Page 37 of 134 FirstFirst ... 273334353637383940414787 ... LastLast
Results 721 to 740 of 2665

Thread: [Deck] 43 Lands

  1. #721

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenCid View Post
    You'd run stone + EE??
    The stone-lock seals the game about as tightly as Slaver-lock does, protecting you against more random stuff than explosives lock ever will.

    also, if you ever get Stone out on turn 2 vs random.dec, you will usually dominate the entire course of the game with it.

  2. #722
    Stay frosty.
    lorddotm's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2009
    Location

    New York City
    Posts

    883

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Quote Originally Posted by Antonius View Post
    The stone-lock seals the game about as tightly as Slaver-lock does, protecting you against more random stuff than explosives lock ever will.

    also, if you ever get Stone out on turn 2 vs random.dec, you will usually dominate the entire course of the game with it.

    You run Stone?

    I thought your lastest list didn't run it...
    Quote Originally Posted by Zach Tartell View Post
    Have to ask one of those West coasters about recreational purposes.
    Quote Originally Posted by DownSyndromeKarl View Post
    A baby seal walks into a club.
    West Coast Legacy

  3. #723

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Quote Originally Posted by lorddotm View Post
    You run Stone?

    I thought your lastest list didn't run it...
    I don't run it now but I was speaking from my experiences with it. My point is simply that stone works well and is not excessive with EE. The redundancy is actually quite nice. And, once again, early stone dominates the course of the game.

  4. #724

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    On stone...it's still needleable and cost 3 (cool) but it requires an "expensive" activation and protection (for fate counters)... maybe smokestack could be a good choice on this point...

  5. #725
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    70

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    The activation costs are steep, but the dire situations Lands encounters aren't usually of the do-or-die variety, but encountering certain permanents, you need to deal with (BtB, Moons, Walkers, Progenitus). You often have alot of time fatecountering your relevant permanents while your opponent is reluctant to commit anything more to the board.
    Plus, Stone lets you win matches against Dragon Stompy, which is hilarious.

  6. #726

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Quote Originally Posted by Serbitar View Post
    The activation costs are steep, but the dire situations Lands encounters aren't usually of the do-or-die variety, but encountering certain permanents, you need to deal with (BtB, Moons, Walkers, Progenitus). You often have alot of time fatecountering your relevant permanents while your opponent is reluctant to commit anything more to the board.
    Plus, Stone lets you win matches against Dragon Stompy, which is hilarious.
    Seismic Assault is equally hilarious in that matchup.

  7. #727
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    70

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Seismic Assault might be hilarious vs Dragon Stompy, but requires them to have Moon and sucks in every other matchup, plus it cannot kill Blood Moon (although that should not matter, since it kills every guy they play and eventually them).

    To add serious content: I would second the suggestion to sideboard Pithing Needles, which also help against Survival. I still haven't had the chance to test Oracle of Mul-Daya in my sideboard. Has anyone experience with this? Is it better than Crucible (since it is completely graveyard independent) or worse (since it cannot actually recur Wastelands or Chasm)?

  8. #728
    Derp.
    neon_havoc's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Location

    Ny
    Posts

    24

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    I have tested Seismic Assault VS decks that play moons and i find that its not really worth the sb space. smoke stack riftstone portal and recurring engineered explosives at 3 is how id go about wining that MU. Pithing needles might be good VS survival , but I think for the most part those decks are very mana hungry and we are very good at mana denial. Also Crucible is WAYYY better then Oracle of Mul Daya it can be dredged away and then played the folowing turn with academy ruins also helps us not lose to extirpate..
    L4W

  9. #729

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Quote Originally Posted by neon_havoc View Post
    I have tested Seismic Assault VS decks that play moons and i find that its not really worth the sb space. smoke stack riftstone portal and recurring engineered explosives at 3 is how id go about wining that MU. Pithing needles might be good VS survival , but I think for the most part those decks are very mana hungry and we are very good at mana denial. Also Crucible is WAYYY better then Oracle of Mul Daya it can be dredged away and then played the folowing turn with academy ruins also helps us not lose to extirpate..
    Level 2 Judge
    Owner, Tales of Adventure Comics and Games, Coopersburg, PA

  10. #730
    Derp.
    neon_havoc's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Location

    Ny
    Posts

    24

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Quote Originally Posted by mchainmail View Post
    Yeah i guess that does it lol. Im just not really a big fan of the creature based versions of this deck , not to say they are bad i have seen others do well with them . What are your thoughts/ current deck list?
    L4W

  11. #731

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Quote Originally Posted by neon_havoc View Post
    Yeah i guess that does it lol. Im just not really a big fan of the creature based versions of this deck , not to say they are bad i have seen others do well with them . What are your thoughts/ current deck list?
    I haven't been playing it very much recently; at an 18 man local event, there were about 5 decks running Extirpate, and 5 decks running duals. The local meta just isn't developed enough.

