don't know what kind of drastic changes would be made to the deck for an aggro meta but I could see cutting the 2 Krosan Grip for spot removal in the form of Lightning Bolt. But if Goblins is a large portion of that aggro meta Krosan Grip is pretty solid in that matchup since its hard to beat an active Vial. In the board you get access to Firespout and BEBs so which should help turn out the aggro matchup substantially.

  9. #149
    Steve Carpenter's my friend.
    jimirynk's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2009
    Location

    Poughkeepsie, Ny.
    Posts

    376

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    What type of aggro?
    Brassmans MD is pretty strong vs. the aggro matchup besides merfolk..

  10. #150
    Journeyman
    Taurelin's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2007
    Location

    In the forest
    Posts

    202

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    Quote Originally Posted by jimirynk View Post
    What type of aggro?
    Brassmans MD is pretty strong vs. the aggro matchup besides merfolk..
    Actually, I find Goblins, for example, a rather challenging MU with Brassman's deck, at least pre-board. You have no answer to Lackey apart from FoW (which you don't always have). G2 and 3 it becomes much better with Firespout, but only if they don't play / if you can shut down Wasteland.

    If you play in an aggro-heavy environment, wouldn't Firespout be maindeck material, possibly instead of 2 Grip, 1 Needle? Or at least some more copies of EE could be handy.
    "My sky is darker than thine!"
    SENTENCED - 1993

  11. #151
    Steve Carpenter's my friend.
    jimirynk's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2009
    Location

    Poughkeepsie, Ny.
    Posts

    376

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    I had 1 ee extra in the board for a while but I decided against it.
    I agree firespout is good.
    but you just said you don't have an answer for turn one lackey and firespout doesn't really help that.
    I say know on cutting the needle from the md their is always a time in a game were your going to wish you had it in, plus its a good turn 1 answer to their turn 1 vial.
    Just remember brassmans list is so strong due to its topdecking+counter top strength.
    Don't weaken the deck with bad top deck spells.
    I will post more in some time I have to go pickup my gf.pc

    Btw this is the list I ran for a sapphire and went undefeated untill I gave the win in t8 to my teammate who won the torn.
    http://www.deckcheck.net/deck.php?id=25624

  12. #152
    Journeyman
    Taurelin's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2007
    Location

    In the forest
    Posts

    202

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    Quote Originally Posted by jimirynk View Post
    but you just said you don't have an answer for turn one lackey and firespout doesn't really help that.
    Well, Firespout answers a 3rd turn army. And sometimes that really helps.

    Additionally, Firespout is not only good vs Goblins, but against other aggro decks as well, obviously.

    Quote Originally Posted by jimirynk View Post
    Don't weaken the deck with bad top deck spells.
    I won't. But depending on the meta, a Grip might be a worse top deck than creature removal.

    Quote Originally Posted by jimirynk View Post
    I say know on cutting the needle from the md their is always a time in a game were your going to wish you had it in,
    Agreed!

    Quote Originally Posted by jimirynk View Post
    Btw this is the list I ran
    Err, looks pretty much identical to the original list to me. Which is perfect, of course!
    "My sky is darker than thine!"
    SENTENCED - 1993

  13. #153

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    This is the list I'm running, is pretty much the same as Mr. GP Chicago winner. The only difference is my meta is not countertop heavy(which means me and maybe 1 other person will have countertop) So I decided to take out the predators(hardest thing I've done since the day I left affinity.) and the single krosan grip to try out 3 lorescale coatl's and soooo far I have loved it, there has been many times where I would prefer Coatl over goyf, and the only reason it hasn't replaced it yet is because it costs three and plus I can run both.


    2 Vedalken Shackles
    4 Swords to Plowshares
    4 Sensei's Divining Top
    2 Ponder
    4 Force of Will
    3 Daze
    4 Counterbalance
    4 Brainstorm
    4 Tarmogoyf
    3 lorescale coatl
    2 Sower of Temptation
    4 Dark Confidant
    4 Underground Sea
    3 Tundra
    3 Tropical Island
    4 Polluted Delta
    2 Island
    4 Flooded Strand

    Sideboard
    1 Enlightened Tutor
    1 Engineered Plague
    1 Energy Flux
    1 Darkblast
    1 Burrenton Forge-Tender
    1 Blue Elemental Blast
    1 Hydroblast
    1 Kataki, War's Wage
    1 Krosan Grip
    1 Perish
    1 Planar Void
    1 Relic of Progenitus
    1 Threads of Disloyalty

    I'm still messin with the sideboard, I've tried to put logic beside and work with this but, I truly just don't understand it. But I'm trying


    Personally I love shackles(moving from ITF to this) and would never take them out or go down to 1. The one thing I would like to do is stick in 1 more ponder somewhere for more consistancy, but hey I can't have everything What do you guys think?

