Page 84 of 108 FirstFirst ... 347480818283848586878894 ... LastLast
Results 1,661 to 1,680 of 2148

Thread: [Archetype] CounterTop

  1. #1661

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    Why not try a single Chimeric Mass to fetch with the Trinket Mage? That should speed up your clock a bit.

    I honestly have no idea about Bob in this deck. In paper he sounds good, giving you a lot of card advantage, but he is a hate magnet, so he might get killed too often. However, you should be able to protect him if you get the countertop online.

    How does this deck (the UWb version) fare against Merfolk and Goblins? Are Peacekeepers enough?

  2. #1662
    Member
    Valtrix's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2008
    Location

    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts

    1,118

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    I disagree about bob. Namely, the cost of running him is hurting your aggro MUs a lot. Goyf is a serious beater in that MU. Plus, by running bob you're not able to run firespout which is a huge disadvantage in my opinion. I like that he gets you cards, but a problem is that he won't actually run through opponent creatures and can't end a game quickly. The ability of goyf to close the game in 4 swings is incredibly powerful, and not worth passing up in my opinion.
    Playing Punishing Regular Miracles.

    Contribute to the community Miracles Primer.

  3. #1663

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    Quote Originally Posted by DFY889 View Post
    If you're playing preordain because you have a slot and are feeling light on land at 21, might I suggest a 22nd land. You may want a basic mountain to keep merfolk,goblins, and some zoo variants from wasting firespout mana. Of course you'd have to shuffle around your fetchland configuration but that's a detail. I've never been a huge fan of Elspeth in legacy as she is pretty slow. She is good once you land her, but I would almost always just slam a Jace. Your cards are so powerful in countertop and in legacy in general that the brainstorm(s) are insane. Yeah I could see Elspeth being better against Zoo or Goblins or whatever but I don't really think four-drops are the way to fight those decks anyway. Similar story with vedalken shackles, I've had success with them against midrangish bant decks like new horizons or Pro-bant, but not really agains the three big aggro decks (zoo, merfolk, goblins). I would play 3 spell snare right now as survival decks are everywhere plus it's pretty good against zoo and merfolk. I also haven't had great results with Oblivion Ring as it's slow and vulnerable. Cards I have had success with are Fire // Ice. It's not insane or anything but it looks a lot better against a turn one lackey than an elspeth. Plus is cycles with a bit of benefit. Though I almost never find myself casting Ice for any actual benefit. Predict is another option and one I was using before but I think it is not quite proactive enough in the current metagame. Anyway just my 2 cents. Good luck in brewing and playing.
    For a 22nd land, what do you think would be best - another blue fetch or a Trop? I'm not playing a Mountain, it really doesn't seem worth it - Forest and Plains just do much more. Firespout is often just a one-time card, whereas you often plan to have multiple swords per game.

    For reference, I have 3 Tundras, 3 Volcanics, 3 Trops, and a Savannah as the relevant duals for this deck (I traded 2 Trops and some other stuff for 2 Tundras and some other stuff sometime back). I have 4 of every blue fetch.

    I've tried 3 Spell Snare, it's been OK for me. I might cut the O-Ring for it, but I really like having outs to random crap.

    Elspeth has been great for me every time I've played her. As long as she keeps putting up results, I'll keep playing her. There's been plenty of times where she's done more for me than Jace. The Shackles is just something I'm trying out - I wouldn't play more than 1.

    Bob just dies too quickly to be a reliable engine. He's pretty crappy against aggro even if they let him stick.

    I might try out 1 or 2 Vindicate in the Prosak list.

  4. #1664

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    EDIT: Moved to previous post.

  5. #1665

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    Quote Originally Posted by gamegeek2 View Post
    For a 22nd land, what do you think would be best - another blue fetch or a Trop? I'm not playing a Mountain, it really doesn't seem worth it - Forest and Plains just do much more. Firespout is often just a one-time card, whereas you often plan to have multiple swords per game.

    I've tried 3 Spell Snare, it's been OK for me. I might cut the O-Ring for it, but I really like having outs to random crap.

    Elspeth has been great for me every time I've played her. As long as she keeps putting up results, I'll keep playing her. There's been plenty of times where she's done more for me than Jace. The Shackles is just something I'm trying out - I wouldn't play more than 1.

    .
    For basics, I play 2 Island, 1 Forest, 1 Mountain, but you could run a plains in place of the mountain if you're set on it. Just out of curisotiy what matchups are you testing against? I've been trying pretty hard to tweak countertop against the vengevine survival decks, so spell snare has been insane.

  6. #1666

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    I went back up to 3 Spell Snare

  7. #1667
    Merkwürdigeliebe
    jazzykat's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Vienna, AT
    Posts

    913

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    Honestly, I don't know why we can't go up to 4 Spell Snare.

  8. #1668

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    Quote Originally Posted by jazzykat View Post
    Honestly, I don't know why we can't go up to 4 Spell Snare.
    I've been toying with this idea as well. I played 4 spell snare for most of the last extended season where dark depths was public enemy number one. The way the recent events have gone down it looks as though survival decks are really going to be the archetype to beat and spell snare certainly helps that matchup since a lot of the hands they keep fall apart without survival.

