View Poll Results: Most bannable card in Legacy? (not that they will touch it)

Voters
192. You may not vote on this poll
  • Brainstorm

    16 8.33%
  • Force of Will

    4 2.08%
  • Lion's Eye Diamond

    35 18.23%
  • Counterbalance

    34 17.71%
  • Sensei's Divining Top

    103 53.65%
  • Tarmogoyf

    46 23.96%
  • Phyrexian Dreadnaught

    2 1.04%
  • Goblin Lackey

    4 2.08%
  • Standstill

    6 3.13%
  • Natural Order

    8 4.17%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 20 of 1183 FirstFirst ... 1016171819202122232430701205201020 ... LastLast
Results 381 to 400 of 23644

Thread: All B/R update speculation.

  1. #381
    Just bored.
    UrDraco's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Location

    San Jose
    Posts

    164

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    FoolofaTook hit the nail right on the head. Legacy could not be more diverse right now. Not only are the winners of the tournaments very diserve but even the top 8's are very different each time.

    The only issue I think needs to be addressed is cards that are banned because they create a barrier to entry. Illusionary mask could come off the list because its price is currently less than underground sea and stifle seems better. I can't remember, what other cards are banned for this reason?

    Oh, and its completly insane but I would love to play Oath in Legacy....
    I collect German and miscut cards. Please PM if you have.

  2. #382
    (' ' '\( 0 ,o)/''')
    TheInfamousBearAssassin's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2004
    Location

    Northern Virginia
    Posts

    6,705

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Roughly 50%, or higher, of most Legacy Top 8's are either Force of Will decks or Tarmogoyf decks (if not both). Legacy clearly could be more diverse, theoretically if not practically. It's worth asking if such changes would be practical. My conclusion was in the case of Force fo Will, no, but in the case of Tarmogoyf, yes.
    For my confessions, they burned me with fire/
    And found I was for endurance made

  3. #383
    Keep Calm and Brainstorm
    (nameless one)'s Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2009
    Location

    GTA, Ontario
    Posts

    2,878

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by FoolofaTook View Post
    This is why WotC shouldn't touch anything about Legacy right now with a 10 foot pole.

    The winners of the last 14 events with more than 100 participants:

    Aggro No Loam (UGW) -
    March 13th Gigantic Legacy of 40 Duals & Fetches @ Jupiter Games!!

    Lands - SCG 5K Indy

    Reanimator (UB) - GP Madrid

    Merfolk (UG) - GPT Madrid 2010 - Bourgoin-Jallieu / France

    ANT - Eternal Party '09 Legacy

    Zoo (RGW) - SCG 5K Dallas

    Dream Halls (URB) - German Magic I Legacy

    Reanimator (UB) - Open Nederlands Kampioenschap Legacy 2009

    Bant CounterTop (UGW) - Lotus Moxen Bazaar Legacy @ Jupiter Games in Vestal, NY

    Canadian Threshold (UGR) - DragonsLeague Master of Geddon Padova

    Bant Loam (GWU) - Bourgoin-Jallieu : Last Chance CdF Legacy

    Canadian Threshold (UGR) - Master of Geddon II

    ANT - Ovino 4, Milan

    Belcher - Mercadiade 2009 Legacy

    That's going back 6 months and we see 14 large events won by 11 different decks representing 5 different themes of play (aggro, aggro control, control, storm combo, non-storm combo.) We see three decks that have won more than once, and none that have won three times. That's like a deck builder's paradise.

    If WotC messes with anything they are fixing something that's not broken and that can't be good.
    Everything was fine before they unbanned Dream Halls, Entomb and Metalworker. I'm not saying let's unban everything. Maybe we should test some cards thoroughly and see if they are what we think they are.
    I am convinced that WotC is "dumbing" the game because of all the stupid posts they come across on MTG-related forums
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyle View Post
    13NoVa plays Force of Will from his hand.
    Finglonger plays Spell Pierce from his hand.
    [10:22:43]  13NoVa: lol
    sure
    Finglonger points from his Dack Fayden to 13NoVa's Sol Ring.
    [10:23:04]  13NoVa: lol dumb ******; nice draws with retard.dec
    stupid cocksucker
    You have been kicked out of the game.

