Page 204 of 299 FirstFirst ... 104154194200201202203204205206207208214254 ... LastLast
Results 4,061 to 4,080 of 5963

Thread: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

  1. #4061

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    What would get banned?

    Also and ideas for a side plan?

  2. #4062
    Member
    apistat_commander's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2011
    Location

    Denver, CO
    Posts

    111

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by emidln View Post
    Yay for uncounterable 2 mana removal spells for everything this deck has ever cared about. As much as this card is going to be fucking amazing in my storm decks for a few months, it's a dumb card and is going to result in something I love a lot getting banned.
    So does this make the green splash worth looking at again? You get Autumn's Veil as a pseudo-Chant and Carpet of Flowers to blow through taxing counters. In exchange you may be losing more game 1's, lower your threat density, and basically lose the EtW plan though PiF is still probably fine via LED/Petal. So basically you have more game against blue control decks but your fair deck/combo deck MU worsens as you are slowing down and becoming less flexible.

  3. #4063

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    You can do whatever you wish, but I'll be doing this to the 75 I posted:

    -3 Wipe Away
    -2 Chain of Vapor
    -2 Engineered Explosives

    +4 Abrupt Decay
    +1 Tropical Island
    +1 Bayou
    +1 Tarpan (okay, maybe a more meaningful free slot)

    I probably would also entertain cutting the 2nd Swamp for a 9th fetch in my list, but I am considering that without Abrupt Decay.

    Considering access to green, I might also be willing to cut out my sideboarded duress and use the free slot on 2 Xantid Swarm vs merfolk.
    BZK! - Storm Boards

    Been there, tried that, still casting Doomsday.
    Drawing my deck for 0 mana since 2013.

  4. #4064
    Member

    Join Date

    Jun 2012
    Location

    Argentina
    Posts

    98

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    i like the idea of green. this new decay seems powerful

  5. #4065
    Member
    Mindlash's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2012
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    98

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by lambert101 View Post
    Thinking I may have smoothed out the boarding plans:
    Main is the same. It is posted awhile back.

    4 Dread of Night
    3 Inquisition of Kozilek
    2 Echoing Truth
    1 Empty the Warrens
    1 Tendrils of Agony
    1 Meltdown
    1 Pyroclasm
    2 Wipe Away

    Maverick:
    -4 Duress
    -3 Cabal
    -4 Gixtaxian Probe

    + 3 Inquisition
    + 4 Dread of Night
    + 2 Echoing Truth
    + 2 Wipe Away

    Miracles:
    +3 Inquisition of Kozleik
    +2 Wipe Away
    +2 Echoing Truth
    +1 Tendrils of Agony

    -1 Empty the Warrens
    -1 Infernal Tutor
    -4 Gixtaxian Probe
    -2 Burning Wish ( I do not think this is correct but do not know what else to take out)

    Rug:
    Nothing... I feel this match-up is good considering the discard, Past in Flames, Empty the Warrens, and Cabal Therapy.

    Show and Tell.dec
    -1 Empty the Warrens
    -4 Gixtaxian Probe (Don't know if this is right)
    -1 Infernal Tutor

    + 1 Tendrils of Agony
    + 2 Wipe Away
    + 3 Inquisition of Kozelik

    Basically, I am having a really hard time with side boarding. I wish Timo made his report from GP Ghent so I could see what he did and base my plans off his.
    Can't say how he boarded against RUG and Sneak/Show, but against Maverick it is

    +2 Inquisition of Kozilek
    +4 Dread of Night
    +1 IGG
    -1 Chrome Mox
    -1 Cabal Ritual
    -2 Duress
    -2 Gitaxian Probe
    -1 PiF

    and Miracle:

    +2 Inquisition of Kozilek
    +1 Duress
    -1 Chrome Mox
    -1 Gitaxian Probe
    -1 Cabal Therapy

    In general you take IGG over PiF against the non-blue (read non counter decks).

    You switch Duress and Inquisition according to what you want to discard (Inquisition over Duress against Goblins and so on)

    Cage against Reanimator, Dredge and so on. Dread of Night against the Maverick Hatebears. Rest of the cards are wishboard material.

    Good cards to side out are Mox and Probes...though I would never take all the Probes out. Sometimes they help you Therapys out on turn 1 when it matters. They also do work nice along PiF :-)

    Perhaps I can post you some information about his boarding for the other two matchups after the weekend, because I intend to play ANT on the tournament in Dortmund on Saturday and tomorrow is BBQ and problably some coaching on schedule ^^

    Hope that helps

    Mindlash
    "I came into this world covered in someone else's blood and screaming, I'd like to leave it the same way."

