View Poll Results: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

Voters
157. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, I am active in Vintage and would surely post in it

    26 16.56%
  • I'm not sure how much I'd post in it, but I love following Vintage and I'd read it regularly

    64 40.76%
  • I'd check it out now and then, and maybe post if I get some idea

    36 22.93%
  • No, T1 players smell funny

    31 19.75%
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 111

Thread: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

  1. #81

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    Quote Originally Posted by Solaran_X View Post
    The problem is that there are quite a few "tuned" Vintage Aggro lists that require only minimum Power (typically a Lotus and on-color Mox[en]). Some of them look quite fun, like the mono-white one and the Vintage-Edition of Deadguy Ale.
    OH man, there should be a vintage subforum!

    First, as an aside, the requirements of vintage decks to run power is a regional one: tournaments in USA allow 15 proxies (or more), while tournaments in Europe allow no proxies. But it's common in European tournaments to give out significant prizes to the top-performing unpowered deck.

    There's historically been very few good (pure) aggro decks in Vintage. I think the reason for this is two-fold: 1) there's fast and strong combos in vintage, which tend to provide a more efficient wincon than swinging with dudes or bolts to the face, leading people who might want to play aggro to play combo instead, and leading people who do play aggro to lose to combo players. And 2) decks that get bigger dudes into play using, eg, oath of druids or mishra's workshop. That being said, here's a pure aggro deck that got 2nd in a 41-player tournament: http://morphling.de/printview.php?c=1580&d=2. (41-players is pretty respectable for vintage events. Also note he lost in the finals to Oath of Druids.)

    Thus, the successful aggro decks have to be at least half focused on disruption. In vintage this means artifact destruction in addition to the discard and wastelands common in legacy. This basically define the "fish" archetype. There's sort of a careful balance a fish deck has to run between playing aggressive creatures and disruptive creatures. It's not quite as simple as taking a successful legacy deck and adding moxes and a lotus. There are, of course, successful ports of legacy decks to vintage, but it requires some testing and development to get the build right. And I think this would be a great benefit of a Vintage subforum here! We could get great legacy players thinking about how best to bring aggro decks and successful legacy builds to the vintage format. It's win-win!

    This thread is already full of great vintage discussion...

  2. #82
    snooty tea cats

    Join Date

    Jan 2008
    Posts

    1,033

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    The only straight aggro deck viable in Vintage is Dredge. If you want to play aggro but not Dredge, Fish is it. RUG, Bant, GW, and BUG are all solid choices.
    Quote Originally Posted by David Ochoa
    Shuffles, much like commas, are useful for altering tempo to add feeling.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord_Mcdonalds View Post
    I just come for the pretty pictures and mono-trolls.

  3. #83
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    The only acceptable form of Aggro is attacking with Myr Battelsphere and his army of peons.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  4. #84
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Jun 2010
    Posts

    249

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    Quote Originally Posted by Koby View Post
    The only acceptable form of Aggro is attacking with Myr Battelsphere and his army of peons.
    My Alpha Scathe Zombie tokens beg to differ.

  5. #85
    Brony and Proud
    Solaran_X's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2007
    Location

    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts

    387

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    Quote Originally Posted by aahz View Post
    My Alpha Scathe Zombie tokens beg to differ.
    All the budget aggro decks wit 3-4 Grafdigger's Cage and 3-4 Stony Silence/Null Rod beg to differ with you both.
    Don't Hate the Herd

  6. #86
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    Quote Originally Posted by Solaran_X View Post
    All the budget aggro decks wit 3-4 Grafdigger's Cage and 3-4 Stony Silence/Null Rod beg to differ with you both.
    Still dense I see. Explain how removing none of Battleball's activated abilities stop it from turning sideways, Mr Ponypower.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  7. #87
    Member
    bfeingersh's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2011
    Location

    Boston, MA
    Posts

    326

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    Posting my current BUG list for opinions. I started with a list that got top 8 at BoM, made a few changes and I'm pretty happy with it. Now that Tinker's gone I think I'm going to cut Crypt for something, I don't know if I need more mana or if I can just have it be another Snapcaster.