  4. #384
    I <3 Peek

    Join Date

    Jul 2007
    Location

    Stormsville, New Mexico
    Posts

    36

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Perhaps I'm missing something but is there any reason anyone would want to play Mind's Desire over Ad Nauseum?

  5. #385
    His name is not unknown in these woods.
    nitewolf9's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Area 88
    Posts

    1,499

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Not killing yourself with it?
    they haunt minds...

  6. #386

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Yes, but probably not enough reasons.

  7. #387
    Team Bad Guys
    mossivo1986's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Michigan, specificly Lansing
    Posts

    1,105

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    I dont think its mean.

  8. #388
    I only play blue for Brainstorm and combo.
    Pulp_Fiction's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2008
    Location

    Alpharetta, Georgia
    Posts

    665

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    You can play 4 with no downfall in the main .... and you can Burning Wish for it (not with 4 in the main).
    "I just shot Marvin in the face!"
    "Why the fuck'd you do that??"

  9. #389
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Italy, Eternal
    Posts

    1,848

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by (nameless one) View Post
    Everything was fine before they unbanned Dream Halls, Entomb and Metalworker. I'm not saying let's unban everything. Maybe we should test some cards thoroughly and see if they are what we think they are.
    Metalworker is ruining the format, i agree.

  10. #390
    Member
    Forbiddian's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2003
    Location

    San Diego
    Posts

    1,377

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by theintangiblefatman View Post
    Yes, but probably not enough reasons.
    The difference is one measly mana.


    Your deck doesn't have to run as much protection because your critical spell is uncounterable. That means you can devote more slots to having fast mana, deck manipulation, or answers for static defenses, like Chalice, 3sphere, or Countertop.

    You don't have to worry about life, so you will typically have one extra turn to go off against Zoo or other beatdown aggro. With a full turn, you can almost certainly come up with one mana.

    So you do better against beatdown aggro, and better against control.



    If, instead of comparing it to Ad Nauseam you compare it to Ill-Gotten Gains (which sees wide play as a backup plan just for the aggro), you will see more clearly: IGG costs more, it's harder to use, and it requires more protection, but it still sees a lot of play.

    Mind's Desire functions as both Ad Nauseam and IGG, only it actually does both roles better.

  11. #391

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by Forbiddian View Post
    Mind's Desire functions as both Ad Nauseam and IGG, only it actually does both roles better.
    Not really. is actually relevant here. The other cards are on-color for your Rituals, so there are more conditions under which you're able to cast them. Getting Mind's Desire to easy castability requires changes to the mana, probably with the addition of more artifact mana or more five-color lands, but changing the land base will make you more vulnerable to Wasteland disabling your engine.

  12. #392
    Rapin' your villages, Burnin' your women
    Jeff Kruchkow's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2008
    Posts

    412

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aggro_zombies View Post
    Not really. is actually relevant here. The other cards are on-color for your Rituals, so there are more conditions under which you're able to cast them. Getting Mind's Desire to easy castability requires changes to the mana, probably with the addition of more artifact mana or more five-color lands, but changing the land base will make you more vulnerable to Wasteland disabling your engine.
    UU may be relevant, but its also a wincon that is immune to Force of Will. It would make combo even more awesome.

  13. #393
    Member

    Join Date

    Jan 2005
    Location

    I actually live in actual Chicago
    Posts

    680

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by loveisgreen View Post
    Perhaps I'm missing something but is there any reason anyone would want to play Mind's Desire over Ad Nauseum?
    Because Mind's Desire lets you play the spells for free, and theres the possibility of chaining Desires together for extra broken. Not that storm combo generally has mana problems after resolving either spell, but it's even more certainly 'I win'.

