Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 100

Thread: GP Amsterdam Top 8

  1. #61
    explosive
    Adan's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Location

    Germany - RLP
    Posts

    855

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    Quote Originally Posted by Admiral_Arzar View Post
    As a Tide player, I'm aware of what Iona does to the deck, bro. I'm pretty sure that's not the only factor, as it wasn't like the whole field was ReAnimator and Dredge.
    Yeah, it was also full of decks that were prepared for Combo decks. Stoneblade and Bant can both play Meddling Mage and/or Ethersworn Canonist.

    GW plays Gaddok Teeg which they can fetch with Zenith (okay, rather irrelevant against Hightide as it just shuts off Turnabout and BSZ) and Ethersworn Canonist which they can fetch with Enlightened Tutor since every GW deck plays a E-Tutor-Toolbox in their SB.
    Aggrocontrols like Candian Thresh are not a favourable matchup for Springtide and all the deck can play Surgical Extraction für additional disruption.

    With this aspect AND Hightide being the slowest combodeck atm, I am not worried why Hightide has not performed very well. I also think that Springtide is the mlst inconsistent deck in view of deck design. There are people that play with Candelabra, others play Snapcasters and Snaps, some people play without Meditate, some people think a singleton Timespiral in their deck is enough etc.

    And some of these lists have it more or less easier than the others to deal with a certain problem and/or have different fizzle-rates.
    There is no stock list and no build that has established itself to be "the best" Springtide.

    Ah, and to add fuel to the debate a few pages before: Some people still suck at casting their Brainstorms well-timed. ;-P
    Team SPOD
    <Der_imaginäre_Freund> props:
    Adan for being the NQG God (drawer)

  2. #62
    Site Contributor
    Admiral_Arzar's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2010
    Location

    Denver, CO
    Posts

    1,289

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    Quote Originally Posted by Adan View Post
    Yeah, it was also full of decks that were prepared for Combo decks. Stoneblade and Bant can both play Meddling Mage and/or Ethersworn Canonist.

    GW plays Gaddok Teeg which they can fetch with Zenith (okay, rather irrelevant against Hightide as it just shuts off Turnabout and BSZ) and Ethersworn Canonist which they can fetch with Enlightened Tutor since every GW deck plays a E-Tutor-Toolbox in their SB.
    Aggrocontrols like Candian Thresh are not a favourable matchup for Springtide and all the deck can play Surgical Extraction für additional disruption.

    With this aspect AND Hightide being the slowest combodeck atm, I am not worried why Hightide has not performed very well. I also think that Springtide is the mlst inconsistent deck in view of deck design. There are people that play with Candelabra, others play Snapcasters and Snaps, some people play without Meditate, some people think a singleton Timespiral in their deck is enough etc.

    And some of these lists have it more or less easier than the others to deal with a certain problem and/or have different fizzle-rates.
    There is no stock list and no build that has established itself to be "the best" Springtide.

    Ah, and to add fuel to the debate a few pages before: Some people still suck at casting their Brainstorms well-timed. ;-P
    Large amounts of combo preparation I can understand. In terms of Canadian thresh (and other non-black tempo decks), I actually find that matchup to be favorable, even with Surgical Extractions coming in post-board. It's when blue decks start packing Hymns or Spellslutter Sprites en mass (or Counterbalance, of course) that I have problems.
    Last edited by Admiral_Arzar; 10-25-2011 at 04:36 PM. Reason: Spelling fail.
    Lord of the Chalice

    Quote Originally Posted by Julian23 View Post
    Since playing against Spiral Tide provides a lot fun for both players is something only someone who's not had sex for quite a while could enjoy, I pull out GW Maverick.
    Quote Originally Posted by Brainstorm Ape View Post
    Spikes are supposed to enjoy winning by leveraging their talents, but this card can't fetch the most SKILL INTENSIVE card in all of Magic?

    Clearly aimed at Modern plebs, not gonna be a pillar of our format.
    Stompy Discord: https://discord.gg/6cesvkz

  3. #63
    Site Contributor
    Esper3k's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2008
    Location

    Houston, TX
    Posts

    2,057

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    Quote Originally Posted by rukcus View Post
    I just hope tons of Merfolk show up to attack the blue decks, nothing is more rewarding that frying Fish with SoFI. :grin:
    Or stick 'em with the fork!

    I always say that the best defense against Merfolk is not playing Islands...

