Page 161 of 299 FirstFirst ... 61111151157158159160161162163164165171211261 ... LastLast
Results 3,201 to 3,220 of 5963

Thread: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

  1. #3201
    the answer is 3

    Join Date

    Feb 2011
    Posts

    46

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    I just want to do something with basic ANT, none of the crazy awesome color splashes. This is what I have come up with below. Let me know whats up, and what needs to be changed.

    4 cabal ritual
    4 dark ritual
    4 lotus petal
    4 lion’s eye diamond
    2 chrome mox
    2 mox diamond

    4 brainstorm
    4 ponder
    3 gitaxian probe

    4 duress
    3 thought sieze

    4 infernal tutor
    1 ill gotten gains
    1 ad neausium
    1 tendrils of agony

    4 darkslick shores
    4 gemstone mine
    4 polluted delta
    2 island
    3 swamp
    Ding, fries are done

  2. #3202

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    I assume you haven't included Underground Sea for budget reasons but I feel like pointing out that using some of those and more blue fetch lands would be better because of the interaction with Ponder and Brainstorm.

    Darkslick Shores is pretty much exactly as good as the Sea here though.

  3. #3203
    Irken invader

    Join Date

    Dec 2008
    Location

    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts

    30

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by deviant View Post
    Shhh... (we're trying to stay under the radar...)
    Sure: nobody expects the spanish inquisiiton! (ups wrong deck)
    I´m a Derek, and Derek's don't run...

  4. #3204
    Team Nijmegen Failtrain Captain
    practical joke's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2009
    Location

    Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Posts

    167

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by UnderwaterGuy View Post
    I assume you haven't included Underground Sea for budget reasons but I feel like pointing out that using some of those and more blue fetch lands would be better because of the interaction with Ponder and Brainstorm.

    Darkslick Shores is pretty much exactly as good as the Sea here though.
    It isn't and it's not even close.....

    Now with mm being banned, the discard effects will be a lot more effective and noone is taking your brainstorm away.

    also...it's ad nauseam

  5. #3205
    the answer is 3

    Join Date

    Feb 2011
    Posts

    46

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Ok so I know seas would be better, but lets just say I can't afford it (which is the trueth) how many games on average, as a percent, would it cost me to run shores or any of the other lands which produce blue and black, like a rav dual?
    Ding, fries are done

  6. #3206
    λόγος + τέλος
    Chikenbok's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2011
    Location

    New York
    Posts

    367

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by thatoneguy View Post
    Ok so I know seas would be better, but lets just say I can't afford it (which is the trueth) how many games on average, as a percent, would it cost me to run shores or any of the other lands which produce blue and black, like a rav dual?
    In a deck that punishes each point of dmg coming at its owner (ad nauseum, fetchlands, thought seize) those extra 2 points of CIPT dmg are going to be significant.

    You need to be using life as a resource to cast spells, not play lands. Shores simply won't work because they're not fetchable.
    Quote Originally Posted by emidln View Post
    If you have 3 mana and 2 draws and can't win through bullshit permanents, you are mentally deficient and probably want to examine a game with less thought. I recommend Lawn Darts.

  7. #3207
    Member
    Rune's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2009
    Location

    Denmark
    Posts

    324

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by thatoneguy View Post
    Ok so I know seas would be better, but lets just say I can't afford it (which is the trueth) how many games on average, as a percent, would it cost me to run shores or any of the other lands which produce blue and black, like a rav dual?
    I'd say that the difference between Darkslick Shores and USea is not THAT great when we're talking about UB ANT, because most of the time you're fetching for basics anyway. However, if you play 3 or more colors, the difference in powerlevel becomes too great. The manabase of UB ANT is very stable, so you can throw in some suboptimal lands (although I'd avoid playing shocklands) and not be hurt that much by it. I think you should try and buy just 1 USea, because just one copy of the card will allow you to make a very solid manabase with a lot of fetches and basics.

