Page 2 of 14 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 262

Thread: How healthy is the format?

  1. #21
    The word is "Fight! Fight! Fight! For Iowa!"
    Shawn's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Posts

    336

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hollywood View Post
    Legacy is fine.
    This. People will adjust.

    I don't see Misstep going anywhere, as I heard Zac Hill say at GP:KC MM was made specifically to slow the format of Legacy down, and it seems to be doing just that.
    "Attack with Order of the Ebon Hand."
    "K, block with Jotun Grunt?"
    "It has pro white."
    "Swords?"
    "It still has pro white."


    Team OMRIAIGTWYFEWARTCAE Team RTD
    Twitter: @shawnldewey

  2. #22
    3-point-shooter

    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Posts

    526

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    6 NO RUG, 6 Stone UW, 2 Zoo are quite surprising, considering the status of these decks one month ago. However, I bet none of the mentioned archetypes will have over 4 T16 representations in the next SCG Open. I can also go on and say in another month, people will find themselves amusing, fearing the dominance of NO RUG or Stoneblade. Furthermore, Innistrad is coming and another shake-up is expected.

    That said, the dominance of Mental Missteps is unquestionable. We knew this was coming when NPH was spoiled. This card has been banned in Modern, which makes it clear that WotC is aware of its performance in Legacy. I don't want see it banned though, because, clearly, everyone knows the most busted card in Legacy is BRAINSTORM!

    Swamp is the loser in the most recent Top16. Why? Discard gets hit hard by Misstep, AND Brainstorm. Brainstorm brings RIDICULOUS consistency to blue decks, and blue combo decks. Ban Brianstorm, and then we can talk about colour balance in Legacy.

  3. #23
    Member

    Join Date

    Dec 2009
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    45

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    Quote Originally Posted by Admiral_Arzar View Post
    "3 non-blue decks" being used as an argument that the format is fine is pretty bad. That's still a strong majority of blue.
    It's still almost half of the top 8 and in the second case it is actually half of the top. What would be the correct number of non-blue decks in a top 8 to have a healthy format? Is it 6 is it 7 and who is defining that?

    But yes you are right: Having just 3 non-blue decks in one top 8 is a bad argument but the same is true if just a single top 8 is presented as an argument for a non-healthy format.

    But that was not my point. My point is: It is wrong to base a opinion on just a single top 8 and use it as an argument.

    I for myself wouldn't be able to come to a conclusion. Not even if I would include the two other top 8ths that I mentioned.

  4. #24
    我不是你的英雄。
    Jonathan Alexander's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2010
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    854

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    There's no way they should ban Brainstorm. Legacy is fun because the decks are consistent and not every deck is like The Gate or Dragon Stompy and loses to itself three out of four games. Magic should be about skill and not about luck, and with Brainstorm, it's much more likely that games actually are decided by skill. Also, banning Brainstorm would most likely help combo decks more than anything else as these are the decks that have the biggest problems against blue based decks and often only need their cantrips to find certain pieces of their combos and not to generate virtual cardadvantage. Not having Brainstorm at least makes them weaker against discard though.

  5. #25
    (previously Metalwalker)
    GGoober's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2008
    Location

    Houston, TX
    Posts

    1,647

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    Quote Originally Posted by DrJones View Post

    Here is TomLaPille's reply:

    TomLaPilleMagic Tom LaPille
    I suggest Great Sable Stag or Thrun, the Last Troll

    Does this make sense? putting Great Sable Stag in your deck to hose blue decks is like putting Lhurgoyf in your deck to hose Graveyard-based strategies. Like putting White Knight in your deck to fight Necropotence decks. It fights the wrong battle.

    So I replied:

    @TomLaPilleMagic They don't work, hosers should meddle with the opponent's gameplan. Thrun and GSS are just efficient lategame creatures.

    And he replied me again:

    I know a few Mistbind Cliques that would beg to differ with you about Great Sable Stag.

    WOW!!

    Does he even have any idea of the format or is he trolling you?

    +10 to Misstep being the most format warping card since Goyf/Counterbalance/Pridemage/Hierarch/Progenitus. Sorry, Misstep warped the format much more than the cards mentioned.

    Think about it this way, if MM is out, Goblins/combos are going to be viable again, AND SFM/NORUG decks won't be overly dominant because they won't have 8 free counters to protect their backup plan.

    I love blue, I love MM, but I love Legacy more than blue/MM and all I can say, it is my opinion that Legacy with MM banned is a much healthier and diverse format than one with MM.

