Page 53 of 104 FirstFirst ... 34349505152535455565763103 ... LastLast
Results 1,041 to 1,060 of 2076

Thread: [DTB] Sneak Attack

  1. #1041
    Member
    The Colonel's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2011
    Location

    A little place called None of Your Damn Business
    Posts

    10

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    So we've been talking about grave hate against Reanimator and Dredge. I've gone back to an old reliable from when WotC first unbanned entomb and I've started running Faerie Macabre and I've gone back to that for Reanimator and I've loved it. Can't counter it, can't respond to it and IT'S FREE. So I've gone to that for Reanimator and it's worked perfectly. I don't like the cage because it just seems spotty at best and has none of the advantages against reanimator that the Faerie has. For Dredge I like Pyroclasm to take care of Zombie tokens. So anyways that's my 2 cents.

  2. #1042
    Member
    bfeingersh's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2011
    Location

    Boston, MA
    Posts

    326

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    Faerie Macabre is a real pain in the ass to play around from reanimator's perspective.

  3. #1043
    Member
    bfeingersh's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2011
    Location

    Boston, MA
    Posts

    326

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    Quote Originally Posted by rxavage View Post
    LOL, I played horrible yesterday and I faced 1 control and 6 combo decks 3 of which were elves, I had never played against before, and all of them could hardcast their Emmy somehow every turn after I would drop mine. Played a forgemaster deck and got mind slavered twice and he just drew me cards with griselbrand. I had enough counters to beat to U/w control deck I played against but I misplayed bad. I won't be making the same mistakes next week. Daze I found practically useless. Echoing truth saved my as in 2 matches and pyroclasms are going back in the board.
    I played against

    Hulk Rebirth/NO (2-1)
    Aggro Loam (2-0)
    Bant Maverick (1-2) (Krondo9, made top 8)
    Aggro Loam (2-0)
    UW Miracles (1-2)
    UG Elves (2-1)
    Bant (1-2)

    My main was posted a couple pages back with the following sideboard:

    3 Relic of Progenitus
    3 Through the Breach
    3 Blood Moon
    2 Echoing Truth
    4 Leyline of Sanctity

    Sucks to lose to 2 guys who were in our car and play against a 3rd (Maverick, Miracles, Elves) but shit happens.

  4. #1044
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    I also played this deck at a Legacy side event at GP Anaheim, and a GPT on this last Saturday....

    Legacy side event:
    Dredge (2-0)
    Bant (0-2)
    Lands (2-0)
    Sneak Show (2-0)
    Elves (2-0)
    UW Terminator (2-0)
    UR Delver (1-2)

    Then again, GPT yesterday:
    Dredge (2-0)
    Elves (2-0)
    RUG Delver (2-0)
    ID for 2 rounds
    Top 8 - UW Cartel (2-0)... notice a theme?
    Top 4 - Maverick (2-1)
    Top 2 - Chopped the byes and Mox favorably, and I got the 3 byes to Atlanta. :D

    List from Saturday:

    4 Emrakul
    4 Griselbrand
    4 Show and Tell
    4 Sneak Attack

    4 Brainstorm
    4 Ponder
    2 Preordain
    2 Intuition

    4 Force of Will
    3 Misdirection
    2 Spell Pierce

    4 Lotus Petal
    7 fetches
    2 Volcanic Island
    3 Island
    1 Mountain
    3 Ancient Tomb
    3 City of Traitors

    Sideboard:
    4 Grafdigger's Cage
    3 Echoing Truth
    3 Pyroblast
    2 Pyroclasm
    3 Blood Moon

    So a grand total of 5 games lost over 14 rounds... Deck is fair.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  5. #1045
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2008
    Location

    Finland
    Posts

    112

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    Quote Originally Posted by Koby View Post
    I also played this deck at a Legacy side event at GP Anaheim, and a GPT on this last Saturday....