    Creatures:
    4 Dark Confidant
    3 Tarmogoyf
    2 Snapcaster Mage
    2 Trygon Predator

    Disruption:
    2 Thoughtseize
    4 Force of Will
    2 Flusterstorm
    2 Mental Misstep
    1 Hurkyl's Recall
    2 Mystic Remora

    Draw/Tutor:
    1 Brainstorm
    1 Ponder
    3 Preordain
    1 Gush
    1 Ancestral Recall
    1 Demonic Tutor
    1 Vampiric Tutor
    1 Merchant Scroll

    Busted:
    1 Yawgmoth's Will
    1 Time Walk
    1 Jace, the Mind Sculptor

    Mana:
    5 Mox
    1 Black Lotus
    1 Mana Crypt
    1 Sol Ring
    3 Tropical Island
    3 Underground Sea
    1 Island
    4 Misty Rainforest
    1 Polluted Delta
    1 Flooded Strand
    1 Strip Mine
    1 Wasteland

    Sideboard:
    2 Flusterstorm
    1 Hurkyl's Recall
    2 Dismember
    4 Leyline of the Void
    1 Nihil Spellbomb
    2 Yixlid Jailor
    3 Nature's Claim

  8. #88
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    Not sure why even include Y-will when there's no inherently broken spell to cast. You should probably also bump Gush to 3-4 copies as a source of card advantage. Adding a 2nd Jace wouldn't hurt too, since you're trying to play fair. I'm glad to see no Mystical Tutor in the list - the card is just bad and overhyped.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  9. #89
    Member
    bfeingersh's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2011
    Location

    Boston, MA
    Posts

    326

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    My first change to the BoM list was - Mystical Scroll Tinker Colossus Vault Key, +2 Snapcaster 2 Thoughtseize 2 Standstill. The Standstills became Remoras but the Snapcasters stuck around. I put Scroll back in when I added Gush (cut Sower and 3rd Trygon)

    Will is never really used to end the game, just for value (flash back an Ancestral, play an extra creature, take an extra turn, etc.).

  10. #90
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    Seems like just adding more Snapcasters would get the job done better.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  11. #91

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    Quote Originally Posted by Solaran_X View Post
    All the budget aggro decks wit 3-4 Grafdigger's Cage and 3-4 Stony Silence/Null Rod beg to differ with you both.
    Stony Silence is out of my main for Gencon. Kataki and Pridemage will have to get it done. Stony Silence is dead a doorknob against the man based shop decks (and even just plain old smokestack) and is pretty useless vs. the Delver decks. At this point it's best use is stopping Time Vault.

    I think it's a fine card but being dead against all the above and Dredge (and other g/w aggro stuff) means moving it to the side (at least for me).

    Oh ... and it can't attack.

  12. #92
    snooty tea cats

    Join Date

    Jan 2008
    Posts

    1,033

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    Ben,
    If I were you I would probably drop Gush for Mystic Remora #3 and Merchant Scroll for JtMS #2. Dark Confidant coupled with Mystic Remora is a solid choice for our local meta.

    Despite a few bigger names running Gush with Remora, I found the synergy between the two more detrimental then beneficial. Gush isn't well positioned enough to run a straight Gro build and to be honest a lot of those builds were super greedy running both Dark Confidant and Gush.

    Merchant scroll is clunky with Remora and rather lacking considering your target selection.

    If you want to run a miser's Strip Mine OK but cut the Wasteland for a basic Island and adjust the dual to basic ratio. You almost certainly want a basic Forest out of the board as well. The mana base in it's current form is just asking for punishment.
    Quote Originally Posted by David Ochoa
    Shuffles, much like commas, are useful for altering tempo to add feeling.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord_Mcdonalds View Post
    I just come for the pretty pictures and mono-trolls.

  13. #93
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    @Ben
    Got me thinking... Cut Gush, Scroll, Will, and 2 Remoras; add 1 Snapcaster Mage, 2 Trinket Mage, 1 Skullclamp, and Jace #2.


    SnapClamp baby!
    <grin>
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  14. #94
    Member

    Join Date

    Aug 2011
    Location

    Italy
    Posts

    780

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    Guys, shouldn't you be discussing this in the Vintage BUG thread? Oh sorry, we were trying to get it opened, my bad...

  15. #95
    Aes Sídhe
    Arianrhod's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2010
    Location

    Williamsport, PA.
    Posts

    397

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    I guess for now this will have to do, until our desire is recognized!