    Brainstorm has never warped the format. It just gave blue a strong tool than the other color pie. Aside from Jace, blue has really not received any form of power inflation while most aggro decks have seen tremendous contributions to power creep. WotC has done a fine job in trying to push aggro against the dominant color that is blue, that is until they printed MM.
    Decks that I care about:
    Steel Stompy
    UWx Landstill
    Dreadstalker
    DDFT (10% practice)

    Mangara on MWS? You must be masochistic. -kiblast
    Quote Originally Posted by Gheizen64 View Post
    REB is a fantastic sideboard card against blue... in blue decks :/

  6. #26
    3-point-shooter

    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Posts

    526

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jona View Post
    There's no way they should ban Brainstorm. Legacy is fun because the decks are consistent and not every deck is like The Gate or Dragon Stompy and loses to itself three out of four games. Magic should be about skill and not about luck, and with Brainstorm, it's much more likely that games actually are decided by skill. Also, banning Brainstorm would most likely help combo decks more than anything else as these are the decks that have the biggest problems against blue based decks and often only need their cantrips to find certain pieces of their combos and not to generate virtual cardadvantage. Not having Brainstorm at least makes them weaker against discard though.
    I appreciate your point about Legacy being a format that values skill. Ponder and Preordain are decent cards that make decks consistent, and FAIR in the sense Dark Confidant and Sylvan Library are fair. However, Brainstorm is not a fair card, as it brings too much consistency: For one card and one mana, at instant speed, one gets three fresh cards from the top of your library, three versus one! Brainstorm is not only the core of any serious combo deck, but the MVP of most of them (Show and Tell, Reanimator, and Tendrils). Brainstorm not only digs cards for the combo decks, it works just as the way it is exploited by other blue decks. Banning Brainstorm and leaving Mental Missteps in will not do anything favouring combo decks.

    Brainstorm supersedes the fairness of Legacy, and as Ponder and Preordain are available, it is a safe ban now. Blue decks will still be fairly consistent without Brainstorm. Blue players will whine (except those playing Islandwalkers) and learn to adapt to a fair format.

  7. #27
    Member
    KobeBryan's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2011
    Location

    Arcadia, CA
    Posts

    2,232

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    I always advocated the banning of brainstorm. The banning would not kill blue where it would be unplayable. It would only nerf blue just a bit to allow other decks to catch up to its power.

    But i was called a troll after making that suggestion.

  8. #28
    3-point-shooter

    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Posts

    526

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    Quote Originally Posted by Avatar of Shadow View Post
    I always advocated the banning of brainstorm. The banning would not kill blue where it would be unplayable. It would only nerf blue just a bit to allow other decks to catch up to its power.

    But i was called a troll after making that suggestion.
    People shouted "Ban Coutertop!", people creamed "Ban High Tide!", people yelled "Ban Show and Tell!", and now people are still amazed by the blue dominance with their hammer in the air, tempted to call a card that is not really blue.

    We are the trolls who mention Brainstorm all the time.

  9. #29

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    And here comes dr. Jones from the closet, right on time. Every few months same little story about how FoW is a free timewalk, it never gets old

    This is when people are mostly cutting few copies of FoW, or playing something like NoFoW Bant and winning things...

    Anyway the real problem here is Mental Misstep like already stated which gives too much tempo, and answers too many cards (Nacatl's, etc) without having the FoW drawback. It's easier to pay 2 life when one starts at 20 life than one paying 1 life and a blue card...

    Personally I don't know what Wizards guys were smoking when they came up with Mental Misstep in card design... especially since it's not a "FoW substitute for Modern".

  10. #30
    Bands with Others
    menace13's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2009
    Location

    NY, NY
    Posts

    1,220

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    Stop crying because Legacy finally has a defined metagame, it's no longer 40decks.format.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cavius The Great View Post
    Respect my shine bitch!

  11. #31
    我不是你的英雄。
    Jonathan Alexander's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2010
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    854

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    Quote Originally Posted by menace13 View Post
    Stop crying because Legacy finally has a defined metagame, it's no longer 40decks.format.
    Yes. Honestly, what is the problem with a blue dominance, when there are still around ten strong decks you can tune? Sure, NO RUG and Stoneblade stand above the other decks, but having two decks on top is perfectly fine in my eyes.
    You should read Chapin's article from monday regarding a healthy metagame.