  8. #3208

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by thatoneguy View Post
    Ok so I know seas would be better, but lets just say I can't afford it (which is the trueth) how many games on average, as a percent, would it cost me to run shores or any of the other lands which produce blue and black, like a rav dual?
    I have been playing a list similar to yours for almost a year now; for reference, this is the list. In my experience, I almost always have basic lands in play; that's why a lot of these lists run such a high number of fetchlands and basic lands. Most of the time, the only time I ever fetch for a dual land is the turn I plan on winning; as a caveat, the reason I get a dual is because the fetchland I have in play does not get me the necessary mana I need. I don't know what your budget is, but you can buy an Underground Sea for $60 - $70 on eBay which isn't unreasonable. You can probably get away with playing one Underground Sea. However, your biggest issue isn't the lack of an Underground Sea, its your lack of fetch lands. Fetchlands make Ponder and Brainstorm so much more powerful because of the shuffle effects to get rid of cards that are undesirable.

    I don't know if I'm in the minority on this issue, but Mox Diamond seems so much worse than any number of other cards you could have in the deck. I understand that it has an upside post Ad Nauseam, but those upsides weighed against the times in which you don't get it when flipping with Ad Nauseam, or have it in hand without a land to discard seem much worse. You could probably sell your Mox Diamonds and get a good start on picking up an Underground Sea. Plus, Sea will have more value if you ever decide to change decks.

    If your looking for something on a budget, the list below is a good place to start:

    Artifacts
    2 Chrome Mox
    4 Lion's Eye Diamond
    4 Lotus Petal

    Instants
    1 Ad Nauseam
    4 Brainstorm
    4 Cabal Ritual
    1 Chain of Vapor
    4 Dark Ritual

    Sorceries
    4 Duress
    1 Ill-Gotten Gains
    4 Infernal Tutor
    4 Ponder
    4 Preordain
    1 Tendrils of Agony
    3 Thoughtseize

    Basic Lands
    3 Island
    2 Swamp

    Lands
    2 Verdant Catacombs
    4 Polluted Delta
    3 Scalding Tarn
    1 Underground Sea

    The mana base is relatively cheap. If you act quickly, you can pick up Misty Rainforest and Verdant Catacombs as Standard players dump their copies with the rotation coming up. The fetchland combination will let you reliably get access to a stable land base while maximizing the shuffle effects in the deck. It also runs Preordain which is more effective than Gitaxian Probe in its ability to dig which his what you want to be doing. While Probe may provide you with information, you're also running seven maindeck Duress effects which should be sufficient to provide you with necessary information to win. This is why Preordain is better; you can dig for your discard spells more effectively. The benefit of Probe is that it is free. However, when flipping it with Ad Nauseam, you have treat it like a -3 instead of -1 since you'll likely be paying the alternative casting cost.

  9. #3209
    Member
    KobeBryan's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2011
    Location

    Arcadia, CA
    Posts

    2,232

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    2x Island
    2x Swamp
    2x Underground Sea
    4x Polluted Delta
    1x Flooded Strand
    1x Misty Rainforest
    1x Scalding Tarn
    1x Bloodstained Mire

    4x Lotus Petal
    4x Lion's Eye Diamond

    4x Dark Ritual
    4x Cabal Ritual

    4x Duress
    3x Thoughtseize

    4x Infernal Tutor
    1x Ad Nauseam
    1x Ill-Gotten Gains
    1x Tendrils of Agony

    3x Gitaxian Probe
    3 Preordain
    3x Ponder
    4x Brainstorm
    1 blazing achron
    1 iona
    1 jin

    side board

    3 jin-gitasis
    3 animate dead
    3 reanimate
    3 careful study
    3 entomb


    so game 2, i drop 4 lotus petal, 4 cabel ritual, 1, igg, 1 ad nauseum, 1 tendrils, 1 duress, gitaxis probe

    What do you think guys

  10. #3210
    λόγος + τέλος
    Chikenbok's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2011
    Location

    New York
    Posts

    367

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by Avatar of Shadow View Post
    2x Island
    2x Swamp
    2x Underground Sea
    4x Polluted Delta
    1x Flooded Strand
    1x Misty Rainforest
    1x Scalding Tarn
    1x Bloodstained Mire

    4x Lotus Petal
    4x Lion's Eye Diamond

    4x Dark Ritual
    4x Cabal Ritual

    4x Duress
    3x Thoughtseize

    4x Infernal Tutor
    1x Ad Nauseam
    1x Ill-Gotten Gains
    1x Tendrils of Agony

    3x Gitaxian Probe
    3 Preordain
    3x Ponder
    4x Brainstorm
    1 blazing achron
    1 iona
    1 jin

    side board

    3 jin-gitasis
    3 animate dead
    3 reanimate
    3 careful study
    3 entomb


    so game 2, i drop 4 lotus petal, 4 cabel ritual, 1, igg, 1 ad nauseum, 1 tendrils, 1 duress, gitaxis probe

    What do you think guys
    I'm not sure what matchups you would ever want to well.. become a worse combo deck. Reanimator had a presence in a misstep era because it was able to capitalize, very well on the first 2-3 turns of the game. ANT is a deck that is able to sit and develop its game - it doesn't mind if the deck hits the mid game.

