View Poll Results: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

Voters
507. You may not vote on this poll
  • No

    398 78.50%
  • Yes

    109 21.50%
Page 18 of 27 FirstFirst ... 8141516171819202122 ... LastLast
Results 341 to 360 of 540

Thread: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

  1. #341
    Member

    Join Date

    Jun 2004
    Location

    Madison, WI
    Posts

    1,601

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    Quote Originally Posted by TheInfamousBearAssassin View Post
    Given that those highly predictable decks make up an ever-increasing percentage of the top tables, verging on 70+%, and still outperform themselves, this seems like an optimistic expectation.

    Hulk-Flash builds that won on turn 0 were garbage btw and could never manage anywhere near 50% but that's neither here nor there.
    I'd have to disagree. Hulk-Flash builds that were Legacy legal that won on turn 0 were too inconsistent. Once you started throwing Pacts into the mix, it got a lot better. I still wouldn't say it would be anywhere near 50% (probably closer to 30%). Testing it with Pacts reminded me of Dragon in T1 before they restricted Entomb.
    Quote Originally Posted by Draener View Post
    You know who thinks it's sweet to play against 8 different decks in an 8 round tournament? People who don't like to win, or people that play combo. This is not EDH; Legacy is a competitive environment, and it should reward skill - more so than it does.
    Quote Originally Posted by Borealis View Post
    Plow their Mom every chance you get!

  2. #342
    jungle lion, good?...
    paeng4983's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2010
    Location

    Isla de luzón de filipinas
    Posts

    438

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    No, not Brainstorm pls.
    TJB

    http://deartiyopaeng.blogspot.com/ <---- (updated) MTG related blog. ^_^

    TES: 102nd out of 2000 players at GP Kyoto 2015 (Legacy)

    UR Storm: 37th of 950 players at GP Guangzhou 2016 (Modern)

  3. #343
    Living in an area where no one plays Legacy
    Raider Bob's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2003
    Posts

    703

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    No, because I have never scooped to someone casting Brainstorm.
    Major Deck Projects
    Deck 2012: Angel Walk
    Deck 2009: Tombstone
    Deck 2007: Exploration Crucible:
    Deck 2005:Bob the Belcher:

  4. #344
    Administrator
    Zilla's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2003
    Location

    Portland, OR
    Posts

    5,532

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    Quote Originally Posted by TheInfamousBearAssassin View Post
    The point is that what is meant by "diversity" differs. Vintage might look diverse to Vintage players, but most other people disagree. Clearly some people think a format full of decks that all run Brainstorm + Force can be diverse; I don't really agree with that either, especially when they're all just basically starting to look like Thresh.
    I'll grant you that BUG Control looks like Team America looks a little like RUG Tempo looks like Next Level Thresh, sure. But Zoo doesn't look like Thresh, and neither does Reanimator or Maverick or Merfolk or Dredge or ANT or even UW Stoneblade.

    The format has a very high amount of diverse tier 1 decks right now, many of which do not resemble Thresh at all. Granted, a lot of winning decks played in recent SCG tournaments look like Thresh, but again, there's no compelling evidence to suggest that this is anything other than a trend like any other, and one which will naturally self correct over time.

    Until the format is generally unfun to play, displays a great lack of diversity, or requires very little skill to play, why are we discussing bans on anything at all?

  5. #345
    Member

    Join Date

    Sep 2008
    Location

    Santiago, Chile
    Posts

    58

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    Quote Originally Posted by Raider Bob View Post
    No, because I have never scooped to someone casting Brainstorm.

    The biggest lie that Brainstorm is selling the players is that he doesn't win the game.

  6. #346
    Administrator
    Zilla's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2003
    Location

    Portland, OR
    Posts

    5,532

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    Quote Originally Posted by sligh16 View Post
    The biggest lie that Brainstorm is selling the players is that he doesn't win the game.
    No one ever suggested that Brainstorm doesn't help win the game, but it is not, in and of itself, a threat or even an answer. A single Stifle or Wasteland or Hymn can singlehandedly win some games, but Brainstorm on its own never ever has. Brainstorm is only as strong as the other cards in your deck.

    What Raider Bob said is neither incorrect nor dishonest in the slightest; no one has ever scooped to a Brainstorm.

