Page 87 of 376 FirstFirst ... 377783848586878889909197137187 ... LastLast
Results 1,721 to 1,740 of 7512

Thread: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBx Explorer Zenith Control)

  1. #1721
    Member
    Alexeezay's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2010
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    238

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Arianrhod, lol I never knew why you love Wood Elves in Valakut-Fit so much...and then I realized how good it works with the Scapeshift plan =) lol I'm so stoked to play that deck

  2. #1722
    Aes Sídhe
    Arianrhod's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2010
    Location

    Williamsport, PA.
    Posts

    397

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Tapping out for Wood Elves with Top in play is also one of the greatest feelings ever =D So much value. It's basically a chump blocking fetchland that can sometimes be sac'd to Therapy and doesn't cost you life.

  3. #1723

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    I'm playing with this list:

    // Lands
    1 [A] Scrubland
    2 [ON] Windswept Heath
    4 [ZEN] Verdant Catacombs
    1 [US] Phyrexian Tower
    1 [SH] Volrath's Stronghold
    2 [A] Swamp (1)
    3 [A] Forest (1)
    2 [A] Plains (1)
    1 [A] Savannah
    1 [FUT] Dryad Arbor
    3 [A] Bayou

    // Creatures
    1 [AVR] Sigarda, Host of Herons
    1 [EVE] Wickerbough Elder
    2 [FD] Eternal Witness
    1 [MBS] Thrun, the Last Troll
    1 [GAM] Grave Titan
    1 [M11] Sun Titan
    4 [WL] Veteran Explorer
    1 [FNM] Wall of Blossoms
    2 [FNM] Kitchen Finks
    1 [UL] Deranged Hermit
    1 [CMD] Scavenging Ooze
    1 [UD] Academy Rector

    // Spells
    3 [AP] Pernicious Deed
    2 [ISD] Liliana of the Veil
    4 [MBS] Green Sun's Zenith
    2 [V09] Sensei's Divining Top
    3 [GPX] Maelstrom Pulse
    3 [A] Swords to Plowshares
    1 [EX] Recurring Nightmare
    4 [FNM] Cabal Therapy

    // Sideboard
    SB: 1 [LG] Nether Void
    SB: 1 [PLC] Damnation
    SB: 1 [LG] Chains of Mephistopheles
    SB: 2 [FBP] Surgical Extraction
    SB: 2 [TE] Choke
    SB: 1 [MI] Enlightened Tutor
    SB: 1 [PLC] Extirpate
    SB: 3 [M11] Leyline of Sanctity
    SB: 2 [SOM] Nihil Spellbomb
    SB: 1 [LRW] Gaddock Teeg

  4. #1724
    Aes Sídhe
    Arianrhod's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2010
    Location

    Williamsport, PA.
    Posts

    397

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    @Garo -- how has the Nether Void been for you? That's one of those cards that I've always wanted to test, but I've never got around to it. That, and I don't want to drop the $120 on it just to try it out, haha.

    I don't like the third Leyline in your board -- I think 2 is plenty. Even if you don't have it in your opener, you can E.T for it and just cast it, or you can Rector it in. 3 seems like overkill to me. Also, there's a distinct lack of Thragtusk in your list, which should be corrected especially if you're running Nightmare. That synergy is really strong...much stronger than with Finks, since the persist screws up Nightmare loops.

  5. #1725
    Member
    Qweerios's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2010
    Location

    Montreal
    Posts

    1,024

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    What about Explore for the Scapeshift version?

    Also, here is my latest BUG Fit:


    Creatures (14)
    4 Veteran Explorer
    2 Coiling Oracle
    2 Eternal Witness
    1 Scavenging Ooze
    1 Thrun, the Last Troll
    1 Thragtusk
    1 Primeval Titan
    1 Grave Titan
    1 Shriekmaw

    Spells (23)
    4 Cabal Therapy
    4 Green Sun's Zenith
    1 Life from the Loam
    1 Maelstrom Pulse
    2 Gifts Ungiven

    3 Sensei's Divining Top
    4 Pernicious Deed

    2 Liliana of the Veil
    2 Jace, the Mind Sculptor

    Lands (23)
    1 Wasteland
    1 Phyrexian Tower
    1 Volrath's Stronghold
    1 Karakas
    4 Verdant Catacombs
    4 Misty Rainforest
    2 Forest
    2 Swamp
    2 Island
    2 Bayou
    2 Tropical Island
    1 Underground Sea

    Sideboard (15)
    4 Negate
    4 Thoughtseize
    2 Faerie Macabre
    2 Extirpate
    1 Darkblast
    1 Damnation
    1 Consuming Vapors


    I don't really like the UU cost of Jace but he is very good... I still think it lacks at least 2 Innocent Blood. Oracle isn't as good as I first thought simply because commiting your second turn to Oracle is really a weak play when we ought to be casting TS, Therapy, GSZ@1, or IB on a Delver. Oracle will only ever be a GSZ target in a mana-short scenario when we are on 3 lands on T3 and have nothing better to do. Oracle makes a good complement to 4 Explorers + 4 GSZ (10 is fine but 12 is too many).