  6. #4066

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    @Mindlash
    Thank.you for the help. I plan on playing this deck at a local tourney this weekend and need help side boarding. I like the wipeaways against miracles.

  7. #4067
    Pray for Rain
    Tammit67's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2010
    Location

    Philadelphia, PA, USA
    Posts

    1,534

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by emidln View Post
    You can do whatever you wish, but I'll be doing this to the 75 I posted:

    -3 Wipe Away
    -2 Chain of Vapor
    -2 Engineered Explosives

    +4 Abrupt Decay
    +1 Tropical Island
    +1 Bayou
    +1 Tarpan (okay, maybe a more meaningful free slot)

    I probably would also entertain cutting the 2nd Swamp for a 9th fetch in my list, but I am considering that without Abrupt Decay.

    Considering access to green, I might also be willing to cut out my sideboarded duress and use the free slot on 2 Xantid Swarm vs merfolk.
    This. Listen to this man
    Matt Bevenour in real life

  8. #4068

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by emidln View Post
    You can do whatever you wish, but I'll be doing this to the 75 I posted:

    -3 Wipe Away
    -2 Chain of Vapor
    -2 Engineered Explosives

    +4 Abrupt Decay
    +1 Tropical Island
    +1 Bayou
    +1 Tarpan (okay, maybe a more meaningful free slot)

    I probably would also entertain cutting the 2nd Swamp for a 9th fetch in my list, but I am considering that without Abrupt Decay.

    Considering access to green, I might also be willing to cut out my sideboarded duress and use the free slot on 2 Xantid Swarm vs merfolk.
    My though process on seeing Decay:

    Step 1: Oh man, people now have an actual good way to kill my Counterbalances that can go in their maindeck. :(
    Step 2: Oh man, when I'm playing storm I just gained access to a two mana answer to Counterbalance, hatebears and Chalice of the Void. The sweetness! :D

    Seriously, Decay is definitely worth splashing for out of the board. As emidln said, it deals with every single permanent this deck ever cares about (other than Leyline of Sanctity), it's cheap enough to not totally ruin AdN and they can't even protect their hate with countermagic. Card is bonkers.
    I don't have low self-esteem, I have low esteem for everyone else. -Daria

    Proud member of Team CAB
    High Priest of the Church of BLA

    CAB JaceTM

    My articles

  9. #4069

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by Mon,Goblin Chief View Post
    My though process on seeing Decay:

    Step 1: Oh man, people now have an actual good way to kill my Counterbalances that can go in their maindeck. :(
    Step 2: Oh man, when I'm playing storm I just gained access to a two mana answer to Counterbalance, hatebears and Chalice of the Void. The sweetness! :D

    Seriously, Decay is definitely worth splashing for out of the board. As emidln said, it deals with every single permanent this deck ever cares about (other than Leyline of Sanctity), it's cheap enough to not totally ruin AdN and they can't even protect their hate with countermagic. Card is bonkers.
    Agreed...I think this should also be the end of people running stuff like Echoing Truth or Meltdown or whatnot, as we don't really need Stax-Specific answers anymore, we have a less narrow one now.

    It does make our mana pretty awkward, I think the card is much, much worse for Burning Wish versions, as I don't think you can support both splashes (as mentioned, Red for Past in Flames is fine off of 1 Red land + artifacts, but this is a spell that needs to be cast off lands, and we really need at least 2 green sources in the 75 if this is going to be a 3-4x in the SB). Also, I don't think we board this in against Maverick, at least not 4x. It doesn't do enough against them, and we don't really want to have green sources + karakas against them, as their end-game is always just KoTR + Wastelanding us it seems.

  10. #4070

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Hmmmm....in any storm deck running black and green this is an automatic 4 of in the sideboard. Also don't see how it will lead to any bannings, I can't see abrupt decay getting the axe in legacy just the notion makes me laugh. As for them banning LED because of this card, I don't see that either. I can't think of any card that will get banned as a result of this being printed. It improves storm to be sure, but it doesn't improve it so much that it will require a banning later on.

    I'm seriously debating whether or not I should splash green in Emidln's ANT list solely for this card. Doing so would destablize the mana a little bit or take up a sideboard slot. I won't cut volcanic island though, as using artifact mana to utilize PiF is a little bit backwards/awkward as you need cabal/dark rit for PiF to work and not LED.

