Page 66 of 105 FirstFirst ... 165662636465666768697076 ... LastLast
Results 1,301 to 1,320 of 2099

Thread: [Deck] UW Tempo

  1. #1301
    The Courage Wolf
    chokin's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Tucson, AZ
    Posts

    267

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    Divert is kind of like extra Pierces. Divert doesn't do anything against planeswalkers, enchantments, or artifacts. It also doesn't stop spells that don't target...like Exhume, Natural Order, etc. It can be cute to Divert a Hymn to Tourach, or 2-for-1 someone with their own removal, but it might just be too narrow. Like, I would hate to have a Divert when I want a Pierce, but I wouldn't mind having a Pierce where Divert would have been better.

  2. #1302
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2006
    Location

    Moscow, Russia
    Posts

    470

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    Quote Originally Posted by pi4meterftw View Post
    It seems like wing shards requires some pretty unlikely conditions to be fulfilled, only one of which is having as much mana open as described.
    I wouldn't argue with that. Still, you plan the game and set up the situations to take advantage of it. Sometimes its necessary to play it as a mere 1 for 1, and when its more than that its just awesome. Works much better than everything I've tried against Zoo/Aggro decks. Has the added bonus of hitting Progenitus. I'd be glad to run something better, but nothing I've tested or thought of yields the better results. Yet to try Retribution of the Meek though, but I'm skeptical about it.

    Wing Shards is worth trying at the very least. It's not like I'm you or Matt, but I've played a lot of games with it, and its been more than OK in tournament games.

    hiyouthere My S/B is quite fluid, since my meta has almost no combo and ichorid, and I can afford to drop some hate for the cards I'm testing.
    Against Zoo I'd go +3 Shards -2 Wayfarer -1 SP.

    That said I've lost a match against Zoo today. Went 2-1-1. Draw with 4c Landstill (god, Jace is very annoying and hard to get rid of. If not for Jace, I think I'd be winning like 90% of the games vs 4c Landstill). Won against Burn 2-0, Swans C/B Top 2-0. Lost to Zoo 0-2. First game featured us trading down cards and on empty board he topdecked a QPM and beat me down to 0 from 15. I've topdecked 5 lands straight. Game2 I get a FoW heavy hand and I almost stabilize since I get an active jitte, and he's low on cards, but he goes for Sylvan Library, I FoW, he Pyroblasts, then proceeds to draw 6 cards in two turns, and blows me out with 3 goyfs, 2 huge 7/7 KoTRs through the active jitte. I fail to draw ANY removal this game.
    Finished 6th out of top4.

    Vacrix and how the hell do you put your Mom in the graveyard against Reanimator? Anyways, Divert is very weak, except against burn or something.

  3. #1303

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    Has anybody tested Rushing River in UW Tempo? I can see a lot of synergy.

  4. #1304
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2006
    Location

    Moscow, Russia
    Posts

    470

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    Quote Originally Posted by therorschach View Post
    i think that rushing river could be better than fathom seer in a lot of ways, but definitely not a 4 of. the only thing I see Fathom Seer doing well, is Carrying a Jitte. Other than that, it has been the weakest card for me in testing this deck. that being said, doing something worthwhile AND also being able to carry a jitte can be awesome sometimes. I am also contemplating 1 path to exile as a 5th StP in the deck. It turns on wayfarer if needed as well.
    I've literally facepalmed. This is so wrong on so many levels... I'm not sure its even worth explaining how wrong it is. Seriously, if you dismiss Fathom Seer and/or suggest anything like Rushing River, you should be playing another deck - Mystic Fish or Excalibur or w/e.

  5. #1305

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    you're right, its probably comes down to that. it's all about "what deck are you playing and what do you want to be playing" This deck probably isn't living up to my ideas because it's the wrong deck for me to be playing.

    I was merely commenting that rushing river takes advantage of you only needing a few lands, can bounce annoying reanimation targets, and can open up a stalled board. Fathom Seer on the other hand, is straight up card draw on a body.

    I used to play a landstill/fish hybrid, that deck used about 80% the same cards and coming from that perspective, i guess i am trying to hybridize that old fish deck with the Tempo strategy. It's hard for me to move past the "metagame fish" idea and just look at this as a flat Tempo-CA deck.

  6. #1306
    Clergyman of Cool
    lordofthepit's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Location

    Daisy Hill Puppy Farm
    Posts

    1,954

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    Quote Originally Posted by Tinefol View Post
    I've literally facepalmed. This is so wrong on so many levels... I'm not sure its even worth explaining how wrong it is. Seriously, if you dismiss Fathom Seer and/or suggest anything like Rushing River, you should be playing another deck - Mystic Fish or Excalibur or w/e.
    No need to be a jerk. If it's not worth explaining why it's wrong to someone who is obviously a new user, you should refrain from making a hostile post.

