Page 92 of 400 FirstFirst ... 4282888990919293949596102142192 ... LastLast
Results 1,821 to 1,840 of 7999

Thread: [Deck] Merfolk

  1. #1821
    Member
    sherko7's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2009
    Location

    Philippines
    Posts

    110

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    i don't really like this new guy. i'd have to take out kira or dreadnought from my list if i play sovereign, and i doubt he'd be able to compete with those guys.

  2. #1822

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    I wouldn't run Merfolk Sovereign. Because of the curve of the deck, the only thing this could replace is Wake Thrasher, and one of the nice things about this deck is after an initial rush gets wiped out, you can play Wake Thrasher and finish the game in a couple turns. You can't do that with the sovereign because on his own he's a 2/2. Running him means you have to over commit more than you already do, and now you don't have anything to follow up with when your initial rush is wiped out.

  3. #1823
    Member

    Join Date

    Sep 2005
    Location

    Boston, MA
    Posts

    781

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    I have to agree with most. I think at 3cc this new guy isn't worth running. Granted he's an interesting choice against goblins (unblockable, yes please), but I don't think he wins that matchup by any extent of the imagination and there are probably better choices from the board.
    Quote Originally Posted by tsabo_tavoc
    Thanks for your reply. I believe it is my wording that has made you unpleasant. My fears were something like Angel Stompy ruling Legacy.

  4. #1824
    The specimen seems to be broken.
    elof's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2008
    Location

    Sweden
    Posts

    396

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    I have an idéa I like to try, and that is something like this:

    Lands 20 (will need config):
    4 Tundra
    3 Flooded Strand
    1 Plains
    5 Island
    4 Mutavault
    3 Mishra's Factory

    Creatures 22:
    4 Cursecatcher
    4 Silvergill Adept
    4 Lord of Atlantis
    2 Sygg, River Guide
    4 Merrow Reejerey
    2 Merfolk Sovereign
    2 Mirror Entity

    Spells 18:
    4 Force of Will
    3 Daze
    4 Standstill
    3 Swords to Plowshares
    4 Aether Vial

    Mirror Entity was cut before because it didn't work with Wake Thrasher but I always loved the effect it has with +1/+1 lords. Sover also gives you an edge in merfolk mirror becasue he/she only gives your guys plus. Swords also removes alot of problems and should perhaps be a 4 off?

    Sygg we have been over before and although it's abillity isn't that good, it does have a good body. Could be replaced with alot of other spells if you want.
    "Think of all we could learn from it! It's the chance of a lifetime! You must let me have it! It's a magnificent specimen!"

    Scandinavian Master Legacy 2010

    World champion 93/94 2013

  5. #1825
    Hella fuckin' balls to the wall awesome
    beastman's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2008
    Location

    Maryland
    Posts

    877

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    I'm amused that the emergence of this new lord is provoking people to post for the first time on the site... just to say that they dont like him.
    Team Unicorn: We're horny...get it?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ewokslayer View Post
    You might want to go to a hospital. It appears you cracked your head open.

    You are leaking stupid all over the internet.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nihil Credo View Post
    I masturbated on that picture of your cat.

  6. #1826
    Member
    sherko7's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2009
    Location

    Philippines
    Posts

    110

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    Quote Originally Posted by Antonius View Post
    Because she sucks; she doesn't defend you from Pyroclasm, Firespout or Volcanic Fallout.
    kira is extremely helpful, especially when it enters through vial. so many times have i negated an opponent's stp on my loa by vialling it in.

  7. #1827
    Legacy Staple
    Piceli89's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2008
    Location

    Citizen of the world.
    Posts

    764

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    Quote Originally Posted by sherko7 View Post
    kira is extremely helpful, especially when it enters through vial. so many times have i negated an opponent's stp on my loa by vialling it in.
    Yeah, that's the right way to cheat, mate !
    Quote Originally Posted by Pastorofmuppets View Post
    you just want us to do that because of your Silences, you sly dog.
    -----------------------------------------------------
    Avatar of kicks_422's creation and property

  8. #1828
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Finland
    Posts

    798

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    Quote Originally Posted by Piceli89 View Post
    Yeah, that's the right way to cheat, mate !
    And here piceli means that you cannot do that. If Swords to plowshares is on the stack, vialing in Kira does nothing about it. Rules ftw.