  14. #154

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    My problem with Coatl and similar things is that they can't block Piledriver. What about maindeck Firespout instead?
    Magic Level 3 Judge
    Southern USA Regional Coordinator

    Quote Originally Posted by frogboy View Post
    Battle with a ragtag crew of adorable misfits. Narcomoeba and Golgari Thug hook up before the end of the movie.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nihil Credo View Post
    Please be less rambling in your next post. I only bothered with figuring out what the fuck you were trying to ask because I took it as a challenge.

  15. #155
    Member
    aTn's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2006
    Location

    Montreal
    Posts

    168

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    Quote Originally Posted by Taurelin View Post
    Additionally, Firespout is not only good vs Goblins, but against other aggro decks as well, obviously.
    In my opinion, Firespout is not that hot against Merfolk (and Enigma and I have been playing that MU since GP: Chicago). Knowing you're going to board Firesoupt in, the Merfolk player can board in BEB and you'll have to go through a counter-wall before you get to resolve it.

    Matters get even worse when you replace Merfolk with the new Wizards deck (i.e. they play tons of daze effects which basically make Firespout not so hot).

    In all these match-ups, I think the deck could benefit from spot removal.

    From my point of view, Brassmann NLU was built to wreck CB-decks, so if your meta shifts to contain more Merfolk, etc. and less CB, I think it's time to modify the list (in particular some MD choices like 2 x Grip). I say this based on experience, i.e. having played Brassmann's list each week in 25+ player Legacy tournaments and playtesting, I noticed my results went drifting when the meta in my area shifted to more Merfolks, less Threshold, more Elves, more UW-Landstill, etc..

    My problem with Coatl and similar things is that they can't block Piledriver. What about maindeck Firespout instead?
    I was actually thinking about it (maybe -2 Grip, +2 Firespout), but I'd rather have spot removal (I'll test it anyhow).

  16. #156

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    unless I'm reading firespout wrong, why would I want to add red into the deck when there are already 4 colors? Personally I think that is crazy. There has to be a lot better options than adding red, and if your going to do that, just run pyroclasm.

  17. #157
    Member
    aTn's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2006
    Location

    Montreal
    Posts

    168

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    Quote Originally Posted by blueneverfails View Post
    unless I'm reading firespout wrong, why would I want to add red into the deck when there are already 4 colors? Personally I think that is crazy. There has to be a lot better options than adding red, and if your going to do that, just run pyroclasm.
    We are talking about Brassman's list which plays red. I'm currently doing a split between Firespout and Pyroclasm in the board. Pyroclasm is not that good sometimes because Elves and Merfolk play lords (and other guys, in the case of Elves) which boost their creatures out of pyro range.

  18. #158
    I clench my fists and yell "anime" towards an uncaring, absent God
    Nihil Credo's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    59°50'59.11" N, 17°34'55.69" E
    Posts

    4,702

    Re: [Deck] NLU_Extended Port GP Chicago Winner

    From the last DTBF update:

    A second important change involves how Threshold decks are counted; in the last year the archetype has evolved to the point that the old categorisation by their splash colour (or lack thereof) makes little sense.

    Today, the one clear split is between decks packing the maindeck Counterbalance/Top combination and those favouring an aggressive, tempo-driver approach with Daze, Stifle, and Wasteland. The latter decks are quite well established, with only a few secondary choices being discussed (mostly additional threats such as Dreadnought or Alara Reborn creatures) and splashing exclusively either Red or Black.

    Counterbalance decks, on the other side, exist in a continuum, from the classic Mongoose builds to the Chicago lists to those incorporating additional tricks (Survival, Natural Order, etc.); they also exist in pretty much every possible colour combination that includes Blue and Green, from two to four colours.
    If some clear division in approaches emerges, this will eventually be adopted in both thread organisation and tournament tallies. For the time being, all CounterTop decks that do not fall into any established category, i.e. that follow the game plan of "establish the Balance soft-lock and play good creatures", will get dumped into one format-leading cauldron.
    In accordance with the above, this thread is being locked and will eventually be archived. You may continue your discussion in either the CounterTop thread or the Tempo Thresh thread, as appropriate.
    YOU'RE GIVING ME A TIME MACHINE IN ORDER TO TREAT MY SLEEP DISORDER.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)