  12. #32
    Site Contributor
    Admiral_Arzar's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2010
    Location

    Denver, CO
    Posts

    1,289

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    Quote Originally Posted by menace13 View Post
    Stop crying because Legacy finally has a defined metagame, it's no longer 40decks.format.
    Some of us - such as myself - find diversity awesome. Others obviously prefer one color over all the others. This lesson can be applied to real life as well as magic.
    Lord of the Chalice

    Quote Originally Posted by Julian23 View Post
    Since playing against Spiral Tide provides a lot fun for both players is something only someone who's not had sex for quite a while could enjoy, I pull out GW Maverick.
    Quote Originally Posted by Brainstorm Ape View Post
    Spikes are supposed to enjoy winning by leveraging their talents, but this card can't fetch the most SKILL INTENSIVE card in all of Magic?

    Clearly aimed at Modern plebs, not gonna be a pillar of our format.
    Stompy Discord: https://discord.gg/6cesvkz

  13. #33
    Super Secret Tech "Ooh...shiny!"
    Fry's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2010
    Location

    Edinboro, PA
    Posts

    498

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    I personally don't think that there is anything wrong with a defined metagame... However with that being said I do believe that there is a problem when the metagame uses blue(8 free counters) in umpteen top 16 decks.
    Quote Originally Posted by nedleeds View Post
    Can't understand wanting the new new border if you have a choice, for any reason. You have to be a casual or have rickets.
    Cockatrice: EMFry

  14. #34

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    Quote Originally Posted by Metalwalker View Post
    WOW!!

    Does he even have any idea of the format or is he trolling you?
    Can someone do something about him? It is getting embarrassing how bad at magic he is.

    Remember, he is the person who tested Reanimator in the MODO practice room and decided to ban Mystical Tutor and who thought NPH would fix Standard.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ertai's Familiar View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by DragoFireheart View Post
    Interestingly enough, I would argue that BS is the Dark Ritual in this case.
    Tom? Is that you? I thought you were going to go work on DnD?

  15. #35
    Member
    KobeBryan's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2011
    Location

    Arcadia, CA
    Posts

    2,232

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    Quote Originally Posted by CorpT View Post
    Can someone do something about him? It is getting embarrassing how bad at magic he is.

    Remember, he is the person who tested Reanimator in the MODO practice room and decided to ban Mystical Tutor and who thought NPH would fix Standard.
    Too bad this isn't MTGSalvation where you can just ban someone for their opinions, reasoning that it is trolling.

  16. #36

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    Quote Originally Posted by Avatar of Shadow View Post
    Too bad this isn't MTGSalvation where you can just ban someone for their opinions, reasoning that it is trolling.
    Yeah, I hate those MTGSalvation mods. They're the worst. I often go to other boards just to complain about them.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ertai's Familiar View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by DragoFireheart View Post
    Interestingly enough, I would argue that BS is the Dark Ritual in this case.
    Tom? Is that you? I thought you were going to go work on DnD?

  17. #37
    Just call me Dick.
    Richard Cheese's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2011
    Location

    Your mom's house.
    Posts

    2,105

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    Quote Originally Posted by menace13 View Post
    Stop crying because Legacy finally has a defined metagame, it's no longer 40decks.format.
    You should check out Standard. I hear it's pretty awesome to play the same 3 matchups all day at every major tournament.
    I think the biggest thing is the deep seeded emotional understanding that the right play is the right play regardless of outcomes. The ability to make a decision 5 straight times, lose 5 times because of it, and still make it the 6th time if it's the right play. - Jon Finkel

    "Notions of chance and fate are the preoccupation of men engaged in rash undertakings."

  18. #38
    Member
    KobeBryan's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2011
    Location

    Arcadia, CA
    Posts

    2,232

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    Quote Originally Posted by CorpT View Post
    Yeah, I hate those MTGSalvation mods. They're the worst. I often go to other boards just to complain about them.
    You are probably the best mod there.

  19. #39

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    Quote Originally Posted by Avatar of Shadow View Post
    You are probably the best mod there.
    Not even a mod there. But continue the nerd rage. It warms my heart.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ertai's Familiar View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by DragoFireheart View Post
    Interestingly enough, I would argue that BS is the Dark Ritual in this case.
    Tom? Is that you? I thought you were going to go work on DnD?

  20. #40
    Bands with Others
    menace13's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2009
    Location

    NY, NY
    Posts

    1,220

    Re: How healthy is the format?

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    You should check out Standard. I hear it's pretty awesome to play the same 3 matchups all day at every major tournament.
    I'm fine with the same ten. So Legacy has a real metagame now and people still find something wrong. Last month it was ban Show and Tell this month it's ban Misstep, Mystic, Clique, Jace?
    Quote Originally Posted by Cavius The Great View Post
    Respect my shine bitch!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)