Page 174 of 279 FirstFirst ... 74124164170171172173174175176177178184224274 ... LastLast
Results 3,461 to 3,480 of 5564

Thread: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

  1. #3461
    Team Bad Guys
    mossivo1986's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Michigan, specificly Lansing
    Posts

    1,105

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by thefreakaccident View Post
    I honestly dont see how running a lower curve hurts the deck's gameplan at all... I have not been having mana issues with the deck with only 3 lands that dont produce colored mana...

    Wastelock is a bitch for anything with a higher curve... Mana denial would hurt a helluva lot more if i added more higj cc spells (i already feel like im running too much)... The additives of both counterbalance and bitterblossom both help the control mu immensely (have you ever had to just deal with the tolens when the opponent wont let you destroy the blossom?) its a pain im the ass for normal control... Especially if they are trying to keep walkers around...

    This list was designed to abuse moat, unless nobody noticed... All but 3 of my threats fly, which allows one sided shenanigans.
    more land should be in the deck because you want to cast moat? 22 land is harsh enough on landstill running 17 1 drops which you arn't doing. I suggest more land because 1 or two land doesn't kill your concept but it does assure your going to hit everything you want to cast. Occasionally flooding isnt a bad thing either especially when you play against anti fetch dual strategies :)

  2. #3462
    Shake that.
    Skeggi's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2008
    Location

    Amsterdam
    Posts

    2,047

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    Since I acquired a playset of Bitterblossoms it's nothing but disappointment. You drop it, it does nothing. The next turn you lose 1 life and you get a token. This token does nothing, because it still has summoning sickness. And they're really bad chump-blockers since they cost you 1 life each: so you want to go aggro with them. Going aggro with Landstill? Sounds like a bad plan to me. I'm going to call it: Bitterblossom is crap. I've tried it in Landstill, I've tried it in Tempo Faeries. Well, I can tell you, there's nothing tempo about Bitterblossom. And for Landstill: you don't want to set a clock on yourself. That's just stupid, really.
    If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it's probably delicious.
    Team ADHD-To resist is to piss in the wind. Anyone who does will end up smelling.

  3. #3463
    Team Bad Guys
    mossivo1986's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Michigan, specificly Lansing
    Posts

    1,105

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    Well I guess I can't argue with it being bad? I mean I went over it with a couple of different people and it was cut each time so...... yeah gg no re

  4. #3464
    Member
    klaus's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2007
    Location

    Berlin, Germany
    Posts

    1,203

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by Skeggi View Post
    I'm going to call it: Bitterblossom is crap[...] in Landstill
    It's actually quite decent in LS featuring 2 Polymorph (+1x Mystical Tutor) and Progenitus.
    (also Mutavaults PLUS Factories).
    I've simply not found the time to test it thoroughly.

  5. #3465
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2006
    Location

    Moscow, Russia
    Posts

    470

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    The most awful thing in Polymorph is that it targets, which turns it into no-no. I've tried, it utterly failed. If you run blossom, you have to squeeze a jitte somewhere. I just can't imagine the why you wouldn't run jitte along the blossom.

  6. #3466
    Shake that.
    Skeggi's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2008
    Location

    Amsterdam
    Posts

    2,047

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    Squeezing a Jitte in Landstill seems silly. Basically you have to make an entire new deck with Standstills, Bitterblossoms, Jitte and Countertop. It won't be Landstill and I'm not sure if it would be any good. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
    If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it's probably delicious.
    Team ADHD-To resist is to piss in the wind. Anyone who does will end up smelling.

  7. #3467

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by Skeggi View Post
    Squeezing a Jitte in Landstill seems silly. Basically you have to make an entire new deck with Standstills, Bitterblossoms, Jitte and Countertop. It won't be Landstill and I'm not sure if it would be any good. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
    NOT saying that Bitterblossom should work in Landstill, but if it does, it's next to Ajani( probably Goldmane for the manabase.)

    Benie

  8. #3468
    Artist formerly known as Anti-American
    Citrus-God's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2005
    Location

    Thursday...
    Posts

    1,692

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    Let's just clear this up. Bitterblossom works in Landstill, but it still sucks in Landstill. Why? Because it's a permanent that doesn't really support Landstill's game plan of function. It makes chumb blockers? Really, is that even good enough to warrant it's inclusion? It doesn't really establish board control, and it's susceptible to Qasali Pridemage, which is huge right now.

    Bitterblossom is also susceptible to opposing Spell Snares and dies to your own EE for 2.
    ICBE - We're totally the coolest Anti-Thesis ever.


    "The Citrus-God just had a Citrus-Supernova... in your mouth."