  7. #1307
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2006
    Location

    Moscow, Russia
    Posts

    470

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    The problem of Rushing River, is that UW Tempo has no so called 'reach'. It can't really squeeze 10+ damage in a turn with a pair of Goyfs or Goyf + a couple of bolts, or anything that Tempo Thresh can do. Although it has a "Tempo" in its name, the deck isn't much about tempo. Granted you can sometimes go for the pure tempoish wins, but most of the time it seeks to gain control of the board and produce card advantage. Rushing River does almost nothing to accomplish that. They would just replay w/e you bounced, and the gain is going to be minimal, if not negative (you lose a card). There are of course way better options against Reanimator, namely Curfew.

    Fathom Seer on other hand is a pure card advantage, and it provides indirect card advantage by re-enabling the Wayfarer. Basically, Wayfarer + Seer is what makes this deck "UW Tempo", a glue that holds it together. Take them out and you're looking at yet another generic fish deck.

    No, I'm not being hostile, its just that case where people really want to play the different deck and get somewhat misguided about why it isn't what they want. If you don't accept Seer, Excalibur thread is probably what you're looking for.

  8. #1308
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2006
    Location

    Moscow, Russia
    Posts

    470

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    You should reread what I've said then. Never did I say Rushing River doesn't provide tempo, what I rather said, is that UW Tempo rarely can gain the considerable advantage of that tempo and thus isn't worth it.

  9. #1309
    Member

    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Location

    Coon Rapids, MN
    Posts

    177

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    Rushing River is terribad. Any reanimator player worth their salt will bring in Inkwell Leviathan against us, at least games 2 and 3.

    Comparing it to Fathom Seer is just ignorant. For starters, you don't lose any land with fathom - and it gives you boatloads of card advantage. Rushing River bounces a dude. Two if you sac a land. The only real similarity here is that they both interact with land *somehow* and they both pitch to FoW.

    Fathom Seer isn't anywhere close to the weakest card in this deck - if you're finding that it is, you're doing it wrong. I'd seriously suggest watching some of Forbiddian's videos on youtube and reading the whole thread from start to finish and try to get a better grasp on the deck.

  10. #1310

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    Recent report: 3-2-1 at Knightware tournament.

  11. #1311
    Member

    Join Date

    Aug 2009
    Location

    SoCal
    Posts

    44

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    obligatory post for Clarence Klase once again.

    Knight Ware tournament (48 ppl i think). Clarence top8s with the same build hes been running. 3 md vial and a 3rd grunt in the KOTWO slot. Matchups were as follows

    Round 1 vs Dredge (2-0) 1-0

    Round 2 vs Zoo (2-0) 2-0

    Round 3 vs Dredge (2-1) 3-0

    Round 4 vs ANT (2-1) 4-0

    Round 5 vs Merfolk (1-2) 4-1

    Round 6 vs Merfolk (ID) 4-1-1

    Top 8 looks like this
    2 ANT
    2 Merfolk
    1 Belcher
    1 UW Tempo
    1 Mono Red Goblins
    1 Counter top ProBant

    Seeded 6th in the top8 and is paired against the Merfolk player he lost to in round 5

    Quarters vs Merfolk (2-1)

    Semis vs Belcher (0-2)

    Takes 4th overall

  12. #1312

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    1-2 on Friday, not that I played it well.
    Quote Originally Posted by Skeggi View Post
    Lol. You're my hero .
    Was this even a real Skeggi's hero?

  13. #1313
    Psilovibin
    Vacrix's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2008
    Posts

    2,204

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    Quote Originally Posted by Tinefol View Post
    Vacrix and how the hell do you put your Mom in the graveyard against Reanimator? Anyways, Divert is very weak, except against burn or something.
    Carefully! JK There isn't really a way for you to get in the grave unless they take it with Thoughtseize. I lied, I was trying to make a pun. :P

    The reason I say Divert could be strong would be in situations like this.