    With this Bug Fit list, I should probably start testing Recurring Nightmare again. I reckon I could always drop the Loam Volrath Tower plan to support Recurring Nightmare more and open up some deck space but that would, IMO, weaken the deck and I don't think this deck needs more than 1 recursion engine (it has other issues to deal mainly).

    My next step is to include said 2 IB to bump up the sac outlets to 7 (7-8 is my goal). Liliana (double black ), Oracle, Thrun, and maybe Shriekmaw are the most likely cards to be replaced.
    Do you know what assuming does? It makes an ass out of you and me.
    Get it...? Ass, u, me?

    ... ffs I was trying to be funny...

  6. #1726
    Land Destruction Enthusiast
    Megadeus's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2012
    Location

    Kennesaw, GA
    Posts

    5,572

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    I mean the list looks pretty good, but why negate? Is it a budget replacement for FoW?

  7. #1727
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Quote Originally Posted by Megadeus View Post
    I mean the list looks pretty good, but why negate? Is it a budget replacement for FoW?
    6 blue cards in the maindeck. Force of Will traditionally needs a minimum of 14 blue cards (including FOW) to be castable.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  8. #1728

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Arian: I am interested in building the BUG fit as I have the BG build and BGw Rock build completed, but I don't own a Karakas or Underground Sea. Would 3 Bayou & 3 Trop be a suitable replacement?

    Also IOK or Duress as The thoughtseizes still elude me as well.

  9. #1729

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    @Arianrhod -- Never used the Nether Void, i mean, never really casted it to see if it really Works, boarded it against TES, Belcher and another deck that i can’t remember by now.The game was either already won or already lost right before i could cast it.
    I bought one just to have as na nice acquisition for my collection, but i don’t believe the deck really needs its effect.

    I Always had a hard time against burn, that’s why i kept the third leyline, its good to save some time until i can draw a good threat, and by the way, this card is NUTS against combo. Waiting until the end of the third turn to tutor for it doesen’t seem to be a good plan for me.

    About the Thragtusk, but, in what slot?The second finks?Deranged Hermit?A Split of one Finks/1 Thragtusk? I really don’t know.
    Andy es, i’m using Recurring Nightmare, the synergy with about 80% of the creatures of the deck is AMAZING!Even if you just veteran a couple times in a turn.

    I just started to read the topic from the very first page, at the momment i’m at the page 62, and because of this there are some informations that i haven’t read yet.

    I really enjoy the decks, have been playing with it since january, with Caleb Durward’s first BG list, just after that, adapting it to Higashi’s BGW list, that i changed one thing or another

  10. #1730

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Quote Originally Posted by Qweerios View Post
    What about Explore for the Scapeshift version?

    Also, here is my latest BUG Fit:


    Creatures (14)
    4 Veteran Explorer
    2 Coiling Oracle
    2 Eternal Witness
    1 Scavenging Ooze
    1 Thrun, the Last Troll
    1 Thragtusk
    1 Primeval Titan
    1 Grave Titan
    1 Shriekmaw

    Spells (23)
    4 Cabal Therapy
    4 Green Sun's Zenith
    1 Life from the Loam
    1 Maelstrom Pulse
    2 Gifts Ungiven

    3 Sensei's Divining Top
    4 Pernicious Deed

    2 Liliana of the Veil
    2 Jace, the Mind Sculptor

    Lands (23)
    1 Wasteland
    1 Phyrexian Tower
    1 Volrath's Stronghold
    1 Karakas
    4 Verdant Catacombs
    4 Misty Rainforest
    2 Forest
    2 Swamp
    2 Island
    2 Bayou
    2 Tropical Island
    1 Underground Sea

    Sideboard (15)
    4 Negate
    4 Thoughtseize
    2 Faerie Macabre
    2 Extirpate
    1 Darkblast
    1 Damnation
    1 Consuming Vapors


    I don't really like the UU cost of Jace but he is very good... I still think it lacks at least 2 Innocent Blood. Oracle isn't as good as I first thought simply because commiting your second turn to Oracle is really a weak play when we ought to be casting TS, Therapy, GSZ@1, or IB on a Delver. Oracle will only ever be a GSZ target in a mana-short scenario when we are on 3 lands on T3 and have nothing better to do. Oracle makes a good complement to 4 Explorers + 4 GSZ (10 is fine but 12 is too many).