    For a manabase with 9 fetches and a green splash out of the sideboard I would use the following:

    4 Polluted Delta
    3 Misty Rainforest
    1 Bloodstained Mire
    1 Verdant Catacombs
    2 U. Sea
    1 Swamp
    2 Island
    1 Volcanic island

    Testing would tell whether you should run a 1/1 split of mire/catacombs, 2 mire, or 2 catacombs. I just went with a 1/1 split as it seems safest.

    As for the xantid swarm idea, it's an interesting one to be sure. Personally I would probably just one a one of EE in that slot, especially now that we can set it up to 4 without petals. Xantid would be my go to card if merfolk rises in popularity though or decks that are soft to xantid.

    Okay so I just noticed that you put a bayou and a trop in your sideboard. So no need to completely redo the manabase as the current manabase can support both rather easily in that any fetch can get you green. Guess I'm just used to only tropical island being sideboarded in and not bayou.
    Bread Connoisseur on MTGSalvation Forums
    Currently Playing:
    All flavors of storm combo
    Quote Originally Posted by Vacrix
    Lands is a joke for Solidarity. Its like asking a morbidly obese parapalegic to run the mile with his shoes tied.

  11. #4071
    Member
    Mindlash's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2012
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    98

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by lambert101 View Post
    @Mindlash
    Thank.you for the help. I plan on playing this deck at a local tourney this weekend and need help side boarding. I like the wipeaways against miracles.
    I have not played that much against Miracle. Played some Games with my common sense boarding....some with Timos boarding plans. The matchup is balanced I would say...there are times, where they have CB/Top and there are other times where you just win.

    There is just no pressure....in my opinion . You can even trick them into putting Top on top of their deck. Most of the time I won...somtimes its a draw....but most of the times you do not loose to this deck...there are even Goblin Decks complaining about it...or Dredge Deck...dafug -.- I cannot understand it...do not overextend...hit the right cards...Miracle lives from people who do not know what to do :-/ Overextending and such...

    I do not like the idea of crippling my manabase against the upcoming tribels. Before I would go 4 color for some new spell I would go TES and trust me...I never would. I like ANT much more for its stable manabase. And stable Mana is a strong thing with Goblins, Merfolk, Canadian, Maverick and this kind of Decks lurking...

    I would also never dismiss "red" in my manabase. Maybe its some kind of personal style...but I like "red" alot because it gives you a good game 1 against Maverick. It gives you easy access to our best Stormengine. It gives access to an easy extra Tutor.

    Even after such a short time of playing this deck...there are so much plays I do not ever want to give up. Grim Tutor is just Baws G1. What does UBg do against Mav G1?

    Its defnitly a Spell I would take up in a playset....but I do not think it is the time to use it....now...it will be here...I will use it....but not now...really....as long as I only see counterbalance for it as a target....
    "I came into this world covered in someone else's blood and screaming, I'd like to leave it the same way."

  12. #4072

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by Mindlash View Post
    .Miracle lives from people who do not know what to do :-/ Overextending and such...

    I do not like the idea of crippling my manabase against the upcoming tribels. Before I would go 4 color for some new spell I would go TES and trust me...I never would. I like ANT much more for its stable manabase. And stable Mana is a strong thing with Goblins, Merfolk, Canadian, Maverick and this kind of Decks lurking...
    So let me get this straight...you just picked up the deck and you're confident enough to a) determine that our worst matchup is only "that bad" because we aren't good players, and b) determine that that matchup doesn't warrant splashing another card?

    Play the deck a little more, then play against a competent miracles player before you rush to judgement. Also, worth mentioning, the green splash comes entirely out of the sideboard, it's not hurting our mana at all, except against decks that run 1-2 Wasteland at most -- the only problem is you can't support the green SB and leave BW in your deck, which means you need to find 1-3x business spells that aren't red to fill those slots (Snapcaster or Grim Tutor are common, some people have also run an additional Ad Naus in the past in that slot).

    Usually UBG loses G1 to maverick, or goes off before they land a hate bear -- it's not like Burning Wish opens up that many lines against them anyway, as it's not that often that BW into Hate into kill is a reasonable line anyway once Thalia is out.

    EDIT:

    It's clear English is not your first language, so I apologize if I misunderstood something you're saying.

  13. #4073
    Member
    Mindlash's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2012
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    98

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by aaronm678 View Post
    So let me get this straight...you just picked up the deck and you're confident enough to a) determine that our worst matchup is only "that bad" because we aren't good players, and b) determine that that matchup doesn't warrant splashing another card?