  9. #1829
    Member
    sherko7's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2009
    Location

    Philippines
    Posts

    110

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    Quote Originally Posted by Hopo View Post
    And here piceli means that you cannot do that. If Swords to plowshares is on the stack, vialing in Kira does nothing about it. Rules ftw.
    lol wtf i did it in a tourney... really thats illegal?

    opponent: "stp your loa"
    you: "in response, i vial in kira"

    illegal?? oh my! anyone wanna clarify?:)

  10. #1830
    Member

    Join Date

    Sep 2005
    Location

    Boston, MA
    Posts

    781

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    Kira has a triggered ability that triggers when a creature becomes the target of a spell. When someone announces a spell being cast, part of that is choosing targets. So if you vial in Kira after the spell has been announced (and targets chosen), his ability will never trigger.

    If, however, his ability read "the first spell targetting a creature you control each turn is countered", then the story might be different. "When" means triggered, and triggered means if Kira's not around when the triggering effect happens, the ability doesn't apply.
    Quote Originally Posted by tsabo_tavoc
    Thanks for your reply. I believe it is my wording that has made you unpleasant. My fears were something like Angel Stompy ruling Legacy.

  11. #1831

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    Yeah, even a writer on magicthegathering.com got this wrong a few years ago, it's a relatively common mistake.

  12. #1832

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    _
    Last edited by DukeDemonKn1ght; 07-01-2009 at 03:36 AM. Reason: oops... reading for the win... or rather, a lack thereof
    Bless your heart, we must consider Blue/White Tempo's strategy and win percentages in an entirely different deck thread. -4eak

  13. #1833
    is selling his Underground Seas.
    Tacosnape's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2006
    Location

    Birmingham, AL
    Posts

    3,148

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    @The U/W Splash: How exactly does Mirror Entity not work with Wake Thrasher?

    I've been playing this deck a lot lately, and Wake Thrasher's ridiculous. The new rules changes made him way better, not only because of the Mana Burn rules, but because people aren't playing nearly as many Mogg Fanatics (This assumption has skyrocketed play of everything from Confidant to Welder ro Wake Thrasher in my metagame).

    I've also been tinkering around with a Back to Basics-packing list. Loving it with Daze and Cursecatcher for mass havoc-wreaking.

    Quote Originally Posted by majikal View Post
    Damn it, Taco, that exactly sums up my opinion on the matter. I need to buy you a beer for that post.

  14. #1834
    Member
    sherko7's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2009
    Location

    Philippines
    Posts

    110

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    Quote Originally Posted by tivadar View Post
    Kira has a triggered ability that triggers when a creature becomes the target of a spell. When someone announces a spell being cast, part of that is choosing targets. So if you vial in Kira after the spell has been announced (and targets chosen), his ability will never trigger.

    If, however, his ability read "the first spell targetting a creature you control each turn is countered", then the story might be different. "When" means triggered, and triggered means if Kira's not around when the triggering effect happens, the ability doesn't apply.
    thanks for clarifying this sir!

    merfolks are now starting to be feared in our meta! lol! at the moment though, i seem to be the only one playing it. people are starting to board for it now though.

  15. #1835
    Force of Will is my bitch
    Finn's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2004
    Location

    South Florida
    Posts

    2,977

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    @ Tacosnape, I have always been a big proponent of Wake Thrasher (to the point of using it in other decks even). I am considering going back to four even though I hate what that does to the mathematics of the deck. But Thrasher really hates red, especially Grim Lavamancer. And red has been getting a bit of a resurgence as this deck becomes ensconced in the metagame.