  7. #347
    All the copies target you.
    thefringthing's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2011
    Location

    Kitchener, Ontario
    Posts

    574

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    It wins you the game sometimes when you have Lab Man in play...
    "I'm willing to imagine a TES where Past in Flames replaces Ill-Gotten Gains entirely, and we just don't play Diminishing Returns." - me, 29/09/2011
    Founding member of Team Scrubbad: Legacy Legends

  8. #348
    Taobotmox

    Join Date

    Sep 2005
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    781

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    Quote Originally Posted by Zilla View Post
    No one ever suggested that Brainstorm doesn't help win the game, but it is not, in and of itself, a threat or even an answer. A single Stifle or Wasteland or Hymn can singlehandedly win some games, but Brainstorm on its own never ever has. Brainstorm is only as strong as the other cards in your deck.

    What Raider Bob said is neither incorrect nor dishonest in the slightest; no one has ever scooped to a Brainstorm.
    Great. So let's unban the five Beta Moxes, Recall and Black Lotus, too. They also only help win the game, but they are not, in and of theirselves, a threat or even an answer.
    Or - let's not do that and look at the card's power level and impact on the format instead. What Raider Bob has said might have not been dishonest or incorrect, but it certainly was completely irrelevant.

  9. #349

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    Quote Originally Posted by Tao View Post
    Great. So let's unban the five Beta Moxes, Recall and Black Lotus, too. They also only help win the game, but they are not, in and of theirselves, a threat or even an answer.
    Or - let's not do that and look at the card's power level and impact on the format instead. What Raider Bob has said might have not been dishonest or incorrect, but it certainly was completely irrelevant.
    Stop being ridiculous!

    Moxes and Lotus are mana accelerants. Brainstorm is not.

    Ancestral Recall indeed wins you games. Brainstorm does not.

    Your argument is not well thought through. Itīs quite relevant if a card wins games. Itīs part of its power level.

  10. #350
    (' ' '\( 0 ,o)/''')
    TheInfamousBearAssassin's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2004
    Location

    Northern Virginia
    Posts

    6,709

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    What on Earth do you mean by saying that Ancestral Recall wins games, and Brainstorm doesn't?
    For my confessions, they burned me with fire/
    And found I was for endurance made

  11. #351

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    Quote Originally Posted by TRS-Jo View Post
    Stop being ridiculous!

    Moxes and Lotus are mana accelerants. Brainstorm is not.

    Ancestral Recall indeed wins you games. Brainstorm does not.

    Your argument is not well thought through. Itīs quite relevant if a card wins games. Itīs part of its power level.
    Hint: Vintage players used to refer to Brainstorm as the Ancestral nobody knew to counter.
    Art Gallery: www.vegeta2711.deviantart.com

    For those saying you should win a tournament before calling people retarded, well, I did win one. And you guys are retarded.
    Kyle Boddy, re: legacy players, Winner of SCG Seattle 5k

  12. #352

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    Ancestral Recall creates Card Advantage. Brainstorm does not create Card Advantage.

    So regarding the ability to win:
    Ancestral Recall is like the size of the moon
    Brainstorm is like the size of an elephant

    So if we look at it in this scale, then the moon is huge, elephants are not huge.
    Therefore I say Ancestral Recall wins games, Brainstorm does not.

    I do not say that there are no scenarios where Brainstorm can be the card that decides whether to win or lose a game. Many unbanned cards can take that role. But in comparison to cards that really win you the game and do this quite regularly, Brainstorm does not.

    @Artowis: Whatīs the point of your post? In a vast majority of cases Brainstorm isnīt worth a Force of Will or Mana Drain (but maybe a Misstep or a Flusterstorm, if you consider these counterspells post-Brainstorm as "dead cards").

  13. #353

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    Quote Originally Posted by TheInfamousBearAssassin View Post
    What on Earth do you mean by saying that Ancestral Recall wins games, and Brainstorm doesn't?
    Becouse Recall gives huge card advantage and Brainstorm doesn't?

  14. #354
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Italy, Eternal
    Posts

    1,848

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    Quote Originally Posted by Birkardo View Post
    Becouse Recall gives huge card advantage and Brainstorm doesn't?
    Under this assumption, every tutor is bad. Card advantage isn't the only kind advantage that matters, card quality also does. To be fair, i'd consider card quality more important than raw card advantage in most cases.