  9. #3469
    Shake that.
    Skeggi's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2008
    Location

    Amsterdam
    Posts

    2,047

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    Bitterblossom being a Tribal Enchantment usually means that if it gets killed it at least gives your opponent's Tarmogoyf +1/+1, often +2/+2. But I guess that's the least of your worries
    If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it's probably delicious.
    Team ADHD-To resist is to piss in the wind. Anyone who does will end up smelling.

  10. #3470
    Goblin Piledriver
    Ectoplasm's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2008
    Location

    Netherlands
    Posts

    462

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    What are we running blossom for? We already have Elspeth :)
    Hello friend.

  11. #3471
    Member
    RogueMTG's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2008
    Location

    Central NY
    Posts

    290

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by Skeggi View Post
    Squeezing a Jitte in Landstill seems silly. Basically you have to make an entire new deck with Standstills, Bitterblossoms, Jitte and Countertop. It won't be Landstill and I'm not sure if it would be any good. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
    Yeah, it's called Countertop Faeries. It's not an awful deck, has it's own thread in established decks, but it's def. not Landstill.

  12. #3472
    Artist formerly known as Anti-American
    Citrus-God's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2005
    Location

    Thursday...
    Posts

    1,692

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by RogueMTG View Post
    Yeah, it's called Countertop Faeries. It's not an awful deck, has it's own thread in established decks, but it's def. not Landstill.
    It's still awfully underdeveloped...

    It's not bad, but it's not great either compared to UGW CounterTop.
    ICBE - We're totally the coolest Anti-Thesis ever.


    "The Citrus-God just had a Citrus-Supernova... in your mouth."

  13. #3473
    Goblin Piledriver
    Ectoplasm's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2008
    Location

    Netherlands
    Posts

    462

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    Landstill is the Legacy deck of choice of the Dutch Worlds-team :D
    Hello friend.

  14. #3474
    Team Bad Guys
    mossivo1986's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Michigan, specificly Lansing
    Posts

    1,105

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    link?

  15. #3475
    Member
    Bardo's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2004
    Location

    Portland, Oregon
    Posts

    3,844

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    The last few posts in this thread do not belong in the DTB.

    Warnings to Mossivo and Ectoplasm for spamming this forum.

    See our Site Rules on this topic.

    http://www.mtgthesource.com/forums/s...28&postcount=6

  16. #3476
    Goblin Piledriver
    Ectoplasm's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2008
    Location

    Netherlands
    Posts

    462

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    I'll redeem myself by posting the decklist :D

    4 Flooded Strand
    1 Polluted Delta
    1 Marsh Flats
    4 Tundra
    1 Underground Sea
    1 Scrubland
    4 Mishra's Factory
    2 Island
    2 Plains
    3 Wasteland
    4 Brainstorm
    3 Standstill
    4 Force of Will
    3 Counterspell
    3 Spell Snare
    4 Swords to Plowshares
    2 Wrath of God
    3 Engineered Explosives
    2 Sensei's Divining Top
    3 Elspeth
    2 Jace
    2 Cunning Wish
    1 Moat
    1 Decree of Justice

    1 Enlightened Tutor
    1 Extirpate
    3 Path to Exile
    1 Return to Dust
    1 Pulse of the Fields
    3 Engineered Plague
    2 Relic of Progenitus
    1 Ravenous Trap
    1 Hydroblast
    1 ... forgot ...

    What immediately jumps at me is the cut of eternal dragon and the high amount of planeswalkers, which seems like a decent pick in a meta filled with control.
    Hello friend.

  17. #3477
    Eating glass
    gustha's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2008
    Location

    Italy, Venice, a small town somwhere in the north.east
    Posts

    236

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    What immediately jumps at me is the cut of eternal dragon and the high amount of planeswalkers, which seems like a decent pick in a meta filled with control.
    I disagree. Planeswalker are bombs in whichever meta, new sets didn't affect the difficulty for any deck to get rid of them (unless someone wants to play mold shambler...and vampire hexmage is used for the combo, so no worry for our strong allies). I'd play 7 if I had room... (I only play 6 atm )
    Quote Originally Posted by mossivo1986
    Sorry for the confusion, and there is always the strong possibility of me being wrong in alot of cases. I am not always right; just most of the time. :)
    Quote Originally Posted by rockout
    Oh my god get to the point. Both of you.

  18. #3478
    Too Retarded to Live
    whiteshepherdman's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Posts

    210

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    A lot of planeswalkers over our usual 2-3 decrees seems good

    But, imagine this scenario:

    You're playing the mirror and you both have a ton of lands in play and he has nothing and you cast elspeth, then cast standstill.

