Page 60 of 134 FirstFirst ... 105056575859606162636470110 ... LastLast
Results 1,181 to 1,200 of 2665

Thread: [Deck] 43 Lands

  1. #1181

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Regarding the first point: You don't always need Loam, e.g. if you have access to Crucible. This is fair, though.

    Regarding the second point: This is also probably true, but at least it opens up the space for us to try and consider replacements. This might be useful for the following reason: in E-Tutor lists, the necessity of Confidant in the sideboard forced the deck to run 4 colors, badly destabilizing the mana base post-board (I've personally fallen victim to color screw, but I might just be a bad pilot). Furthermore, such lists run blue only for Academy Ruins and Tolaria West, and they have less need for Tolaria West than the Intuition builds because you rely more on artifacts, not bullet lands, to create soft locks.

    Furthermore, in exchange for Tolaria West, a better mana base might allow us to run things like Humility or Knight of the Reliquary, which undoubtedly address some deficiencies that may emerge from cutting blue.

  2. #1182

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Gamble much?

  3. #1183

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Gamble is unreliable, and red is almost totally barren of useful cards for control Loam decks. Wonderful for aggro Loam, but not this, especially since I'm trying to cut a 4th color for consistency reasons.

  4. #1184


    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Location

    São Paulo - Brazil
    Posts

    222

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    I would cut black before cut blue. Dark Confidant is nuts, but both Tolaria West and Ruins are just better.

    And while Confidant draws, Reliquary tutors, Every turn. And is a really good beater. AAAND has sinergy with 4 Mazes. I will test KotR this weekend.

  5. #1185
    Member
    plus_ten's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2007
    Location

    Australia
    Posts

    38

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Tiago's invitational card to be released in INN.

    http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=335445

    Denying Channel
    Land
    T: Add to {1} your mana pool.
    2UU, Discard Denying Channel: Counter target spell.


    Too high to utilise, but still a card for this deck than any other.

    @Buried Ruin: I think this is playable, as it gets the EE back straight away.

    EDIT: I am of the opinion that Buried Ruins should complement Academy, rather than a straight replacement.
    Last edited by plus_ten; 07-01-2011 at 10:10 AM.
    Oh, FFS!

  6. #1186
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    70

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    @Denying Channel
    That's not even the form, the card will have. They said, "it changed quite a bit (for the better)", which probably means it got worse ^^. But I guess this is just speculation for now.

    I don't think Buried Ruin should replace Academy Ruins. I guess it's nice that you get to recur an artifact while loaming but this could be done with Academy Ruins, too - just required a Thicket. On the other hand, it costs a land drop to keep using it. You probably should be blue anyways.
    There is, however, a not irrelevant play that cannot be done with Buried Ruins: to deck the opponent or prevent yourself from getting decked.

  7. #1187

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    what do u think about:
    intuition + noxious revival? we can tutor anything...
    Druidic Satchel in sideboard like second engine?
    Visions of Beyond??

  8. #1188
    Member
    rocketrae21's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2008
    Location

    Wilkes Barre
    Posts

    472

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Quote Originally Posted by kjeldoran View Post
    what do u think about:
    intuition + noxious revival? we can tutor anything...
    Druidic Satchel in sideboard like second engine?
    Visions of Beyond??
    I'm okay with Noxious Revival in the deck but as currently my list doesn't run Intuition I don't know if its worth it for me that is. The other two cards just don't seem that good. The problem with any instant or sorcery in the deck is that if you don't have it in your opener you will most likely end up dredging it anyway with no way to return it. So a lot of time Visions doesn't really do anything for us.
    Check out my Articles

  9. #1189

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Quote Originally Posted by kjeldoran View Post
    what do u think about:
    intuition + noxious revival? we can tutor anything...
    Druidic Satchel in sideboard like second engine?
    Visions of Beyond??
    If you get 3 cards off Visions of Beyond, you're already winning.
    Level 2 Judge
    Owner, Tales of Adventure Comics and Games, Coopersburg, PA

  10. #1190

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    The only M12 card that jumped out at me is Sundial of the Infinite. With Smokestack or against a deck that has no way to remove Glacial Chasm, it could just win the game, and it can fight some stuff like EOT Wasteland activations or Price of Progress.