    With this Bug Fit list, I should probably start testing Recurring Nightmare again. I reckon I could always drop the Loam Volrath Tower plan to support Recurring Nightmare more and open up some deck space but that would, IMO, weaken the deck and I don't think this deck needs more than 1 recursion engine (it has other issues to deal mainly).

    My next step is to include said 2 IB to bump up the sac outlets to 7 (7-8 is my goal). Liliana (double black ), Oracle, Thrun, and maybe Shriekmaw are the most likely cards to be replaced.

    @Qweerios
    I like the list but in which match ups do you transform into a control deck of the board? What do you take out without compromising the consistency of the deck?

  11. #1731
    Member
    Qweerios's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2010
    Location

    Montreal
    Posts

    1,024

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Lily, Jace, Deeds, Shriekmaw, and Karakas are popular cards that I side out for the TS/Negates. Negates are really powerful against Miracle so I usualy side out Ooze, Shriek, and 2 Deeds. Against combo decks I tend to side out the 4 Deeds, Pulse, Shriek/Ooze, and Jace for the 4 TS and 4 Negates. Lilies, Shriek, and Jaces come out against Dredge, and I also throw out the Pulse/Deeds against Reanimator.
    Do you know what assuming does? It makes an ass out of you and me.
    Get it...? Ass, u, me?

    ... ffs I was trying to be funny...

  12. #1732

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Qweerios: Please see my question to Arian above. I meant to direct it to you. my bad.

  13. #1733

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    This might be too random of a question, but is there a "I win" combo for GB? In lists I have running around with Culling the Weak, it can generate massive amounts of mana but I lack good ways to use it, especially when it's often a one-shot ritual turn. I found Mikaeus + Triskelion but that might be too high cc across both components. I took a look at storm but most non-blue versions roll with Ad Nauseum. There is ob nixilis and scape shift...

    I'm mostly limited to these colors (or white) due to not having other duals, but otherwise it feels like a mono-black storm when I go t1 explorer - culling the Weak for GBBBBXX on turn 2.

    Edit: I fear that I didn't "expect" the Spanish Inquisition.

    For now I'm experimenting with New Frontiers to give the deck some additional redundancy when you don't have an Explorer, and to make it relevant late game using some Landfall critters like Ob Nixilis and Rampaging Baloths. Phyrexian Obliterators to make Culling extra good. Throwing in Dark Ritual for the help of it lol
    Last edited by Claymore; 08-11-2012 at 08:15 PM. Reason: ho ho ho

  14. #1734
    Land Destruction Enthusiast
    Megadeus's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2012
    Location

    Kennesaw, GA
    Posts

    5,572

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    I have been looking for a replacement for wickerbough elder because I don't know if I need it... I may try out a 1of Disciple of Bolas on Wednesday. If skeletal scrying is good, this guy seems awesome, and I know he is awesome in my standard deck

  15. #1735
    Aes Sídhe
    Arianrhod's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2010
    Location

    Williamsport, PA.
    Posts

    397

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    I split top 4 at Jupiter yesterday, taking home a Mox Pearl for my trouble. I'll do a more full writeup and post it later. I played the Scapeshift version....matchups were U/R Delver (W), Burn (W), TES (W), Sneak (L), RUG (W), Miracles (Draw), top 8 U/R Delver again (W), then split. There's a feature match against the Sneak player, and then later on they also featured game 3 my top 8 match vs U/R Delver. I'll fish out the link / timestamps for that when I do my full report.

  16. #1736

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Damn son, congrats!

  17. #1737
    Member
    Cire_dk's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2012
    Location

    The Netherlands
    Posts

    16

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    @Arianrhod Well done!! I will be looking forward to your report.

    ? Did you play 3 Huntmasters? Any other changes to your list. I am also very curious about SB plan and choices. Since I am new to Nic Fit it helps me a lot to understand the deck. Thanks a lot.

  18. #1738

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    I did a little digging and found the link for the video http://www.twitch.tv/jupitergames/b/328251813

    Sneak Attack at 4:10 and RUG at 8:30

  19. #1739
    Aes Sídhe
    Arianrhod's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2010
    Location

    Williamsport, PA.
    Posts

    397

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    8:30 is actually vs U/R Delver, not RUG. And as I watched back the Sneak matchup earlier today, I saw literally the worst misplay I've ever made in my life, which cost me game one completely. I don't think that game three would have gone better -- he had four Leyline of Sanctity in his board, which really hurts any chance the Red version has, but I could have at least made a set out of it, rather than just folding 0-2. Rage.

    And yeah, I played 3 Huntmasters. You can find the list here: http://www.jupitergamesonline.com/ar...gust-11th-2012

  20. #1740

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Ah, I see now. I assumed it was RUG because of all the Tropicals he fetched

    What miss play, not calling Show on the flashback therapy?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)