    Legacy side event:
    Dredge (2-0)
    Bant (0-2)
    Lands (2-0)
    Sneak Show (2-0)
    Elves (2-0)
    UW Terminator (2-0)
    UR Delver (1-2)

    Then again, GPT yesterday:
    Dredge (2-0)
    Elves (2-0)
    RUG Delver (2-0)
    ID for 2 rounds
    Top 8 - UW Cartel (2-0)... notice a theme?
    Top 4 - Maverick (2-1)
    Top 2 - Chopped the byes and Mox favorably, and I got the 3 byes to Atlanta. :D

    List from Saturday:

    4 Emrakul
    4 Griselbrand
    4 Show and Tell
    4 Sneak Attack

    4 Brainstorm
    4 Ponder
    2 Preordain
    2 Intuition

    4 Force of Will
    3 Misdirection
    2 Spell Pierce

    4 Lotus Petal
    7 fetches
    2 Volcanic Island
    3 Island
    1 Mountain
    3 Ancient Tomb
    3 City of Traitors

    Sideboard:
    4 Grafdigger's Cage
    3 Echoing Truth
    3 Pyroblast
    2 Pyroclasm
    3 Blood Moon

    So a grand total of 5 games lost over 14 rounds... Deck is fair.
    Congrats for byes! :) How were Cages working for you? It could be if you can counter their nature's claims and/or Chain of Vapor targeting Cage, you will be doing fine, since they arent. Were Pyroclasm enought vs. elves, rug and maveric? Or did you even side them in against rug, since there are lots of cards you could bring in against them.

  6. #1046
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    Quote Originally Posted by Atog View Post
    Congrats for byes! :) How were Cages working for you? It could be if you can counter their nature's claims and/or Chain of Vapor targeting Cage, you will be doing fine, since they arent. Were Pyroclasm enought vs. elves, rug and maveric? Or did you even side them in against rug, since there are lots of cards you could bring in against them.
    Cages are doing exactly what I need them to do: prevent losing in the first 1-3 turns while I assemble fatties into play. Pyroclasm is against Maverick, Elves, and rarely used against RUG - Pyroblast is just better here. You can ignore their creatures and bait out their soft counters. We playtested some matchups and if they counter all your spells, you're probably not winning (cantrips included). RUG might be a tough matchup due to this. Flusterstorm could improve that scenario.

    Pyroclasm is just better than Firespout because the goal isn't to kill Mongoose/Knight/Goyf. It's to kill hate-bears and destroy Elves.

    I very rarely go balls-deep with Show & Tell. I prefer to put down Sneak Attack from S&T often, because it ends up being faster (attack right now) and safer (no interaction). Sometimes, Sneak'ing Emrakul off the S&T/SA setup is more than enough to effectively win, even if you need to dig for another finisher later.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  7. #1047
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2008
    Location

    Finland
    Posts

    112

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    Quote Originally Posted by Koby View Post
    Cages are doing exactly what I need them to do: prevent losing in the first 1-3 turns while I assemble fatties into play. Pyroclasm is against Maverick, Elves, and rarely used against RUG - Pyroblast is just better here. You can ignore their creatures and bait out their soft counters. We playtested some matchups and if they counter all your spells, you're probably not winning (cantrips included). RUG might be a tough matchup due to this. Flusterstorm could improve that scenario.

    Pyroclasm is just better than Firespout because the goal isn't to kill Mongoose/Knight/Goyf. It's to kill hate-bears and destroy Elves.

    I very rarely go balls-deep with Show & Tell. I prefer to put down Sneak Attack from S&T often, because it ends up being faster (attack right now) and safer (no interaction). Sometimes, Sneak'ing Emrakul off the S&T/SA setup is more than enough to effectively win, even if you need to dig for another finisher later.
    So Cages are there just for buying some time, not being permanent answer.

    So you side in 6 cards vs. RUG (3 blood moon & 3 pyroblast?), what do you take out? Intuitions, Misdirection and cantrip?

    Were elves matchups close, since that should't be good matchup because they are usually just faster than us? Sideboard gives you two cards but that isn't that much if they won't show early enought or you don't get fast starts. So is that key in that match, mulligan aggressive to fast SaT or Sneak?

  8. #1048

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    Quote Originally Posted by The Colonel View Post
    So we've been talking about grave hate against Reanimator and Dredge. I've gone back to an old reliable from when WotC first unbanned entomb and I've started running Faerie Macabre and I've gone back to that for Reanimator and I've loved it. Can't counter it, can't respond to it and IT'S FREE. So I've gone to that for Reanimator and it's worked perfectly. I don't like the cage because it just seems spotty at best and has none of the advantages against reanimator that the Faerie has. For Dredge I like Pyroclasm to take care of Zombie tokens. So anyways that's my 2 cents.
    Cage is "spotty"? Cage locks them out of their game plan, cold.

    Faerie Macabre simply nerfs one re-animation spell.