    So you think this game is in the bag,

    until he cycles for 5 soldier tokens, deals with elspeth and starts attacking your life for 3 or 4 a turn. While Decree is great for giving you time in an aggro match, I think decree is even better in a control game where all of a sudden you have multiple threats and they arn't able to deal with it quickly. You get that surprise factor, similar to playing standstill early game and the opponent playing vendillion clique in response..

  19. #3479
    Artist formerly known as Anti-American
    Citrus-God's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2005
    Location

    Thursday...
    Posts

    1,692

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    But Landstill mirrors are still quite rare, and isn't much of a concern right now; especially if most players use Landstill as a metagame deck. The best tools to have for Landstill is still uncountably DoJs and Wasteland, but it's not something for people to worry about. Especially if they already pack 3 Wastelands and 3 DoJs. Playskill and experience will win this match up anyway. This is why most skilled Landstill players back in the era of Vial Goblins and Landstill kept Standstills in mirrors, because it forces their opponents to play different when dropped. Especially when you have experience. While those inexperienced Landstill players boarded in Deep Analysis, the better ones kept Standstills in and overran the lesser players.



    But back to the main point. Planeswalkers are really fucking good, but having DoJs can still a lot of the time be better. The only Planeswalker I will ever use are Elspeth, and occasionally Ajani Goldmane in the SB. Elspeth is really fucking good on her own, but you like playing with bombs, just cram in an extra copy or two. DoJ, however, forces bad players to play badly. I've stolen too many games off a hardcasted DoJ for 2+ Angel tokens, or bought time by cycling them to create 1-3 turn fogs until I can maintain my mana and card advantage so that I can turn the game around. A play, which many would consider cute, but isn't fucking cute at all, is cycling DoJ as blockers when holding WoG in hand, then proceed to cast FoF. Regardless of whether they know you have WoG in your hand or not, they will make piles where they try and keep you away from removal; especially with WoG in the mix. Let's say you're facing down a Ncatl and a Goyf. Your FoF pile reveals

    Island
    Island
    Swords
    EE
    Standstill


    You have just previously cycled DoJ for 3 the previous turn, and holding WoG in hand. You blocked a Nactl and a Goyf came into play, and then this turn, you traded both your soldier tokens to Goyf and Nactl. Chances are they think you're desperate to stay alive, seeing as you just cycled DoJ the previous turns, you might be trying to buy time for WoG or two removal spells, or just removal of any kind. They aren't going to give you both of those removal spells. Guess what? That's good. You can pick between piles that would like something like this:

    Standstill
    EE

    Island
    Island
    Swords

    And any of those piles would be beneficial for you depending on other cards in your hand, but taking a pile with just two removal spells seems a little pointless, as all they can do is buy time, and not speed up your development. Hitting 8 lands is the sweet spot for you, and that pile isn't going to do that for you. In this case, I would just take Standstill and EE, cast WoG, and drop Standstill. Now you have a removal spell, and more than likely to draw into more control elements and that extra land you need to hit 8.

    Now if experienced Zoo players catch that from experience against you, shift your play. Cast FoF in scenarios like the one above, and they might even split it as

    EE
    Swords

    Standstill
    Island
    Island

    Congratz. You have stayed alive. This is the beauty of human psychology and your personal vigilance. Also, when you are holding WoG and they make this pile, when your opponent shifts gears against you, again, you can just take Standstill and Islands. You have not only taken more control of the game, you have turned it into a fucking lock. Let's be honest though. A WoG isn't going to take that much control of the game, which is why a lot of players don't like it. It isn't get you control completely, and never will. Why do you think we make so many 1-for-1 trades with WoG? Exactly, it can't contain the opponents. Players know how to play against you, and you can only use play skill and clever manipulation to swing the game in your favor.
    ICBE - We're totally the coolest Anti-Thesis ever.


    "The Citrus-God just had a Citrus-Supernova... in your mouth."

  20. #3480
    is selling his Underground Seas.
    Tacosnape's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2006
    Location

    Birmingham, AL
    Posts

    3,148

    Re: [DTW] UW(x) Landstill

    I agree with high amounts of Planeswalkers. I'm up to running a 3/2/1 Jace/Elspeth/Ajani split with no regrets.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ectoplasm View Post
    Landstill is the Legacy deck of choice of the Dutch Worlds-team :D
    This is because of the Dutch's automatic love of anything that costs . Don't be surprised to see Cavalry Master become the next Elspeth/Humility/Moat.

    Quote Originally Posted by majikal View Post
    Damn it, Taco, that exactly sums up my opinion on the matter. I need to buy you a beer for that post.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)