    I have Mother of Runes and an Island untapped. My opponent has a Nacatl. He attacks, I block and give it pro green. He plays Bolt in response. You could Daze and return your Island. Thats 1 for 1. Your opponent wasted his removal spell and you played your Daze. Instead, you could play Divert and use his own removal on his Nacatl. Thats a 2 for 1. Thats card advantage. The same case could be made against opponents playing Duress effects in the early game. It can also switch the targets for Reanimate to a Grunt (a more realistic example). It helps you win counterwars. Its extremely hilarious against Hymn to Tourach. Far from 'very weak'. It might not be as strong as other board cards that you already have, but you should give it more credit than very weak, seriously.
    Also, I think its worth noting that Divert is particularly good in UW Tempo (and not really anywhere else) because UW Tempo is extremely good at keeping the opponent's land count low.
    Luck is a residue of design.



    I'm an aspiring Psychedelic Trance musician. Please feel free to enjoy my sense of life:
    http://soundcloud.com/vacrix


    Expect me or die. I play SI.

  14. #1314
    Member

    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Location

    Coon Rapids, MN
    Posts

    177

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    Quick Tourney report, Went 3-1 on the night.

    My list was 1x Sphinx, 3x vial - and I swapped out curfews in the board for paths. I know, I know. Path is terrible, it doesn't work well in this deck, etc etc. The meta at the local shop by me is pretty aggro, and I wanted to be able to be able to side into 8x removal spells. I also didn't like how restrictive that Wing Shards was (and the CC didn't help) - Condemn didn't get the nod either since I wanted to be able to deal with non attacking dudes.

    Round 1 v Burn

    G1 -Don't realize he's actually on burn until two turns in, I've already cracked a few fetches. I miss the upkeep on jotun grunt early. Eventually, I start to stabilize but can't draw enough counters to stop things.
    G2- He mulls down to 4 or 5. Gets stuck on one land. Aggro out with dorks for the W.
    G3- Got a full grip of counters, he isn't able to get in for enough, Avenger gets me there.

    1-0 (2-1-0)


    Round 2 v R/G aggro

    This deck was rather underdeveloped, mostly commons and full of auras. Not really worth going into depth on it since I steamrolled.

    2-0 (4-1-0)

    Round 3 v ANT

    G1 - Ant does what it does. Strips me of the Fow, then goes off.
    G2 - Side in boatloads of hate. Stick a Thorn pretty early. He can't dig up the bounce early enough. He drops an Ad Nauseum, but doesn't get what he needs and burns himself out.
    G3 - Stick tons of hate. Get down a few weenies, then stick thorn again off etutor. Stick Canonist later (with another in hand). My aggro gets there, he needed to find his mystical for hurkyl's recall to get there.

    3-0 (6-2-0)

    Round 4 v RWg Sligh

    G1 - Gets in for early goblin guide beats and I don't find a decent blocker until my life is dangerously low. He's got triple fireblast in hand. I scoop it up.
    G2 - Side in my 4x Path, and 2x canonists (for more bodies to chump with). Opening 7 has double wasteland. He goes fetch, dual. Waste. He goes fetch dual again. Waste again. He never really recovers from the land-screw and we're on to game three.
    G3 - Fantastic game. Went down to the wire. I manage to remove a few dudes (second path he fails to find basics). Comes down to him resolving a Sulfuric Vortex. He gets it to stick. All comes down to his last topdeck. He needed to deal 2 damage, and he top-decks the Magma Jet. I Have the FoW in hand, but not a blue card to actually cast it.

    3-1 (7-4-0)

    Cracked two ROE packs as my prizes - pulled 2x Dragonlord and 1x Foily Emrakul. Sick, sick pulls.

    Feels good to put up a decent result again after last tourney.

    Don't think that Path is worth playing in a normal meta - but in an aggro heavy one, it's not a bad call. Wing Shard might have worked, but the 1WW cost scared me off (plus I didn't have any onhand)
    Last edited by stuckpixel; 05-20-2010 at 09:43 AM.

  15. #1315

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    Quote Originally Posted by Tinefol View Post
    You should reread what I've said then. Never did I say Rushing River doesn't provide tempo, what I rather said, is that UW Tempo rarely can gain the considerable advantage of that tempo and thus isn't worth it.
    Well it really has a lot to do with "UW Tempo" not being a tempo deck at all. The name sucks and was thrown out by someone on a podcast that happened to stick. its more of a UW creature based control. The only tempo card is aether vial really.

  16. #1316
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2006
    Location

    Moscow, Russia
    Posts

    470

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    Went 3-0-1 today, didn't drop a single game.
    2-0 Excalibur, 2-0 Wildfire Stax, 2-0 Swans C/B Top, id in last round. Twice I've pulled the game out from 1life, that felt so awesome.