    I'll contribute my Bomberman build:

    3x Jace TMS
    1x Tezz the Seeker

    3x Trinket Mage
    3x Auriok Salvagers
    3x Snapcaster Mage

    3x Mana Drain
    4x Force of Will
    2x Spell Snare
    2x Mental Misstep
    1x Ancestral Recall
    1x Vamp Tutor
    1x Demonic Tutor
    1x Brainstorm
    1x Merchant Scroll
    1x Time Walk
    1x Tinker
    1x Repeal

    5x Moxen
    1x Lotus
    1x Sol Ring
    1x Mana Crypt
    1x Time Vault
    1x Voltaic Key
    1x Nihil Spellbomb
    1x Aether Spellbomb
    1x Sensei's Divining Top

    2x Island
    1x Plains
    3x Polluted Delta
    3x Flooded Strand
    2x Underground Sea
    3x Tundra
    1x Tolarian Academy
    1x Library of Alexandria

    //Sb
    2x Devout Witness
    3x Energy Flux
    2x Surgical Extraction
    1x Grafdigger's Cage
    1x Tormod's Crypt
    2x Yixlid Jailer
    2x Massacre
    2x Flusterstorm

    Still very unsure about some of the choices -- experimenting with running Top and Repeal instead of a tinkerbot and Thirst. Thirst was always meh whenever I found it, Tinkerbot has so many commonly maindecked answers it isn't even funny anymore. I always thought Top wouldn't do enough for me, but it's been pretty good so far, and tricks with Key and Repeal are always awesome. Repeal gives me (an) answer for Stoney Silence other than just beating down or planeswalkers, which is nice.

  16. #96

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    I agree with the Bob + Jace + Remora suggestion for the BUG fish deck... that's definitely the conventional wisdom or safest choice. That Trinket Mage + Skullclamp idea is more out there... could be a lot of fun. :)

    For Bomberman, you need Cavern of Souls. All your men are humans and having your combo being uncounterable is pretty strong. Why no EE? (And that's a legitimate question... I haven't played bomberman enough to know if spellbombs do enough w/o EE).

  17. #97
    Aes Sídhe
    Arianrhod's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2010
    Location

    Williamsport, PA.
    Posts

    397

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    I was actually thinking about editing in that I'm planning on trying a pair of Caverns tonight at my local, but had decided to wait until after the event =P I should probably trim out two of the Deltas, I'm guessing (which annoys me, since they're pack foil and the strands just regular lol).

    EE hasn't impressed me whenever I've tried it. I'd like it if it could kill Null Rod or Stony Silence, but obviously there's a problem there. Dredge is a faceroll already since black allows me to play Nihil Spellbomb. It could be decent against shops, but at the same time, it doesn't kill the things I really care about (ie Lodestone Golem). It would also likely have to be tutored, and resolving a Trinket Mage can be hard enough, even with full artifact mana and Drains. Besdies, I'd rather just drop Energy Flux and watch them writhe in agony.

  18. #98
    Member
    bfeingersh's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2011
    Location

    Boston, MA
    Posts

    326

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    Quote Originally Posted by Koby View Post
    @Ben
    Got me thinking... Cut Gush, Scroll, Will, and 2 Remoras; add 1 Snapcaster Mage, 2 Trinket Mage, 1 Skullclamp, and Jace #2.


    SnapClamp baby!
    <grin>
    If I had seen this message 6 hours earlier I could have tried it tonight. I ran the above list -1 Crypt +1 Snapcaster to 3-1 tonight, lost to Bant fish off 2 mulls to 5 :(

  19. #99

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    Quote Originally Posted by Koby View Post
    Not sure why even include Y-will when there's no inherently broken spell to cast. You should probably also bump Gush to 3-4 copies as a source of card advantage. Adding a 2nd Jace wouldn't hurt too, since you're trying to play fair. I'm glad to see no Mystical Tutor in the list - the card is just bad and overhyped.
    I would also add two more gush to the deck. Just cut the mystic remoras for another MM and mystical tutor.

  20. #100
    Aes Sídhe
    Arianrhod's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2010
    Location

    Williamsport, PA.
    Posts

    397

    Re: Would you actually post in a Vintage subforum?

    Repeal was a boss for me all night. Cavern was never relevant one way or the other...not sure what I think about it at this point. Definitely nice for my creatures to resolve for certain, but if they're holding a counter, it'll just nuke my Lotus, which is awkward and annoying.

    Lost the last round to Cobra Gush -- my opponent had the stonecold nuts both games, and I actually misplayed really badly in game two, or I might have stabilized -through- his draw. Even as a tutor for Vault/Key/Lotus/Spellbomb, Tinker isn't impressing me at the moment. Might try to cut that. If I cut Tinker, do you guys think I should also cut Mana Crypt?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)