    This is substantially less usefull in this match up, and across the board.

  9. #1049
    We are lost. We can never go home.
    Einherjer's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2011
    Location

    Noricum
    Posts

    1,475

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    Okay guys,

    there's always a point where a journey ends. My SneakAttack journey with all of you ends now. I sold all my Show and Tell-Stuff. All Enabelers, alls Creatures, all Enchantments, all Pacts. This is due to the B/R-Update in a few weeks. Even though I strongly believe that Show and Tell is not banworthy, I cannot say for sure what WotC does. I sent them the results of this poll in this forum with 25-75 for banning Show and Tell. I hope this helps to keep Show and Tell legal. I, for my part, cannot risk to lose 400€ at once. I wish all of you all the best, and keep putting up good results! Thanks for all the good discussions and conversations we had. May the force be with you.

    Greetings
    My articles here, here, here and here | My current list | Follow me on Twitter | Questions I answered.

  10. #1050

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    Quote Originally Posted by Philipp802 View Post
    Okay guys,

    there's always a point where a journey ends. My SneakAttack journey with all of you ends now. I sold all my Show and Tell-Stuff. All Enabelers, alls Creatures, all Enchantments, all Pacts. This is due to the B/R-Update in a few weeks. Even though I strongly believe that Show and Tell is not banworthy, I cannot say for sure what WotC does. I sent them the results of this poll in this forum with 25-75 for banning Show and Tell. I hope this helps to keep Show and Tell legal. I, for my part, cannot risk to lose 400€ at once. I wish all of you all the best, and keep putting up good results! Thanks for all the good discussions and conversations we had. May the force be with you.

    Greetings
    Oh man, i'm feel sorry! But there is something new, and even cheaper than sneak show. Look :
    http://sales.starcitygames.com//deck...p?DeckID=46648

    Deck can operate fine even without show and tell, because there are 8 other show and tells in deck . In case of baning S&T, intuition can be solid replacement, and you can play clique, leylines, krosan grip, blood moon, firespouts, trinispheres etc in sideboard.

  11. #1051
    We are lost. We can never go home.
    Einherjer's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2011
    Location

    Noricum
    Posts

    1,475

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    Haha thank you :P but expenses are not the measures I choose a Legacy-deck by. Ill play the decks listed down there in my sig, but it was the unsureness about SnT getting banned or not, that forced me to make that switch..

    Greetings
    My articles here, here, here and here | My current list | Follow me on Twitter | Questions I answered.

  12. #1052
    Member
    JPA's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2011
    Location

    Berlin, Germany
    Posts

    260

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    I don't get it... Why sell everything based on an assumption that has a very low probability of actually happening??

    If you are 25:75 sure they don't ban it, why sell all of it right now? Did you need the money instantly?

  13. #1053
    Resident Proctologist
    DrHealex's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2008
    Location

    Muncie, Indiana
    Posts

    142

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    Well selling it off right now and then picking them up after the banning annoucement simply gives him an inconvenience picking them back up if they don't get banned (since its doubtful the price will go any higher between then). I for one have faith in Wizards not banning anything that isn't a problem.

  14. #1054
    Site Contributor
    Esper3k's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2008
    Location

    Houston, TX
    Posts

    2,057

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    Quote Originally Posted by wizard_of_gore View Post
    Oh man, i'm feel sorry! But there is something new, and even cheaper than sneak show. Look :
    http://sales.starcitygames.com//deck...p?DeckID=46648

    Deck can operate fine even without show and tell, because there are 8 other show and tells in deck . In case of baning S&T, intuition can be solid replacement, and you can play clique, leylines, krosan grip, blood moon, firespouts, trinispheres etc in sideboard.
    What's funny is that I have almost all of Hypergenesis foiled out from when I tried playing the deck briefly last year.

    Sadly, I think Hypergenesis is much easier to hate out than Sneaky Show. Stifle, Ethersworn Canonist, Trinisphere, Chalice @ 0, and a shaky manabase (plenty of Wasteland targets) make it fairly easy to disrupt.

  15. #1055
    We are lost. We can never go home.
    Einherjer's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2011
    Location

    Noricum
    Posts

    1,475

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    Quote Originally Posted by JPAnghelescu View Post
    I don't get it... Why sell everything based on an assumption that has a very low probability of actually happening??