  17. #1317

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    Legacy Night Report

    On this Wednesday I was able to make it out to legacy night at Super Games again. I would guess the turnout was about 25 people or so.
    Round 1 2-0 Goblins
    Both games came down to me sticking a Jitte and then running the board.

    Round 2 2-1 Dreadstill
    I lost game 1 to 2 Dreadnaughts, scary stuff. Game 2 he could not draw his stifles or trickbinds, so I was able to play beatdown. For game 3 I believe he mulled to 5 or 6. His hand was land light, while mine had 2 wastelands. He was not able to recover after losing his first 2 lands.

    Round 3 ANT 0-2
    Wasn't really sure what I was playing against game 1 until he went off. His duress took away my force of will. Game 2 was rather poor for me as well. I lost all my counter magic to discard. This is a match up that I really need to get some more practice against.

    Round 4 Aggro Loam 2-0
    On game 1 I was able to stop him from doing very much through with mom, and some counter magic. Jitte gave me a fast clock and a fairly easy win. In game 1 I got to morph a fathom seer in response to a devastating dreams, which was rather amusing and useful. Game 2 was much more interesting. He was able to get his life from the loam shenanigans going very early in the game. In this game Jotun Grunt saved the day. My grunt managed to make it to 6 age counters, a new personal record.

    Round 5 GBW Rock 2-0
    Don't remember too much from game 1. Game 2 was more interesting, weathered wayfarer worked like a champ. Was able to keep those lands coming, which made great hymm to tourach fodder. I also over the course of the game got to swords to plowshare 2 Tarmogoyfs, a Kitchen Finks, and a Merit Lage token. Needless to say it was a very long game.

    Top 8
    First round Dreadstill Again 2-0
    I got a terrible headache at this point, so I don't remember too much from this round. I remember counter wars over the stifles, and using swords to plowshares on a dreadnaught at some point. I remember resolving a aura of silence game 2, which really slowed him down, and possibly won me the game. He was able to get counter top assembled after I had 2 Aethervials in play. I must have lucked out a bit there.

    The top 4 decided to split the usual 100 dollars store credit prize.

    This week I decided to up my Aethervials to 3 and cut my Vexing Sphinx down to 1. This is mostly due to the fact that counter top is very heavy in my meta. Overall I was pleased with the change.

    Thanks for all the great info you guys have been posting. I know I would not be as competent with this deck were it not for you guys. Thanks a lot!
    David

  18. #1318
    Buttscratcher?
    FredMaster's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2007
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    151

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    Quote Originally Posted by newworldman View Post
    In this game Jotun Grunt saved the day. My grunt managed to make it to 6 age counters, a new personal record.
    Wow. That's a total of 42 cards.

    R.E.S.T.E.C.P.
    Team Legal Actions. What else?

    Check out my All-Commons Cube on MTGS.

  19. #1319

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    2-2 on Friday

    R1, Tom, Depths

    g1 I was stuck on low lands and finished him when he tried to stabilize on one life
    g2 I was stuck on one land and finished him when he tried to stabilize on low life.


    R2, Milan, ZOO

    g1 He Bolted away my creatures and finished me with some cat
    g2 He Bolted away my creatures and finished me with some cat when I forget to pay upkeep of Grunt


    R3, Michael, ANT

    g1 I kept horribad hand and I lost
    g2 Aметистовый Шип
    g3 Land, Mox, Mox, Ritual, AdN -> crap, crap, crap, crap, Tendrills, AdN, Tendrills. Fall to one hit point, storm ten, Tendrills gg


    R4, Karel, NQlegacy.dec

    g1 Mom held Blastoderm, Avenger held Jitte, Leatherback Baloth held +7/+7, +5/+5, blah blah, won this one on two life
    g2 Mom held Blastoderm, Avenger held Jitte, Timbermare swordsed, blah, blah, unbeatable, blah blah, DTB, ATW, blah blah, Top8, Madrid, PTQ, GP, blah blah...


    We hold pretty nice FNM drafts, once I wanna kill my opponents with 1/1s and 2/2s, I can try my luck in Limited.
    Quote Originally Posted by Skeggi View Post
    Lol. You're my hero .
    Was this even a real Skeggi's hero?

  20. #1320

    Re: [Deck] UW Tempo

    Everybody has bad days. Don't give up.

    I think I made a play mistake leading to my 3-2-1 for example. I won't do a tournament report, but for the sake keeping statistics accurate my matchups were as follows:

    Dreadstill (0-2)
    Random (2-0)
    Merfolk (1-1-1)
    Bant aggro/control (2-0)
    Lands (0-2)
    RG beats (2-0)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)