    And no, i'm not implying that ancestral is worse than Brainstorm since the best card quality brainstorm can provide is exactly the same as ancestral. It would be interesting to debate where a digging effect is considered equivalent to a pure card drawing spell, but this isn't the place.

  15. #355

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    Quote Originally Posted by TRS-Jo View Post
    Ancestral Recall creates Card Advantage. Brainstorm does not create Card Advantage.
    Just because it doesn't lead to wins the same way, doesn't mean it won't lead to wins. Brainstorm creates virtual card advantage by allowing you to trade cards that are weak for ones that are strong. There are other virtual card advantage effects that are definitely potent enough to win games -- consider cards like Trinisphere,Doomsday or Demonic Tutor.

  16. #356
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Dec 2008
    Location

    Cambridge, MA
    Posts

    29

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    Quote Originally Posted by TRS-Jo View Post
    Ancestral Recall creates Card Advantage. Brainstorm does not create Card Advantage.

    So regarding the ability to win:
    Ancestral Recall is like the size of the moon
    Brainstorm is like the size of an elephant

    So if we look at it in this scale, then the moon is huge, elephants are not huge.
    Therefore I say Ancestral Recall wins games, Brainstorm does not.

    I do not say that there are no scenarios where Brainstorm can be the card that decides whether to win or lose a game. Many unbanned cards can take that role. But in comparison to cards that really win you the game and do this quite regularly, Brainstorm does not.

    @Artowis: Whatīs the point of your post? In a vast majority of cases Brainstorm isnīt worth a Force of Will or Mana Drain (but maybe a Misstep or a Flusterstorm, if you consider these counterspells post-Brainstorm as "dead cards").
    This is just stupid.

    You could say every card wins and loses games. The impact on a game's outcome Ancestral Recall and Brainstorm have is dependent upon the relevance of the cards they find you (I suppose Recall also decreases library size by 2 additional cards, but I doubt this has very much impact in most Eternal games). Recall is obviously going to have more impact on average, but how much better it is than Brainstorm will vary from metagame to metagame. When a large portion of your games end early and come down to simply resolving a specific card (maybe Yawgmoth's Will, Oath of Druids, Ad Nauseam or Counterbalance) then Brainstorm probably isn't all that far behind Ancestral - not that this comparison even matters since this thread is just about Brainstorm in Legacy.

    I would like to see the data and analysis you have to support the claim that 'In a vast majority of cases Brainstorm isnīt worth a Force of Will or Mana Drain.'
    Last edited by ColeM; 12-07-2011 at 09:02 AM. Reason: spelling

  17. #357
    Lets be freaks...
    NecroYawgmoth's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2007
    Location

    Mettmann
    Posts

    339

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    No one ever suggested that Brainstorm doesn't help win the game, but it is not, in and of itself, a threat or even an answer. A single Stifle or Wasteland or Hymn can singlehandedly win some games, but Brainstorm on its own never ever has. Brainstorm is only as strong as the other cards in your deck.
    Ancestral Recall indeed wins you games. Brainstorm does not.
    That Brainstorm can find you the same gamewinning cards [Stifle/Wasteland/Hymn/whatever] what Ancestral could also find. Brainstorm is truly a strong card, and actually HAS the ability to decide games, because of the +3draw at instantspeed.I really can see the comparsion between Brainstorm and Ancestral Recall regarding power levels.

    Card advantage isn't the only kind advantage that matters, card quality also does. To be fair, i'd consider card quality more important than raw card advantage in most cases.

    And no, i'm not implying that ancestral is worse than Brainstorm since the best card quality brainstorm can provide is exactly the same as ancestral. It would be interesting to debate where a digging effect is considered equivalent to a pure card drawing spell, but this isn't the place.
    +1
    Quote Originally Posted by Tacosnape View Post
    Kenjawn, Mutator of Cells
    :16: - (See, now Erratic Explosion's a deck)
    Legendary Creature - Horror
    Haste, Hexproof, Double Strike, Trample
    Kenjawn, Mutator of Cells is indestructible.
    Permanents you control can't be sacrificed or copied.
    Whenever Kenjawn, Mutator of Cells attacks, defending player gets liver cancer (This effect doesn't end at end of turn.)
    13/13

  18. #358

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    Those saying Brainstorm doesn't win games probably haven't won games with it.