    If you are 25:75 sure they don't ban it, why sell all of it right now? Did you need the money instantly?
    It had 2 reasons:
    1) Even though I think it doesn't deserve banning I wasn't sure about what WotC would do..
    2) On the other hand, playing with this deck felt great, because you won most of your games. But, everytime you won, you were feeling like..great deck...great list...well build sideboard..but hey? My whole possible playskill didn't interact with the game at all? Making no mistakes was everything that could push your strength with this deck. You know what I mean? When you compare this to playing tempo or control, playing tempo and control just adds another level of complexity to the game, which results in a better gaming-experience.

    No I didn't need the money instantly - what I did with this money is buying the last duals to finish of my "collection" of having each blue dual land 3 times. But that doesn't belong in this thread^^

    But that's just my opinion. Keep on playing this strong deck and enjoy winning.

    Greetings
    My articles here, here, here and here | My current list | Follow me on Twitter | Questions I answered.

  16. #1056
    Meh.
    whienot's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Atlanta, Ga
    Posts

    447

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    As mentioned in another thread, legacy has such a critical mass of cheatafattyintoplay enablers, that banning Show & Tell won't stop Griselbrand from eating the format. Jumping the wagon may be a bit premature. Survival took a good 6 months of shenanigans before it finally received the ban.

    In other news, I won a GPT with Sneak Attack on Saturday. Nothing exciting to say about the maindeck. Sideboard:

    4x Grafdigger's Cage
    3x Red Elemental Blast
    3x Blood Moon
    2x Engineered Explosives
    2x Wipe Away
    1x Echoing Truth

    TES (2-0)
    Belcher (0-2) - On the draw, mulled to 3 and 4. No FoW, Belched both games.
    Burn (2-0)
    Combo Elves (2-1)
    UW Stoneblade (2-1)
    Affinity (2-0)
    Griselbargain / Count Chocula 2-0
    Tusk up.

    Quote Originally Posted by Finn View Post
    Just fucking ban the 600 pound gorilla and be done with it. FFS

  17. #1057

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    Quote Originally Posted by Philipp802 View Post
    Okay guys,

    there's always a point where a journey ends. My SneakAttack journey with all of you ends now. I sold all my Show and Tell-Stuff. All Enabelers, alls Creatures, all Enchantments, all Pacts. This is due to the B/R-Update in a few weeks. Even though I strongly believe that Show and Tell is not banworthy, I cannot say for sure what WotC does. I sent them the results of this poll in this forum with 25-75 for banning Show and Tell. I hope this helps to keep Show and Tell legal. I, for my part, cannot risk to lose 400€ at once. I wish all of you all the best, and keep putting up good results! Thanks for all the good discussions and conversations we had. May the force be with you.

    Greetings

    1/10

    Enjoy your new deck. Stop feeling guilty for winning.

  18. #1058
    Site Contributor
    Esper3k's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2008
    Location

    Houston, TX
    Posts

    2,057

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    I was thinking about this a little more this morning - if Hypergenesis starts to get more popular, Trinisphere and Flusterstorm (answers we can play fairly easily) sound like they would be awesome sideboard cards for us.

  19. #1059
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    Quote Originally Posted by Esper3k View Post
    I was thinking about this a little more this morning - if Hypergenesis starts to get more popular, Trinisphere and Flusterstorm (answers we can play fairly easily) sound like they would be awesome sideboard cards for us.
    Mana Maze. Boom. nice Cascade spells. Also, I cast Show & Tell, you can't cast Blue spells?

    Did I just break open the format?
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  20. #1060
    Site Contributor
    Esper3k's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2008
    Location

    Houston, TX
    Posts

    2,057

    Re: [Deck] Sneak Attack

    Quote Originally Posted by Koby View Post
    Mana Maze. Boom. nice Cascade spells. Also, I cast Show & Tell, you can't cast Blue spells?

    Did I just break open the format?
    Rofl that's awesome! We just can't bring it in against red decks running REB, hah.

    Conversely though, they cast Show & Tell and we can't really stop it without Pyroblast/REB either.

    I'd also think in this matchup, we want to board out Show & Tell since they run more dudes than we do and just go for the Sneak Attack / Through the Breach plan?

    Also to note - for all the complaining we're getting here about this deck, it only got 1 in the T16 (granted it T8'd) compared to Maverick and RUG still putting up more numbers.

    Hell, Belcher put up more numbers that tournament than we did...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)