  4. #64

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    Interesting that a Counterbalance deck won the GP. Any thoughts on that? Did he simply get lucky with the matchups or what?

  5. #65
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    Quote Originally Posted by DragoFireheart View Post
    Interesting that a Counterbalance deck won the GP. Any thoughts on that? Did he simply get lucky with the matchups or what?
    Did you mean SCG? Calasso won the SCGBaltimore event with CB RUG, while Pierre Sommen won with Bant Aggro. UW Counterbalance did make 8th place at the GP though.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  6. #66

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    Quote Originally Posted by rukcus View Post
    Did you mean SCG? Calasso won the SCGBaltimore event with CB RUG, while Pierre Sommen won with Bant Aggro. UW Counterbalance did make 8th place at the GP though.
    Oh my bad, I meant the SCGBaltimore event.

  7. #67

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    Quote Originally Posted by DragoFireheart View Post
    Interesting that a Counterbalance deck won the GP. Any thoughts on that? Did he simply get lucky with the matchups or what?
    An active Counterbalance is quite good against other blue decks and is of course good versus many combo decks, so those are reasons to include it. Furthermore, hate for the card (in the form of EE and Grip) has largely disappeared because who plays Counterbalance? In a field as dominated by blue as this one I can see wanting a mid- to late-game trump card. His deck looks a little like a format relic, but Legacy might just be homogenous enough right now to justify control decks.

    Also, the Counterbalance deck was in eighth.

  8. #68

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    I think it is save to say that although it is quite obvious with 12% being the average for your so called "entrance" %. A simpler way looking at this would be to take a deck like TA and see that it tripled its metagame relevance for day 2. The same factor can be observed between 12% being the average (keeping the level of metagame relevance like Elves) and 36% for TA which is trice as much. Translating that:

    Tripled or more then tripled metagame presence during the tournament:
    Team America
    Canadian Threshold
    Bant

    So these decks did extremely well and there is a wide gap until it is followed by decks that slightly
    increased their metgame presence like:

    Dredge
    UW Stoneforge
    Maverick
    Ad Nauseam Tendrils

    From decks that stayed more or less indifferent to the metagame:
    Elves -- 10.82%
    Goblins -- 10.80%

    To decks that were reduced in presence:
    Sneak Attack
    Reanimator
    Merfolk

    To decks that obviously were a bad to crappy choice
    UB Snapcaster Control -- 6.20%
    Doomsday -- 5.36%
    Zoo -- 4.82%
    BUG -- 3.61%
    High Tide -- 2.68%
    Burn -- 2.17%
    Junk -- 1.79%

    Also I agree with the basic trend observed Combo > Aggro and Aggro Control > Combo for this tournament.

  9. #69
    In response: Snapcaster Mage
    catmint's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2011
    Posts

    923

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    How did they make the cut between BUG and TA?
    the 3 "TA" decks in the top 32 run 23 lands+ and I would call them BUG (altough 1 is running 3 Stifle).

    I think they messed these thats up... this is why TA is so high and BUG so low...

  10. #70

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    Quote Originally Posted by Aggro_zombies View Post
    Because they hate you.

    And in other news, tempo decks and Bant midrange continue to be really strong choices. If the amount of combo starts to go down after this GP, the format will probably diversify more, but as long as people think that MMS being banned means combo is suddenly the bestest thing ever, blue will continue to be a strong choice. Hopefully in the next few months we'll see a surge in anti-blue strategies that are typically vulnerable to combo decks (though it's hard to say because Legacy is starting to suffer from a lot of the groupthink and herd mentality that Standard has in terms of deckbuilding and deck choice).
    Well a big problem is that blue can plug the holes in their strategy by splashing a few cards from other colors. Goblins and Zoo don't really cut it anymore against blue. That leaves just GW because it can beat aggro-control decks, mostly because it can win Goyf/Knight standoffs.
    Last edited by ddt15; 10-30-2011 at 09:36 AM.
    Needs more goyfs.

  11. #71
    Salt of the earth

    Join Date

    May 2009
    Location

    Canada
    Posts

    4,685

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    I mainly dislike how the format has sped up since MM got banned. I do like more diversity, but still...