  11. #1191

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Quote Originally Posted by kjeldoran View Post
    what do u think about:
    intuition + noxious revival? we can tutor anything...
    Druidic Satchel in sideboard like second engine?
    Visions of Beyond??
    The only think you really want to tutor is for loam, lands or artifacts. All of them tutoreable with intuition.

  12. #1192
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    70

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Quote Originally Posted by LowBeyonder View Post
    The only M12 card that jumped out at me is Sundial of the Infinite. With Smokestack or against a deck that has no way to remove Glacial Chasm, it could just win the game, and it can fight some stuff like EOT Wasteland activations or Price of Progress.
    You already win against decks that have no way to remove Chasm and/or were you resolve Smokestack under no pressure...

  13. #1193

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Quote Originally Posted by Serbitar View Post
    You already win against decks that have no way to remove Chasm and/or were you resolve Smokestack under no pressure...
    That's true.

    There are probably some other tricks with it. Wastelanding fetches and dodging Clique come to mind, but they're pretty niche. I may test with it, though.

  14. #1194

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Quote Originally Posted by Serbitar View Post
    You already win against decks that have no way to remove Chasm and/or were you resolve Smokestack under no pressure...
    Even in game 1, what decks can't deal with *any* part of that combo?

    Maybe the various Natural Order decks in game 1, but in game 2, everyone will have K-grip or Grudge. Don't get me wrong, I like the idea. It just doesn't seem good enough sometimes.
    Level 2 Judge
    Owner, Tales of Adventure Comics and Games, Coopersburg, PA

  15. #1195

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Don't even bother your time with Sundial, it is nothing but winmore.

  16. #1196
    Member
    rocketrae21's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2008
    Location

    Wilkes Barre
    Posts

    472

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Its Lands viable to play right now? I want to run it at the next Jupiter Event, but I'm not sure if its worth it
    Check out my Articles

  17. #1197
    The green Ancestral
    ESG's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2010
    Location

    Seattle, WA
    Posts

    1,322

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Probably not. Given the predicted field, will you be able to consistently resolve Exploration or Manabond? What's your plan against Hive Mind? Do you have any game against Reanimator? Can you beat TES or ANT or High Tide or any other storm combo? How about Combo Elves or Painter? These, in my opinion, are the main questions to consider before rolling this deck into battle. If those problem decks are absent, or if you're able to adequately hate out the few that are present, then things get a lot easier.

    I would play this deck if you expect lots of aggro and very little combo, and if people are running vulnerable manabases. Other than that, I'd keep it on the shelf. Lands has always been a niche deck, and the niche is smaller this year than it was last year.

  18. #1198
    Member
    iamfrightenedtoo's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2011
    Location

    under a dead Ohio sky
    Posts

    19

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    lands just took like 27 at the Pitt SCG open, out of about 190, went 6-2. its not a bad deck, just a little difficult to run and figure out.

  19. #1199

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    I agree with ESG. This deck should be played when combo has a small presence OR you manage to have a perfect sideboard and are able to defeat combo decks.

    If not, just play another deck. What we could discuss is a sideboard and maindeck cards that would help the deck in these matchups.

    Has anyone tried Leyline of the Void against Reanimator? Along with Extirpate I think it's the best answer to that deck.

  20. #1200
    Member
    rocketrae21's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2008
    Location

    Wilkes Barre
    Posts

    472

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Quote Originally Posted by Davetradint View Post
    Has anyone tried Leyline of the Void against Reanimator? Along with Extirpate I think it's the best answer to that deck.
    I feel Leyline is just too much to have in your board. You normally want to have a good hand with Exploration/Manabond and a Loam and now if you are looking for a Leyline as well? Reanimator isn't a deck that just loses to Leyline, especially because they normally side in Show and Tell.

    Also I really just want to get Lands back out just to try and stay fresh with the deck. I don't get enough chances to test and honestly no one ever wants to test against lands. I guess I'll just scout the field and if it looks lands angry, just play my bant list.
    Check out my Articles

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)