  14. #394

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    I've typed up much longer posts on Mind's Desire on MTGSalvation before, so I will keep this brief. I find that, in general, people greatly overestimate Mind's Desire.

    As Aggro_zombies said, double blue is actually much more difficult to generate than you would imagaine without LED mana. The second most reliable way is to slow roll it until you hit three or four lands, but the more lands you play the less consitent your Desire becomes; it's a catch 22. Using LED mana means that Desire is no longer "immune to Force of Will" as people are fond of saying. On that note...

    It requires at least five copies of Desire (including the original one) to win with any consistency. This has a couple of consequences, the most obvious of which is that playing Desire over Ad Nasueam/Doomsday/IGG kills your black match ups. The less obvious consequence is that your opponent Forcing one of your five copies significantly decreases your chances of winning. Each card in your hand being very valuable also makes Mystical Tutor worse.

    Desire also requires you to play four copies main deck (or three plus a bunch of wishes). This is often quoted as a benefit, but in reality it takes away protection slots and makes you reliant on Brainstorm to put additional copies back into the deck so that your first Desire can actually hit them. Protection in general has to be kept to a minimum, because hitting protection off of Desire sucks.

    Preempting one final point, yes, Desire decks can play Force of Will if they want to. Force of Will is really bad in the deck for a variety of reasons.

    I played a couple of Desire builds in Classic for a while, and even with Demonic Tutor, Vampiric Tutor, Imperial Seal, and Demonic Consultation legal the deck was still slower and less consistent than Ad Nauseam or Doomsday based decks.

    Edit: come on guys; chaining Desires isn't a benefit of playing the card - it is a necessity to win with the card.

  15. #395
    Bands with Others
    menace13's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2009
    Location

    NY, NY
    Posts

    1,220

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    In Classic on MTGO, we have unrestricted use of Desire. The deck has finished in the money and is a good deck, but it has not half the placings of Ad-Naus-the players prefer a faster,on color,instant that with a storm count of 2 will draw your whole deck-sometimes you can desire for 7 and whiff-.

  16. #396
    Don't ping the hydra
    DrJones's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Spain
    Posts

    107,480

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    I've read that the B&R announcement comes out tomorrow, so only a few hours remaining. This might become interesting with all the fuss about the reserved list and all.

  17. #397
    Member

    Join Date

    Feb 2004
    Location

    Clifton Park, NY
    Posts

    2,690

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Declaring that Reserve List cards never will never be reprinted and a b/r announcement around the corner? Hrm.

    Duals are Banned, have fun Legacy.
    Team Albany: What's Legacy?

    You cannot know the sweetness of Victory, without first dwelling in the agony of Defeat.

  18. #398
    doesn't afraid of anything
    majikal's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2009
    Location

    in ur tournament, judgin ur gamez
    Posts

    1,253

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheInfamousBearAssassin View Post
    This isn't the game of holding hands and friendship. This is a competitive game, and if we all sit around singing kumbaya and sucking each other's dicks, then a lot of people are going to go to a tournament and lose because their pile of 61 jank isn't the special unique snowflake that everyone on the Source says it was.

  19. #399
    Keep Calm and Brainstorm
    (nameless one)'s Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2009
    Location

    GTA, Ontario
    Posts

    2,878

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    so much optimism for nothing :(

    hey at least the format did not change!
    I am convinced that WotC is "dumbing" the game because of all the stupid posts they come across on MTG-related forums
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyle View Post
    13NoVa plays Force of Will from his hand.
    Finglonger plays Spell Pierce from his hand.
    [10:22:43]  13NoVa: lol
    sure
    Finglonger points from his Dack Fayden to 13NoVa's Sol Ring.
    [10:23:04]  13NoVa: lol dumb ******; nice draws with retard.dec
    stupid cocksucker
    You have been kicked out of the game.

  20. #400
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Italy, Eternal
    Posts

    1,848

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    This hate for the format is getting really annoying. No changes, no changes, no changes. And stupid cards like Monolith are still banned.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)