    I have been thinking about including 1 copy of Minamo, School at Water's Edge or Candelabra of Tawnos as a way to make red hurt it less (and to make Thrahsers scarier). But I am wondering if there might be a better way. Basalt Monolith is a cute infinite combo with Wake Thrasher. But it sorta sucks in the deck. Has anyone found a way to use Reejerey to untap stuff a few of times as a fast effect?
    "Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job."
    "Politicians are like diapers. They should be changed often and for the same reason."
    "Governing is too important to be left to people as silly as politicians."
    "Politicians were mostly people who'd had too little morals and ethics to stay lawyers."

  16. #1836
    Member

    Join Date

    Sep 2005
    Location

    Boston, MA
    Posts

    781

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    Quote Originally Posted by Tacosnape View Post
    @The U/W Splash: How exactly does Mirror Entity not work with Wake Thrasher?
    I'm wondering the same thing. One can:

    Untap permanents
    Put +1/+1 bonus triggers on the stack
    With these on the stack, use Mirror Entity
    Let +1/+1 bonus triggers resolve

    Obviously, if one casts entity the same turn, this doesn't work. It does however work to vial him in in response to triggers then tap to boost immediately as well.

    What's broken? Outside of having to do this during your untap phase.
    Quote Originally Posted by tsabo_tavoc
    Thanks for your reply. I believe it is my wording that has made you unpleasant. My fears were something like Angel Stompy ruling Legacy.

  17. #1837
    Member

    Join Date

    Sep 2005
    Location

    Boston, MA
    Posts

    781

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    I've been doing some testing, and from what I've seen the whole "no mana burn" thing looks like at least a somewhat significant deal. I'd say there are plenty of times with Thrasher that over the course of game I have 5 extra mana with nothing to burn it on at the end of the opponent's turn with thrasher in play. That's 5 damage I'm not doing to myself/5 additional damage I'm doing to my opponent. I think that's far from insignificant.
    Quote Originally Posted by tsabo_tavoc
    Thanks for your reply. I believe it is my wording that has made you unpleasant. My fears were something like Angel Stompy ruling Legacy.

  18. #1838
    is selling his Underground Seas.
    Tacosnape's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2006
    Location

    Birmingham, AL
    Posts

    3,148

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    I agree with Tivadar. Wake Thrasher is an absolutely retarded threat now. Not running him is a mistake. Not running FOUR of him is a mistake. I'm not even convinced Countertop shouldn't be running him.

    If you're worried about Grim Lavamancer, which is surging back now that Mogg Fanatic's basically gone from the format, maindeck Jitte or pack extra Blasts in sideboard.

    Quote Originally Posted by majikal View Post
    Damn it, Taco, that exactly sums up my opinion on the matter. I need to buy you a beer for that post.

  19. #1839
    Member
    Forbiddian's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2003
    Location

    San Diego
    Posts

    1,377

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    Quote Originally Posted by tivadar View Post
    I'm wondering the same thing. One can:

    Untap permanents
    Put +1/+1 bonus triggers on the stack
    With these on the stack, use Mirror Entity
    Let +1/+1 bonus triggers resolve

    Obviously, if one casts entity the same turn, this doesn't work. It does however work to vial him in in response to triggers then tap to boost immediately as well.

    What's broken? Outside of having to do this during your untap phase.
    Nothing goes on the stack during the untap step.

    Things only go on the stack the next time active player would receive priority. Thus the wakethrasher trigger goes on the stack during the upkeep step of the turn and you can pump (or get it Lavamancered or Fanaticed).

  20. #1840
    Member

    Join Date

    Sep 2005
    Location

    Boston, MA
    Posts

    781

    Re: [DTW] Merfolk

    Sorry, you're correct, but it amounts to the same thing. You can use mirror entity and still get your thrasher bonus on top of it...
    Quote Originally Posted by tsabo_tavoc
    Thanks for your reply. I believe it is my wording that has made you unpleasant. My fears were something like Angel Stompy ruling Legacy.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)