    -Matt

  12. #72

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    Sure, they *could* ban Brainstorm. In most cases, it would be replaced by Preordain, then in a year, we can start to hear bitching about how broken Preordain is, and how it needs to be banned. Just because Brainstorm is the best at what it does doesn't mean it's broken.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sims View Post
    On a more constructive note: Anything can be funny, even if it is about rape.
    TIME POLICE

  13. #73
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2010
    Location

    Japan
    Posts

    369

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    Quote Originally Posted by honestabe View Post
    Sure, they *could* ban Brainstorm. In most cases, it would be replaced by Preordain, then in a year, we can start to hear bitching about how broken Preordain is, and how it needs to be banned. Just because Brainstorm is the best at what it does doesn't mean it's broken.
    I recall someone once telling me that Brainstorm is insane because it basically "undoes" a mulligan, and that comment stuck with me. The card, when you pair it with a shuffle effect, is a level of card selection that I wouldn't be wholly opposed to calling unfair. And that's not even delving into using the "put two on top" part to hide cards from disruption/shuffle back cards you need in-deck and not in hand. I wouldn't call it broken, but Preordain isn't even comparable, in my mind. It's not just the best at what it does--what other card functions mechanically like Brainstorm?

  14. #74
    Member

    Join Date

    Sep 2010
    Location

    Warsaw, Poland
    Posts

    548

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    There is a big difference between Brainstorm and other cantrips, BS changes 3 cards, other ones changes 1..

  15. #75
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Italy, Eternal
    Posts

    1,848

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    Quote Originally Posted by Fatal View Post
    There is a big difference between Brainstorm and other cantrips, BS changes 3 cards, other ones changes 1..
    The big point is also that being an instant make discard so much weaker. Especially against combo/control.

  16. #76
    Folk Punk Pirate
    spirit of the wretch's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2007
    Location

    Mannheim, Germany
    Posts

    3,951

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    Quote Originally Posted by Namida View Post
    It's not just the best at what it does--what other card functions mechanically like Brainstorm?
    Dream Cache
    Survivor of the Unseen
    Sneaky Pirates of Doom - Not really a Legacy Team anymore.

  17. #77
    Member

    Join Date

    Oct 2004
    Location

    Earth
    Posts

    112

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    And Conch Horn.

    But why are we having this discussion - why now? Brainstorm is played in control and combo decks and in some aggro-control decks with blue, and it is truly excellent at what it does, but at a cost. There is a reason why aggro decks don't play Brainstorm - even blue aggro decks like Merfolk don't play it, not even Merfolk versions with fetchlands, because it is too slow for this strategy. Unlike, say Mental Misstep which was played in almost every competitive deck there was - control, combo, and aggro alike.

  18. #78
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Italy, Eternal
    Posts

    1,848

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    Quote Originally Posted by Hof View Post
    And Conch Horn.

    But why are we having this discussion - why now? Brainstorm is played in control and combo decks and in some aggro-control decks with blue, and it is truly excellent at what it does, but at a cost. There is a reason why aggro decks don't play Brainstorm - even blue aggro decks like Merfolk don't play it, not even Merfolk versions with fetchlands, because it is too slow for this strategy. Unlike, say Mental Misstep which was played in almost every competitive deck there was - control, combo, and aggro alike.
    Actually brainstorm was the reason Blue Zoo existed in the first place. That and MM. And now that and Delver of secrets.

  19. #79
    Member

    Join Date

    Oct 2004
    Location

    Earth
    Posts

    112

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    Quote Originally Posted by Gheizen64 View Post
    Actually brainstorm was the reason Blue Zoo existed in the first place. That and MM. And now that and Delver of secrets.
    Blue Zoo can hardly be categorized as a Zoo deck, it is much more like Threshold. In fact, Blue Zoo and Ugr Threshold has converged so much that they are practically the same deck now. The only real difference between the two is the amount of stifle/wasteland contra burn.

  20. #80

    Re: GP Amsterdam Top 8

    Quote Originally Posted by honestabe View Post
    Sure, they *could* ban Brainstorm. In most cases, it would be replaced by Preordain, then in a year, we can start to hear bitching about how broken Preordain is, and how it needs to be banned. Just because Brainstorm is the best at what it does doesn't mean it's broken.
    The term broken is absurd; but as it turns out it is far more powerful than other banned cards.

    Also, you should check out the following topics:

    Sorceries

    and

    Instants.

    Because if you don't see why Brainstorm is head and shoulders above the other U-trips (assuming the ubiquity of fetchlands) then you probably don't have an informed opinion on the subject.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)