    2011 Grand Prix Amsterdam Day 2 Blog
    Two life remaining. No cards in play. Christof Kovacs needed a miracle. He needed an instant kill, he needed his Hive Mind and a Pact, but he also needed a Show and Tell because on 2 life he couldn't afford to use his Ancient Tomb for mana.

    The odds of having those cards were astronomical. The odds of casting Brainstorm and seeing all three of the cards you needed were even higher.

    But it's what happening. Ripping victory out of the ashes of defeat, Christof Kovacs cast Show and Tell, deployed his Hive Mind, and played a Summoner's Pact!

    Christof Kovacs 2 – 1 Bas Melis
    Brainstorm wins game in a lot of decks not just with Lab Maniac. Consider Doomsday/ANT/TES/High Tide. Even Ponder wins games.

    Finals: Alix Hatfield vs. Eli Kassis
    Alix played High Tide, a land, and a Ponder. He began calculating how he would put together a win in this position, and step one involved shuffling his library following a Ponder. Alix peeled the top card of the deck, and the room quaked as everyone exclaimed—Time Spiral had put Alix suddenly and violently back into the game.

    Eli 1, Alix 2
    Counterbalance without top in play can win with Brainstorm when game breaking plays are on the line. Only those with experience winning with the card understands this.
    Quote Originally Posted by GoblinSettler View Post
    Jesus H Cardsheet died for your NFC sins.

  19. #359
    Site Contributor
    Admiral_Arzar's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2010
    Location

    Denver, CO
    Posts

    1,289

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    Quote Originally Posted by TheInfamousBearAssassin View Post
    What on Earth do you mean by saying that Ancestral Recall wins games, and Brainstorm doesn't?
    He means that he's straw-manning like a motherfucker, because if you have a shuffle effect, Brainstorm often does basically the same thing. The difference is Recall doesn't need a shuffle effect, and if all the cards are good you get to keep them. They are both restricted in vintage for a reason.

    Quote Originally Posted by death View Post
    Those saying Brainstorm doesn't win games probably haven't won games with it.

    Brainstorm wins game in a lot of decks not just with Lab Maniac. Consider Doomsday/ANT/TES/High Tide. Even Ponder wins games.

    Only those with experience winning with the card understands this.
    Brainstorm probably wins me more games than any other card when I'm playing combo, excepting the occasional hilarious topdeck (Oh look, a Time Spiral, I guess I win now...).
    Lord of the Chalice

    Quote Originally Posted by Julian23 View Post
    Since playing against Spiral Tide provides a lot fun for both players is something only someone who's not had sex for quite a while could enjoy, I pull out GW Maverick.
    Quote Originally Posted by Brainstorm Ape View Post
    Spikes are supposed to enjoy winning by leveraging their talents, but this card can't fetch the most SKILL INTENSIVE card in all of Magic?

    Clearly aimed at Modern plebs, not gonna be a pillar of our format.
    Stompy Discord: https://discord.gg/6cesvkz

  20. #360
    Member
    joemauer's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2011
    Location

    Louisiana
    Posts

    683

    Re: Ban on Brainstorm: Yes or No (Post Snapcaster Mage)

    Why are wasting our time debating whether brainstorm is broken or not?
    Three cards drawn for one mana at instant speed is clearly broken. Irregardless of the drawback which is small.

    Does brainstorm need to be banned because it is broken?

    If you answered yes then that opens a whole can of worms. Legacy is full of broken cards so what will be banned next?
    Artifact that produces three mana of any color?
    Free spells?
    A land almost as good as strip mine?
    Cards banned in other formats like stoneforge and jace?
    6/7 creature for two mana?
    Artifact that can pump out creatures for free every turn?
    Tutors like entomb and enlightened?

    So much brokeness in Legacy, but these are the pillars of Legacy. Take one down and there will be need of discussion to take another down.

    Force of Will + Brainstorm has always been a good stategy in Legacy. Why does Snapcaster make it in need of banning? Maybe Snapcaster Mage might be more broken?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)