  9. #1669
    Splitting time between Legacy, EDH and Alterations
    ivanpei's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    Posts

    1,202

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    3 Snare, 3 counterspell split is ideally what I would play if I was facing a survival-infested meta. I would play the 4th counterspell over the 4th snare as it is less narrow. If you see plenty of survival and the mirror, no harm in upping to 4 spell snares. Tempo threshold/canadian threshold in the old days played 4 snares and did well, however that was a meta deck. I see no problems playing 4 today with survival being the rage.
    Last edited by ivanpei; 10-19-2010 at 08:28 PM. Reason: typo

  10. #1670

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    On a unrelated note among all the talk about U/G Madness, is there a reason Thopter Sword is not discussed in this thread? Is the deck simply too different and is classified as it's own arch-type? Is this thread not about all Counter-Top decks and it's variants? Isn't the Thopter Foundry and Sword of the Meek combo with the Counterbalance/Sensei's Divining Top a powerful and competitive combination?

  11. #1671
    Member
    keys's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Location

    London
    Posts

    1,053

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    Quote Originally Posted by DragoFireheart View Post
    On a unrelated note among all the talk about U/G Madness, is there a reason Thopter Sword is not discussed in this thread?
    There is a thread in the Established Decks forum devoted solely to that deck.

  12. #1672
    Splitting time between Legacy, EDH and Alterations
    ivanpei's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    Posts

    1,202

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    I actually submitted an article to the SCG writing contest about countertop. I'll wait a bit, if it doesn't get published, I'll just post it here. In that article I examine countertop-thopters and why people are dropping it in favor of other decks. I also look at the various countertop archtypes and the evolution of the Martell/Sperling list. Let me know if interested and I'll put it up on google docs or something. But in summary, countertop thopters is very weak to krosan grip and spell pierce/reb post board. The card disadvantage built into the enlightened tutor engine makes the deck lose out after the opponent's dead creature removal is boarded out for "live" cards. I played the deck and my moat (which I bought just for the deck) has been sitting around sad faced in my box. :(
    Last edited by ivanpei; 10-21-2010 at 01:37 AM.

  13. #1673
    Trample, Haste
    pippo84's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Location

    Italy
    Posts

    467

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    Quote Originally Posted by ivanpei View Post
    I actually submitted an article to the SCG writing contest about countertop. I'll wait a bit, if it doesn't get published, I'll just post it here. In that article I examine countertop-thopters and why people are dropping it in favor of other decks. I also look at the various countertop archtypes and the evolution of the Martell/Sperling list. Let me know if interested and I'll put it up on google docs or something. But in summary, countertop thopters is very weak to krosan grip and spell pierce/reb post board. The card disadvantage built into the enlightened tutor engine makes the deck lose out after the opponent's dead creature removal is boarded out for "live" cards. I played the deck and my moat (which I bought just for the deck) has been sitting around sad faced in my box. :(
    That's way after game 1 you side in creatures with CTT.
    You then have 3 Jace 2.0, 2 Thopter Foundry + 1 Sword of the Meek and 3-4 creatures as win conditions.
    Team Stimato

    Quote Originally Posted by Julian23 View Post
    He told you a foil from Time Spiral was Summer?
    This man must be a Jedi.

  14. #1674
    Member

    Join Date

    Sep 2009
    Location

    Michigan, US
    Posts

    373

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    Thopter-Sword is awful. That's why it's over in its own thread.

    I think the decision of how many Counterspell/Spell Snares to play comes down to how many cmc=2 you have. Your deck wants 10, at minimum. At least that's what I've discovered, and I've been playing Countertop since the card came out.

  15. #1675

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    I'd say that's generally true if spell snare didn't read "target spell with converted mana cost two" basically making it able to hit a one via an enabled counterbalance or a two by, you know, casting it.

  16. #1676
    Member
    keys's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Location

    London
    Posts

    1,053

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    Quote Originally Posted by DFY889 View Post
    I'd say that's generally true if spell snare didn't read "target spell with converted mana cost two" basically making it able to hit a one via an enabled counterbalance or a two by, you know, casting it.
    Yeah but we want to enable the softlock, not just counter one spell.

  17. #1677

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    Our problem isn't winning with countertop down. It's beating a survival.

  18. #1678

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    Wow. It's absolutely staggering how sick I am of hearing that. If I ever catch Evan Erwin on a bad day I'm just going to wring his overbearing, hyperbole-slinging neck...

  19. #1679
    cant play as much as he wants

    Join Date

    Jun 2010
    Posts

    319

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    Ehm,

    with Spell Pierce and Needle, is it still THAT hard of a matchup?

    If so:
    WHY is it that hard?

    (haven't come to test against G/W Survival yet.....)

  20. #1680

    Re: [DTW] CounterTop

    It's nowhere near as hard as most people like to pretend it is. There's just a whole lot of hype around Vengevival. It's a good deck, with good MUs, but it's currently the "flavor of the month," as it were. It's been around for years, but Vengevine has given it a lot of press.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)