    I guess my question is, when would I want to be resolving an animate dead over an ad nauseum? When would it be easier for an opponent boarding against a combo deck to resolve an entomb over a dark ritual? A good player boarding against a combo player is going to bring in grave hate, chalice style hate (pick your poison), and maybe pithing needle or something like that - the decks require the same action to perform well. It would just be a bad reanimator deck without counter backup. Lacking the full package of discard and reanimation would make it slower than normal reanimator as well.

    And now the deck has 5 cards maindeck that are essentially auto-muls. It has no outs to resolved leyline/grave hate or permanent based hate of any kind.

    Yes, game two can be harder than game 1 but that's the fun of combo, playing around a competent opponent; and changing the entire deck in a way that seems counter-intuitive might make it harder than simply playing decks to interact with your opponent. Or, you can always just win turn 1.
    Quote Originally Posted by emidln View Post
    If you have 3 mana and 2 draws and can't win through bullshit permanents, you are mentally deficient and probably want to examine a game with less thought. I recommend Lawn Darts.

  11. #3211
    Member

    Join Date

    Aug 2010
    Location

    Seattle, WA
    Posts

    182

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    yeaaaaaaah........

    counter balance, any new ideas on how to approach this matchup now that it will be heavily played again?

    doomsday is still real, krosan grip still costs 3 one of which needs to be green. wipe away is a card. i guess reverent silence is as well.

    fish will be big again but i never really worried about that deck

    or i guess just jam past in flames in TNT and see what happens, need to work on these.

  12. #3212
    λόγος + τέλος
    Chikenbok's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2011
    Location

    New York
    Posts

    367

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by ThomasDowd View Post
    yeaaaaaaah........

    counter balance, any new ideas on how to approach this matchup now that it will be heavily played again?

    doomsday is still real, krosan grip still costs 3 one of which needs to be green. wipe away is a card. i guess reverent silence is as well.

    fish will be big again but i never really worried about that deck

    or i guess just jam past in flames in TNT and see what happens, need to work on these.
    I don't think I understand what the question is.. Is there a question here? Maybe just a comment?

    Counter balance is half of the reason people used to play 4 Doomsday in their sideboards... I still don't know what the question is.
    Quote Originally Posted by emidln View Post
    If you have 3 mana and 2 draws and can't win through bullshit permanents, you are mentally deficient and probably want to examine a game with less thought. I recommend Lawn Darts.

  13. #3213
    Member

    Join Date

    Aug 2010
    Location

    Seattle, WA
    Posts

    182

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by Chikenbok View Post
    I don't think I understand what the question is.. Is there a question here? Maybe just a comment?

    Counter balance is half of the reason people used to play 4 Doomsday in their sideboards... I still don't know what the question is.
    the question/ statement is meant to foster discussion in the direction towards counterbalance.

    i was also just thinking of ideas of how to beat it, sorry if my posting is kind of ramble-y

    the real question is: has anyone thought of anything else besides doomsday? which although is powerful, the jig is up and competent players know what's going on.

  14. #3214

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    I haven't played this deck since the banning of Mystical Tutor, but I tried everything imaginable against Counterbalance. I found the best way to beat it was Krosan Grips, bobs, and thoughtseizes out of the board, and a lot of practice. I probably played the ANT vs CB MU for 3-4 hours a day every day (college heh). It got to the point where I would beat any CB player who didn't test against extensively against ANT, and my testing partner actually never lost to ANT in any tournament.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sims View Post
    On a more constructive note: Anything can be funny, even if it is about rape.
    TIME POLICE

  15. #3215

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by Avatar of Shadow View Post
    2x Island
    2x Swamp
    2x Underground Sea
    4x Polluted Delta
    1x Flooded Strand
    1x Misty Rainforest
    1x Scalding Tarn
    1x Bloodstained Mire