    Play the deck a little more, then play against a competent miracles player before you rush to judgement. Also, worth mentioning, the green splash comes entirely out of the sideboard, it's not hurting our mana at all, except against decks that run 1-2 Wasteland at most -- the only problem is you can't support the green SB and leave BW in your deck, which means you need to find 1-3x business spells that aren't red to fill those slots (Snapcaster or Grim Tutor are common, some people have also run an additional Ad Naus in the past in that slot).

    Usually UBG loses G1 to maverick, or goes off before they land a hate bear -- it's not like Burning Wish opens up that many lines against them anyway, as it's not that often that BW into Hate into kill is a reasonable line anyway once Thalia is out.

    EDIT:

    It's clear English is not your first language, so I apologize if I misunderstood something you're saying.
    Wow...Miracle as worst matchup...I would like to play your Meta :-) I feel RUG and Reanimator are alot harder...but you are right...I am just a newb...perhaps I am wrong... At a sidenote: You do not need to offense my language! It is not my fault that you are loosing to Miracle...I am not even playing it :-/ We are on the same side here...
    "I came into this world covered in someone else's blood and screaming, I'd like to leave it the same way."

  14. #4074
    Member

    Join Date

    Jun 2011
    Location

    n/a
    Posts

    168

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    I've completely smashed CB players with storm before, and then lose in the matchup to Dave Gearhart because he has enough experience to know how hard it is to beat a top in play floating Force of will.
    Pretty much sum's up the CB matchup. Playing through the softlock against an experianced CB players is extremely challenging. You need a really good sideboard plan to beat a good CB player, and even then your going to be 50/50, best case.

  15. #4075

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Mindlash,

    I thank you for your help.

  16. #4076

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Decay does seem like a nice catch-all, but it still doesn't get around MoR. Still a nice card to have which can shave down some sb space. I'm not sure it's better than Wipe Away or E.E though. I guess if you are playing 4 Dread of Nights Decay gains a lot of power against Maverick decks though.

  17. #4077

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    CB has been archenemy nr. 1 for a long long time. Now I'm still unsure if its actually played enough to give a fuck and waste 3-4 sideboard slots on it . My policy for a very long time has been to just ignore it but I guess if its really popular in you area you should make some room for it.
    I really can't wait till decay is legal especially since I already splash green for Xantid swarm anyway.

  18. #4078

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by Dia_Bot View Post
    CB has been archenemy nr. 1 for a long long time. Now I'm still unsure if its actually played enough to give a fuck and waste 3-4 sideboard slots on it . My policy for a very long time has been to just ignore it but I guess if its really popular in you area you should make some room for it.
    I really can't wait till decay is legal especially since I already splash green for Xantid swarm anyway.
    with decay you no longer have to dedicate spots or just ignore it. you get something you can bring in against basically all creature decks. this kills every hate bear and those random pillars the red deck will play.
    bring this in and they don't have a hatebear draw, kill a knight. yes this doesn't beat a mom and hatebear but its not like you cut the virtue's ruins or e.es
    the fact of the matter is this new spell is just better then wipeaway and fills the same role as a cb killer. you bring this in most all the time. the only concern i have is how the mana will be considering we are in 4 colors.
    maybe we (and this might be crazy) cut pif go for iggy and just crush things. hopefully cb dies out and i don't have to wonder what i wanna play anymore

  19. #4079

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by Rekk View Post
    with decay you no longer have to dedicate spots or just ignore it. you get something you can bring in against basically all creature decks. this kills every hate bear and those random pillars the red deck will play.
    bring this in and they don't have a hatebear draw, kill a knight. yes this doesn't beat a mom and hatebear but its not like you cut the virtue's ruins or e.es
    the fact of the matter is this new spell is just better then wipeaway and fills the same role as a cb killer. you bring this in most all the time. the only concern i have is how the mana will be considering we are in 4 colors.
    maybe we (and this might be crazy) cut pif go for iggy and just crush things. hopefully cb dies out and i don't have to wonder what i wanna play anymore
    Yeah I know, the first part of my post was directed at the situation right now. Sorry if it caused confusion.

  20. #4080
    Member

    Join Date

    Jun 2012
    Location

    Argentina
    Posts

    98

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    no bounce? i mean, leyline of sanctity is a card too (maybe a really random one), i know that we have etw, but that's the plan?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)