    My decklist is posted a couple pages ago. I board into 3 Smokestack 3 Crucible for sheer power in G2/3; Smokestack is so incredible against blue decks.
    Level 2 Judge
    Owner, Tales of Adventure Comics and Games, Coopersburg, PA

  12. #732

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Just thinking out of the box ... Is it possible to incorporate Koth since his emblem is transforming mountains to pingers? Although you'd have to put in Taiga, Stomping Ground, Rootbound Crag. Hoping to hear your opinions on getting Koth in.

  13. #733

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Quote Originally Posted by Khell View Post
    Just thinking out of the box ... Is it possible to incorporate Koth since his emblem is transforming mountains to pingers? Although you'd have to put in Taiga, Stomping Ground, Rootbound Crag. Hoping to hear your opinions on getting Koth in.
    Koth man, what?

    Shoot, I'd rather have Nicol Bolas. We ramp to 8 mana easily, sometimes we run red black and blue. He kills Jace, their basics AND he dodges counterbalance! Holy balls, dude.

    I mean, cruel ultimatum...chchchyeaaaa. It's also scientifically proven that resolving Nicol Bolas during a competitive legacy event causes the caster's penis to grow a good two or three inches.

  14. #734
    itsJulian.com - Legacy Videos
    Julian23's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Location

    Munich / Germany
    Posts

    3,141

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Rules to take into account when considering new cards for this deck:

    a) Is it a land?
    b) Is it an aritfact?
    c) Do you want to run 3 or 4 copies of it?

    If your answer is "no" to each of these questions, chances are you shouldn't play the card.
    The seven cardinal sins of Legacy:
    1. Discuss the unbanning of Land Tax Earthcraft.
    2. Argue that banning Force of Will would make the format healthier.
    3. Play Brainstorm without Fetchlands.
    4. Stifle Standstill.
    5. Think that Gaea's Blessing will make you Solidarity-proof.
    6. Pass priority after playing Infernal Tutor.
    7. Fail to playtest against Nourishing Lich (coZ iT wIlL gEt U!).

  15. #735
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Erie, PA
    Posts

    35

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Yeah people need to get off the bandwagon on Koth, he isn't nearly good enough to be played in legacy seeing as the easiest way to abuse him is counterproductive because mountains can't get him out very fast without card disadvantage. That is why when I added painterstone to lands during my last tournament it worked out fine because it didn't change the overall core of the deck it just changed some of the weaker cards for ones that are more universal and can help improve certain matchups and help play around certain hate cards. I suppose if you want to abuse koth in lands you could play some version that uses blood moon to make all your lands mountains but that like I said is counterproductive because it shuts off your other cards. The only real deck that could abuse koth is something like dragon stompy but by dropping him that quickly you won't have a lot of mountains for any of his abilities thus making him underwhelming and strictly worse than some other 3-4 mana red card.

  16. #736

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Could anybody give some sideboarding guidelines for oracle of mul daya? Does it really worth?

  17. #737
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    70

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Siding Oracle should be about the same as sideboarding Crucible (as it probably takes those slots, anyway): if you want to dodge graveyard hate, especially Extirpate. So this should be a card that comes in almost always (at least I almost always side Crucible, but I also face Extirpate almost every round).
    That being said, Oracle is way clunkier than Crucible and you are screwed, if they didn't board out their removal.

  18. #738

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Quote Originally Posted by Serbitar View Post
    Siding Oracle should be about the same as sideboarding Crucible (as it probably takes those slots, anyway): if you want to dodge graveyard hate, especially Extirpate. So this should be a card that comes in almost always (at least I almost always side Crucible, but I also face Extirpate almost every round).
    That being said, Oracle is way clunkier than Crucible and you are screwed, if they didn't board out their removal.
    If you always side it in...why don't run it main deck?

  19. #739
    itsJulian.com - Legacy Videos
    Julian23's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Location

    Munich / Germany
    Posts

    3,141

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    The maindeck is so tight but the sideboard is evern tighter so I'm currently trying Crucible of Worlds in the main replacing 1 Intuition and 1 Manabond freeing up 1 maindeck slot.
    The seven cardinal sins of Legacy:
    1. Discuss the unbanning of Land Tax Earthcraft.
    2. Argue that banning Force of Will would make the format healthier.
    3. Play Brainstorm without Fetchlands.
    4. Stifle Standstill.
    5. Think that Gaea's Blessing will make you Solidarity-proof.
    6. Pass priority after playing Infernal Tutor.
    7. Fail to playtest against Nourishing Lich (coZ iT wIlL gEt U!).

  20. #740
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    70

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    I do not start with MD Crucible because obviously no one has graveyard hate G1. I guess you can make the argument, that you should win your G1s anyway... and I guess that's kind of valid. Then I would follow Julian23's suggestion - which I might also try out, actually.

    @Julian: What has replaced your Crucibles in the now freed sideboard slots?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)