    4x Lotus Petal
    4x Lion's Eye Diamond

    4x Dark Ritual
    4x Cabal Ritual

    4x Duress
    3x Thoughtseize

    4x Infernal Tutor
    1x Ad Nauseam
    1x Ill-Gotten Gains
    1x Tendrils of Agony

    3x Gitaxian Probe
    3 Preordain
    3x Ponder
    4x Brainstorm
    1 blazing achron
    1 iona
    1 jin

    side board

    3 jin-gitasis
    3 animate dead
    3 reanimate
    3 careful study
    3 entomb


    so game 2, i drop 4 lotus petal, 4 cabel ritual, 1, igg, 1 ad nauseum, 1 tendrils, 1 duress, gitaxis probe

    What do you think guys
    Comparatively, I think your deck is a less consistent and less powerful version of both ANT and Reanimator respectively. I understand the concept of hybridization that you're going for and it works well in decks such as Bant and RUG which can have a "oops I win" top deck with Natural Order. However, the nature both ANT and Reanimator as linear strategies means the deck should be as streamlined as possible toward whatever the deck is trying to do (Storm out or Reanimate). Attempting to combine the two only means you are detracting from the overall goal of the other. A specific example of this is that you are running three reanimate targets in the maindeck. However, these cards all have such a high mana cost that it makes flipping with Ad Nauseam simply terrible. Theoretically, you could cast them if you generated enough mana and had a Lion's Eye Diamond (for the white creatures), but that seems underwhelming and inefficient relative to dedicating the deck to one strategy or another.

    The problem reanimate strategies had to overcome was the with the lack of Mystical Tutor, the deck had to slightly increase the creature count because it meant you had to rely on Careful Study instead of eight virtual copies of Entomb. If you're really set on this strategy, I would suggest something like this:

    Land (15)
    2x Island
    2x Swamp
    2x Underground Sea
    4x Polluted Delta
    1x Flooded Strand
    1x Misty Rainforest
    1x Scalding Tarn
    1x Bloodstained Mire
    1x Verdant Catacombs

    Mana Acceleration (16)
    4x Lotus Petal
    4x Lion's Eye Diamond
    4x Dark Ritual
    4x Cabal Ritual

    Disruption (7)
    4x Thoughtseize
    3x Duress

    Tutors (6)
    4x Infernal Tutor
    2x Entomb

    Engine (2)
    1x Ad Nauseam
    1x Ill-Gotten Gains

    Win Condition (1)
    1x Tendrils of Agony

    Cantrips (13)
    4x Brainstorm
    4x Careful Study
    4x Ponder
    1x Preordain

    Sideboard
    x2 Entomb
    x4 Reanimate
    x4 Exhume
    5 Creatures

    The maindeck puts a heavier emphasis on the Storm portion of the deck. Careful Study can function fine as a cantrip. The fact that it draws you two cards can actually be powerful. Entomb, at worst, can be a one B spell that puts two cards to your graveyard to allow the deck to reach Threshold faster to enable Cabal Ritual. At its best, Entomb can be used to create some interesting interactions with Ill-Gotten Gains. There are five slots in the sideboard which are to be used for the reanimate creature package. Sideboard would look something like this:

    In
    2 Entomb
    4 Exhume
    4 Reanimate
    5 Creatures

    Out
    1 Ad Nauseam
    1 Ill-Gotten Gains
    1 Tendrils of Agony
    1 Preordain
    4 Cabal Ritual
    4 Lotus Petal
    3 Others

    The Storm engine comes out (3). The extra Preordain (1) isn't necessary since post board you have eight reanimate spells and twelve ways to put creatures into the graveyard along with twelve cantrips (as opposed to only 4 Infernal Tutor). Cabal Ritual (4) is too slow at two mana since you can just put a creature into the yard turn one and reanimate turn two. Lotus Petal (4), while potentially enabling some fast draws, is way to much of a dead draw in most situations. The last three slots are somewhat in contention between Dark Ritual and Lion's Eye Diamond. Ritual allows turn on Reanimates and can also help to pay for taxing counters. Lion'sy Eye Diamond functions as another discard outlet (albeit requiring some work) and can also allow you to use a Hellbent Infernal Tutor to dig for a Reanimate spell. I would suggest -1 Lion's Eye Diamond and -2 Cabal Ritual.


    Quote Originally Posted by honestabe View Post
    I haven't played this deck since the banning of Mystical Tutor, but I tried everything imaginable against Counterbalance. I found the best way to beat it was Krosan Grips, bobs, and thoughtseizes out of the board, and a lot of practice. I probably played the ANT vs CB MU for 3-4 hours a day every day (college heh). It got to the point where I would beat any CB player who didn't test against extensively against ANT, and my testing partner actually never lost to ANT in any tournament.
    What lead you the Grip, Thoughtseize, Bob conclusion relative to the other options such as more Ad Nauseam/Tendrils or Doomsday out of the board?

  16. #3216
    Member

    Join Date

    Sep 2009
    Location

    Michigan, US
    Posts

    373

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Preparing for Countertop, a Guide for Being Evil
    You can expect this disruption package from CounterTop decks:
    4 Counterbalance
    4 Force of Will
    2 Counterspell
    2 Spell Snare
    2 Vendillion Clique

    Which they find using:
    4 Sensei's Diving Top
    4 Brainstorm

    Additionally, you can expect the following out of the board:
    2 Pyroblast / Red Elemental Blast
    2 Spell Pierce

    The curve will generally feature:
    22 lands (zero drops)
    12+ one drops
    10+ two drops
    5+ three drops
    2-4 four drops
    4-6 five drops

    Some builds may be packing more.

    Their primary offense will be either Tarmogoyf or Stoneforge Mystic.

  17. #3217
    Member

    Join Date

    Sep 2009
    Location

    Michigan, US
    Posts

    373

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    I think this is my first double-post ever.

  18. #3218

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by honestabe View Post
    I haven't played this deck since the banning of Mystical Tutor, but I tried everything imaginable against Counterbalance. I found the best way to beat it was Krosan Grips, bobs, and thoughtseizes out of the board, and a lot of practice. I probably played the ANT vs CB MU for 3-4 hours a day every day (college heh). It got to the point where I would beat any CB player who didn't test against extensively against ANT, and my testing partner actually never lost to ANT in any tournament.
    You sir, need to compile a small article and give us some pointers! I am going into ANT for the next season of Legacy and I could use some friendly suggestions.

  19. #3219

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Is there a general consensus on what a counterbalance lists will look like now? From what I can remember, the dominate archetypes prior to its decline where NO Bant & UW/UWr/UWb Thopter Sword. I found the article the Hatfields wrote on the metagame trends prior to the printing of Mental Misstep. It would seem that Counterbalance had been trending down in the prior months. If the metagame reverts back to where it was in May, it is possible that counterbalance will be a poor choice.

    I believe the presences of Junk/Zoo decks (especially with Green Sun's Zenith) and Merfolk decks will help to curb the potentially resurgence of counterbalance decks. Another outlier deck in Goblins may also see a resurgence which would contribute to the curbing of this resurgence as well. While I think the banning of Mental Misstep has help counterbalance decks. However, I do not necessarily think they can overcome some of the other decks in the format. I think we'll see traditional control players either moving toward counterbalance or Stoneblade decks; what they decide will likely be determined by which of those decks posts better win percentages against Mefolk, Junk, Zoo and Bant/RUG decks. I believe Stoneblade may still be a better choice against the field. While the combo match up is important, combo also represents a small percentage of the metagame. This means the match up percentages against the aforementioned will likely be the determining factor. The X-Factor for Stoneblade will be how much Mental Misstep actually contributed to the Zoo/Junk/Merfolk/RUG(Bant) match ups.

  20. #3220
    Like a man bear, just more pig like
    NesretepNoj's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2009
    Location

    Aarhus, Denmark
    Posts

    105

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by Fossil4182 View Post
    Is there a general consensus on what a counterbalance lists will look like now?
    As long as they don't contain Stifle/Wasteland (like Dreadstill), we can always go back to Doomsday/Emrakul transformational sideboard.

    With regard to how the lists will look like, I think they'll go in three directions: Tom Martell style Four Colour Counterbalance, Barnello style Uw Stonforge Thopter and ProBant. The first two will probably attract former StoneBlade/NO RUG players, given that the meta indeed will become favourable for CounterTop decks

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)